What are the polite ways to approach an agent? – Author! Author!:: Anne Mini's Blog

April 11, 2013June 13, 2020 - No Comments

Handwritten manuscripts, profanity in queries, and other phenomena that give Millicent pause

I had meant to devote my next post to showing you fine people more examples of title pages done right — and done wrong, so we could discuss the difference. Why invest the time and energy in generating both, you ask? Clearer understanding, mostly. Oh, I know that I could just slap up a single properly-formatted title page and walk away, pleased with myself for having provided guidance to writers submitting to agencies and small publishing houses; I could also, as some other blogs devoted to helping aspiring writers do, post readers’ own pages and critique them. In my long experience working with writers, established and aspiring both, however, I’ve found that talking through an array of positive and negative examples yields better results.

In no area of advice is this more strongly the case than in manuscript formatting. Since very few aspiring writers have had the opportunity to see a manuscript in circulation by a major agency close up, it can be quite difficult to tell whether one is following the rules — if, indeed, the submitter is aware that there are rules. Many are not. By presenting my readers with a plethora of practical examples and ample discussion, I hope to help writers new to the game avoid falling into pitfalls they might not otherwise know exist. It also enables those who have never enjoyed the inestimable advantage of having read manuscripts or contest entries on a daily basis to see first-hand just how much submission quality varies, even amongst the best-written specimens.

I sense some finely-tuned authorial antennae waving out there. Yes, novelists and other aficionados of character development?

“Is there a reason that you’re explaining this to us, Anne? Surely, by the middle of a series devoted to explaining the requirements of standard format for book manuscripts, any reader paying even the vaguest attention could be safely relied upon to have picked up on your fondness for compare-and-contrast exercises aimed at helping us develop our collective sense of what will and will not strike our old pal and nemesis, Millicent the agency screener, as professional means of presenting good writing. Heck, that would be obvious to anyone taking a casual scroll through your blog. So am I correct in picking up a subtext here?”

Well spotted, close observers of human nature: I am in fact leading up to something. And while anyone who works with manuscripts for a living could tell you that what I shall be spending the rest of this post discussing is a pitfall into which eager aspiring writers stumble all the time, sometimes at serious cost to themselves, I’m afraid that explaining what that common trap is and how to negotiate one’s way around it will require sharing an example or two that are far from pretty.

It’s been quite a while since I’ve written an industry etiquette post. I normally would not interrupt a series in progress in order to introduce one, but for the last six months or so, I, others who write online advice for writers, and even the excellent individuals toiling away in agencies have been seeing an uptick in a particular type of approach from aspiring writers. Admittedly, it’s always been common enough to drive the burn-out rate for writing gurus sky-high — in this line of endeavor, 7 1/2 years makes me a great-grandmother — yet anytime those of us still cranking out the posts start complaining about the same thing at the same time, it’s worth noting.

What’s the phenomenon? you ask with bated breath. Ah, I could tell you, but it would be easier to get why those of us behind the book scenes have been buzzing about it if I showed you. Fortunately — for discussion purposes, if not for me personally — yesterday, I received a sterling example of the breed of missives those of us in the profession often receive from total strangers, demanding attention and assistance for their writing endeavors.

Before I reveal yesterday’s communiqué in all of its glory, let’s take a moment to talk about how a savvy writer might want to go about alerting a publishing professional to the existence and many strong points of his or her book. It’s not an especially well-kept secret that, in this business, there are not all that many polite ways to go about it. If one is seeking to get a book published with a traditional large or mid-sized publishing house, one can only do so through an agency. If one is seeking an agent for that purpose, one either writes a 1-page query letter containing a specific set of information about the book or registers for a writers’ conference featuring formal pitching sessions to give at most a 2-minute description. If one wishes to work with a small publisher, one takes the time to find out what that particular publisher’s submission requirements are, then adheres to them through storm and tempest.

That’s it. Any other form of approach virtually always results in rejection. on general principle.

Why? Well, think about it: if you were an agent or editor, with which kind of writer would you prefer to work — one who has made the effort to learn the rules and follow them courteously, or one whose blustering demand for attention informs you right off the bat that, at minimum, you’re going to have to sit this writer down and explain that this is a business in which politeness counts?

Aspiring writers, especially those faced with the daunting task of contacting one of us for the first time, often find these simple strictures monumentally frustrating, if not downright perplexing. Many more regard industry etiquette as counterintuitive — or so we much surmise from the fact that the pros constantly find themselves on the receiving end of telephone calls from writers of whom they have never heard. Both agencies and publishing houses with well-advertised no unsolicited manuscripts, please policies get thousands every year. Although all of the major U.S. publishing houses have only accepted agented manuscripts for quite some time, the virtually complete disappearance of the slush pile seems not to have made the national news, if you catch my drift.

Some of you are shifting uncomfortably in your chairs, I notice. “But Anne,” a few of you on the cusp of approaching the pros for the first time murmur, “I understand that the rules of querying and submission might make life easier for agents and editors, but I’m excited about my book! I’ve worked really hard on it, and I’m impatient to see it in print. If it’s the next bestseller, I would think they would want to snap it up as quickly as possible. If it’s well-written, why would anyone in a position to publish it care how I manage to get the manuscript under their noses?”

Several reasons, actually, and very practical ones. First — and the one that most astonishes the pros that anxious aspiring writers so often don’t seem to take into consideration — literally millions of people write books every year. Many, if not most, are pretty excited when they finish them. So from the publishing world’s perspective, while it’s completely understandable, charming, and even potentially a marketing plus that a particular writer is full of vim about placing his book in front of an admiring public, it’s not a rare enough recommendation to justify tossing the rules out the window.

Second, while it pains me to say this, a writer is not always the best judge of her own book’s market-readiness; even if she were, as the industry truism goes, an author’s always the least credible reviewer of her own book. You would never know that, though, from how frequently Millicent hears from writers absolutely convinced that their efforts are uniquely qualified to grace the bestseller lists. Although the once-ubiquitous it’s a natural for Oprah! has mostly fallen out of currency, this kind of hard sell remains a not-uncommon opening for a query:

My novel, Premise Lifted from a Recent Movie, is sure to be as popular as The Da Vinci Code. Beautifully written and gripping, it will bowl readers over. You’ll be sorry if you miss this one!

While it’s not completely beyond belief that this writer’s self-assessment is correct, agents and editors tend to prefer to judge manuscripts themselves. Why? Well, since so many aspiring writers begin approaching agents and publishing houses practically the instant they polish off a first draft, it’s actually pretty common for even quite well-written manuscripts with terrific premises to arrive still needing quite a bit of revision. Millicent remains perpetually astonished, for instance, at how few submitters seem to take the time to spell- and/or grammar-check their work, much less to proofread it for flow and clarity.

Oh, stop rolling your eyes: any reputable agency, much less good small publishing house or well-known literary competition, will receive enough well-written, perfectly clean manuscripts — the industry’s term for pages free of typos, dropped words, protagonists’ sisters named Audrey for three the first three chapters and Andrea thereafter, etc. — not to have to worry about rejecting those that are not quite up to that level of sheen. From an aspiring writer’s perspective, it’s an unfortunate fact of recent literary history that the rise of the personal computer has caused the sheer number of queries and submissions to increase astronomically, rendering it impossible for even the most sleep-sacrificing professional reader to read more than a small fraction of the manuscripts eagerly thrust in his general direction.

That’s why, in case you’d been wondering, any pro with more than a few months’ worth of screening experience or writing contest judging will be aware that a super-confident writer does not necessarily come bearing a manuscript that will take the literary world by storm. Indeed, one of the reasons that the query above would be rejected on sight is that supreme confidence can be an indicator that the writer in question simply isn’t all that familiar with the current book market or how books are sold. That reference to The Da Vinci Code all by itself would automatically raise Millicent’s delicate eyebrows: in publishing circles, only books released within the past five years are considered part of the current market.

Then, too, since the kind of hard sell we saw above has been a notorious agents’ pet peeve for a couple of decades now, the very fact that an aspiring writer would use it could be construed — and generally is — as evidence that she’s not done much homework on how books actually get published. The popular notion that a good book will automatically and more or less instantly attract agents’ and editors’ attention is not an accurate reflection of current publishing realities, after all. (If that comes as a surprise to you, you might want to invest a little time in reading through the posts under the aptly-named START WITH THESE POSTS IF YOU ARE BRAND-NEW TO PUBLISHING category at the top of the archive list at right.)

Why might giving the impression that one isn’t overly familiar with the proverbial ropes prove a disadvantage in a first approach to a pro? Those of you who have been following my recent series on manuscript formatting already know the answer, right? It’s less time-consuming to work with a writer to whom the ropes are already a friendly medium. And honestly, it’s not that unreasonable for Millicent to presume that if our querier above does not know that boasting about a book is not what a query is for, she might also be unaware that, say, a book manuscript should be formatted in a particular way. Or that it’s now routinely expected that since submissions must arrive at publishing houses completely clean, savvy writers will submit them to agencies already scanned for errors.

It’s not as though a busy agent would have time to reformat or proofread a new client’s work before submitting it to an editor, right? Right? Do those glazed eyes mean some of you are in shock?

I can’t say as I blame you — when the first few agencies began recommending in their submission guidelines the now rather common advice that potential clients not only proofread their manuscripts carefully, but run them by a freelance editor before even considering approaching an agent, the collective moan that rose from the admirable, hard-working aspiring writers who routinely check each and every agency’s website before submitting positively rent the cosmos in twain. It can be a big shock to a writer new to querying and submission just how fierce the competition is to land one of the very scarce new client spots on a well-established agent’s client list.

“But I wrote a good book!” they wail, and with reason. “Why does landing an agent and getting published have to be so hard?”

The aforementioned competition, mostly: it gives agencies, publishing houses, literary contests, and even good freelance editors quite a bit of incentive to read as critically as possible. Lest we forget, most queries and requested materials are not read in their entirety — as we’ve discussed, most submissions get rejected on page 1, and most queries get slipped into the no, thank you pile before the end of their opening paragraphs.

Which makes sense, right? If the opening lines contain typos, clich?s, or any of the other unfortunately common first-approach faux pas, Millicent generally just stops reading. She assumes, rightly or wrongly, that what hits her eyes initially is an accurate representation of what is to follow. That’s the norm for agents, editors, and contest judges, too: if the third paragraph of page 1 is grammatically shaky, or if the writing is unclear, it’s taken for granted that Paragraph #3 will not be the only one that could use some additional work.

That tends to come as a surprise to many, if not most, aspiring writers. The rather endearing expectation that good writing will be read with a charitable eye often crashes straight into the reality of how many queries, submissions, and/or contest entries a pro has to read in a day. Millicent can only judge writing by what’s in front of her, after all. No matter how lovely the prose may be on page 56, or how stunning the imagery on page 312, if page 1 isn’t sufficiently polished, she’s going to make up her mind before she has a chance to admire what may come later in the book.

The same logic applies to the tone and consideration of the initial approach. If a writer observes the prevailing norms of publishing world etiquette — by, say, e-mailing a query rather than cold-calling the agent or adhering to a small publisher’s posted requirements to send a query containing specific pieces of information about the book instead of just popping an unsolicited book proposal into the mail and hoping for the best — then it’s reasonable to project that level of consideration onto any subsequent relationship, right? If, on the other hand, a writer first contacts the pro by non-standard means or, sacre bleu!, impolitely, it wouldn’t really make sense to expect rigorous rule-adherence or courtesy down the road, would it?

Oh, should I have warned you to sit down before I sprung that one?

Like most people, I suspect, agents, editors, and the people who work with them tend to prefer to devote their efforts to those who will be treat them with respect. This is a business positively stuffed to the gills with nice people. Although it may be difficult to discern from the perspective of a writer trying to break into print, most professional readers are quite aware that they are dealing with writers’ dreams — and do their best to handle them gently.

That’s why, incidentally, so many agencies and publishing houses employ kindly-worded form-letter rejections. More often than not, those sets of vague platitudes like I’m sorry, but I just didn’t fall in love with this, we regret to say that this book doesn’t meet our needs at this time, or I don’t think I can sell this in the current market are less attempts at explanation than efforts to spare feelings.

I know, I know: that’s not what it feels like to be on the receiving end of such a communication. It can be maddening not to know for sure why a query didn’t wow Millicent, or whether a submission stumbled on page 1 or page 221; being given a specific rejection reason could help one improve one’s efforts next time.

What the pros know from long, hard experience, though, and what aspiring writers may not consider, is that some rejection recipients will regard any explicitly-cited reason to turn down the book as an invitation to argue the matter further. This is an especially common reaction for conference pitchers, alas: first-time successful pitchers sometimes mistake polite professional friendliness and enthusiasm for a promising book concept for the beginning of a friendship. Or confuse “Gee, I’d like to read that — why don’t you send me the first 50 pages?” with an implicit promise of representation and/or publication.

From an agent or editor’s point of view, issuing a rejection, however regretfully, is intended to end the conversation about the book, not to prolong it. If they want you to revise and resubmit, trust me, they won’t be shy about telling you.

You may also take my word for it that no matter how excellent your case may be that s/he is in fact the perfect person to handle your book, how completely viable your plan may be to tweak the manuscript so s/he will fall in love with your protagonist, or how otherwise estimable your argument that this is indeed the next The Da Vinci Code may be, trying to talk your book into acceptance will strike the rejecter as rude. It’s just not done.

And in all probability, it won’t even be read. The agency may even have established a policy against it.

Don’t want to believe that? Completely understandable, from a writer’s point of view. An agent or editor wouldn’t have to engage in many correspondences like the following, however, to embrace such a policy with vim.

Dear Tyrone,
Thanks so much for letting me read your book proposal for a Western how-to, Log Cabin Beautiful: Arranging a Home on the Range. I’m afraid, however, that as intriguing as this book concept is, I would have a hard time convincing editors that there’s a large audience waiting for it. At best, this book would likely appeal only to a niche market.

Best of luck placing it elsewhere.

Hawkeye McBestsellerspotter
Picky and Pickier Literary Management

Dear Hawkeye,
I’ve received your rejection for Log Cabin Beautiful, and I must say, I’m astonished. Perhaps living in New York has blunted your sense of just how many log cabin dwellers there actually are? It’s hardly an urban phenomenon.

Please find enclosed 27 pages of statistics on the new log cabin movement. I’m returning my proposal to you, so you may have it handy if you reconsider.

Please do. I really did pour my heart into this book.

Sincerely,
Tyrone T. Umbleweeds

Tyrone —

I’m returning both your proposal and the accompanying startling array of supporting documentation with this letter. I’m sorry, but your book just doesn’t meet our needs at this time.

Hawkeye McBestsellerspotter
Picky and Pickier Literary Management

Dear Hawkeye,
Perhaps you didn’t really get my book’s concept. You see…
{Five pages of impassioned explanation and pleading.}
Won’t you give it a chance? Please?

Sincerely,
Tyrone T. Umbleweeds

{No response}

Dear Hawkeye,
Sorry for contacting you via e-mail, but my last letter to you seems to have gone astray. To continue our discussion of my book…

Time-consuming, isn’t it? Not to mention frustrating for poor Hawkeye. And in all probability, this is one of the nicer post-rejection arguments she’s had this month.

Just don’t do it. Quibbling won’t change a no into a yes, and believe me, the last thing any querier wants to be is the hero of the cautionary tale Hawkeye tells at writers’ conferences.

Should I be alarmed by how pleased some of you look? “But this is wonderful, Anne,” a tenacious few murmur. “Hawkeye answered. That must mean that she read Tyrone’s pleas, doesn’t it? And if she read them, there must have been some chance that she could have been convinced by them, right?”

Not necessarily, on that first point — and no on the second. Before any of you who happen to be particularly gifted at debate get your hopes up, it’s exceedingly rare that an agent would even glance at a follow-up letter or e-mail. They wouldn’t want to be confronted by the much more usual post-rejection response, which tends to open something like this:

Dear Idiot —
What the {profanity deleted} do you mean, you just didn’t fall in love with my book? Did you even bother to read it, you {profanity deleted} literature-hater? I’ll bet you wouldn’t know a good book if it bit you on the {profanity deleted}…

I’ll spare you the rest, but you get the picture, right? For every 1, 100, or 10,000 writers that take rejection in respectful silence, there are at least a couple who feel the need to vent their spleen. And, amazingly enough, they almost always sign their flame-mails.

Yes, really. I guess it doesn’t occur to them that people move around a lot in publishing circles. Today’s rejecting Millicent might well be tomorrow’s agent — or sitting in an editorial meeting next to an editor who wants to acquire their books the year after that.

The sad thing is, the very notion that manners might count doesn’t seem to occur to quite a few people. Perhaps that’s not entirely astonishing, given how firmly many aspiring writers reject the notion that, as I like to point out early and often, every single syllable a writer sends to anyone even vaguely affiliated with publishing will be considered a writing sample. Those who express their desires and requests in polite, conventional terms tend to get much better responses than those who do, well, anything else.

Even sadder: as anyone in the habit of receiving requests from aspiring writers could tell you, the senders sometimes don’t seem to understand that just because a certain type of phrasing or vocabulary is acceptable in social circles or on television doesn’t necessarily mean that it would be appropriate when trying to interest a publishing professional in one’s book. You wouldn’t believe how often the Millicent working for Hawkeye opens queries like this:

Hey, Hawkeye —

Since you claim on your website to be looking for literary-voiced women’s fiction focusing on strong protagonists facing offbeat challenges, why don’t you do yourself a favor and read my book, A Forceful Female Confronts Wackiness? It’s really cool, and I know you and your buddies at the agency will like it.

Millicent stopped reading just after that startlingly informal salutation, by the way. You can see that the tone is also askew thereafter, though, right? It’s the way someone might address a longtime friend, not a total stranger. And not a friend one particularly liked, apparently: what’s up with that snide since you claim… part? What could the querier possibly hope to gain by implying that Ms. McBestsellerspotter is being insincere in expressing her literary preferences?

Why, yes, it’s possible that the querier didn’t mean to imply any such thing, now that you mention it. Had I mentioned that Millicent can only judge a writer by what’s actually on the page in front of her, and that every single syllable a writer passes under a professional reader’s nose will be read as a writing sample?

What do I need to do, embroider it on a pillow?

I sense a certain amount of bemused disbelief out there. “Oh, come on, Anne,” those that pride themselves on the graceful phrasing of even their most hastily tossed-off e-mails observe. “Surely, addressing someone in a position to help get one’s book published this informally is practically unheard-of. I could see it — maybe — if the book in question was written in the same chatty voice as that query, but even then, I would assume that most writers would be too fearful of offending an agent like Hawkeye to approach her like this.”

Oh, you’d be surprised. Agents and editors who are habitually nice to writers at conferences routinely receive e-mails just like this. So do most of us who offer online advice, as it happens, particularly if we blog in a friendly, writer-sympathetic, and/or funny voices.

It is precisely because I am friendly and sympathetic to the struggles of aspiring writers that I am reproducing yesterday’s e-mail: I could give you made-up examples until the proverbial cows came home, but until one has actually seen a real, live specimen of this exceedingly common type of ill-considered approach, it can be rather hard to understand why someone who receives a lot of them might stop reading them after just a couple of lines. Or — I told you this wasn’t going to be pretty — why so many literature-loving, writer-empathizing folks in the biz eventually just give up on being nice about sharing their professional insights at all.

Naturally, I’ve changed name, title, and everything else that might allow anyone who might conceivably help the sender of this astonishing letter get published, but otherwise, our correspondence remains exactly as I first saw it. To maximize its usefulness as an example, though, I shall stop periodically to comment on where the sender’s message seems to have gone awry and how the same information could have been presented in a more publishing world-appropriate manner.

Heya Anne;

Okay, let’s stop here, and not merely because a semicolon is an odd choice in a salutation (the usual options are a comma, colon, or dash). It would have given most professional readers pause, too, not to see the necessary direct address comma: were heya actually a word, Heya, Anne would have been the correct punctuation.

Can you imagine Hawkeye or Millicent’s facial expressions, though, upon catching sight of a query opening this informally? True, I write a chatty blog, and the disembodied voices I choose to attribute to my readers do routinely address me in posts as Anne, but honestly, I’ve never met the sender before. A more conventional — and polite — salutation would have been nice.

This early in the e-mail, though, I’m willing to assume what Hawkeye or Millicent would not: “Frank” is trying to be funny. I read on.

I’ve drafted a 30,000 word treatise on {currently highly controversial political topic}. I call it Main Title-Reference to Similarly Themed Bestseller from the Late 1980s.

I’m going to stop us again. Treatise is an strange word in this context, but that’s not what would give a professional reader pause here. 30,000 words is quite a bit shorter than most political books; it’s really closer to a pamphlet. It’s also about a quarter of the length of the bestseller referenced here — which was written by a former professor of mine, as it happens, just before I took a couple of seminars with him in graduate school. So, unfortunately for Frank, he’s making this argument to someone who heard over a year’s worth of complaints by the author of the other work about how often his title got recycled.

Surprised at the coincidence? Don’t be. For decades, going into publishing has been a well-trodden path for those with graduate degrees (or partially-completed graduate degrees) who decide not to become professors. Or when professor jobs become scarce. Or when universities decide that it’s cheaper to replace retiring faculty with poorly-paid lecturers, rather than with, say, faculty.

But I digress. More to our current point, this section contains a formatting problem: the hyphen used as a dash in the title would be incorrect in standard format for manuscripts, would it not? What was I saying about Millicent’s tendency to extrapolate an entire manuscript’s formatting faux pas from a slight stumble like this?

If you’ve been murmuring, “My, that’s a lot of reaction to just a few lines of an e-mail,” congratulations. You’re gaining a sense of just how closely professional readers observe every single syllable of every single piece of writing you send them. Speaking of which, let’s move on with our missive-in-progress.

It is not a rant or a historical narrative but a polemic attempt to change the rhetoric.

Sorry to have to stop us again so soon, but just so everyone knows, telling a professional reader that a manuscript is not a rant will automatically raise the suspicion that it is a rant. That’s pretty much the reaction that non-professional readers have to statements like this, too, come to think of it. Just human nature, I’m afraid.

Also, note the non-standard use of polemic. Usually, it means an aggressive attack upon somebody else’s theories. It would have been helpful if Frank had mentioned whose. Pressing on…

Scholarly in tone and temper is how it is presented but metaphors, similes, enthymemes, as well as personal observation and experiences are liberally used.

I’m rather glad that Frank decided to tell, rather than show, the “tone and temper” of his book, because talking about the language in which a manuscript is written is an exceedingly common querying mistake. A book description should aim at informing the professional reader what the book is about, not the kind of linguistic tricks the author has used to tell the tale. Think about it: why should Millicent (or I, for that matter) care that Frank is fond of metaphors, similes, or aphorisms, except insofar as they work in the manuscript itself? Wouldn’t the best — indeed, only — way to demonstrate that they do work be to show them in the writing?

Speaking of demonstrating authorial intentions, as a group, professional readers tend to be suspicious when a book description says the manuscript is written in a style not reflected in the writing of the description itself. Since this letter has not so far been written in scholarly language, the assertion that the book is carries less weight than it otherwise would.

And now that we’re at the end of Frank’s first paragraph, should we not know why he decided to contact me at all? So far, it reads like a query, but why on earth send a blogger a query? He doesn’t seem to have a blog-related question (which should have been posted as a comment on the blog, anyway, right?), nor does he appear to be seeking editorial services. Has he perhaps made the rather ubiquitous mistake of believing that anyone called an editor works at a publishing house?

No, seriously, I hear from aspiring writers laboring under this misconception all the time. Let’s read on to see if that’s what’s on Frank’s mind.

Anyway, I’ve two publishers who want me to send them my manuscript. {He names them here.} They’ve sent me forms to fill out.

Okay, so he’s sent queries to publishers, but I recognize that both of the publishers he names are self-publishing houses. Curious about whether either has recently opened a traditional publishing imprint, I checked both websites. Both offer downloadable forms, asking writers to fill them out and send them along with a manuscript or proposal.

Now I’m even more confused. Both of these printers offer editing services for self-publishing writers. So again, how would he like me to help him? Reading on…

One of the things they want is an annotated table of contents. I googled {sic} it and saw your blog.

Not entirely surprising news, as that’s a standard part of a nonfiction book proposal. As I hope every nonfiction writer reading this is aware, the archive list conveniently located at the lower right-hand corner of this page includes categories specifically aimed at assisting you in pulling together a book proposal. (You’re welcome.)

If he’s having trouble with his annotated ToC, however — which, to be fair, isn’t always easy to write — why not tell me how? Or, better still, ask a question in the comments on the relevant posts?

Or is he seeking my assistance with something else? The next couple of sentences raise a possibility that rather astonished me.

Man you write up a storm-must be one hellava typer. I can’t type worth a {profanity deleted} -my manuscript was hand written-then hunted and pecked.

More hyphens employed as dashes and other offbeat punctuation — and excuse me, but is he asking me to type his manuscript for him? Because I’m such a good little typer?

Jaw firmly dropped, I read on. The rest of the e-mail will have greater impact, I suspect, if I show it in its entirety. Or as much as I can legitimately reproduce on a family-friendly blog.

Anyway, for {profanity deleted} and giggles I just thought you might give me something to work with and/or recommend. Although they haven’t given a deadline I’ve set mine for early next month-this things {sic} been three years in the making and its {sic} time to fish or cut bait.
Thanks for your time and attention-good luck to you.
Sincerely,
Frank Lee Wantstogetpublished

I’m at a loss for words. I also still don’t know for certain why Frank contacted me in the first place — to what, I wondered, could I just thought you might give me something to work with and/or recommend possibly refer? Advice doesn’t make sense — presumably, he turned up what I had to say about annotated ToCs when he Googled the term. Or at any rate would have, had he checked out the posts under the cryptically-named ANNOTATED TABLE OF CONTENTS category on the archive list.

Here, though, is where I part company with most other professional readers. Millicent, for instance, probably would not have taken the time to ask follow-up questions if a query was unclear — or if it swore at her, for that matter. I did consider not answering it for that reason. Still, if Frank was harboring some question that he was too shy to post on the blog, I was reluctant to leave him hanging. Ditto if he just didn’t understand the difference between a freelance editor and the services for which he would be paying at either of the presses he cited.

While I was at it, I thought it might be a good idea to nudge him back toward a professional tone. As I said, it’s surprising how often writers contacting the pros don’t seem to regard it as an occasion for formal courtesy.

Hello, Mr. Wantstogetpublished —

Congratulations upon completing your book, but I’m afraid that your e-mail was a trifle unclear. Are you asking me to recommend a book on how to write a book proposal? Are you asking to book some consultation time with me on the telephone to go over the forms and how to write the annotated table of contents? Or are you looking for someone to hire to computerize your manuscript for you, since no publishing house would accept a handwritten manuscript?

If you are looking for a word processing professional, I have to say, paying a editor with a Ph.D. to do it is probably not the best use of your resources. To find someone in your area with the skills and expertise to present your manuscript professionally, you might want to call the English department at your local community college; students often are eager for this sort of work. Anyone you hire could find both the rules of manuscript formatting and visual examples on my blog.

If, on the other hand, you were asking for a book recommendation, would you mind posting that request on the blog itself? That way, my answer could be of benefit to other writers. I understand the impulse for personal behind-the-scenes contact, but part of the point of blogging is that it permits me not to have to address thousands of readers’ individual concerns one at a time.

Just so you know, though, many, many writers have used my blog’s directions on how to write a book proposal to write a successful annotated table of contents. Check the Nonfiction heading on my archive list. Should you have questions on what I recommend in those posts, please feel free to ask questions in the comments section.

That seemed to cover the bases — but see why Hawkeye and her ilk have fallen out of the habit of responding to vague e-mails like this? If the writer isn’t clear about what he wants, it takes quite a bit of time and effort to spin out a guessing-game’s worth of logical possibilities.

Another reason the pros tend to burn out on following up on these types of missives: about half the time, a thoughtful response like this will go unanswered. Then the writing guru ends up feeling a bit silly for having been nice enough to try to answer a question that was both asked in the wrong place (if the guru happens to blog, that is) and in an indistinct manner.

While I had Frank’s attention, though, there was no reason I shouldn’t try to help him become a better member of the online writing community. After politely expressing the hope that he would find the guidance he was seeking on my blog, I added:

To assist you in your publication efforts, do you mind a little free advice? People in publishing tend to judge writing quality by every single thing a writer sends them. Your e-mail contained two clich?s, something to which editors are specifically trained to respond negatively, regardless of context. You might want to choose your words with a bit more care.

Also, publishing is a formal business; manners count. It would never be appropriate to use even minor profanity in a communication with a publishing professional a writer had never met — and even if we had, it would not be advisable in an initial approach. A word to the wise.

Best of luck with your book!

Not out of line with the advice he might already have seen on the blog, right? Now, if Frank was like most aspiring writers, he would be glad of some feedback from a professional. He would also, I hoped, be pleased that I had told him where to look on my blog for writing tips. As Hawkeye and Millicent would be only too eager to tell you, however, not all aspiring writers who ask for help are particularly overjoyed to receive it.

You can see it coming, can’t you? Very well: here is Frank’s reply in its entirety. Please be kind enough to read it all the way to the end before shouting, “I told you so,” Millie.

Anne-
Your blog is-well a BLOG-its {sic} really hard to navigate and way to {sic} pedantic-as are you. Anyway my proposal letter worked! My manuscript is processed-it was drafted by hand. Oh fyi-Tolstoy re-wrote War and Peace 10 times before he submitted to the printer. Bye, Bye Ms. PHD
Well isn’t that special!
Frank Lee Wantstogetpublished

One hardly knows where to begin, does one? Leaving aside the obvious questions about why somebody who hates blogs would turn to one for advice and why one would go to the trouble of tracking down a blogger whose advice one found pedantic, I can only assume that my subtle hints about formality of tone were lost on poor Frank. And while clearly, he continues to operate under the assumption that a print-for-pay press is the same thing as a traditional publisher, he’s certainly not the only aspiring writer confused by ambiguous wording on a self-publishing site. The best of luck to him, I say.

But if typing was not what he was seeking, why did he contact me in the first place?

We shall never know. I shall limit myself, then, to observations that might help other writers. First, even if Frank found my response unhelpful, a reply that merely vented spleen served no purpose other than to burn a bridge. That made me feel sorry for him, but that would not be most pros’ reaction.

Second, if one feels compelled to cite pop culture references, do try to keep them within the current decade. Better still, avoid them entirely; by definition, quotes are not original writing, and thus not the best way to show off your unique literary voice or analytical acumen.

Third, as hard as I laughed at his evidently not having been able to come up with a stronger zinger than a reference to my degree (“You…you…educated person, you!”), it bears contemplation that the professor he admired enough to cite in his own book’s title graded me in graduate school. As I mentioned above, publishing is stuffed to bursting with former academics; an aspiring writer can never be sure on a first approach if, where, or with whom the publishing professional he’s asking to help him went to grad school. So if one’s tastes run to credential-bashing, a letter to someone in a position to help get a book published might not be the best venue for it.

Oh, and to address an amazingly common misconception about formal salutations: femaleness is not a universal solvent of credentials. If one wishes to address any holder of an earned doctorate formally, the letter should open Dear Dr. X, regardless of whether the recipient is a man or a woman.

Above all, though, if you decide to make direct contact with anyone who works in publishing, do be polite — and do be clear about what kind of favor you’re asking, if you’re writing anything but what Millicent would expect to see in a garden-variety query. Remember, answering aspiring writers’ questions is not part of most professional readers’ job descriptions: agents make their living representing their already-signed writers, just as editors make theirs handling manuscripts and guiding them to publication. Most of the time, it’s entirely up to the recipient whether to respond to such non-standard approaches or not.

Your mother was right, you know. People really will like you better if you use your manners.

Next time, we shall be delving back into the wonderful world of title page examples. Why? Because we like you. Keep up the good work!

February 19, 2012January 19, 2017 - 4 Comments

The threshold of difficult: a tale of three memoirists, or, can’t we all get along?

I’m getting back to you a few days later than I intended in posting, campers, but not for any of the usual reasons. Not that the usual reasons wouldn’t have been more than enough: this last week has been a festival of juggling my editing clients’ deadlines, adapting book promotion advice to the needs of individual books and the ever-changing tastes of the literary market, and dealing with the second week of that allergic reaction I mentioned a couple of posts back, the one that initially made me look like the unholy love child of Boris Karloff from his Bride of Frankenstein period and James Spader, shortly after that unfortunate offspring had been burned at the stake by villagers of the pitchfork-and-torch variety. By this last Monday, the histamine had faded, naturally: for the next four days or so, I merely resembled Cro-Magnon man as it might have been played by Lon Chaney, Sr., of Phantom of the Opera fame.

And some people say there’s no such thing as progress.

No, my excuse for sidling away from the blog this week was far more profound: for the first time in the six-and-a-half-year Author! Author! hegemony, I found myself wondering whether I should blog about a power dynamic relatively common in agent-writer and editor-author relationships. Not because its existence is any secret — as any faithful attendee of literary conferences knows, plenty of the pros are not shy about sharing stories of difficult clients — but because I hesitated to add more complaints to the already-burgeoning array of horror stories floating around the Internet. As long-term Author! Author! readers know, I’m very aware of how easily professional advice to writers can get twisted in the retelling: what might begin as a single weary, battle-scarred agent blurting out a pet peeve or expressing a personal preference on a conference dais can all too often end up being presented online as a universally-applicable rule of submission, querying, or even writing style three months later.

“But Anne!” those of you fond of trawling the web to form composite impressions of wildly contradictory advice protest, and who could blame you? “What’s wrong with that? Obviously, someone in the conference audience heard what the weary agent said and wanted to warn other writers away from running afoul of that agent’s pet peeve — or any agent’s pet peeve, for that matter. Speaking of horror stories, we’ve all heard our share about how easy it is for a well-meaning-but-industry-ignorant writer to blunder into being labeled (shudder) difficult. I, for one, am grateful for that plethora of warnings.”

I’m not faulting the motives of those who choose to pass such admonitions along — the first time. That is indeed often a generous move. The problem arises when that initial warning gets passed along again (and again, and again), often with tweaks, embellishments, and, let’s face it, incorrect interpretations. As should not come as much of a surprise to anyone who has ever played the magic game of Telephone, by the tenth, fifteenth, or fiftieth retelling, the pro who first uttered the advice would not recognize it. Frequently, it’s not just the content that changes; you’d be amazed how often a single observation about a unique situation gets transmogrified into a barked order about what must be done in every instance.

Oh, you thought that a sweeping axiom like the surprisingly ubiquitous agents hate it when writers use adverbs started life that way? Hardly likely. From a professional point of view, it’s an absurd assertion: sometimes adverbs make sense to use, sometimes they don’t.

It’s not at all difficult to picture, though, some poor agent sighing over an opening page in which every other sentence is decorated with an -ly — or that same agent talking about it on a conference panel a week later. With half the aspiring writers in the audience frantically scribbling notes, it’s only reasonable to expect Agent X hates adverbs to turn up online fairly shortly thereafter, right? Or for the next person to pass the news along to report it as agents hate adverbs? And, down the line, for someone who misunderstood the point of an English class exercise aimed at improving characterization in dialogue to conflate instead of Herbert said angrily, why not try showing his anger in his speech? with the shocking news about agents breaking out in hives the instant they clap eyes on an adverb in a submission, creating a universal axiom that no good writer uses adverbs, ever.

Which, I suspect, would come as something of a surprise to Agent X. As the most cursory glance through his clients’ published novels and memoirs would demonstrate, he’s a great fan of the skillfully-applied adverb.

At the risk of coining an axiom, both the source and the context are important to consider when weighing writing advice. And that goes double for anything you may hear about the kind of behavior that gets writers labeled difficult.

Oh, I’m not saying that you should not worry about the phenomenon: it definitely exists, and it is most assuredly true that writers unfamiliar with the rules of the game occasionally find themselves on the receiving end of the epithet without perceiving that an interaction has gone awry. I’m just saying that when you hear a blanket rule asserted, you might want to ask some follow-up questions about how the asserter knows it to be true. And when you stumble upon one of those third-hand this-is-how-a-writer-got-dropped horror stories, whether told from the agent’s, editor’s, or writer’s perspective, you might want to consider the possibility that the original teller’s intent is not being borne out in the version before you. Or — and this is true more often than any of us who give writers advice online might like to think — that a conclusion drawn from a single person’s reaction to a single instance might not in fact be reflective of an industry-wide feeling about a pervasive phenomenon.

I’m going to be talking about some of those pervasive phenomena a little bit later — hey, I wasn’t kidding about being hesitant to blog about some of this stuff — but first, let’s address that widespread writerly fear of running afoul of unspoken rules. As I said, it’s not entirely unjustified: what experience has made self-evidently rude to someone working in an agency might not strike someone new to the querying process as even vaguely impolite.

Take cold-calling an agent, for instance: if you’d like to see an entire panel of publishing professionals cringe in unison, by all means, raise your hand in an agents’ forum and ask if it’s okay to call an agent instead of querying in writing. Chances are, every agent on the dais will have a personal horror story about that pushy aspiring writer who thought, wrongly, that if a hard-sell technique works for used cars, why, only a spineless wimp would content himself with writing a query letter, sending it off, and waiting weeks or months for a reply. Why wait that long, when the agency that represented Tuesdays with Morrie has a listed telephone number?

Oh, you may laugh (at least, I hope those of you who have queried or pitched before are), but agencies get approached like this all the time. As you may have heard, agents hate it.

Unfortunately, those who have heard that are not the only people who want to land agents. So why not just call, the writer who has not taken the time to learn how books actually get published reasons, perhaps pretending to be a personal friend of the agent’s to get past Millicent, and explain to the agent how he just has to drop everything to read his manuscript? While he’s at it, wouldn’t it strengthen the appeal to go on a tirade about how much he wants to get published — unlike, say, every other writer who contacts the agency?

Why? To anyone not new to the agency biz, the answer is simple: because agencies simply don’t work that way, and with good reason. Think about it: if an agent got a reputation for saying yes to this kind of approach, he would be inundated with calls from precisely the type of writer that most agencies do not want to represent, those who believe that being talented grants them the right to expect instantaneous, personal attention.

Which is, incidentally, usually the way difficult gets defined in a publishing context: a writer’s not following prevailing industry etiquette in a manner that requires someone within it to expend unanticipated time and energy in dealing with her.

That covers a lot of territory, obviously, but once a writer understands this underlying principle, not being difficult becomes, well, easier. Instead of trying to learn and abide by each rule of etiquette one at time, laboriously, as if they existed in a vacuum, a writer can simply look at what she is being asked to do, compare it to what she is planning to do, and ask, “Okay, will this make more work for the agent/editor/contest judge? And if so, is the benefit I hope to derive from it worth the risk of eating up more of that person’s time?”

Don’t you wish someone had told you about that test before the first time you queried or submitted to an agent? Unfortunately, this measure of behavior is so self-evidently applicable to those who would actually be inconvenienced by violated expectations that it’s rarely discussed in the company of writers, except as a complaint.

Except, perhaps, phrased as send what we tell you to send, not what you want us to see. And please believe us that we chose the query format for a reason.

By either of these standards, the clueless caller above is clearly difficult, but so is the submitter who, when asked to send the first ten pages of a manuscript, sends fifteen. In both cases, the agent (or, in the second instance, her Millicent) would have to spend valuable time handling a situation she had no way to see coming: chatting with a writer calling out of the blue, reading those extra pages. Since the writer in both cases is being difficult — and does it really matter from her point of view whether the behavior is the result of ignorance or inconsideration? — why should she bother to invest that time at all? Why not just reject the writer out of hand?

Was that thunderous clamor out there in the ether the sound of a good third of you leaping to your feet? Perhaps — and I’m only guessing here — the third of you who have in the past sent more pages than an agent requested? Or that a contest’s rules specified? “But Anne,” the over-sending many shout, “I didn’t mean to be difficult. Surely, no one serious about evaluating writing would want to base that assessment on two-thirds of a scene. Wasn’t I being nice to care about the agent’s reading experience? Or are you saying that I should have rewritten the scene so that it ended on page 10?”

Neither, as it happens: you should have sent the first ten pages. Period. Sending more is being difficult.

Your audible huffs of annoyance are understandable, over-senders, but here we have an instance where the perception of inconsideration differs wildly from the writer’s and agent’s perspectives. You assumed, and not unreasonably, that the request for a partial, contest’s length restriction, or permission to send a specified number of pages with your query was not only intended to provide the agent with an indication of your writing style, the professionalism of your presentation, the voice of the book in question, its appropriateness for your target audience, and how you handle narrative, but to demonstrate how you structure a full scene.

Oh, you didn’t think about it that much? You just thought it would make better reading if the writing sample didn’t get cut off in mid-paragraph?

I hate to break it to you, but either way, an over-sender deliberately disregards a request for a specific number of pages. That’s not only difficult, from the recipient’s perspective; that’s rude. Not only does including the extra pages imply an expectation that the agent, Millicent, or contest judge will make time to read them, but also — you might want to sit down for this one — a belief that the person requesting that number of pages just didn’t understand that not every manuscript will feature a section or chapter break at the bottom of page 10.

Or 15, or 50, or whatever length the requesting agent/contest rules/submission guidelines indicated. Which, from a professional reader’s perspective, is a pretty insulting assumption: honestly, someone who handles manuscripts for a living or has judged more than a single contest entry would have to be awfully unobservant to think that. No one who asks for 10 pages expects a ten-page scene; they want to see if you can write. If an agent or contest wants to read an entire chapter or manuscript, it will ask for it point-blank.

The over-sending writer doesn’t think of it in those terms, naturally; often, he’s just trying to present himself in the best light as a storyteller. In doing so, however, he also presumes, wrongly that the pro will bend the rules in just this one instance. What could another couple of pages matter, after all?

Plenty, to an agent, Millicent, or contest judge who reads tens of thousands of pages a year. Five extra pages on a ten-page writing sample means devoting one and a half times the reading minutes to this submission than one that followed the rules. Why make the exception, when we all know from experience that on the writing grapevine, an anecdote about a single writer-agent interaction can quickly mutate into an immutable rule of conduct?

More to the point, wouldn’t it be reasonable to expect that a writer who violated one rule or request, however well-meaningly, would do it again in future — and that the belief that the rules really don’t apply to him would be problematic down the line, as well as time-consuming for the agency? If a writer thinks it is acceptable to send 15 pages instead of 10, why wouldn’t he also presume that the agency and the industry are willing to let him fudge on the length of a synopsis? Or an author bio?

Still think it’s unfair to leap to the conclusion that such an aspiring writer would be a difficult client at the query packet stage? Okay, let’s consider how Millicent might make that assessment at the submission stage. Try this one on for size: what if a novelist presumes, not entirely unreasonably, that since publishing houses employ copyeditors, he doesn’t need to proofread or spell-check?

Millicent sees this all the time, of course; usually, she leaps to the conclusion that the writer just can’t spell and/or doesn’t know the rules of grammar. But let’s assume for the moment that an apparently random array of typos pepper an otherwise estimable manuscript. Is that enough evidence to decide that this writer is difficult?

No? Okay, what if a memoirist operates on the assumption that somebody else involved in the publishing process is going to fact-check the parts of the book that she did not experience first-hand, so it really doesn’t matter if her manuscript said the Cuban Revolution occurred in 1952?

Lest anyone be tempted to rip that last line out of context and promulgate it as fact around the Internet: it didn’t. Look it up.

But is this gaffe sufficient to label the writer too difficult to take on as a client? Most aspiring writers would say no; from their perspective, it’s just a minor typo. Would you feel different, though, if the mistake were consistent throughout the manuscript?

Still no? Okay, what if the protagonist’s family had emigrated from Cuba in 1950, and the narrative represented the move as their having fled the revolution? If you were Millicent, would the prospect of your boss’ having to convince the writer that she is wrong about her family’s motivations for coming to this country? Or accuse her of having misrepresented them in order to make a narrative point? And that regardless of why the historical accuracy is off, she is going to have to change either the date or the memoir’s story arc?

Still no takers? Okay, what if a nonfiction writer believes, with some justification, that since her future agent must by definition know much, much more about the current market for her type of book than she does, she’s just not going to bother to include a marketing section in her book proposal? Again, it happens all the time. So does restricting the Competitive Market Analysis to just a couple of books, or limiting the marketing plan to a breezy announcement that since bookstores sometimes allow book signings (a fact that’s sure to astonish anyone currently working in the publishing industry), the writer is willing to show up at any signings the publisher might take the time to set up.

Now Millicent has pretty good reason to believe that not only will this writer be both time-consuming and rather irritating, at least at first, for her agency to represent — do you want to be the one to tell her boss, the agent, that it is his job, not the writer’s, to write the book proposal in its entirety? — but that this writer is actively planning to be time-consuming for the publishing house that picks up her book as well. (These days, first-time authors usually set up their signings themselves.) So the agency will probably have to spend time mediating some disagreements down the line.

What do you think? Too difficult?

I’m sensing that for some of you, even this provocation seems insufficient. “But Anne, I always thought being difficult was a function of how someone works and plays with others, a pattern demonstrated over the course of many incidents over time. I understand that all of the attitudes you describe would result in more work for the agent, but surely each could be fairly easily resolved with just a short explanatory conversation. After all, the writer has every motivation to try to make this relationship work.”

Perhaps, but you would be surprised at how often writers don’t act that way, at least in their earliest interactions with the agents and editors of their dreams. That’s a real pity, because for better or worse, all an agent, her Millicent, and/or a contest judge can base her assessment of a writer upon is the evidence actually in front of her: the query or pitch, accompanying materials, contest entry, requested pages — and that writer’s behavior while providing them. Given that they are charged with the task of selecting a small handful of writers out of the thousands who approach them (or, in the judge’s case, winnowing hundreds of entries down to a list of finalists in the single digits), is it honestly astonishing that they would have developed a tendency to extrapolate ease of working with a writer based upon whether that writer adheres to industry manners and respects the pro’s time?

Believe it or not, writers often do send quite definite messages about their attitudes at the querying stage. Take, for instance, the querier who shrinks the query’s typeface in order to cram more information into a one-page letter. Or the submitter who sends requested pages in a mailing format requiring a signature on the receiving end. Or, sacre bleu, the rejected writer that sees fit to send an e-mail, demanding a complete explanation of a no.

Is this difficult behavior? Well, apply our test: it’s all time-consuming — and frankly, kind of annoying — on the receiving end. How so? Well, he font-shrinker presumes that Millicent will both not notice the deviation from the norms of query presentation (but she will) and be willing to strain her eyes to read the extra parts (but she won’t). The confirmation signature-requirer may not think about the fact that his demand would compel someone at the agency to stop what she is doing in order to pay attention to an arriving package, but believe me, when you’re receiving fifty manuscripts a month, forty-nine of which did not require a work stoppage to accept, it’s noteworthy.

And do we even need to discuss the futility of having a heart-to-heart with an angry writer with whom one has already decided not to work? Or why such a conversation would have no chance whatsoever of changing the agent’s mind? Or, if gravity suddenly began making things fall up, babies abruptly began being born 42 years old, and agents started being open to this sort of follow-up conversation with queriers, the question the agent would have to weigh throughout that conversation would not be gee, did I make a mistake in rejecting this writer? but wow, if this writer is so touchy about a simple, polite no, how will he react when I or his future editor ask him to make changes in his manuscript?

That last one, of course, is the classic publishing pro’s complaint about difficult writers: indeed, the term is often used as a synonym for those so in love with their own words that they are not open to revision suggestions. Those of you who attend writers’ conferences have heard that one before, have you not? It’s right up there with writers are lazy and writers whine about deadlines in complaint popularity.

How popular, you ask? Well, if you walked into that bar that’s never more than a hundred yards from any writers’ conference in North America, sat at the next table over from the agents, and took a sip from your drink every time you overheard one of those three comments, you wouldn’t remember enough about the event the next day to render it a useful learning experience.

Suffice it to say, though, that if you did have a clear enough head to remember it, you would no longer wonder why agents and editors have been known to roll their eyes when writers start to talk about their creative freedom being hampered. Although many, many writers are pretty good about implementing editorial feedback (at least after an initial period of shock has passed), every pro who’s been at it for a while has a personal horror story about that one writer who stamped his feet, screamed, cried, and threatened to sue over a suggestion as practical and simple as “Would you mind changing your protagonist’s sister’s name, since Ellen looks so much in print like Eileen (the villain), Helen (the sidekick), Helene (the schoolyard friend in that flashback), and you’ve chosen for some reason best known to yourself to abbreviate all of those names in the dialogue to El, Eil, Hel, and Hel?”

Oh, you think I’m joking? I once edited a memoir in which the seven daughters of the family’s names all ended in –een — not because those were their names in real life, but because the author felt that this array of synonyms was an essential reflection of the family’s ethnicity. When I pointed out, nicely, that the visual similarity rendered the fifteen (oh, no, another –een!) scenes in which they appeared as a group slightly challenging for readers who had not seen fit to equip themselves with a program to follow, not to mention impossible for a skimmer, the author saw fit to…

Well, let’s just say the reaction wasn’t pretty. Unlike most editors and virtually all agents working with a first-time author, however, I was willing to keep making the case for changing the names not just once, but many times over the course of a few months. But then, unlike denizens of publishing houses and agencies, freelance editors charge by the hour.

That giant thud you just heard, in case you were curious, was the collective stomach of every agented writer reading this hitting the floor immediately after toting up what their last creative disagreement with their representatives would have cost.

I bring up the creative differences issue advisedly: when aspiring writers borrow trouble about the problems they might face in working with an agent or editor at a publishing house, it’s often the concern they express first. Certainly, those of us who answer writers’ questions hear it frequently. Usually, it runs something like this: “My vision of the book doesn’t fit neatly into the publishing industry’s notion of what books like this are like.” (Pause for the advice-giver to ask how, what makes the writer think so — and if he believes his book concept is a category-buster, is it possible he’s assigned it to the wrong book category?) “I know what I want to say, though, and I’m afraid that an agent will ask me to change it to make it easier to sell.”

Well, if the book honestly does contain elements that would render it less marketable, and those elements are not so critical to the story arc or NF argument that they did not trigger rejection all by themselves, this writer is probably right: it would be a good agent’s job to advise him how to maximize the book’s marketability. Writers do, after all, seek out agents because of the latter’s expertise in selling books to publishing houses, right?

Instead of desiring the judicious application of that expertise, however, the change-fearful writer would prefer an agent simply to take the manuscript as he has chosen to form it and walk it around to editors. Happily for the fearer, many good agents’ acceptance standards are so high that they do sometimes — not often — decide to send out a new client’s work without requesting changes. That most emphatically does not mean, though, that the fearful writer’s agent would be pleased if, after interesting an editor in acquiring the book, the writer flatly refused to accept revision requests from the publisher.

Which, in case anyone out there is harboring any illusions on the subject, is the norm for newly-acquired books in the current market, not the exception. It’s also fairly common now — brace yourself, should any of your illusions have survived that last sentence unscathed — for a book under contract to be passed from the control of the acquiring editor to another editor before the manuscript reaches the front of the print queue, due to layoffs, retirements, parental leaves, etc.

Still think Millicent should not be considering ease of working relationship at the querying phase?

Now that I’ve depressed you into a stupor, I’d like to share with you the situations I hemmed and hawed about talking about at all; let’s consider them in the light of the difficulty-assessment criteria we’ve gotten so good at applying. A couple of caveats before we launch, though: I am presenting these not to hold the (heavily fictionalized) persons and (factually accurate) attitudes involved up to ridicule or censure, but in the hope that we might discuss these interactions fruitfully, with an eye toward helping all of you avoid such contretemps in your writing careers.

I do think the matter is ripe for discussion. Although the web is stuffed to the gills with admonitions about what agents love and hate, as well as writers’ complaints, we actually don’t talk all that much — or all that productively — amongst ourselves about how to reconcile professional expectations about how a working writer should interact with the business side of the industry with how those of us on the creative side tend to think of our manuscripts. And that’s a shame, because all too often, when something goes wrong, the writer in the situation can mistakenly believe that she’s the only one to whom it has happened.

Fair warning: some of what is to follow may make some of you angry. Although I understand that it may be tempting to take a few pot shots at the messenger, I do wish you wouldn’t. I also hope that, even if some of this strikes you as unfair — and it probably will — we can concentrate upon how these situations could have been improved or avoided, rather than giving in to the temptation of luxuriating in lamentations.

As I said, there is already quite enough of that on the net, isn’t there?

To keep the conversation from getting too heated or personal feelings getting hurt, I would like to reiterate that the people here are all fictionalized, to protect the parties involved. Sexes have been changed; story details have been significantly altered; no publishing professional or house is identifiable. So if any of the resulting case studies happens to bear any resemblance to something that happened to you or someone you know, please take it as a testament to just how pervasive these phenomena are, rather than a provocation to clutch your heart, cry, “Mon dieu, that’s me/my critique partner, Sheila/my agent!” and tumble sideways in a heap.

So please help me welcome, with compassion and an open mind, three well-meaning memoirists, Huey, Dewey, and Louise. In order to help clarify the sometimes hard-to-discern missteps, miscommunications, and power dynamics, I’m going to tell each of their stories twice: once from the writer’s point of view, and once from the relevant publishing professional’s perspective. True to the rules of memoir (and first-person narrative in general), each will be exclusively from that perspective. Perhaps, after considering both sides, we can mediate between them.

Let’s begin with Huey’s saga. Take it away, Hugh!

I have to say, I was disappointed. I had been querying my memoir, the story of my wife’s battle with a life-threatening illness, for more than two years when Agent Montrose asked to see my proposal. The request caught me a bit off-guard, I’m afraid: I had a full manuscript, but had only been picking away at the proposal in fits and starts. Every time I sat down with it, I felt like I was being given a pop quiz on material we hadn’t covered in class. It just didn’t make sense that they would rather have me write about my book than read the book itself.

So when Montrose sent the request for the proposal, I e-mailed him back and said that it would be a few months. Wouldn’t he like to see the manuscript instead? He said no — a blow, of course, but he was nice about it. He said to send the proposal when it was done.

Well, I worked on it; really, I did. Every few weeks, I sent an e-mail to Montrose, to let him know how I was getting along. The first couple of times, he replied cheerily, telling me to take my time and to let him know if I had any questions. Then he just stopped replying. He didn’t even respond to my Christmas card.

So now I don’t know what to do. I think I could finish the proposal in another month or so — I have some vacation coming up — but if he’s lost interest, shouldn’t I be moving on?

Before we move on to Montrose’s version, what’s your initial impression? Was Huey being difficult, or has he just been having difficulties? Is his assessment of Montrose’s waning interest well-founded? And then there’s the most important question of all: should Huey finish the proposal? Or should he be looking — or have been looking — for an agent who would have said yes to reading the manuscript?

Got your answers to that dizzying array of rhetorical questions firmly in mind? Excellent. Let’s take a gander at what happened from Montrose’s perspective.

I have to say, I was disappointed; that book had some real potential. I know what you’re thinking — there are a million caretaker memoirs out there, so what’s different about this one? Well, the synopsis, for one thing: unlike a good 80% of the memoir synopses I see, this one had a beginning, middle, and an end; the two main characters grew and changed. I think that disease memoir readers would root for these people.

Millie, my assistant, kept burbling about how her aunt had gone through the same thing as his wife, and how much she was looking forward to a really good book about it. Publishers love people like Millie: whenever any of their acquaintance goes through something rough, their first instinct is to buy ‘em a book.

Imagine my disappointment, then, when it turned out Huey had not even begun a proposal. Heck, he didn’t even seem to realize that was how nonfiction books were sold; he kept suggesting that I should read the memoir instead — which was something like 150,000 words, for heaven’s sake. I liked what I had seen, though, and he genuinely seemed flummoxed, so I sent him the agency’s proposal guidelines and hoped for the best.

That was sometime in 2010, I think; I don’t really remember. He never sent the proposal, just a lot of excuses, as if I could simply change my mind about whether a proposal was necessary. Too bad — it could have been an interesting memoir.

Taken together, these two accounts form quite a sad little story, do they not? Huey was lucky enough to find an agent (and a Millicent) genuinely taken by his book concept — but he was not ready to take advantage of it. While Montrose’s conclusion that Huey just hadn’t done enough homework about how nonfiction is sold might not have been entirely correct, it’s hard to argue that the effect of the writer’s not having taken the necessary steps to learn how to write a book proposal amounted to the same thing, in practical terms. Yet Montrose did, by his lights, do all he could to help, and rather more than most would have done in this situation: being a good memoir agent, realized that proposal-writing is a professional skill, and thus not something even the most gifted memoirist is born knowing, so he provided his potential client with both encouragement and guidelines.

See how easily, though, a writer’s just not knowing the ropes can result in practical difficulties for the pro trying to help him? Huey felt, understandably, that since the proposal was a stand-in for the book, it didn’t make sense that Montrose couldn’t make up his mind about representation based upon the manuscript. But since Montrose knew that he could not approach the editors he already had in mind for this project without a proposal, what good would it have done to read the manuscript first? Especially when Huey had already told him that the draft was considerably longer than this type of memoir typically runs; with an Annotated Table of Contents in hand, they could talk down the line about cutting it down to a more reasonable length.

So should Huey give up on Montrose at this point and move on to querying other agents? I think that’s the answer he would like here; it would save him an awful lot of work, wouldn’t it? Frankly, I would rather see him invest that energy in a class on proposal-writing. Or reading a good book on the subject. Or hiring a developmental editor to assist him in writing it. Or, heck, he could take a peek at the step-by-step instructions on how to write a book proposal buried in this very site, cleverly concealed under the opaque heading HOW TO WRITE A BOOK PROPOSAL.

Then, when he has a professional proposal in hand, he will be ready to start querying again. As a courtesy, he might drop Montrose an e-mail first, to see if he’s still interested in reading it, but he shouldn’t be too disappointed if the answer is no: a lot has changed in the literary market since 2010. And Millie is in graduate school now; isn’t that terrific?

The issue of who is or is not being difficult isn’t so cut and dried at the submission stage as it was when querying, is it? There’s a reason for that: since the perception of whether someone is easy to work with is inextricably linked to how intensely one happens to be working with him, as well as to the expectations appropriate to that level of contact, the threshold of difficult is obviously different before and after an agent becomes interested in a writer’s work.

It’s also different once a writer and an agent have made a formal commitment to work together. Consider, if you will, memoirist Dewey’s dilemma.

God, what a nightmare that turned out to be. I slaved over that book proposal — read five books about how to do it, took an expensive weekend seminar, read everything there was about it online, the works. So when Agent Paulette said she loved it, it felt like I’d swum across the Atlantic and washed up on some beach in France. All I wanted was to catch up on my sleep.

So when I didn’t hear from Paulette for a while, it didn’t seem that weird. She said that she would want me to make a couple of tiny changes — no big deal, just tweaks to appeal a little better to the current market. But when I was still waiting a couple of months later, I felt I had to call and ask what was going on. She said she was sorry — she had been just swamped, and she would get to it soon.

Well, a week later, I still didn’t have the feedback. Yet another call. That produced results — and how! Didn’t she realize I had a full-time job? It took me three months to make those changes. Once again, I dumped the results into her capable hands and collapsed.

So I guess I shouldn’t have been surprised when I didn’t hear from her right away — or ever, really, unless I contacted her first. She just kept saying it was a slow process, that editors took a while to read things these days, anything and everything to put me off. After six months, I began to wonder whether she was still sending it out at all. But just try talking to her about it; she’s so touchy.

Dewey would be happy to continue in this vein as long as you’re willing to listen; just ask the other members of his writing group. Because your time is valuable, however, I’ll skip ahead to the end of his story:

And now I’m feeling really trapped: since the book has been shopped around, I would have to write another, or at least another proposal, before I could query someone else. Guess I’m still in the middle of the Atlantic after all.

The lingering questions are pretty self-evident here, I think. In a situation where both partners are doing the job they agreed to do in pursuing a collective goal, it usually takes some time for each to adjust to the other’s work style. To assess how well Dewey’s and Paulette’s meshed, let’s take a peek at what she has to say on the matter.

God, what a nightmare that turned out to be. It started out so promising, too: Dewey’s book proposal was one of the best I’d seen in a long time. It needed a little work, of course — as most of them do — but I was confident that the results would be good.

A lot of brand-new clients are pretty jumpy, so when Dewey started e-mailing me every other day, to ask what he was supposed to change, it didn’t seem that weird. I was in the middle of a three-book deal for another client; he knew he would have to wait his turn. I wasn’t even all that worried when, after I sent him the revision memo, he initially reacted as though I’d asked him to recreate the works of Homer from memory. It was too much, he didn’t have the time, and so forth.

But he was serious about the book and cranked it out. Rather more quickly than the average client, actually; you wouldn’t believe how often I pass along feedback to a client, then hear nothing for a year or two.

Not our boy Dewey, though. Practically the instant he’d sent me the new version, he starts nagging me about when I’m going to submit it. I explained the process to him, naturally: it’s not as though I have much control over how fast other people read. That seemed to calm him down, but a few days later, he’d be calling or e-mailing again. Doesn’t he know I have other clients? And that it’s in his best interest to leave me alone long enough to sell his book?

Again, quite sad. Here are two perfectly nice, professionally-focused individuals, both eager to collaborate on selling a book proposal they both perceive to be excellent. So what happened?

Misaligned expectations, I’m afraid: Dewey just didn’t understand what his role in their relationship would be, other than writing. Because that was what he was prepared to do, he got antsy every time he didn’t have an assignment on his plate; he didn’t have a constructive outlet for all of that nervous energy. So he focused it on prodding Paulette into a job that she already knew perfectly well how to do — which, in turn, took up enough of her time and energy that she felt, not unreasonably, that his demands were making it harder for her to do that job.

An expectations draw, really — and a dynamic that could have been improved by these two fine people having an honest, straightforward conversation about what Paulette was actually doing to promote the book, as well as how he could spend his time and energy while she did it. I’m happy to report that they did have that conversation (perhaps at the suggestion of someone who knew and cared about them both), and they are getting along swimmingly. Paulette’s still knocking herself out, talking up his book — and his next. Dewey’s working on the proposal for that. In his spare time, he’s taking an online class on book promotion; he’s already started a blog, to establish a web presence for the happy day when he has a book out.

Not all such tug-of-wars end quite so harmoniously, however. Prepare yourself, please, to enter the world of Louise.

Oh, you wouldn’t believe what happened. I had my doubts about Evelyn from the get-go: no matter how much work I did or how well I did it — and I really ripped myself to shreds meeting her constant demands — she never seemed satisfied. “I’ll do my best,” was all she ever said, as though she had to compensate for something wrong with my book.

I remember my guts churning during our very first phone conversation: right away, she started criticizing my proposal. Before she’d even signed me! I bit the bullet, though, and knuckled under to her demands, even though they seemed really far afield from where I wanted to take my book. She told me it had to be that way in order to sell, so like a fool, I went along with it.

The book took FOREVER to sell, but I wasn’t supposed to ask questions about where it was or why it was taking so long. I was just supposed to wait by the phone, in case a call came — because then, Evelyn said, the acquiring editor would probably have a whole new set of suggestions for how to modify the book. I just kept praying that the editor that picked it up would get my artistic vision better.

But the instant we had signed the contract, the quibbling began. Was I really married to the chapter I liked best? Did I really have to spend thirty pages talking about my spiritual connection with marsupials? Was it really important to the story I was telling that I had been raised from ages 4 to 6 by bears?

That sort of thing. You’d think they had never met an interesting, multifaceted person before; all they wanted me to do was simplify my complex life. I don’t know how novelists feel about having their stories chopped to pieces, but for a memoirist, that story is a life. I couldn’t exactly change what I had done ten years before because some editor didn’t like it, right?

And don’t even get me started on the marketing trauma. They changed my title — then got mad at me for not liking the new one. They asked what I would like to see in a cover — then came up with something totally different. They asked me to list every town where I had friends — then expected me to construct my own book tour. Even though I showed up and did my best at every single podunk bookstore where they wanted me to do a reading — I even did a few libraries; way to cater to an audience that wants to buy books — they were never satisfied; they always seemed to want me to do more. And no matter how much promotion I did, the book never sold up to their completely preposterous expectations. Naturally, they thought that was my fault, too.

Of course, Evelyn took their side. She did on everything. And every time I tried to talk to her about it, she always changed the subject to my next book. At first, I thought she was kidding — when would I have possibly found time to write a new proposal? I was already working full-time, helping my sister through a truly horrific divorce, and promoting my book. When was it going to be time for somebody else to do some work?

After a few years of this, with no offer for the next book on the table, I just couldn’t take the constant conflict anymore. There’s no way I would work with any of these people again; it’s way too stressful. If and when I have the time and energy to write yet another book proposal, I’d rather start querying again from scratch than to entrust the fruit of my art to Evelyn.

Okay, so I took a few liberties in the bear department; this story was just too depressing otherwise. The lot of the first-time author today couldn’t be more different than it was twenty years ago — and as quite a few of those authors walk into the process with expectations more in line with thirty or forty years ago, when advances were significantly higher and authors carried less of the responsibility for book promotion, the expectations clash can be pretty dramatic.

Since, by Louise’s account, realizing her dream resulted in such deep disappointment, I’m reluctant to analyze her career trajectory too much. At least, not before we’ve heard Evelyn’s side of the story.

Oh, you wouldn’t believe what happened. I had my doubts about Louise from the get-go: when she was into what I asked her to do, she couldn’t be happier, but let one little obstacle fall in her path, and she’d freak out. It always made me just a touch nervous when an e-mail from her appeared in my inbox. But I don’t have to tell you what kind of audience a really good memoir pandas would draw. I honestly did fall in love with that proposal.

In retrospect, though, I should have listened to my gut feeling during our first phone conversation: she nearly fell over when I told her that before I signed her, I would want her to revise her proposal to my specifications first. Editors expect a certain style and structure from my agency’s clients, after all. We had quite the little argument; she seemed to feel that any concession now would doom her book. Once I convinced her that I wasn’t going to back down, however, she did an excellent job on the rewrite.

And my hopes proved justified when I started shopping her proposal around; on paper, Louise was a great client. Her proposal was very strong. She wasn’t inexperienced at working with an editor, either; she had a couple of previous publications — articles on another subject, if memory serves. since she had put herself through graduate school as a stand-up comic, I had no qualms about predicting she would be great at readings. I always mentioned it when I was pitching her book.

In practice, though, she could be pretty trying. Everything would be going along fine, or so I would think, and suddenly, I’d find myself on the receiving end of an ultimatum. I wasn’t selling the book fast enough; I was showing it to the wrong people; was this really the right economy to be trying to push a book on pandas? Every time, it was different; sometimes, I got the feeling she was picking fights with me so she would have an excuse to ask if there had been any nibbles on the proposal. Once the book sold, however, she was over the moon — this was the best possible outcome in every way. And she actually delivered the manuscript to the editor a week ahead of schedule.

So when the editor called me to say that Louise had been stormily contesting every single revision suggestion in the editorial memo, I can’t say that I was entirely surprised. Nor was I particularly surprised when Louise called me in tears, convinced that her book was going to get destroyed. It took a lot of hand-holding over a period of weeks, but eventually, she did make the requested changes. I have to say, they made the book better.

Then the marketing department started calling; Louise hated the change they wanted to make to her title. Then she couldn’t stand the cover design, the back jacket, the Amazon blurb, the advance reviews…in short, everything was a battle that went on for weeks on end. And for someone who used to tell jokes for a living, she certainly seemed reluctant to get out and promote her book. She kept telling me that she had a job, family, obligations: did I want her to write her next book proposal, she would demand, or did I want her to do the publisher’s job for them?

Of course, we all expected her to do both: that’s what career writers do. But she seemed to feel that she had paid her dues, and now was entitled to coast. Which would have made more sense, I’ve got to say, had her first book sold particularly well, or if the proposal for the next were anywhere near as strong as the first. I wish I could say that I believed she had put a quarter of the energy into it that she’s evidently focused upon serving me with ultimatums about how I need to do more for her.

After a while, I just stopped reading them closely; I don’t need the drama. A quick skim was enough. When she sent that nasty e-mail saying that thanks to me, she had lost faith in her second book, and so was dropping it for a third, well, let’s just say that I wasn’t surprised then, either. Or when the third lost its shine for her, too, also apparently my fault. I don’t remember why she said she was leaving our agency; I’m sure it was in a similar vein.

There’s quite a bit that could have gone differently here, but for the sake of today’s discussion, let’s not focus on that. Instead, I would like you to notice that it was not just quite divergent expectations that harmed this working relationship; it was also that issues don’t seem to have gotten hashed out much until at least one party was already angry. An ultimatum, after all, is not exactly an invitation to first-round negotiation.

Allow me to make a tiny, insignificant suggestion to anyone contemplating entering this kind of working partnership: try to regard it as a relationship. Relationships take work, after all, and they tend not to thrive on mind-reading. If both parties are not up front about what they want from the other, is it honestly surprising if one or the other occasionally guesses incorrectly?

If I ruled the universe, every writer-agent (and writer-editor) relationship would start out with a full and frank discussion of what the agent expects to do for the writer — and what the writer will need to do to support those efforts. I would also mandate up-front agreement on how often each party feels it is appropriate to communicate; just knowing when to expect an update can make a huge difference to a writer gnawing his fingernails up to the elbow while waiting to hear back on a round of submissions. That way, too, the writer does not have to guess whether it’s too soon to ask a follow-up question.

The last time I checked, though, I did not rule the universe. If I did, libraries would be open 24 hours per day, businesses would allow their employees two-hour lunches — the better to browse at bookstores or finish reading that chapter, my dear — and my former elementary school would be named after Ambrose Bierce, who lived in my home town many years longer than Robert Louis Stevenson, whose name graces my former middle school. And the high school would bear the name of M.F.K. Fisher, who lived there longest at all.

I’m not sure what they would name after me, once I have shuffled off this mortal coil and joined the choir invisible. I’m sure they could come up with an unnamed Quonset hut.

Since none of these things are currently the case, however, I can only conclude that I do not have the power to change writers’ sometimes troubled relationships with the publishing industry with a wave of my wee hand. All I can do is advise, recommend, and, every so often, mediate. And urge everyone concerned to bear in mind that they are all good people (at least, most of them are) committed to the same quite estimable goal: bringing great stories and marvelous writing to readers everywhere. Who, let’s face it, don’t particularly care how difficult it was to bring the books they love into print.

It’s a noble endeavor, from every perspective. Let’s all try to gain some insight into others’ points of view — and, of course, keep up the good work!

December 6, 2011January 19, 2017 - 2 Comments

Queryfest, part XVI: weaving together all of those disparate elements into a Millicent-pleasing whole, or, could we possibly see some practical examples, please?

West Seattle beach

“What?” those of you who have been following Queryfest lo! these many weeks cry in astonishment. “Another post on how to put together a query letter? Surely, by now, we’ve covered the basics?”

The basics, yes. The finesse, not entirely. Bear with me here.

As those of you stalwart souls who have been following this long, in-depth, and (my apologies) sporadically posted series are, I hope, acutely aware, it’s a matter of great astonishment to those of us who work with manuscripts for a living how often reasonable professional advice to aspiring writers (or, even more often, an agent’s offhand comment about a personal preference) becomes transformed through the magic of third-through-hundredth repetition into a purported Cosmic Law of Querying that bears only a faint familial resemblance to the original advice. Apparently, nowhere is the potent equation specific statement + word of mouth + time = distortion more operational than in the word-of-mouth paradise that is the aspiring writers’ community.

That has been true since Jane Austen’s time, certainly — the next time a long turn-around time on requested materials frustrates you, you might want to refresh your spirit by reading up on her publisher’s sitting on her first book for years on end, leaving her to guess why — but the speed and frequency with which sensible advice can mutate has risen astronomically in recent years. Not entirely surprising, when Internet searches are so gifted at ripping individual statements out of context, communications are so rapid — and far, far too many people believe, mistakenly, that if they saw something online, it must be true..

Now, to paraphrase Mark Twain, a misconception can make it halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its boots on. And because of the astonishingly pervasive belief in the Internet Truth Fairy, the winsome pixie that flits from site to site, waving her magic wand over misstatements, misapprehensions, and outright lies and transforming them into the purest of driven truths, well-meaning writers all over the country — nay, the world — end up following advice not only at odds with the original advisor’s intention, but sometimes even diametrically opposed to it.

How does that happen, you ask, wide-eyed? Good question.

Do you recall how careful I was in my recent post on platform paragraph construction to assure all of you that the examples I was using were fictional, and thus should not be cited anywhere, anytime, as fact? Thought I was being a tad pedantic, didn’t you?

I had good reason: in last year’s foray into the mysteries of query-writing, I woke one drizzly Seattle a.m., to find an incoming link from the University of Bonn.

Why? Because my post the previous evening had contained the following totally made-up statement: Audrey Hepburn holds an earned doctorate in particle physics from the University of Bonn, and thus is eminently qualified to write on atomic bombs.

Now, to the best of my knowledge, this is not historically true; I said in the post that it was not true. But did the web bot searching for the phrase University of Bonn trouble itself with fact-checking? Or with context?

The moral: Don’t believe everything you read on the Internet. Even if you read it here. Or heard someone say that they might have heard it here.

I hope I shan’t shatter anybody’s cherished illusions about the ITF, but there’s quite a bit of query-construction advice floating around out there on the Internet, and not all of it is particularly helpful. Partially, that’s a function of lack of term definition: just as standard format for book manuscripts and proper formatting for short stories differ in many ways (yes, really), yet few websites professing to tell writers how their work should appear on the page mention those important distinctions, a query to an agent seeking representation for a book, a query to a magazine to try to place an article, and a query to someone outside of the publishing industry would all call for different approaches.

Self-evident as soon as you hear it broken down that way, right? Each would require different information; the recipients would expect different styles. Even what would constitute a polite tone would vary, depending upon destination.

All of that screaming echoing out there in the ether is emitting, I presume, from the many, many aspiring writers out there who launched their efforts to get published by plugging query letter into a search engine and reading the top five results. Or the top fifty. As many of you have no doubt discovered to your chagrin, not only is every self-styled expert not recommending the same strategies; often, the advice is contradictory. And that tends to come as a big, nasty surprise to the legions of aspiring writers out there who believe, all practical evidence to the contrary, that the publishing riddle is so easy to crack that a one-minute Google search and ten minutes of reading will provide every scintilla of guidance necessary to land an agent.

Not to mention those who firmly cling to a belief in the ITF’s error-reducing wand.

To whom I say: please read with care, and never follow querying advice if you don’t completely understand how to implement it and how implementing it will help you. Be wary of any self-styled sure-fire boilerplates: in an industry devoted to celebrating individual authorial voices, aspiring writers are expected to come up with queries that don’t sound exactly like everyone else’s.

And don’t be afraid to ask follow-up questions. In these days of slashed budgets, even the best-intentioned fairy godmothers sometimes fall down on the job.

Case in point: earlier in these series, I wrote at length — yes, yes, I know: that qualifier doesn’t narrow it down much — about how narrative voice does and does not play a role in a strong query letter. Yet even as my much-beleaguered fingertips were typing a spirited defense of a narrative paragraph that tells the book’s story, rather then just discussing it the way one might in an English term paper, I found myself murmuring, “You know, I’ve been talking about each of the requisite elements of a query — as well as a couple that are merely helpful and stylish to include — as if they were building blocks: stack ‘em up, and you have yourself a query. I’m pretty sure that we’ve covered the constituent parts sufficiently, but have I given enough examples of how those parts fit together into a harmonious whole?”

Well might I mutter. Although the overall impression a careful reader might derive from Queryfest is a coherent whole, we’ve mostly been talking about individual parts, paragraphs, or even sentences, have we not? For those of you new to the querying process, I imagine it’s been sort of like my asking you to form a mental picture of a beach, not by flashing you the photograph at the top of this post, but by showing you the same space chopped up like this:

It’s not that any of these close-ups are inaccurate, per se (although that last shot of the boulder has some perspective problems), but even viewed all together, they don’t give the full picture. This evening, I would like to rectify that by simply overwhelming you with examples of entire query letters.

Yes, in response to what half of you just shouted: I, a writer, am voluntarily going to sit down and write not only one query letter tonight, but several, back to back. And I’m not going to be driven insane by stress in the process. Heck, I’ll probably even enjoy it.

And the masses swoon. “How is this miracle possible?” you cry. “Is not querying a migraine-inducing, fingernail-gnawing, soul-sucking process by definition? How might a sane creative person run this gauntlet and emerge unscathed?”

Come closer, and I’ll let you in on a little professional writers’ secret: querying gets easier with practice. Once you get the hang of the logic behind it and learn to describe a book in professional terms, it actually isn’t all that hard.

That’s why, in case you’d been wondering, agents, editors, and even already-agented writers tend to give querying advice as if a show-stopping query were something any truly talented writer could toss off in 15 minutes flat. They’re not being insensitive to the difficulties facing the aspiring writer intimidated by the querying process; they’ve just forgotten what it’s like to do it for the first time. Or the incredible courage required for someone who knows nothing about such a letter other than the fact that he cannot land an agent without it to take pen in hand and even begin a draft, much less send it.

No, the fine folks who read these things for a living must, in self-defense, get inured to the difficulties. Given what a high percentage of even rather interesting-sounding queries Millicent must reject, she must come to accept the industry truism that a more polished, professional-looking query is a pretty good indicator of an aspiring writer who has been plugging away at if for a while.

Oh, you may groan, but there’s a reason they believe it: just as most submitters do not present their manuscripts in standard format the first time they send off requested materials, for the simple reason that they have not been hanging around the publishing world long enough to know that in the U.S., agents submit their clients’ work to editors in a specific format (which you will find laid out at length under the HOW TO FORMAT A BOOK MANUSCRIPT category on the archive list at right, should these repeated references be making you a bit nervous), most eventually successful queriers send out at least a few awkward, incomplete, or downright inadequate queries early in their drive to get published. There’s nothing like rejection, after all, to make a writer question whether his query is doing the job.

So to the pros, believe it or not, rejection doesn’t always represent a final refusal to consider a writer’s work; it can be a necessary and even helpful part of a good writer’s training.

Which is to say: query-writing gets easier with practice. At least it does if you understand what’s supposed to go into the darned thing.

Let’s recap what’s absolutely required in a query letter, and what merely advisable to mention. Here are the absolutely indispensable elements of a successful query letter. Without each and every one, rejection is more or less inevitable.

1. The book’s title

2. The book’s category, expressed in existing category terms

3. A brief statement about why you are approaching this particular agent

4. A descriptive paragraph or two, giving a compelling foretaste of the premise, plot, and/or argument of the book, ideally in a voice similar to the narrative.

5. An EXTREMELY brief closing paragraph thanking the agent for considering the project.

6. A SASE, if querying by mail.

Stop kicking yourselves and wailing, those of you who realized that you have in the past sent out letters with one or more of these rudiments missing. Practically everyone does that at first; see comment above re: it getting easier with practice. Those dark days are behind you now.

What makes me so sure of that, you ask? Because you’re never going to forget to include each and every one of these essential bits of information in a query letter again, right?

Heck, you’re even going to get fancy and include some not -strictly-required elements that Millicent the agency screener generally enjoys seeing in a query:

7. A brief marketing paragraph explaining for whom you have written this book and why this book might appeal to that demographic in a way that no other book currently on the market does.

8. A platform paragraph giving your writing credentials and/or expertise that renders you the ideal person to have written this book.

You also know — and this is going to place you miles ahead of a startlingly broad swathe of the aspiring writer population — what all of these building blocks are supposed to look like once they’re assembled into a building. A little something like the following , to be precise (and my apologies in advance if the images here come out a trifle fuzzy; if they do, try enlarging them by holding down the COMMAND key and pressing + several times):

good query

See? A place for everything, and everything in its place.

But what happens if the various elements don’t appear more or less in the expected order, or if the tone is not professionally respectful? Great questions. Let’s take a peek at the same book with the same selling points, not presented nearly so well.

good query gone bad

I like to call this the Good Query Gone Bad. It contains all the basic elements (although not done very well); the querier has clearly given some thought to the market appeal of his book (but not presented the results very convincingly); the story itself sounds rather interesting (despite being poorly described). It is, in fact, what many aspiring writers confused by conflicting querying advice produce, the basic notes of the query strung together without getting the tune quite right.

“But isn’t that close enough?” thousands of you ask, tears welling up in your frustrated eyes. “This second letter is a trifle vague, perhaps, and rather pushy at the end, but Millicent couldn’t be in serious doubt regarding what this book is about, could she? Why wouldn’t she give it the benefit of the doubt?”

A pretty good reason, actually: in these days of shrinking agency support staffs, she and her boss cannot read every vaguely-described manuscript that might be interesting and well-written. And in the current literary environment, in which — correct me if I am wrong, long-time readers — thousands upon thousands of very talented writers have spent years upon years learning the ropes of writing a query letter, why wouldn’t she automatically prefer the first example over the second?

The book being presented is the same, but admit it: it sounds more interesting in the first query, does it not? Not to mention coming across as the work of a more experienced writer. If that’s not enough to sway you as you step reluctantly into Millicent’s shoes, consider: which writer would you expect to be more work for the agency to take on as a client, the first or the second?

Uh-huh. Remember, it’s not as though Millicent’s boss can afford to take on every promising writer who queries with an intriguing story: it’s rare that an established agent with an active client list takes on more than three or four new books per year. Considering that agent’s Millicent might easily screen somewhere between 800 and 1500 queries per week, can you really blame her for being exceptionally picky?

I sense some furrowed brows out there. “But Anne,” brow-knitters across the land protest, “even recognizing the exceedingly high level of competition at the querying stage — which, incidentally, strikes me as an unfairly high barrier for a new writer to be expected to hurdle — this second version looks okay to me. Not nearly as good as the first one, of course, but still, it does everything I’ve always heard a query needs to do. The tone may not be professional, but it’s hardly insulting, and you said yourself that the plot still sounds interesting. So mightn’t it get past a Millicent who happens to be in a good mood?”

Well, I suppose it might, furrowers — but do you have any idea how mood-deflating reading a hundred queries before lunch can be?

And this is one of the better ones. Also one of the more polite, believe it or not. Now do you want to risk taking your chances on Millie’s mood saving this one, Savvy?

You’re quite right, though, furrowers, that the tone problems here are subtle, so much so that someone who has never seen a professionally-phrased query letter before might not catch the difference. So let’s put some of those skills we all learned in our English classes to good use and do a solid, old-fashioned compare-and-contrast exercise, shall we?

I shall take that multi-part chorus of moans for a resounding affirmative. Let’s go through our list of required elements one by one, to see what a difference attitude and thoroughness make.

The book’s title: both include that in the first paragraph, check.

The book category: again, check, in both versions. But take a peek at how differently this information is conveyed:

Good example: Since you said that you were specifically looking for YA novels for horse-loving girls aged 10-12, I believe you may be interested in my middle-grade novel.

Gone Bad example: Since you said…you absolutely must read my first novel for middle-grade readers

Not nearly so specific, is it? Yes, middle-grade novel is a legitimate book category, but it’s awfully broad. By giving some indication of what sub-segment of the immense and complex middle-grade market the book is aimed, Savvy does a better job at presenting the book’s market niche.

And call me old fashioned, but I don’t approve of people asking favors giving orders: while I believe you may be interested in is polite speculation, you absolutely must read implies that the agent has no choice in the matter. From orders, Not-so-Savvy escalates by the end of the letter to threats:

Gone Bad example: Don’t let this one pass you by. You’ll be sorry if you do!

Excuse me? I’m quite positive that Not-so-Savvy’s mother, dear old white-haired Mrs. Writerly, cannot know that her offspring is communicating this way with strangers — and strangers he wants to help him, no less. It would break her long-suffering heart.

So let’s not tell her, okay? Or about that nasty little dig at the writers Mr. Championovich has represented in the past.

And what do you suppose is the point of Not-so-Savvy’s going out of his way to mention that this is my first novel for middle-grade readers? How could that possibly be relevant to Millicent’s decision whether she believes this book might interest Mr. Championovich? Unless the query went on to mention previous publications in other book categories, whether this was Not-so-Savvy’s first attempt to write a YA book or his 47th wouldn’t really weigh into her decision.

There’s another reason to avoid including this information in a query. As important as the fact of having written a first novel (as opposed to, say, a third) might be to the writer, all including this information in the query tells an agency inhabitant is that the writer isn’t very experienced — not the best impression to convey, as I mentioned above.

Can’t you think of better ways for a querier to use that precious page space? How about working in another of our required elements?

A brief statement about why you are approaching this particular agent: again, check on both counts.
But again, note the differential in tone:

Good example: I enjoyed hearing you speak at the recent Learn the Ropes conference in Minneapolis. Since you said that you were specifically looking for YA novels for horse-loving girls…the many sensitive books you have made available for these young readers over the years.

Ah, you hadn’t thought of that bit in the last paragraph as being part of the why me? explanation, had you? To Millicent’s eye, it is: it implied that the Savvy has gone to the trouble of finding out what her boss has represented in the past.

Compare the graceful ingratiation of that, please, with our other exemplar’s efforts to explain why he had approached this particular agent:

Gone Bad example: Since you said at the recent Learn the Ropes conference in Minneapolis…

Um, since he said what? Actually, this was an honest-to-goodness typo in my hastily-constructed example, but as it’s an extremely common species of typo, I didn’t correct it.

Did you catch it the first time? Millicent would have.

Had I reminded you lately to proofread every query every time? While you are ruminating on that excellent precept, let’s continue down our list.

A descriptive paragraph: as a professional reader, I think there’s no comparison between the two queries on this point: the first tells the story via vivid details by focusing on characterization; the second just summarizes the plot.

Admittedly, though, it still makes the story sound exciting. Most queriers would actually be quite pleased if they could be simultaneously this pithy and this entertaining in their descriptive paragraphs.

The glitch in the second is really the result of where this information falls in the letter. See if you can spot the problem in the third paragraph:

Gone Bad example: Every kid who rides horses will love this book. So will kids who feel like outsiders. Tanya, my protagonist, is the new kid in a virtual ghost town — until she’s befriended by Flambeau, the most beautiful wild stallion in the desert. No one but Tanya can touch him, she feels special. At least until Flambeau’s cruel bandit owner shows up!

Comes rather late in the paragraph, doesn’t it? Especially for a piece of writing intended for eyes notorious for skimming queries very quickly.

In journalism, this is called burying the lead. It’s a good story — so why hide its merits in the middle of a paragraph about something else entirely?

Starting to get the hang of this? Excellent. Let’s move on.

A brief marketing paragraph explaining for whom you have written this book and why this book might appeal to that demographic : this is perhaps where the strongest contrast between the two lies. Gone Bad’s rendition is far and away the more common in actual queries.

Good example: Tanya’s story will not only appeal to readers of the already well-established horse book market, but to kids who feel like outsiders as well. According to a recent GAO report, one out of every six American third-graders has changed schools at least once, yet only two books for US 10- to 12-year-olds out within the last two years touch on this important life event.

“Swoon!” Millicent murmurs. “A novelist who knows how to do market research! And I’d had no idea how often elementary schoolers move. That’s definitely a large niche market.”

I’d had no idea, either, Millicent, until I conducted a 2-minute web search while I was writing Savvy’s query. Startling, isn’t it? (The fact that they move so much, I mean, not that I was able to turn up an apt statistic that fast. I do have a Ph.D., you know; I’m trained for this stuff.)

Gone Bad example: It is head, shoulders, and forelock above anything else currently on the market! … Unlike most writers who pen books about horses — including, unfortunately, some of your clients — I know my way around a stable… Every kid who rides horses will love this book. So will kids who feel like outsiders.

Okay, so the joke in the first sentence is actually rather funny (if I do say so myself), but what a lot of unsubstantiated claims in a row! Even if they are true, why should Millicent believe them without any corroboration?

It’s starting to be hard to remember that these two queries were for the same book, isn’t it?

A platform paragraph: admittedly, both queries do make the writer sound quite knowledgeable about horses. However, Not-so-Savvy has forgotten his single best credential for writing on this particular subject for this particular audience. See if you can spot his unfortunate omission.

Good example: As a horse world insider, I have drawn upon extensive personal experience to flesh out Tanya’s story. In addition to having taught middle-grade girls Western riding for the past three years, in my own youth, I was a competitive horse jumper. The sights, sounds, and smells of the stable are as familiar and natural to me as sidewalks are to city folks..

Gone Bad example: Unlike most writers who pen books about horses — including, unfortunately, some of your clients — I know my way around a stable. I even teach Western riding.

Did you catch it this time? Even setting aside the rather nasty tone of the opening sentence, can you justify his having left out the information that he has been teaching readers in his target demographic to ride their beloved horses for three years?

Oh, Not-So. I’m genuinely worried about your self-esteem. If you don’t tell Millicent about your book’s selling points, she’s not going to know about them. Is that honestly the best strategy for convincing her that her boss should take a chance on your novel?

A closing paragraph thanking the agent for considering the project: hoo boy. Try not to avert your eyes from the disastrous contrast you are about to see.

Good example: Thank you for your time in considering this query, as well as for the many sensitive books you have made available for these young readers over the years. I enclose a synopsis and a SASE for your convenience, and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Gone Bad example: Don’t let this one pass you by. You’ll be sorry if you do!

Even I feel like averting my eyes from that last one — which is a quote fed to me by an agent who prefers to remain nameless, by the way. She wanted to get the word out that she would prefer, on the whole, never to see this arrangement of words on a query page again.

If it’s all the same to you, queriers. Which I’m betting it will be, now that you have seen first-hand just how rude ostensibly upbeat hard-sell statements like this look in a query.

Makes quite a difference, knowing how a professional screener might view things, eh? Starting to feel more comfortable navigating those ropes by yourself without a net?

I had planned to stuff a few more positive examples into this post, but frankly, proving so thoroughly that the same book can be queried so differently using precisely the same selling points has depressed me into a stupor. I’m sure I’ll rouse myself for another example-heavy post later this week.

But before I sign off, one more thing: remember how I mentioned at the top of this post that agents, editors, and already-agented writers often take it for granted that an aspiring writer really serious about getting into the biz would have done sufficient homework to toss off a query as solid as Savvy’s in 15 minutes flat?

It took me a grand total of 5 minutes to write both of today’s examples in their entirety. Yes, counting those two minutes of web research.

That’s the result of practice, my friends. That, and knowing precisely what Millicent wants to see in a query. Once a writer understands that the only trick here is figuring out how to present her book in those terms, the actual writing of the darned thing can be downright speedy.

Trust me on this one; I’m a doctor. Book doctor, that is. Keep up the good work!

October 18, 2011January 19, 2017 - 5 Comments

Queryfest, part IX: toiling productively in the vineyards of literature, or, would Pavlov’s doggie like a biscuit?

Since we began our last post with an image of a crowd storming a castle, I thought it might be nice to open tonight’s Queryfest post with an image of an un-stormed one. I like to yank this gorgeous image from the Book of Hours out of the mothballs every now and again, because it is such an accurate depiction of how so many aspiring writers view the work of querying these days: a long, toilsome effort aimed toward impressing the powerful folks in the white castle on the hill — who may or may not be paying attention — under a sky that (we hope) conceals at least a few minor deities rooting for the underdog’s eventual success.

What’s that you say, campers? It may have felt like that back I was trying to find the right agent way back in the dimly-remembered mists of the Paleolithic era, but everyone concerned feels perfectly marvelous about the process today? Whew, that’s a relief — I guess I can end Queryfest here and now.

On the off chance that I wasn’t the only aspiring writer who ever shivered in the face of seemingly unalterable industry coldness, I feel an obligation to point out from the other side of the Rubicon that even those newest to querying are not as entirely helpless in the face of it as we writers tend to tell ourselves we are.

Stop rolling your eyes; it’s true. Although much of a writer’s progress along the road to publication is dependent upon factors outside her control — fads in writing style, fashions in content, and what species of memoir has garnered the most scandals recently, to name but three — how an aspiring writer presents her work to the industry is in fact entirely under her own control.

That’s a really, really nice way of saying that from a professional reader’s point of view, scads of query letters traject themselves like lemmings straight from the envelope into the rejection pile with scarcely a pause in between, due to problems that the writers who sent them could have fixed fairly easily. Sadly, the vast majority are rejected for reasons that don’t necessarily have anything to do with the potential personality fit between the author and agent, the agent’s ability to sell the book in question in the current market, or even the quality of the writing.

Yes, yes, I know — the form-letter rejection you got implies otherwise. But form letters rejections are, by definition, sent to everyone an agency is rejecting, regardless of the reason. Because a good agency genuinely does not want to discourage writers on the way to perfecting their craft and professionalizing their presentation, their prefab rejections are usually geared toward the best of the rejected manuscripts, the near-misses for whom it’s actually true that the book sounds intriguing, but publishing houses just are not buying that sort of manuscript right now.

That is not, however, your garden-variety rejected query. A hefty percentage of them all contain the same 10 or 15 stripes of mistake. And that repetition has serious implications for even otherwise good queries that happen to stumble into the same pitfalls.

A forest of hands just sprouted out there in the ether. “But Anne,” conscientious queriers everywhere moan, “that’s absurd! How could anyone else’s querying habits, or even the querying habits of every single other aspiring writer in the nation, possibly have any effect upon my query’s reception at an agency? They’re all judged individually, aren’t they?”

Well, yes and no, moaners. Because agents and their screeners read so many of the darned things, they inevitably develop pet peeves and start identifying common red flags. And because our old pal, Millicent the agency screener, often spends hours on end scanning queries, even if only 20 of them share the same basic error — and trust me, more of them will — the 21rst query that carries even a shade of similarity is likely to trigger a knee-jerk reaction so strong that even Dr. Pavlov would shake his head and say, “No kidding? Just because the letter was addressed to Dear Agent, rather than to an individual?”

Oh, yes, Dr. Pavlov, there are few epistolary errors that engender a stronger — or quicker — negative response than a Dear Agent letter. That’s merely the best-known of the notorious query-readers’ pet peeves.

In response to that giant collective huff of indignation I just out there: you’re probably thinking that Millicent is hypersensitive, far more eager to reject a query than to accept it, and perhaps even downright mean. Heck, judging by the expressions on your faces, you probably wouldn’t be remotely surprised to learn that she regularly eats live kittens for breakfast, snarls at babies, and honks her horn when Boy Scouts assist people on crutches across the street.

Don’t be ridiculous. Millicent lives in New York City; she doesn’t drive a car. What’s she going to do, honk like a goose?

True, she rejects writers for a living, but that doesn’t mean that rejections are necessarily her fault: many, many, MANY query letters just scream from their very first paragraph, “Reject me! I have no idea what I’m doing on your desk, much less what book category the manuscript my rambling prose professes to promote might best fit into, so why not put me out of my misery right away?”

The ubiquity of such self-rejecting queries — yes, they’re really called that — means that the all-too-common writerly practice of blaming the rejecter is not the best strategy for landing an agent. Call me zany, but if a query elicits a rejection for any reason other than that the storyline or argument in the proposed book didn’t grab Millicent or her boss, my first question would be not, “Oh, how could the screener have made such a mistake?” but “May I have a look at that letter, please, to assess how the writer may improve it?”

Why do I tend to leap straight to that conclusion, you ask? Experience, mostly. Out comes the broken record again:

If there is a single rule of thumb that may be applied at every stage of any successful author’s career, it’s that it ALWAYS behooves us to look critically at our own writing, rather than assuming that the only possible explanation for frowned-upon writing lies in the eye of the predisposition of the reader to frown.

To put it more simply, offense does not always lie in the propensity of the affronted to take umbrage. Millicent may indeed be a bit rejection-happy — it’s her job to reject 98% of what she sees, recall — but any writer willing to put in the time and effort can learn how to avoid provoking her.

I know — it’s tempting just to assume it’s her problem and press on. It’s a pain to revise a query letter, after all, or indeed, to write one in the first place. But it’s my considered opinion that the overwhelming majority of frustrated queriers radically underestimate the amount of energy they habitually put into resenting the necessity to query at all. Is that honestly the best use of a writer’s time?

As with a manuscript, the writer of a query will virtually always be better off taking steps to improve what he can control than blaming the rejection upon other factors out of his control. It is possible to learn from one’s own mistakes, even in the current insanely competitive agent-seeking environment, where most rejected queriers are never told precisely what made Millicent slide their letters directly into their SASEs with a copy of the agency’s one-size-fits-all rejection note. Or, in the case of e-queries, to hit the REPLY key, sending the prefab rejection reply.

I just saw some of your faces fall: hands up, everyone who has ever wasted hours — or days — in trying to read some specific feedback into a rejection platitude like I’m sorry, but I just didn’t fall in love with this, just because it appeared in a letter with a personalized salutation or in an e-mail. While Millicents and their bosses do occasionally break their rejection pattern to add a personal note to a rejection, it’s rare enough these days that you should be flattered if you receive one.

But that’s far from the norm; the advent of the copy-and-paste function has been a positive boon to agencies, much as photocopy machines were a couple of decades before. It’s not hard to see why: honestly, if you were Millicent, would you be willing to type I’m sorry, but this manuscript just doesn’t fit our needs at this time hundreds of times per week if it weren’t absolutely necessary?

In the spirit of trying to avoid being on the receiving end of such stock let-‘em-down-easy phrasing, let’s plunge back into our ongoing efforts to elevate a merely okay query letter into a really good one. At this point, we’ve moved far past the most basic mistakes; now, we’re well into the more sophisticated problems.

That’s good news, by the way. You should be proud of yourself for taking your own writing prospects seriously enough to make it this far — believe me, Millicents everywhere will applaud you for it. As a reward for virtue, I begin tonight with a few exceptionally simple problems to fix.

(18) If I am querying anything but a memoir, is my descriptive paragraph written in the third person and the present tense?
Regardless of the narrative perspective of the manuscript itself, descriptive paragraphs in queries are always written in the third person. So if your description of your first-person fantasy begins I had just landed my dream job when the aliens landed on the roof, change it right away: to Millicent’s eyes, it will read like a description for a memoir. Ditto for pitches and synopses, by the way.

Don’t you wish someone had mentioned that little tidbit to you before you sent out your first query?

The proper tense choice, too, may strike some writers as counter-intuitive: one-paragraph book descriptions, like pitches and synopses, are always written in the present tense. Yes, even when the author is describing events that happened before the fall of the Roman Empire.

And apparently, writers are supposed to know both of these things because the Query Fairy descends from the heavens when one reaches a certain level of craft and bops one on the head with her magic wand. Or because they have attended an expensive class or conference that told them so. Or so I surmise from the fact that this particular piece of advice isn’t given much these days.

I’m not a big fan of keeping expectations like this secret, so let’s shout it to the rooftops: YOUR DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPH SHOULD BE IN THE THIRD PERSON AND THE PRESENT TENSE.

The only major exception is, interestingly enough, memoir. Which leads me to:

(19) If I am querying a memoir, is my descriptive paragraph written in the present tense and the first person?
All too often, memoirists refer to themselves in the third person in query letters, pitches, and synopses of their books, puzzling Millicents exceedingly. If your memoir is about you, go ahead and use the perpendicular pronoun.

The logic behind describing memoir in the first person doesn’t really require much explanation — the book’s about you, isn’t it? — but the tense choice might. It simply doesn’t make sense for an adult to say:

Now I am six, and my father tells me to take out the garbage. But I don’t want to take out the garbage, and in a decision that will come back to haunt me in high school, I chose to bury it in the back yard instead.

You must admit, this is more than a little at odds with a sane person’s sense of time. (But then, so is the turn-around time for queries and submissions, frequently.)

Please note, though, that other than this shift in tense and person, the same basic structures we applied last time to describing novels will work perfectly well for memoir: your goal here is make yourself sound like an interesting person in an interesting situation overcoming obstacles to your happiness. For example:

Back in my days as a silent movie star of the 1920s, women ruled the silver screen. I was paid more than my male counterparts; I had my pick of projects (and extras for my private pleasures); my dressing room’s cushions were trimmed in mink. But once the talkies came, I was faced with an impossible choice: take a massive pay cut or allow my public to be told that my beautifully resonant opera-trained voice was too squeaky for the new technology. If I was going to make the films that I wanted, I realized I would have to start writing and directing for myself.

See? By describing herself as the protagonist in a story, rather than just a person talking about herself, our starlet has made a compelling case that both she and the challenges she confronted would make for fascinating reading.

(20) Is the tone and language in my descriptive paragraph representative of the tone and language of the manuscript?
Yes, yes, I know: I’ve just finished telling you that the tense and perspective choice in the description should not be dictated by the voice of the narrative in the book, unless it’s a memoir. But just as a stellar verbal pitch gives the hearer a foretaste of what the manuscript is like, so does a well-constructed descriptive paragraph in a query letter. Just bear in mind that nice writing is not the only aim here: you’re also trying to demonstrate that you are aware of the types of voices considered stylish in your chosen book category — and that you can in fact write in a voice that the already-established readers of that category will like.

Stop laughing. Query letters do so have narrative voices. It’s just that most of the boilerplates we see are so businesslike in tone and generic in content that you’d never notice.

It’s definitely possible, though, to construct a query that gives Millicent a foretaste of your manuscript. If your book is funny, go for a laugh; if it’s scary, make sure to include at least one genuinely frightening image; if it’s sexy, make Millicent pant in her cubicle.

Getting the picture?

Some of you find this suggestion a trifle wacky, I’m sensing. “But Anne,” a scandalized few protest, “didn’t you say earlier in this series that part of the goal here was to come across as professional? Won’t making the descriptive paragraph sound like my surly protagonist/whiny narrator/a lighthearted romp through the merry world of particle physics make me seem like a grump/annoying to work with/like I don’t know what I’m talking about?”

Good questions, scandalized few. Your concerns are precisely why I’m advising that only the descriptive paragraph match the tone of the book, rather than the entire letter.

Surprised? Don’t be. You’re entirely right that Millicent might well draw the wrong conclusions if your letter were written primarily for laughs. Let’s face it, it’s kind of hard to turn the credentials paragraph of a query into much of a chucklefest. Even if you happen to have taught comedic theory for 52 years at the Aspen Institute for Gut-Busting, it would hard to turn that fact into a giggle line.

Although I just did, didn’t I? In a query, though, that would have been a risk: jokes that fall flat are a common screeners’ pet peeve. So unless you’re positive that your joke is (a) original — almost impossible, if it’s related to some standard query element like SASE inclusion — (b) doesn’t detract from the clarity of your letter, and (c) is funny enough that a Millicent bleary-eyed after seven hours of straight screening will chuckle, save the one-liners for your stand-up act.

But in the part of the letter where you’re supposed to be telling a story, why not let your manuscript’s voice come out to play for a few lines? Can you think of a better way to demonstrate to Millicent how your narrative voice is unique?

(21) Am I telling a compelling story in my descriptive paragraph, or does it read as though I’ve written a book report about my own manuscript?
All too often, aspiring writers will construct their descriptive paragraphs as though they were writing high school English papers. There’s usually a pretty good reason for that: writers tend to have been excellent high school English students. So were most agents and editors, as it happens, and certainly most Millicents.

But collective nostalgia for one’s happy days in Intro to American Literature doesn’t mean that a descriptive paragraph demonstrating that glorious past too clearly is smart book marketing at the query stage. Analysis-based descriptions distance the reader from the story being told.

How so, you ask? They tend to rely upon generalities, in a context that cries out for one-of-a-kind specifics. Take a gander at a representative sample:

MIXED MESSAGES is a nuanced slice-of-life tale of interpersonal and intergenerational misunderstanding set against the backdrop of turbulent social change. The protagonist is a troubled man, an employee caught up in a realistic conflict with his boss while his fantasies of perfect love are constantly thwarted by a lackluster family life. Told in alternating first person voices and the present tense, character is revealed through slice-of-life episodes before reaching the denouement.

Doesn’t exactly draw you into the protagonist’s world, does it? This description could be applied equally well to hundreds of thousands of wildly different plot and voice.

As a result of trying to sound analytical, this description presents the protagonist as a man without a face. While all of these things may well be true of the book being discussed, what is this book ABOUT? Who is this troubled man? Where does he live? What kind of work does he do? What’s the central conflict, and what is at stake for the protagonist in overcoming it?

As a rule, Millicent is eager to know the answer to those questions. Faced with a description like this one, though, she is also likely to roll her eyes and mutter, “English term paper,” and swiftly move on to the next query.

Why apply that particular epithet? Because this kind of description talks about the novel, rather than telling its story as a story.

Because Millicent’s job is to spot great storytellers, not great textual analysts, she would have preferred it if the querier simply presented the story directly. Then, too, the writer’s choice to concentrate upon the themes and construction of the novel, rather than who the protagonist is and what conflicts he wants or needs to battle in order to fulfill his dreams decreases the reader’s incentive to care about what’s going on.

Indeed, we’re left wondering what is going on. Here’s the same plot, presented in a manner Millicent is far more likely to find pleasing:

Troubled Harry (47) can’t seem to make it through even a single work day at the squid ink pasta factory without running afoul of his boss, chronic aquatic creature abuser Zeke (52). Since the pasta factory is the town’s only employer, Harry has little choice but to stomach the flogging of innocent carp — until Zeke’s merciless sarcasm at the expense of a dolphin cracks his stoic veneer. After an unsuccessful attempt to unionize the squid, Harry must face the truth: Zeke has been just stringing him along for the last seventeen years about that promotion. But now that he is cast adrift in a rudderless sailboat, what is he going to do about that?

I spy some hands raised out there, do I not? “But Anne,” some terrific English essay-writers point out, “doesn’t the second version leave out a couple of pretty important items? Like, say, that the book is written in the first person, or that it has multiple protagonists?”

Actually, I left those out on purpose, A students; as important as those facts may be to the writer, they would only distract Millicent at the querying stage. Or in a synopsis.

Do you English majors want to know why? Cue the music department.

Neither the point of view choice nor the number of protagonists is germane at the query stage: the goal of the descriptive paragraph is to show what the book is about, not how it is written. Let the narrative choices come as a delightful surprise.

Remember, your goal here is not to provide a substitute for reading your manuscript, but to describe the book’s premise and central conflict or argument intriguingly enough to prompt someone at the agency to ask you to send pages. At the submission stage, you can let your narrative choices speak for themselves.

Which is, of course, as it should be. As Millicent’s boss, the agent, likes to say, it all depends on the writing.

(22) Does my descriptive paragraph emphasize the specific points that will make the book appeal to my target audience?
Since a query letter is, at base, a marketing document (I do hope that revelation doesn’t startle anybody, at this juncture; if so, where oh where did I go wrong, I had such high hopes when I raised you, etc.), it should be readily apparent to anyone who reads your summary what elements of the book are most likely to draw readers. Or, to put it another way, if you printed out your list of selling points and read it side-by-side with your query, would the summary paragraph demonstrate that at least a few of those elements you identified as most market-worthy?

I said demonstrate, mind you, not just assert. If the answer is no, is the descriptive paragraph doing your book justice as a marketing tool?

Don’t look at me that way: there is absolutely nothing anti-literary about making it clear why habitual readers of your book category will be drawn to your work. Remember, no matter how beautifully your book is written or argued, Millicent isn’t going to know you can write until she reads your manuscript — and if your query does not convince her that your book is potentially marketable, as well as nicely written, she’s not going to ask to see the manuscript.

That’s likely to be the case, incidentally, even if she happens to work at one of the increasingly common agencies that allow aspiring writers to send pages of text along with their queries: just because the agency’s guidelines say that a querier can include other materials doesn’t mean that everything in the packet is going to be read thoroughly before acceptance or rejection. Millicent simply doesn’t have time for that, if she’s going to get through hundreds of queries before lunchtime.

Translation: the query is going to determine whether she reads anything else.

So just in case any of you have been receiving form-letter rejections based upon query + pages agent approaches: I know that it’s tempting to assume that the problem is in the text itself, but strategically, the first place you should be looking for red flags is your letter. In a query + approach, it’s the gatekeeper for your pages.

I’m going to take that chorus of great, gusty sighs as a sign that I’ve made my point sufficiently. If it’s any consolation, contemplating your book’s selling points is great experience for working with an agent: when their clients bring them fresh book ideas, the first question they tend to ask is, “Okay, who needs this book, and why?”

(23) Even if Millicent skipped my opening paragraph, would the descriptive paragraph that followed prompt her to exclaim, “Oh, that story is perfect for {fill in my target audience here}? Or have I forestalled that spontaneous cry by describing my book in back-jacket terms?
This is a corollary of the last one, obviously, but still worth considering as a separate question. One of the most common mistakes in descriptive paragraphs is to confuse vague statements about who might conceivably buy the book with specific, pithy descriptions of what in the book might appeal to the market you’ve already identified in your first paragraph. Compare, for instance:

CANOE-PADDLING MAMAS is designed to appeal to the wild, romantic adventurer in every woman. Set along the scenic Snake River, well known to whitewater rafters, the story follows two women in their journey through fast water and faster men. It belongs on the bookshelf of every paddle-wielding woman in America.

With:

Caroline Bingley (26) and Elizabeth Bennet (20) are floating down a lazy river, the sun baking an uneasy outline around their barely-moving paddles. Suddenly, the rapids are upon them — as is a flotilla of gorgeous, shirtless, rapids-navigating men on generous inner tubes. When a violent hailstorm traps them all in a dank, mysterious cave redolent of recently-departed grizzly bear, shivering in their thin, wet clothes, tempers flare — and so does romance.

The first sounds an awful lot like the summary a publisher’s marketing department might construct for a book’s back jacket, doesn’t it? It’s all breathless hype and promotional persuasion, leaving the reader thinking, “Um, I know nowwhere this story takes place, but what is this book about?”

As you may have already gathered, that’s not a question Millicent is fond of muttering in the middle of reading a query. Which is a shame, really, as so many queriers give her such excellent provocation to mutter it.

By contrast, the second version answers that question very directly: CANOE PADDLING MAMAS is about Caroline and Elizabeth’s trip down a river, where they meet some sizzling potential love interests and perhaps a grizzly.

“Now that’s what I like to see,” Millicent cries, reaching for the seldom-used Yes, please send us the first 50 pages boilerplate. (Oh, you thought that she wrote a fresh letter for every acceptance, too?)

Unfortunately, as we saw earlier in this series, most aspiring writers are so used to reading marketing copy that they might well regard the first version as inherently more professional than the second. In fact, it’s far from uncommon to see this type of marketing rhetoric in synopses, or even in contest entries.

To clear up this misconception once and for all, I’m going to ask you to join me in a little experiment. Scroll down so those last two examples above are hidden, please.

All gone? Good. Now take this multi-part pop quiz.

1) What do you remember most from the first summary paragraph?

The title? The Snake River? The bad cliché? Your speculation that my reference to “every paddle-wielding woman in America” might cause this blog to spring up in some unlikely Internet searches from now until Doomsday?

2) What do you remember about the second?

As a writer, I’m betting that the image that popped first into your mind was that floating phalanx of nearly naked hunks.

3) If you were an agent handling romances, which image would impress you as being easiest to market to outdoorsy heterosexual women — or to indoorsy women who like to fantasize about adventurous encounters with outdoorsy men and/or bears?

I rest my case.

Except to say: in the first summary, a reader is unlikely to remember the story, rather than the query. And in the second, the query-reader is encouraged to identify with the protagonists — who are, like the projected reader, contemplating all of those inner tube-straddling guys.

Okay, try to shake that image from your mind now, so we can move on. No, seriously: stop picturing those floating bodies. We have work to do.

The other reason that the second summary is better is that it presumably echoes the tone of the book. Which brings me to…

(23) If my descriptive paragraph were the only thing a habitual reader in my book category knew about my manuscript, would s/he think, Oh, that sounds like a great read? Or would s/he think, I can’t tell what this book would be like, because this summary could apply to a lot of different kinds of books?
This question often makes even seasoned queriers do a double-take, but actually, it’s closely related to #20, is the tone and language in my description representative of the tone and language of the manuscript? Most query letters elect to adopt one of two tones: unprofessional or serious, serious, serious. The first is never a good idea, but the second is fine — if you happen to have written the 21rst century’s answer to MOBY DICK.

Which I’m guessing no one currently reading this actually has. If, however, you’ve written this year’s answer to BRIDGET JONES’ DIARY, a super-serious summary paragraph is probably not the best marketing tactic. Quite apart from the fact that it’s hard to make a lighthearted romp seem either lighthearted or like a romp if it’s described in a turgid manner, a deadpan presentation is probably not the best strategy for convincing Millicent that you can write comedy.

So why not use the description as a writing sample to demonstrate that you can? In fact, why not embrace the opportunity to show how well you understand your target readership by including images, wording, and details likely to appeal to them?

The same logic can be applied to any category of book — and it’s a great way to figure out whether a plot point is worth mentioning in your summary paragraph, actually. If you have written a steamy romance, choose the sexy detail over the mundane one. If it’s a western, make sure there’s at least one line in the summary that elicits a feeling of the open range. If it’s a horror novel, opt for the creepy detail, and so forth.

The sole exception to this rule is if you happen to have written a really, really dull book on a mind-bendingly tedious topic. Then, and only then, do you have my full and enthusiastic permission to construct a descriptive paragraph that doesn’t sound anything at all like the tone of the book.

Hey, you have to pique Millicent’s interest somehow.

(24) Wait — have I given any indication in the letter who my target audience IS?
Despite my utmost efforts in spreading advice on the subject, most queries include no reference whatsoever to the target audience. It’s as though their writers believe it’s in poor taste to suggest to an agent that somebody somewhere might conceivably wish to purchase the book being pitched.

Call me mercenary, but I think that attitude is rather market-unwise, don’t you? If Millicent is going to spend only about thirty seconds on any given query letter before deciding whether to reject it or not, is there really time for her to murmur, “Hmm, who on earth is going to want to buy this book?”

No extra credit for guessing the answer to that one: no.

As those of you who went through the identifying your target market exercises in last summer’s Pitchingpalooza series already know, figuring out the ideal readership for a book is not always a simple or straightforward task, even for someone who knows the text as intimately as its author. Don’t expect its appeal to be self-evident, therefore, to Millicent.

Yes, even for a book like CANOE-PADDLING MAMAS, where the appeal is pretty darned close to self-evident.

Structure your query to make it as easy as possible for folks in the industry to recognize your book’s worth. Write it well, yes, but also show why readers in your chosen book category will find it appealing. You want Millicent to cast her eyes over your query and go running to her boss, the agent, saying, “Oh, my God, we have to see this manuscript,” don’t you?

To that end, it is a far, far better thing to induce the screener to exclaim, “This book belongs on the bookshelf of every paddle-wielding woman in America!” than to have the query tell her that it does. Even if it’s true. Just a little something to ponder while our heroines explore some wild, largely unexplored river with scantily-clad men who obviously spend a suspiciously high percentage of their time at the gym.

Since I’m not going to be able to wrest that image from your mind anytime, this seems like an excellent place to stop our list for the evening. Keep up the good work!

October 9, 2011January 19, 2017 - No Comments

Queryfest, part VI: pretty is as pretty does, or, what makes you think that polyester minidresses are still in style, Barbie?

Barbie ad

Last time, I threw all of you queriers a bit of a curve ball: in the midst of talking about how to polish a basic query letter — polite salutation, title, book category, brief description, writing credentials/platform for writing the book, courteous sign-off, your contact information, SASE if you’re going to send it via mail — I ~~insisted~~ ~~ordered~~ ~~blandished you into~~ suggested that you write it not in your own good prose, but in the language of the publishing industry.

Why might you want to invest the time in doing that? To elevate a ho-hum query that features just the basics into one that veritably leaps off the incoming mail stack at Millicent the agency screener, the dedicated and often quite poorly paid individual charged with the awesome task of going through the hundreds upon hundreds of queries a good agency receives each week, deciding what tiny fraction fits closely enough with the resident agents’ interests to warrant requesting pages.

Does that sudden flash of blinding light mean that Millicent’s job description caused light bulbs to appear over some of your heads? Or was it something else? “Oh, I was already aware that it was Millicent’s job to reject over 90% of the queries she sees,” some of the abruptly illuminated call out, “but back up a little. Did you just give a formula for a bare-bones query two paragraphs ago? I was so startled that I almost burned my lip on a too-hot latte, as Millicent always sees to be doing.”

My sympathies on your scalded mouth, campers, but I’m afraid I must make a technical correction: what I described above was a list of the information that absolutely must appear in a query letter in order for Millicent to decide to ask for pages; it wasn’t a formula for how to put it all together. This data could be presented in a million different ways — and should be, because as we have discussed, nothing so bores our Millie as the 5,421rst version of the same ostensibly surefire boilerplate query that’s been making the rounds on the Internet this month.

It would behoove you, therefore, to send her something a trifle more original.

I felt half of you tense up, but you have my permission to relax to the point of lolling: you’re beyond basic querying now, my friends, at least if you have been following Queryfest with an open heart and inquisitive mind (or even vice-versa) moved past the quite good query letter we discussed in Part I of this series. I have greater ambitions for you than that. You’re ready to become so conversant with the logic of querying that you could toss out future queries in a relatively pain-free hour or two, instead of an anguish-filled week or month.

And what’s the magic wand that’s going to enable you to make that radical leap forward? Learning how to describe your work as an agent or editor would. The first two steps: nailing down a book category and figuring out who your ideal reader is.

A savvy querier needs to do more than assert that such a reader exists, however; she must provide some evidence of it. Why? Well, no matter how well-read Millicent and her boss are in your chosen book category, unless you happen to have written a manuscript with exactly the same market appeal as a recent bestseller, neither will necessarily have a clear idea of how many potential readers there are for your book.

The more esoteric your claim to your ideal reader’s sympathies, the more likely this is to be the case, by the way. Let’s assume you’ve written a cozy mystery about a left-handed, redheaded sleuth/clog dancer who breaks her foot by tripping over log while running away from a spider. Now, you could say in your query that your novel will appeal to readers of cozy mysteries — but that’s not likely to come as news to an agent who represents that sub-genre, is it? It’s a tautology: cozy mystery buyers buy cozy mysteries, by definition. You could also claim that your book will appeal to left-handed people, or to redheads, but that would be a hard sell: both of these groups are too large and diverse to render such a claim plausible. You could, however, argue persuasively that there are not at present very many mysteries aimed specifically at clog-dancing enthusiasts, spider-fearers, and/or victims of falling accidents.

That’s not a bad argument — perhaps not the best for the work in question, but certainly a means of demonstrating the possible market appeal of this book. Strategically, you could do worse. However, it would definitely be poor strategy to assume that simply mentioning each of these groups would be sufficient to make your case.

Why not? How likely is either Millicent or her boss to be conversant with the specific demographics of that target audience to be able to say instantly, “Oh, terrific — arachnophobia is one of the most common of all phobias, 1 in 3 Americans over 65 will experience a fall in any given year, and clog dancing has been popular for the last four centuries! That would provide a wealth of different promotional approaches for this book!”

Even if an agency denizen did happen to have that particular array of statistics at her ink-stained fingertips, she’s not going to have the time (and probably not the inclination) to do the math. Although it’s fun to picture, isn’t it? “Let’s see,” Millie muses over your query, “assuming that about 30% of readers will be afraid of spiders, and virtually all of them will know somebody who harbors such a fear (insert adding machine operation sounds here)…and that about 10% of the population is left-handed (click, click, click), although of course that includes the ambidextrous and incompletely dominant as well…and about 13% of the current U.S. population is over 65…carry the three…add that to the national clog sales statistics I have at my elbow…”

Not going to happen. So why make Millicent guess?

In response to the hefty percentage of you who just shouted, “Because tracking down those numbers would be a big, fat pain!”: allow me to suggest that if you do not do that research, it’s terribly unlikely that Millicent will. Even if she happens to be a clogging enthusiast, she’s going to appreciate it if you throw some concrete numbers into your query, demonstrating just how big your target market actually is. Not to mention rendering it infinitely easier for Millicent to talk about your book to higher-ups — and, in turn, for an agent to pitch it to anyone at a publishing house.

Why, you gasp? Well, sales and marketing departments expect agents and editors to be able to speak in hard numbers. No matter how much the editors at a publishing house love any given manuscript or book proposal, they’re unlikely to make an actual offer for it unless the sales and marketing folks are pretty enthused about it, too.

So doesn’t it make sense to make sure the agent and editor fighting for your book have that demographic information at their fingertips, when it’s relatively easy for you to put it there?

I sense some ambient eye-rolling. “But Anne,” I hear those of you writing for some of the bigger markets protest. “Surely, everyone with a pulse is aware of how big my particular target audience is and why they would find my book appealing. Wouldn’t it be, you know, a little insulting if my query assumed that the agent wasn’t sufficiently aware of the world around him to know these things?”

Well, yes — if you happen to be a former president of the United States, a movie star recovering from a drug addiction, or a plain, ordinary writer with previous publishing credentials querying a YA book about a teenage girl’s relationship with a vampire and a werewolf, or a middle-grade novel about a young magician left mysteriously to fend for himself, with the assistant of two friends carefully selected to maximize the probability that young readers will be able to identify with one or the other, in the face of ultimate evil that adults are too dim-witted to see. If you are already a household name or have written a clone of a recent best-seller, it is entirely possible that your target market is so self-evident that any agent with a brain would pitch it as, “This memoir gives the inside scoop on the White House,” “This is what it’s like in celebrity rehab,” or, “It’s basically TWILIGHT, but with twist X…”

But the fact is, few books that aren’t really, really derivative of current bestsellers have that obvious a target audience, and if you’re already a celebrity or an ex-president, you’re probably not writing your own query letters, anyway. If your manuscript is original — it is, isn’t it? — you’re probably going to have some ‘splaining to do.

Still don’t believe me? Okay, here’s a parable about what can happen if a writer is vague about her target market’s demographics. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.

Aspiring writer Ermintrude has written a charming women’s fiction manuscript about Trudymin, an American woman in her early forties who finds herself reliving the trauma of her parents’ divorce when she was 12, as well as the trauma of having grown up with an off-beat name. Miracle of miracles, since the book is set in the present day, that makes her protagonist a Gen Xer, as Ermintrude herself is. (“It’s sort of autobiographical,” she admits, but only amongst friends.)

Like the vast majority of queriers, Ermintrude has not thought much about her target market before approaching agent Betheen; she just assumes, and rightly, that she’s written a well-crafted women’s fiction novel. Isn’t it enough to say that it will appeal to women?

Um, no: she’s stunned when Betheen tells her that there’s no market for such a book. But being a bright person, quick on her feet, Ermintrude comes up with a plausible response: “I’m the target market for this book,” she shoots back in an e-mail. (A tactic a rejected querier should NEVER, EVER embrace, by the way, but necessary here for the sake of drama.) “People like me.”

Now, that’s actually a pretty good answer — readers are often drawn to the work of writers like themselves — but it is too vague to convince Betheen. What Ermintrude really meant was:

“My target readership is women born between 1964 and 1975, half of whom have divorced parents. Just under 12 million Americans, in other words — and that’s just for starters. Would you like to hear the demographics on how many of us had oddball names like Sunshine?”

But Betheen heard what Ermintrude SAID in her query and ill-advised follow-up e-mail, not what she MEANT. As they’ve never met, how reasonable was it for Ermintrude to expect Betheen to read her mind?

Given this partial information, Betheen thought: “Oh, God, another book for aspiring writers.” (People like the author, right?) “What does this writer think my agency is, a charitable organization? I’d like to be able to retire someday.”

And what would an editor at a major publishing house (let’s call him Federico) conclude from Ermintrude’s statement? Something, no doubt, along the lines of, “This writer is writing for her friends. All four of them. Next!”

Clearly, being vague about her target audience has not served Ermintrude’s interests. Let’s take a peek at what would have happened if she had been a trifle more specific, shall we?

Ermintrude says: “Yes, there is a target market for my book: Gen Xers, half of whom are women, many of whom have divorced parents, many of whom will have had an elementary school classmate named Zephyr.”

Agent Betheen thinks: “Hmm, that’s a substantial niche market. 5 million, maybe?”

Sounding more marketable already, isn’t it?

But when Betheen pitches it to editor Federico this way, he thinks: “Great, a book for people who aren’t Baby Boomers. Most of the US population is made up of Baby Boomers and their children. Do I really want to publish a book for a niche market of underemployed, recycling-conscientious vegans with little disposable income?”

So a little better, but still, no cigar. Let’s take a look at what happens if Ermintrude has thought through her readership in advance and approaches Betheen with relevant statistics all ready to leap off onto the query page.

Ermintrude says (immediately after describing the book in her query): “I’m excited about this project, because I think my protagonist’s divorce trauma will really resonate with the 47 million Gen Xers currently living in the United States. Half of these potential readers have parents who have divorced at least once in their lifetimes. Literally everybody in that age group either had divorces within their own families as kids or had close friends that did. I think this book will strike a chord with these people.”

Agent Betheen responds: “There are 47 million Gen Xers? I had no idea there were that many. I want to see the manuscript; this has market potential.”

And editor Federico thinks: “47 million! Even if the book actually appealed to only a tiny fraction of them, it’s still a market well worth pursuing. Yes, Betheen, send me that manuscript by your new client.”

The moral of this exciting tale of woe and uproar: even the best book premise can be harmed by vague assertions about its target audience; it can only helped by the query’s talking about in marketing terms.

There is one drawback to using up-to-the-minute demographic statistics, of course — if you end up querying the same project repeatedly over several years (not at all unusual for even very well-written manuscripts, at this point in literary history), you may have to go back and update your numbers. Actually, it’s not a bad idea to reexamine your query’s arguments every so often, anyway. it’s quite easy to fall into the habit of pumping out those queries without really pondering their content — or whether this particular letter is the best means of marketing to that particular agent.

Speaking of which, let’s return to our ongoing query-improvement list already in progress. Take a long, hard look at your letter and ask yourself…

(10) Have I addressed this letter to a specific person, rather than an entire agency or any agent currently walking the face of the earth? Does it read like a form letter?
Some of you just did a double-take, didn’t you? “But Anne,” you cry in unison, and who could blame you? “I’m experiencing déjà vu. Didn’t we already cover this in #5, Is it clear from the first paragraph that I am querying the appropriate agent for my work?”

Well, yes and no. Yes, I made some suggestions last time for some tried-and-true reasons for explaining why approaching a particular agent makes sense for your book. But no, we didn’t discuss how to fix a generic-sounding first paragraph.

Let’s rectify that right now: basically, you fix it by not using the same first paragraph in every query.

As I mentioned in an earlier post in this series, experienced queriers will tweak their basic query letters to personalize them for each agent on their list. Less experienced serial queriers, though, often do not change anything but the first paragraph, address, and salutation between each time they sent out their mailed letters, more or less insuring that a mistake made once will be replicated a dozen times. Copying and pasting the text of one e-mailed query into the next guarantees it.

And those of you who habitually did this were surprised to receive form-letter rejections? The electronic age has, alas, made it much, much easier to be dismissive: never have so many been rejected so much with so few keystrokes. So although it may seem needlessly time-consuming, it’s worth reviewing every single query to ascertain that the opening paragraph speaks specifically to the recipient’s tastes and placement record.

Most aspiring writers don’t even consider doing this — and frankly, it’s easy to see why. Many approach quite a few agents simultaneously, and with good reason. At this point in publishing history, when many agencies don’t even respond to e-mailed queries if the answer is no, waiting to hear back from one agent before approaching the next is poor strategy. Querying every possible agent one at a time can add years to the agent-finding process.

Do I sense some restless murmuring out there? “But Anne,” some of you conference veterans protest, “I heard that some agents will become furious if they find out that a writer is sending out many queries simultaneously. I don’t want to scare them away from my book by breaking their rules right off the bat!”

I agree with the general principle imbedded in this cri de coeur — it’s only prudent to check an agency’s website and/or its listing in one of the standard agency guides to ascertain what precisely the agent you are addressing wants to see in a query packet. The differentials can be astonishing: some want queries only, others want synopses, many ask for pages to be placed in the body of an e-mail, a few ask queriers just to go ahead and send the first 50 pages unsolicited.

What no agency will ever leave off any of its expressions of preference, however, is mention of a policy forbidding simultaneous querying, the practice of sending out queries to more than one agent at a time — if it has one, which is exceedingly rare. Some do have policies against simultaneous submissions, where more than one agent is reading requested materials at the same time, but believe me, the agencies that want an exclusive peek tend to be VERY up front about it.

So if you heard that most agents prefer exclusive queries, you’ve been misinformed — or have been talking to someone who last queried in the mid-1970s.

Rather than hamstringing your querying efforts by assuming that a relatively rare preference is universal, take the necessary few minutes to check each agency’s querying policies before you send them anything. If you can’t find agency-specific guidelines (and you may not; query with SASE is an exceedingly common agents’ guide listing), it’s safe to assume that (a) they’re not expecting solo queries, so (b) you needn’t even mention multiple queries in your letter. Trust me, (c) if the agent wants an exclusive peek at your manuscript, he’ll tell you so point-blank in the request for pages.

This should, I hope, sound somewhat familiar to those of you who have been querying for a while. If not, I’m more than happy to haul out the broken record player again:

There is no such thing as a one-size-fits-all query packet. In order not to run afoul of these wildly disparate expectations, a querier must be willing to do a bit of homework and follow individualized directions.

Fair warning: sometimes an agency’s listing in one of the standard guides, its website, and what one of its member agents will say at a conference are at odds. In the event of a serious discrepancy, don’t call or e-mail the agency to find out which they prefer. Go with the information that appears to be most recent — in my experience, that’s usually what’s posted either on the website or on the agency’s Publisher’s Marketplace page.

I can hear some of you worrying types beginning to gnaw your fingernails down to the elbow, wondering if you sent out multiple queries based upon outdated sets of guidelines, or that the information was coded in a way you did not understand, but again, I would urge you to relax. It’s practically unheard-of for an agent to wake up one fine morning, stretch, and suddenly shout, “Hey, I’m sick of queriers not committing to me from the instant it occurs to them to approach me. I’m going to tell Millicent to dump any query that doesn’t say I’m getting an exclusive look into the recycling bin!”

That’s ridiculous, of course. Many agencies don’t recycle.

Just do your best, and hope for same. If you have checked to ascertain that the agent of your dreams — or at least the next on your list — does not have an exclusivity policy, you should assume that s/he doesn’t. Trust me, if an agent who does prefer an exclusive peek doesn’t want other agents seeing it, s/he will let you know.

Until then, it’s a waste of your valuable time to grant a de facto exclusive to someone who hasn’t asked for it. (For some tips on how to deal with such a request if and when it comes up, please see the EXCLUSIVES TO AGENTS category on the list at right.)

So why does the rumor that that agents secretly crave exclusives (and thus penalize queriers who don’t read their minds and act accordingly) remain so pervasive? Beats me. If I had to guess (and apparently I do), I would say that it is an unintended side effect of agents’ standing up at writers’ conferences and saying, “For heaven’s sake, don’t send out mass queries — if I see a query that’s clearly been sent to every agent in the book, I send straight it into the rejection pile.”

In other words, don’t send out generic queries. They’re just not worth your time — or Millicent’s.

A query letter designed to please all is unlikely to be geared to the specific quirks and literary tastes of any particular agent — one of the many reasons that this shotgun approach seldom works. The other, believe it or not, is that mass submitters often render the fact that they don’t know one agent on their lists from another by sending out what is known in the biz as a Dear Agent letter. As in one that begins:

Dear Agent,

I haven’t the vaguest idea who you are or what you represent, but since the big publishing houses don’t accept submissions from unagented authors, I come to you, hat in hand, to beg you to represent my fiction novel, LEFT-HANDED REDHEAD IN CLOGS. It’s a guaranteed hit with tempestuous coppertops everywhere, and a natural for the talk-show circuit. I enclose a pair of clogs as a gift in the desperate, forlorn hope that a huge, heavy box will be mistaken for a manuscript, and thus this query will end up on someone influential’s desk. Please find me charming?

Why, when there is so much to resent in this (probably quite honest) little missive, would the salutation alone be enough to get this query rejected without reading farther? Well, to folks who work in agencies, Dear Agent means only one thing: the writer who sent it is sending an identical letter to every agent listed on the Internet or in one of the standard agency guides.

Willy-nilly, with no regard to who represents what and consequently who is likely to be interested in the book at hand.

Which means, Millicent reasons, that it is unlikely to the point of mockery that the book being proposed is going to fit the specific requirements and tastes of any of the agents currently domiciled at the agency — and unlikely to the point of rolling around in hysterics on the floor that the querier will have bothered to read the agency’s submission guidelines What’s the hope, then, that requested materials would even remotely resemble professional manuscript pages? And, most agency denizens would additionally conclude, the writer hasn’t bothered to learn much about how the publishing industry works.

The result: virtually any Millicent will simply toss it into the reject pile, if not actually the trash, without bothering to read even the first paragraph. (Dear Agent letter-writers seldom know to include SASEs, alas.)

Since this is such a notorious agents’ pet peeve, I’m going to trouble you with yet another question aimed at making that first paragraph a beautiful case that you — yes, you — are the best possible fit for the agent you happen to be querying at the moment. And to make that case pellucidly clear even to a Millicent who has only 30 seconds or so to devote to each query.

(11) Do I make it clear in the first paragraph of the letter SPECIFICALLY why I am writing to THIS particular agent — or does it read as though I could be addressing any agent in North America?
This is a corollary of the last, of course. To put it another way, writers aren’t the only ones screaming at the heavens, “Why me? Why me?” (Agents scream it, too, but with a slightly different meaning.)

It’s worth taking a look at your query letter and asking yourself if it answers the question: there are hundreds and hundreds of literary agents in the United States alone — why did you choose this one, out of all others, to query? What specifically about this agent’s track record, literary tastes, and/or bio led you to say, By gum, I would like this person to represent my work?

And no, in this context, because she is an agent and I desperately want to sell my book to a publisher is not a reason likely to impress Millicent. She hears it too often.

The best way to justify your agent choice is by mentioning one of the agent’s recent sales. (Recent, in publishing-speak, means within the last five years.) Remember, agents — like most other people — tend to be proud of their best work: if you want to get on their good side, showing a little appreciation for what they have done in the past is just good strategy. Especially if you can honestly compliment them on a project they really loved, or one that was unusually difficult to sell.

I picked this little trick up not at writers’ conferences, but in academia. When a professor is applying for a job, she is subjected to a form of medieval torture known as a job talk. Not only is she expected to give a lecture in front of the entire faculty that is thinking of hiring her, all of whom are instructed in advance to jump on everything she says with abandon, but she is also expected to have brief, private meetings with everyone on the faculty first. If she wants to get their vote, she had better have at least one pithy comment prepared about each and every faculty member’s most recent article, or she’s toast.

It’s every bit as horrible as it sounds, like going through a series of 20 or 30 interviews with authors who want to believe simply everyone in the universe has read their work. Everyone smart, anyway.

Gee, I can’t imagine why I didn’t want to remain in academia. But it did teach me something very valuable indeed: pretty much every human being affiliated with any book ever published likes to be recognized for the fact.

Fortunately, it’s very easy to work a compliment into a query letter without sounding cheesy or obsequious. If the agent you are querying has represented something similar to your work in the past, you have a natural beginning:

Since you so ably represented X’s excellent {fill in recent title here}, I believe you may be interested in my book, TITLE, a {book category} aimed at {target audience}.”

I can feel your blood pressure rising, but again, relax: there are many ways to find out what an agent has represented. Check the acknowledgments of books you like (authors often thank their agents), or check the agency’s website to see whom the agent represents. If all else fails, call your favorite book’s publisher, ask for the publicity department, and ask who the agent of record was; legally, it’s a matter of public record, so they have to tell you.

Actually, with small publishers, this isn’t a bad method for finding out what they are looking to publish. I once had a charming conversation with an editor at a small Midwestern press, who confided to me that when she had acquired the book about which I was inquiring, the author did not yet have an agent. Sensing an opportunity, I promptly pitched my book to her — and she asked me to send her the first fifty pages right away.

Sometimes opportunities are hiding in some unexpected places. Are you presenting your work in a way that invites Millicent to take a chance?

(12) If I met this agent or editor at a conference, or am querying because I heard him speak at one, or picked him because s/he represents a particular author, do I make that obvious immediately? If I picked him purely because he represents my book category, have I at least made that plain?
Queriers often seem reluctant to mention bring up having heard an agent speak, but since such a low percentage of the aspiring writers out there attend conferences (under 4%, according to the last estimate I saw), attending a good one that the agent you’re querying also attended is in fact a minor selling point for your book.

The prevailing wisdom dictates that writers who make the investment in learning how to market their work professionally tend to have more professional work to present. A kind of old-fashioned notion, true, but if you’re a conference-goer, it’s one you should be milking for all it is worth.

I would suggest being even more upfront than this, if the conference in question was a reputable one and you did in fact attend it. Why not write the name of the conference on the outside of the envelope, in approximately the same place where you would have written REQUESTED MATERIALS had you pitched to the agent successfully there?

And if you are e-querying, why not mention the conference in the subject line of the e-mail? Also a good idea to include: the word QUERY.

If you have not heard the agent speak at a conference, read an article she has written in a writer’s magazine or online, or noticed that your favorite author thanked her in the acknowledgments of a book you liked — all fair game to mention in the first line of your query — don’t give in to the temptation not to personalize the first paragraph. Be polite enough to invent a general explanation for why you added her to your querying list. Something like this will work just find

Since you represent such an interesting array of debut fiction about women in challenging situations, I hope you will be interested in my novel…

(13) Am I sending this query in the form that the recipient prefers to receive it? If I intend to send it via e-mail, have I quadruple-checked that the agency accepts e-mailed queries? If I am sending it via regular mail, have I checked that the agency still accepts paper queries?
Stop cackling, hard-core web fiends. The publishing world runs on paper — even as I write this, it’s still far from unusual for a prestigious agency not to accept e-submissions at all. Even agencies with websites (which not all of them maintain, even today) that routinely accept electronic submissions often employ agents who prefer paper queries, even from writers residing in foreign countries for whom getting the right stamps for the SASE is problematic.

Double-check the agency’s policy before you e-query. This information will be in any of the standard agency guides, and usually on the website as well. If you’re in doubt, query via regular mail — strategically, it’s a better idea, anyway.

Why? Glad you asked.

it’s far, far less work to reject someone by the press of a single button than by stuffing a response into a SASE. Also, the average reader scans words on a screen 70% faster than the same words on paper. Thus, a truly swift-fingered Millicent can reject 50 writers online in the time that it would take her to reject 10 on paper.

The relative speed of scanning e-queries is why, in case you’re wondering, quite a few of the agencies that actively solicit online queries tend to respond more quickly than those that don’t. Or not at all — which means that it’s doubly worth your while to check an agency’s policy on responding to e-queries before you approach them; many have policies that preclude responding to a querier if the answer is no.

“But Anne,” I hear many of you protest, “what happens if I accidentally send an e-query to an agent who doesn’t like them, or a paper query to one who prefers to be approached electronically? That won’t result in an automatic rejection, will it? It’s not as though I did it on purpose.”

I’m afraid intent doesn’t matter much in this instance, but no, these are not necessarily instant-rejection offenses. They often are, though, for obvious reasons.

Oh, it’s not so obvious? Okay, let me ask you: who would you prefer to read your letter, an agent calmly going through a stack (or list) of queries, or an agent whose first thought upon seeing your epistle is, “Oh, God, not another one! Can’t any of these writers READ? I’ve said in the last ten years’ worth of Herman’s Guides that I don’t want to be queried via e-mail!”

I don’t know about you, but given my druthers, I would select the former.

Call me old-fashioned, but I believe that just as it’s polite to address a person the way he prefers to be addressed, rather than by a hated nickname, a courteous writer should approach an agent in the manner she prefers to be approached. Those with strong preferences either way seldom make a secret of it; verify before you send.

And before anyone out there asks: yes, most agents will assume that a writer worth having as a client will have gone to the trouble of learning something about their personal preferences. If they have expressed a pet peeve in one of the standard agency guides, been interviewed about it, or have written about it in a blog, they will assume that you are aware of it.

Google is your friend, in other words. Take the 5 minutes to check before you query. While we’re on the subject of double-checking, allow me to sneak in one more quick question before I sign off for the night:

(14) Am I absolutely positive that I have spelled the agent’s name correctly, as well as the agency’s? Am I addressing the agent of my dreams as Dear Ms. Smith, rather than Hey, Amy? Am I positive that the letter I have addressed to Dear Mr. Smith shouldn’t actually read Dear Ms. Smith? Heck, am I even sure that I’m placing the right letter in the right envelope?
I hear some titters out there, but you wouldn’t BELIEVE how common each of these gaffes is. The last is usually just the result of a writer’s being in a hurry to get the next set of queries in the mail, and tend to be treated accordingly, but the first two constitute major breaches of etiquette.

And yes, an agent with a first name that leaves gender a tad ambiguous is every bit as likely to resent an incorrect salutation as a Rebecca or Stephen would. Often more, because a Cricket, Chris, or Leslie constantly receives queries apparently addressed to someone of the opposite sex. This type of annoying mix-up has led to more agencies posting pictures of their agents on their websites than you’d expect.

If you’re in serious doubt — faced with a grainy photo, no photo at all, an agent with a name like Bo, etc. — call the agency and ask point-blank whether the agent is a Mr. or Ms. (Quick note for those querying US agents from other parts of the world: currently, Mr. or Ms. are the only two polite options, unless the person in question happens to be a doctor or a professor. Unless a woman makes a point of identifying herself as a Miss or Mrs., Ms. is the proper salutation.)

I know: you’ve heard 4500 times that a writer should never call an agency until after she has a signed representation contract in hand or the agent has left a message asking him to call back, whichever comes first. While it is quite true that allowing the agent to set the level of familiarity in the early stages of exchange is good strategy, most offices are set up to allow a caller to ask a quick, anonymous question, if she’s polite about it. As long as you don’t ask to speak to the agent personally and/or use the occasion to pitch your book, you should be fine.

Have you noticed how many of these tips boil down to some flavor of be clear, do your homework, and be courteous? That’s not entirely coincidental: as odd as it may seem in an industry that rejects so many talented people so brusquely, manners honestly do count in this business.

As my grandmother was fond of saying, manners cost nothing. But as I am prone to tell my clients and students, not exhibiting courtesy can cost an aspiring writer quite a lot.

So sit up straight, brush your teeth, and help little old ladies across the street; it will be great practice for working with an agent or editor. Keep up the good work!

October 7, 2011January 19, 2017 - 6 Comments

Queryfest, part V: is this my best side?

My apologies about the unexpected hiatus, campers; I know that many of you are anxious to get your queries out the door. Let’s just say that it’s been a heck of a week, and leave it at that.

Among recent events: my birthday was last week — I’m at that perfect age when I’m young enough not to mind being truthful about when I was born, but old enough to be pleased when people’s estimates of my age are low by a decade or two — and my, how the Muses waxed poetic. One of the many benefits of having a large acquaintanceship among writers is that they tend to be oriented toward marking occasions with words, and boy, did they ever. Indeed, I know many writers constitutionally incapable of letting a significant pass without delivering, if not a lecture, at least a few breaths’ worth of trenchant commentary. If not a few dozen pages.

I was particularly enchanted by a piece of aging advice from a rather well-known novelist who says I can pass it along to you, as long as I keep his/her august name out of it: Honey, you should start lying about your age now, while your author photos still make you look dewy. It’s a {expletive deleted} of a lot easier to chop off a decade while it’s still plausible than to wait until you’re old enough to want people to think you’re a dozen years younger. Fringe benefit: you’ll be able to keep using your current bio pic until you’re on Social Security.

This made me giggle: my generation spent the 1980s complaining to one another about how unlikely Social Security was to be around by the time we reached retirement age. On one memorable occasion, a fellow delegate to a teen mock-Congress pushed me sideways over a rickety chair because I was the only person in the room who thought that Social Security was a good idea. Apparently, that offense merited a sprained ankle. When I met my congressman the next day, he not unnaturally mistook my pain-glazed eyes as the telltale sign of inveterate drug use. His office staff called my mother, to alert her to my evident repudiation of Just Say No.

Ah, the Reagan years. You had to be there.

My novelist friend had a point: in a business that’s notoriously unforgiving of writers who exaggerate their bios, it’s an accepted piece of author vanity to misrepresent one’s age — and not merely so a youthful-looking 33-year-old can pass himself off as this year’s literary enfant terrible, or so a hip-minded 55-year-old can continue to pen credible chick lit. There isn’t always even a marketing value to the fib. You’d be astonished how many established authors keep using flattering author photos five, ten, fifteen, or even twenty years after it has, to put it kindly, ceased to resemble them closely.

They just want to look good — who can blame them for that? Except, perhaps, for the writers’ conference volunteer who spends an extra hour wandering around the airport, fruitlessly seeking the flaxen-haired nymph depicted on the book jacket so he can drive her to the convention center, no one is really harmed by this sort of misrepresentation. It may result in the now snowy-haired authoress twiddling her thumbs while she awaits her ride, but that’s a small price to pay for tens of thousands of dust jacket-perusers’ exclamations of, “My, but that’s an attractive literary figure. Would that all of our national treasures were so comely,” isn’t it?

There’s a practical reason that author photos exhibit such extraordinary longevity: let’s face it, coming up with a good author photo can be a pain. Even the most photogenic among us often go through a couple of dozen, if not a couple of hundred, clicks of the shutter before we end up with anything remotely pleasing, much less an image that we would like to identify us for posterity. I frequently end up being the photographer in these situations, aiming at a protesting, howling author-to-be the day before her editor has said that the jacket photo absolutely, positively must be in the printer’s hands by noon, and it’s rare that a resentful author likes any of the first thirty or so. I’m often cajoling and swooping in for close-ups for an hour or two.

Trust me on this one: you’ll be happier if your trigger-happy friend is not trying to get you to smile when you’re right on top of a submission deadline. Also, choosing amongst fifty okay shots and eight good ones is not a decision you’re going to want to make under time pressure.

Start posing now. Your photographer, agent, and editor will thank you for it.

I sensed some of you going pale over the course of the last few paragraphs. “Um, Anne?” the nervous murmur, glancing at their slim pocketbooks. “What do you mean, trigger-happy friend? My future publisher is going to pay a professional photographer to shoot my jacket photos, right?”

Probably not, unless you happen already to be famous. First-time authors are almost invariably responsible for providing their publishers with jacket photos these days, rather than the other way around. As a direct result, not only are non-professional dust jacket photos the norm, but we have substantially less incentive not to re-use those snapshots, once we find ones we like.

Why bring this up in the middle of a series on querying? Increasingly, agencies’ submission guidelines have been requesting queriers to send additional materials along with their letters — and sometimes, those materials include an author bio.

Yes, even for fiction writers. As I said, you might want to get used to posing — and start buttering up your friends who happen to have some fancy shuttering skills.

Back to the business at hand. In our last thrilling installment of Queryfest, we began going through a list of questions intended to help you steer clear of the most common querying mistakes. So far, our troubleshooting list has concentrated upon length and tone. Tonight, however, I would like to shift our focus toward the more market-oriented aspects of the query.

And half of you just tensed up as if you were about to have your pictures taken, didn’t you? Not entirely surprising: for many, if not most, aspiring writers, marketing is a dirty word. Indeed, you can’t throw a piece of bread at a circle of writers without hitting someone who will insist that writing for the market is the moral opposite of writing for art’s sake.

To a professional writer, the market/art split is a false dichotomy. There’s plenty of marvelous writing that’s done very well commercially. And it would be surprising if most aspiring writers weren’t aware of that: as a group, we’re some of the most devoted readers of the already-published, right?

Besides, insisting that thinking seriously about who is going to buy your work is tantamount to selling out is self-defeating for a writer trying to land an agent. Knowing something about how books are sold is not optional for an author working with an agent or editor; it’s a prerequisite. (If you are brand-new to the process, you might want to set aside some time to peruse the HOW DO MANUSCRIPTS GET PUBLISHED? category on the archive list at right.)

If you don’t want to make a living at it, of course, you needn’t worry about marketing realities. Writing for your own pleasure, and that of your kith and kin, is a laudable pursuit. Have at it, Emily Dickinson. But if you want total strangers to buy your work, you are going to have to think about how to market it to them — and that means learning to speak the language of the industry.

At least enough to describe your work in terms that every agent, editor, and screener will understand. To pull that off, you’re going to need to give some thought to what your book is about, who you expect to read it, and where it might sit on a shelf in a brick-and-mortar bookstore.

Not to frighten you, but you’re also going to have to be able to convey all of this information within just a few sentences. Query letters are, after all, brief — and may not have even an entire page of Millicent’s attention to make their cases. To crank up the broken record player again,

The vast majority of queries are not read in their entirety before being rejected. Therefore, the first paragraph of your query is one of the very few situations in the writing world where you need to tell, as well as show.

That admonition made you sit bold upright, didn’t it? Glad I have your attention. Let’s turn our attention to the crucial information in that first paragraph.

(5) Is it clear from the first paragraph that I am querying the appropriate agent for my work? In other words, would a screener who read nothing else in the letter be certain on this point?
I don’t mean to alarm anyone, but if the answer is no, your query is exceedingly likely to get rejected, regardless of how beautifully you have crafted the rest of the letter. Why? Well, if your first paragraph doesn’t tell our pal Millicent the agency screener either that the book in question is in fact the kind of book her boss is looking to represent or another very good reason to query him (having spoken to him at a conference, having heard her speak at same, because she so ably represented Book X, etc.), she is very, very likely to shove it into the rejection pile without reading any farther.

I hear you groaning over the amount of research this may entail, but let’s face it, indiscriminate querying probably won’t match you up with the best agent for your work. It’s a waste of your time to query agents who do not represent books like yours, so in the long run, doing a bit of background-checking may actually speed up your querying process. Besides, in order to personalize each query, you need to come up with only one or two reasons for picking this particular agent.

The one down side to being this specific in your paragraph one: if you are querying many agents at once, it renders it much, much easier to send the wrong query — and infinitely easier for Millicent to notice that you’ve done so.

What might that look like in action, you ask? Remember our two examples from last time, where Flaubert accidentally mixed up one agent’s name and background with another’s? It contained some good selection criteria, couched in some restrained praise. To refresh your memory, he sent this:

wrong names query

When he intended to send this:

Despite our Gustave’s momentary inattention to critical detail, he had embraced essentially the right approach in both letters: he devoted the opening sentences of his various queries to telling each agent why he was querying him or her, rather than simply sending the same letter to everybody. In fact, he brought up two perfectly adequate for each: for Ms. Marketer, he mentioned both an article she had written and a book she had successfully represented; for Mr. Bookpusher, he brought up having heard him speak at a conference — and a book Ms. Marketer had successfully represented.

Again: proofread your queries before you send them out. Every time, without exception — and yes, Virginia, even if you are querying via e-mail or by filling out a form on an agency’s website. Contrary to popular opinion amongst aspiring writers, the relative ease of mass-querying electronically often renders Millicents more nit-picky on the detail front, not less.

How can you figure out what kind of reason Millicent will find persuasive? Agents-who-blog make this kind of opening quite easy for queriers: all you have to do is mention that you’re a fan. Do be positive before embracing this tactic, however, that you have read enough of the blog in question to know what the agent has said she is looking for in a query or book project. Trust me, AWBs’ Millicents already see enough queries from people who make it quite plain that all they know about the blogging agent is her name and that she blogs.

Don’t hesitate to mention if you attended a conference where the agent spoke: traditionally, conference attendance is considered a sign that a writer is serious about learning how the publishing business works. Which is kind of funny, actually, as so many writers’ conferences focus far more on craft than practical issues like manuscript preparation and submission. (You’d be amazed at how often conference organizers have asked incredulously, “You want to teach a two-hour seminar on formatting? What on earth for? Isn’t everybody already familiar with professional standards?”) Even now, when so many writers are gleaning their knowledge from the Internet, many agents still tell attendees to include the conference’s name in the first line of the query, the subject line of the e-query, or both.

It’s worth using as an entrée even if you did not get a chance to interact with him at all. At a large or stand-offish conference, it’s not always possible — and even if you do manage some face-to-face time, the agent may well be meeting so many aspiring writers in so short a time that he may not remember every individual. So don’t be shy about reminding him that you were a face in the crowd.

(6) Is it clear from the first paragraph what kind of book I am asking the agent to represent?
This may seem like a silly question, but it’s jaw-dropping how many otherwise well-written query letters don’t even specify whether the book in question is fiction or nonfiction. Or the book category. Or even, believe it or not, the title.

Quoth Millicent: “Next!”

The book category, the most straightforward way to talk about your writing in professional terms, is the most often omitted element. And that’s a shame, because in either a query or a pitch, the more terse and specific you can be about your book’s category, the more professional you will sound — as long as you are being terse in the language of the business.

In other words, don’t just manufacture your own category. Tell the nice Millicent what already-established book category your work would fit into most comfortably, so she can tell her boss which editors will be interested in seeing your manuscript. Shilly-shallying will not serve you here: an agent would use only a couple of words to categorize any book, any time, and so should you.

Why be so terse? Established book categories tend to be only one or two words long: historical romance, science fiction, urban fantasy, women’s fiction, Highland romance, YA paranormal, Western, literary fiction, memoir, and so forth. In fact, these terms are so concentrated that it’s very, very easy to annoy Millicent by adding unnecessary adjectives or explanation: literary fiction novel or science fiction novel are technically redundant, for instance, because all novels are fiction, by definition. By the same logic, true memoir, real-life memoir, and memoir about my life are all needlessly repetitive descriptions.

The sad thing is, the widespread tendency among both queries and pitchers is in the opposite direction of terseness — or even using the terminology that agents themselves use. “Just tell me where it would sit in a well-organized bookstore,” Millicent begs. “Why do so many aspiring writers find that so hard?”

Why, indeed? In my experience, it’s usually a matter of either not being aware that the publishing industry runs on book categories — or, if a writer is aware of it, a clawing, pathological terror that putting his work into the same conceptual box in which any agent would need to place it in order to be able to sell it to a publisher in North America would somehow limit Millicent’s understanding of just how complex the book in question is. That’s not how anyone who works in an agency would see it, however. As much as writers seem to adore describing their work as, “Well, it’s sort of a romance, with a thriller plot, a horror villain, and a resolution like a cozy mystery, but the writing is literary,” agents and editors tend to hear ambiguous descriptions as either waffling, a book’s not being ready to market, or the writer’s just not being very familiar with how the industry actually works.

So you might want to avoid those ever-popular terms of waffle, my writing defies categorization, my book is too complex to categorize, my book isn’t like anything else out there, no one has ever written a book like this before, and that perennial favorite of first novelists, it’s sort of autobiographical.

Which, translated into industry-speak, come across respectively as I’m not familiar with how books are sold in North America, I don’t know one book category from another, I’m not familiar with the current market in my area of interest — which means, Mr. Agent, that I haven’t been buying your clients’ work lately, I’m not familiar with the history of the book market in my area, and I was afraid people would hate me/hurt me/sue me for two million dollars if I wrote this story as a memoir.

Don’t blame the translator, please: the writers and the agents are just not speaking the same language. And speaking as a memoirist who actually has had a book subject to a $2 million lawsuit threat, it’s not as bad as it sounds.

Nor is committing to a book category. Contrary to popular opinion, picking a conceptual box for your work will not limit its market appeal; it will simply tell Millicent which shelf at a well-stocked bookstore or category on Amazon you expect to house your book. It honestly is that simple.

You really do not need to stress out about the choice nearly as much as most aspiring writers do. Just take a nice, deep breath and consider: what books currently on the market does my book resemble? How are these books categorized?

“But Anne,” I hear the more prolific among you protest, “I write in a number of different book categories, and I’m looking for an agent to represent all of my work, not just some of it. Won’t it be confusing if I list all of my areas of interest at the beginning of my query?”

In a word, yes — and generally speaking, it’s better strategy to query one book at a time, for precisely that reason. If you like (and you should like, if you have a publication history in another book category), you may mention the other titles later in your query letter, down in the paragraph where you will be talking about your writing credentials. It will only render you more memorable if you are the science fiction writer whose query included the immortal words, Having twenty-seven years’ experience as a deep-sea archeologist, I also am working on a book on underwater spelunking.

But in the first paragraph of your query, no. Keep it simple. Do you really want to run the risk of confusing Millicent right off the bat about which project you are trying to sell?

(7) Does my letter sound as though I am excited about this book, or as if I have little confidence in the work? Or does it read as though I’m apologizing for querying at all?
We all know that writing query letters is no one’s idea of a good time. Well, maybe a few masochists enjoy it — if they’re really lucky, maybe they can give themselves a paper cut while they’re licking the envelope — but the vast majority of writers hate it, hate it, hate it.

Loathe it. Despise it. Resent it with a vehemence that most non-writers reserve for poisonous snakes, black widows, and persons who disagree with them politically.

Which is fine, on a personal level — but can translate on the page into sounding apprehensive, unenthusiastic, or just plain tired. While query fatigue is certainly understandable, it tends not to produce a positive tone for presenting your work.

Insecurities, too, show up beautifully on the query page. While the writer’s opinion of her own work is unavoidably biased, in my experience, that bias tends to be on the negative side for most. We’ve all heard of queriers who make overblown claims about their work (This book will revolutionize fiction!, This is a sure-fire bestseller!, or that now-obsolete favorite, It’s a natural for Oprah!), but apologetic openings like I’m so sorry to bother you,, Pardon me for taking up your valuable time,, and This may not be the kind of book that interests you, but… turn up on Millicent’s desk more often than you’d think.

Often, this sad-sack tone is the result of query fatigue, not actual lack of confidence in the book, but Millicent has no way of knowing that. I know that repeated rejection is depressing and exhausting, but it really is in your best interest to make an effort to try to sound as upbeat in your seventeenth query letter as in your first.

No need to sound like a Mouseketeer on speed, of course, but try not to sound discouraged, either. And never, ever, EVER mention how long you’ve been querying, how many agents have already rejected this project, or how hard it has been emotionally. It’s unprofessional. A query is not the place to express frustration with the querying process; save that for lively conversation with your aforementioned significant other, family members, and friends.

While it is a nice touch to thank the agent at the end of the query for taking the time to consider your work, doing so in the first paragraph of the letter and/or repeatedly in the body can come across as a tad obsequious. Begging tends not to be helpful in this situation. Remember, reading your query is the agent’s (or, more likely, the agent’s assistant’s) JOB, not a personal favor to you.

No, no matter how long you’ve been shopping your book around. Speaking of overly-effusive politeness,

If you have already pitched to an agent at a conference and she asked you to send materials, you do not need to query that same agent to ask permission to send them, unless she specifically said, “Okay, query me.”

To the pros, being asked over and over again whether they REALLY meant that request is puzzling and, if it happens frequently, annoying. These people are busy; take yes for an answer.

Many conference-goers seem to be confused on this point. Remember, in-person pitching is a substitute for querying, not merely an expensive extension of it.

This remains true, incidentally, even if many months have passed since that pitch session: if it’s been less than a year since an agent requested pages, there is absolutely no need to query, call, or e-mail to confirm that she still wants to see them. (If it’s been longer, send an e-mail. Or just send the requested pages along with a cover letter, apologizing politely for the delay in following up.)

(8) Does my book come across as genuinely marketable, or does the letter read as though I’m boasting?
In my many, many years of hanging out with publishing types, I have literally never met an agent who could not, if asked (and often if not), launch into a medley of annoyingly pushy, self-aggrandizing query letter openings he’s received. As I may have mentioned already,

Every agent and screener in the biz already seen a lifetime’s supply of, “This is the greatest work ever written!”, “My book is the next bestseller!”, and “Don’t miss your opportunity to represent this book!” Such inflated claims make a manuscript seem less marketable, ultimately, not more.

Trust me, they don’t want to hear it again. Ever. Even if it’s true.

So how do you make your work sound marketable without, well, just asserting that it is? Glad you asked.

(9) Does my query make it clear what kind of readers will buy my book — and why?
Amazingly few queries address this point, but to folks who speak publishing’s lingua franca, it’s simply not possible to talk about a manuscript without considering the issue of audience. So you’ll reap the benefits of both professional presentation and comparative rarity if your query identifies your target market clearly, demonstrating (with statistics, if you can) both how large it is and why your book will appeal to that particular demographic.

Trust me, Millicent is going to respond quite a bit better to a statement like MADAME BOVARY will resonate with the 20% of Americans who suffer from depression at some point in their lives than Every depressed woman in America will want to read this book! She sees the latter type of claim on a daily — or even hourly — basis and discounts it accordingly. At best, such claims come across as exaggerations; at worst, they look like lies.

Why might she think that? Well, logically, a claim like Every depressed woman in America will want to read this book! could not possibly be true. No book appeals to every single reader within a large demographic, and nobody knows that better than someone who works within the publishing industry. Far, far better, then, to make a realistic claim that you can back up with concrete numbers.

I feel a golden oldie coming on:

No book ever written appeals to every conceivable reader — or can be represented effectively by any randomly-selected agent. While your future publisher’s marketing department will undoubtedly have ideas about who your ideal reader is and why, it’s far, far easier to talk about your book professionally if you first take the time to figure out what kind of readers are in your target audience — and how many of them there are.

I’m not talking about publishing statistics here; I’m talking about easy-to-track-down population statistics, a recommendation that comes as a big surprise to practically every aspiring writer who has ever taken my pitching class. “Why,” they almost invariably cry, “shouldn’t I go to the trouble to find out how many books sold in my chosen category last year? Wouldn’t that prove that my book is important enough to deserve to be published?”

Well, for starters, any agent or editor would already be aware of how well books in the categories they handle sell, right? Mentioning the Amazon numbers for the latest bestseller is hardly going to impress them. (And you’d be astonished by how many agents don’t really understand how those numbers work, anyway.) Believe me, if books like yours are selling well online these days, and if you have queried an agent who represents even one of those books, her Millicent will already be aware of it.

Nor should you waste everyone’s time by making a case that the book category in general has an eager target audience. To a pro, that’s the same thing as saying that your book belongs to that category; by accurately defining your book’s category in paragraph one, you are essentially claiming that established readership for your book. Belaboring that point will not make your manuscript sound more appealing.

So what should you say to impress Millicent? How about how many people there are who have already demonstrated interest in your book’s specific subject matter?

The term target audience made some of you tense up again, didn’t it? As scary as it may be to think about, if you are going to make a living as a writer, you will be writing for a public. In order to convince people in the publishing industry that yours is the voice that public wants and needs to hear, you will need to figure out who those people are, and why they will be drawn toward your book.

Let’s start off with a nice, non-threatening definition of terms. What is a target audience?

Simply put, the target audience for a book is the group of people most likely to buy it. Not just a segment of the population, mind you, but readers who are already in the habit of buying books like yours. That’s why it is also known as a target market: it is the demographic (or the demographics) toward which your publisher will be gearing advertising.

So I ask you: who out there needs to read your book and why?

If that question leaves you a bit flummoxed, you’re certainly not alone — most fiction writers and nearly all memoirists initially have a difficult time answering that question about their own work. First-time memoirists are notorious in their first panic to answer huffily, “Well, obviously, the book’s about me.”

Yes, that is obvious, now that you mention it. But what else is the memoir about? Even the most introspective memoir is about something other than its author.

Fiction writers, too, tend to stumble over this question. Indeed, it frequently offends them. “Well, people will read it for the writing, obviously,” novelists tend to huff. “Isn’t that enough? It’s sort of based on something that really happened, if that helps.”

Of course, lovely writing is going to be one of any good novel’s attractions, but every book category has well-written books in it. Well-crafted sentences are expected in professional writing; they’re not optional extras. But unless you are planning to market your book as literary fiction — i.e., a novel where the beauty or experimental nature of the writing and exquisitely-examined character development are the book’s primary selling points — nice writing, which of course a plus, is not much of a descriptor. (Besides, literary fiction is a relatively tiny portion of the fiction market, usually coming in around 3-4%. Why so small? It assumes a college-educated readership.)

What makes literary a poor descriptor for a book that isn’t literary fiction? It does not answer the central questions of a query letter: what is your book about, and who needs to read it?

Or, to put in the terms Millicent might: what are the potential readers for this book already reading? Why are they reading it? What about this book is likely to appeal to those same readers?

But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Your book is about something other than its protagonist, right? That something has probably been written about before — so why not find out how those books were marketed, to glean inspiration about how to market yours? (As Pablo Picasso was reportedly fond of saying, “Bad artists copy. Good artists steal.”)

Or you can approach it even more straightforwardly: pick an element of your story that might make your ideal reader pick up your book. It’s set on a farm; the protagonist’s sister has multiple sclerosis; the characters keep going to a drive-in movie theatre. Any running theme is legitimate subject matter for marketing purposes.

Then ask yourself: who might be interested in this subject? How many small family farms are there in the US? Just how many people have multiple sclerosis — and how many people are relatives, friends, or coworkers of those who do? Who is likely to remember drive-in theatres fondly?

Getting the picture? Might not people who are already interested in that topic — and, ideally, are already demonstrating that interest by buying books about it — be reasonably regarded as potential readers for your book? What books do these readers already buy? Who are their favorite living authors, and what traits do your books share with theirs?

While we’re at it, who represents these readers’ favorite authors, and would those agents be interested in your book?

Is tracking down all of this information bound to be a lot of work? Yes, possibly, but as the Internet has made performing such research quite a bit easier than it was at any previous point in human history, you’re probably not going to garner any sympathy from Millicent. A word to the wise, though: just because information is posted online doesn’t mean it is true; it’s worth your while to double-check with credible sources. (Stop groaning. Just last year, a Wikipedia spokesperson told an interviewer that the site is not intended to be anyone’s only source of information; it’s designed to give an overview of a subject.)

Just as performing background research on who agents are and what they represent will enable you to target your queries more effectively than indiscriminate mass mailings to everyone who has ever sold a book in your book category, doing a bit of digging on your target audience before you send out your queries will save you time in the long run. Yes, really.

At a loss about how to begin about gathering this data, or even what information you should be gathering? As it happens, I’ve written about these issues at some length — and have carefully hidden the relevant posts under the obscure monikers IDENTIFYING YOUR TARGET MARKET and YOUR BOOK’S SELLING POINTS in the category list at right. Those posts should give you quite a bit of material for brainstorming — and if you’re still lost, by all means, leave a question in the comments about it. I’m always happy to help my readers come up with marketing ideas.

Do I hear some disgruntled muttering out there? “I’m not a marketer; I’m a writer,” some of you object, and who could blame you? “How the heck should I know who is going to buy my book? Isn’t that the publishing house’s job to figure out? And anyway, shouldn’t a well-written book be its own justification to anyone but a money-grubbing philistine?”

Well, yes, in a perfect world — or one without a competitive market. But neither is, alas, the world in which we currently live.

As nice as it would be if readers flocked to buy our books simply because we had invested a whole lot of time in writing them, no potential book buyer is interested in every book on the market. There are enough beautifully-written books out there that most readers expect to be offered something else as well: an exciting plot, for instance, or information about an interesting phenomenon.

To pitch or query your book successfully, you’re going to need to be able to make it look to the philistines not just like a good read, but also a good investment.

And before anybody out there gets huffy about how the industry really ought to publish gorgeously-written books for art’s sake alone, rather than books that are likely to appeal to an already-established demographic, think about what the pure art route would mean from the editor’s perspective. If she can realistically bring only 4 books to press in the next year (not an unusually low per-editor number, by the way), how many of them can be serious marketing risks, without placing herself in danger of losing her job? Especially in this economy, when the major publishers have been trimming their editorial staffs?

Oh, well might you avert your eyes. The answer isn’t pretty.

As with choosing a book category, it pays to be specific in identifying your target audience. It will make your query stand out from the crowd. And PLEASE, for your own sake, avoid the oh-so-common trap of the dismissive too-broad answer, especially the ever-popular women everywhere will be interested in this book; every American will want to buy this; it’s a natural for the Colbert Report. Even in the extremely unlikely event that any of these statements is literally true in your book’s case, agents and editors hear such statements so often that by this point in human history, they simply tune them out.

Make sure your target market is defined believably — but don’t be afraid to use your imagination. Is your ideal reader a college-educated woman in her thirties or forties? Is it a girl aged 10-13 who doesn’t quite fit in with her classmates? Is it an office worker who likes easy-to-follow plots to peruse while he’s running on the treadmill during his lunch break? Is it a working grandmother who fears she will never be able to afford to retire? Is it a commuter who reads on the bus for a couple of hours a day, seeking an escape from a dull, dead-end job?

Is it the girl who was pushed over a chair in a long-ago debate about Social Security? If so, I’m flattered, but you might be defining your audience a little too narrowly.

But ‘fess up: before that last paragraph, you thought the groups I had already mentioned were pretty darned specific, perhaps to the point of ridiculousness. But this is a big country, stuffed to the brim with individuals who just love to read. Each group I listed actually represents an immense number of people, and a group that buys a heck of a lot of books.

Give some thought to who they are, and what they will get out of your book. Or, to put a smilier face upon it, how will those readers’ lives be improved by reading this particular book, as opposed to any other? Why will the book speak to them?

Again, be as specific as you can. As with book category, if you explain in nebulous terms who you expect to read your book, you will simply not be speaking the language of agents and editors. My target market is women under 50 is too vague to be helpful to Millicent; college-educated Gen X and Gen Y women who long to see their work struggles reflected in contemporary fiction will identify with my protagonist’s challenges might well cause her to exclaim, “Oh, my boss represents several writers who write for that demographic. This book might appeal to the editors that bought Talented McWriterly’s last novel, in fact.”

See the difference? The first is an empty boast of universal appeal; the second is an explanation of why a particular group of readers who already buy a hefty percentage of the fiction sold each year in this country will resonate with the story. If you were Millicent, which would you think was the better investment of the agency’s time and effort?

Try to think of learning to speak this language as less of an annoying hurdle than as another step toward assembling a serious writer’s bag of marketing tools, a collection that will, I hope, serve you well throughout the rest of your writing life. Learning to figure out a book’s ideal readership, how to identify a selling point, coming to describe a book in the manner the industry best understands — these are all skills that transcend the agent-finding stage of a writer’s career.

But like coming up with a flattering author photo, you might not capture the essence of what you are trying to convey the first time around. It usually takes practice — and quite a bit of fine-tuning. Most of all, though, it takes a willingness to approach the process as the necessary first step to becoming a professional writer, rather than as a gratuitous exercise in busywork intended to discourage newcomers — or as a system that’s set up to make it easy for exciting new writers to navigate the first time around.

In practice, it’s neither. Millicent actually does need this information in order to be able to recommend your book to her boss.

Don’t worry: in the days to come, we’re going to be working on how to couch that information in terms that will appeal to her. You can do this. Keep up the good work!

September 24, 2011January 19, 2017 - 9 Comments

Queryfest, part II: the infamous self-rejecting query, or, when is a letter addressed to a business not a business letter?

Querying, I think we all can agree, is a necessary evil: no one likes it. It generates a whole lot of inconvenience for writer and agency alike, and to engage in sending one out is to put one’s ego on the line in a very fundamental way. Rejection hurts, and you can’t be rejected if you never send out your work, right? So you can either try to lie low, keeping your dreams to yourself, or you can attempt to approach those high-and-mighty gatekeepers of the industry, asking to be let inside the Emerald City.

Sounds a lot like high school social dynamics, doesn’t it?

Just as many people stay away from their high school reunions because they fear exposing themselves to the judgment of people whom past experience has led them to believe to be shallow and hurtful, many, many writers avoid querying, or give up after just a handful of queries, because they fear to be rejected by folks they have heard are — wait for it — kind of shallow and prone to be hurtful.

There are a variety of ways to deal with such fears. One could, for instance, not query at all, and resign oneself to that great novel or brilliant nonfiction book’s never being published. Alternatively, one could query just a couple of times, then give up.

Or — and if you haven’t guessed by now, this would be my preferred option — you could recognize that while some of the people at the reunion may in fact turn out to be kind of unpleasant, you really only need to find the one delightful person who finds you truly fascinating to make the entire enterprise worthwhile.

You’ll be pleased to hear, though, that unlike a hapless ex-school kid gearing up to attend a reunion, there are certain things an aspiring writer can do before querying to increase the probability of a positive reception. Certain elements mark a query letter as coming from someone who has taken the time to learn how the publishing industry works.

Agents like writers who bother to do that, you know, and with good reason. Such new clients are much less time-consuming than those whose ideas of how books are sold bear only scant relation to reality. Aspiring writers harboring unrealistic expectations tend not only to express resentment when their work encounters stumbling-blocks — they often end up feeling disappointed when things are going well.

This isn’t at all uncommon, by the way; even very talented fledgling writers often harbor unrealistic ideas about how books find representation. Let’s face it, we all know at least one writer who has blithely sent off a query, expecting to receive in reply an immediate offer of representation, only to be astonished to learn that the agent to whom he sent it actually wants to read his manuscript before making a commitment. Chances are that you’re also acquainted with a writer, perhaps the same one, laboring under the illusion that a really good book will move from the query stage to publication, or at least an offer of publication, within a matter of weeks. Then there’s the writer flabbergasted when her query does not receive an instantaneous response, and the one stunned to realize that it often takes 3-6 months or even longer for an agent to get back to a writer about a submitted manuscript.

And hands up, anybody who also knows a writer who, after his first query was rejected (or, as has become increasingly common, did not generate a response at all), decides that there’s no need to query anyone else. If one agent rejected it, they all will, right?

Wrong on every point, I’m afraid. Chant it with me now, veterans of Queryfest, Part I: agents are individuals, with individual tastes; they represent specific book categories, not books in general; therefore, there is no such thing as a single manuscript — or a perfect query letter — that will please every agent, everywhere, every time.

The query letter structure I proposed last time — not the only one possible by any means, or even the only one that works; it’s just what has worked best in my experience — also frees the writer from the well-nigh impossible task of trying to cram everything good about a book into a single page.

Which is, I have noticed over the years, precisely what most aspiring writers try to do.

No wonder they get intimidated and frustrated long before they query the 50 or 100 agents (yes, you read that correctly) it often takes these days for a good book to find the right fit. To put this in perspective, a truly talented writer might well end up querying the equivalent of my entire high school graduating class before being signed.

Hey, I went to a small school. My class wasn’t even big enough to sustain exclusive cliques.

Believe it or not, a book project that generates masses of rejected queries is not necessarily a bad book concept, poorly written, or even unmarketable. Rejection is often a function of heavy competition, agent specialization, and aspiring writers not being aware of what information a query letter is supposed to contain.

Apart from doing the necessary homework to get a query that does contain the right information onto the desk of an agent who does habitually represent that type of book, the only way that I know to speed up that process is to make the query letter itself businesslike, but personable.

I sense some of you clutching your chests, all set to launch into a full-blown panic attack, but you can relax. I’m not talking about spilling your soul onto a single sheet of paper.

I’m talking about making your query letter unique. And not in the all-too-common misdefinition of the word as a synonym for special. I mean unique in its proper sense of one of a kind.

A tall order, you say? Well, keep in mind that the sole purpose of the query is to engender enough excitement in an agent (or, more commonly, in Millicent the agency screener: it is rare for agents at the larger agencies to read query letters themselves; Millicent’s the one getting the paper cuts) that she will ask to see a representative chunk of the book itself, not to reproduce what you would like to see on the book’s back jacket or to complain about having to work through an agent at all.

If either of the last two options made you chuckle in disbelief, good. Believe it or not, I’ve seen both turn up many, many times in unsuccessful query letters. Boasting and petulance both abound on the query page, and both tend to discourage positive response.

Now, I know that my readers are too savvy to do either of those things deliberately, but isn’t it worth sitting down with your query letter and asking yourself: could an exhausted Millicent — in a bad mood, with a cold, having just broken up with her boyfriend AND burned her lip on that over-hot latte yet again — possibly construe that letter as either?

Yes, querying is a chore, and an intimidating one at that. Yes, ultimately, it will be the agent’s job, not yours, to market your work to publishers. And yes, an agent or editor probably would have a far better idea of how to spin your book than you would.

Agents and their screeners are in fact aware of all of these things. You don’t need to tell them.

Your query letter needs to market your book impeccably anyway, in a tone that makes you sound like an author who loves his work and is eager to give agent and editor alike huge amounts of his time to promote it. Not a walk in the park, definitely, but certainly doable by a smart, talented writer who approaches it in the right spirit.

Sound like anyone you know?

So start thinking, please, about how to make your query the one that waltzes into the reunion with a positive attitude, not the one who storms in with a chip on its little shoulder. Or, heaven forefend, the one that doesn’t stick its nose through the door at all.

The gates of the Emerald City are not going to open unless you knock, people. I’ve said it before, and I shall no doubt say it again: the only manuscript that has absolutely no chance of getting published is the one that is never queried or pitched.

Yet even as I typed that, I could sense some ardor-deflation out there. “”My God,” the little voice in the back of my head which I choose to attribute to my readership shouts, “how on earth could anyone sound unique within the context of a single-page missive? How can I cram all I need to say to grab their attention in that little space, much less seem unique while doing it?”

Um, are you sitting down? You don’t actually have the entire page to catch their attention. To be on the safe side, figure you have only about five lines to convince them to keep reading.

Yes, you read that correctly. While you already have the heart medication and/or asthma inhaler at the ready, it seems like a good time to add: Millicent and her ilk do not read the vast majority of query letters to their ends.

Are you rending your garments and shouting, “Why, Lord, why?” Because the vast majority of query letters disqualify themselves from serious consideration before the end of the opening paragraph. They are, in fact, self-rejecting.

Hey, I told you to sit down first.

At the risk of repeating myself, this is largely attributable to aspiring writers’ not being aware of what information a query letter should contain. And should not: unfortunately, Americans are so heavily exposed to hard-sell techniques that many aspiring writers make the mistake of using their query letters to batter the agent with predictions of future greatness so over-inflated (and, from the agent’s point of view, so apparently groundless, coming from a previously unpublished writer) that they may be dismissed out of hand.

Like what, you ask? Here are some perennial favorites:

This is the next (fill in name of bestseller here)!

You’ll be sorry if you let this one pass by!

Everyone in the country will want to read this book!

Women everywhere will want to buy this book!

This book is like nothing else on the market!

There’s never been a novel/memoir/nonfiction book on this subject before!

And, of course, the all-time most common:

It’s a natural for Oprah!

Admittedly, Millicent sees this one less often since Oprah’s network show went off the air, but you’d be surprised at how little the demise of Oprah’s book club caused the frequency of this claim’s appearing in query letters to diminish. Five years ago, it wasn’t at all uncommon for Millicent to see this assertion ten or fifteen times per day.

I hate to burst anyone’s bubble (yet I do seem to be doing it quite a bit lately, don’t I?), but even back when Oprah’s book club was in full swing and concentrating on living authors, this claim was seldom credible to professional eyes, unless the author could legitimately include in the query the date upon which she was already booked to appear on the show. Ditto with all of the boasts above, actually: to Millicent, these are all absurd statements to discover in a query letter.

Yes, even if the book in question actually is the next DA VINCI CODE.

Why? Because these aren’t descriptions of the book; they’re back-jacket blurbs, marketing copy, equally applicable to (and equally likely to be true about) any manuscript that crosses their desks. After one has heard the same claim 1500 times, it starts to lose a little vim.

“Why do these queriers keep telling me that their books are unique?” Millicent grumbles, reaching for her fourth latte of the afternoon. “Why aren’t they SHOWING me?”

Ah, there’s the rub: assertions like these simply are not as effective at establishing a writer’s ability or a story’s appeal as demonstrating both practically, through well-written sentences and a summary containing lively and unusual details. At base, all of these hard-sell statements are reviews — and not, let’s face it, from the most credible source. Authors tend, after all, to be slightly partial to their own work.

Or so the pros surmise from the scads and scads of queries telling them point-blank that this book or that is terrific.
Even in the rare instances that these statements aren’t just empty boasts based upon wishful thinking, consider: whose literary opinion would you be more likely to believe in Millicent’s shoes, the author’s vague claim of excellence about his own book or another reader’s recommendation?

To put it another way, if someone you’d never met before came up to you on the street and said, “Hey, I bake the world’s best mincemeat pies, the kind that can change your life in a single bite,” would you believe him? Enough to stop in your tracks, giving up all hope of getting your errands done that morning, and ask him for information about his pie-making process? Based upon only his self-assessment, would you trustingly place that total stranger’s good-looking (or not) slice of God-knows-what into your mouth?

Or would you want some assurances that, say, this hard-selling yahoo knows something about cooking, had produced the pie in a vermin-free kitchen, and/or hadn’t constructed the mincemeat out of ground-up domestic pets?

Oh, you may laugh, but honestly, expecting an agent to ask to read a manuscript purely because you think it might sell well to a non-specific audience is the literary equivalent of that pie-pusher’s telling a passerby to open wide and swallow. Requesting manuscript pages means setting aside time (usually Millicent’s first, then, if she approves it, the agent’s) out of very busy schedules to engage in intensive reading. Why would agents and editors’ desire to hear about a new writer’s past publication history in a query — or educational background, or even platform — if not to try to figure out if that pie is made of reasonable materials and in a manner up to professional standards of production before agreeing to invest the time in ingesting it?

That’s why, in case you’ve been wondering, a good query letter includes what I like to call ECQLC, Eye-Catching Query Letter Candy, platform information and/or selling points that will make Millicent sit up and say either, “Wow, this writer has interesting credentials,” “Wow, this writer is uniquely qualified to tell this story,” and/or “Wow, this book has greater market appeal/a larger target audience/is significantly more important to human existence than I would have guessed.”

The crucial exclamation to elicit, obviously, is “Wow!” Not merely because Millicent honestly does enjoy discovering exciting new writing projects (yes, even though it’s her job to reject 98% of the ones that cross her desk), but because a query letter that mentions either the writer’s credentials or the book’s selling points is genuinely rare. It’s very much in your book’s interest, then, to include yours.

I sense some disgruntled muttering out there, do I not? “Here we go again, Anne,” some mutterers, well, mutter. “I can’t stand it when the pros start rattling on about platform. Isn’t that just code for we’re not interested in taking a chance on previously unpublished authors?”

Actually, it isn’t. Agents and their Millicents don’t ask to see platform information in queries in order to seem exclusionary toward previously unpublished writers (okay, not merely to seem exclusionary). They want it to be there because specific references to specific past literary achievements are signals to a quick-scanning screener that this is a query letter to take seriously.

As will an opening paragraph that states clearly and concisely why the writer decided to query this agent, as opposed to any other; a well-crafted single-paragraph elevator speech for the book; some indication of the target market, and a polite, respectful tone. The same basic elements, in short, as an effective verbal pitch.

Did some light bulbs just flicker on over some heads out there?

That’s right, campers — the difference between a vague boast and solid information about your book and why THIS agent is the best fit for it is actually a show, don’t tell problem, at base. Part of your goal in the query letter is to demonstrate through your professional presentation of your project that this is a great book by an exciting new author, not just to say it.

So you might want to eschew such statements as, “My friends say this is the greatest novel since THE GRAPES OF WRATH. It will move you to tears and rock you with laughter. It’s also a natural for Oprah.” You can make better arguments for your manuscript’s relevance.

“But Anne,” I hear some of you protest, “my book really is the best novel since THE GRAPES OF WRATH; several of my first readers/my writing teacher/my mother said so. Even if I did happen to be clutching the hems of their respective garments at the time, begging piteously for some positive feedback on my writing, isn’t it relevant in a query that I’m not the only human being that thinks I can write?”

Well, yes and no, garment-clutchers. Yes, you should mention in your query letter if someone of whom Millicent is likely to have heard and whose opinion she is likely to respect has said, preferably in writing, that your manuscript will revolutionize literature as we know it. At least if s/he meant it in a positive sense.

No, you should not bring up that someone of whom the literary world at large has never heard has compared you to Leo Tolstoy. Trust me on this one: it’s just going to sound like yet another boast

Think about it: why would someone who reads for a living just take a total stranger’s assurance that a manuscript is the most hilarious novel since TOM JONES? Professional readers tend to like to make up their own minds about how good a book is. Besides, how could Millicent possibly verify a review from a random person? For all she knows, your sainted and exceptionally literate mother has no taste in books at all, or any familiarity with the current book market. For all she knows, you just made up that writing teacher’s comment.

Oh, pick your jaws off the floor, quoters-of-others: of course, you weren’t intending to do such a thing, but you’d be astonished at how often queriers seem to pluck positive reviews from the ether. Unless you can legitimately cite a well-established author in your chosen book category — and believe me, Millicent will double-check the quote — or a household name other than Mom, your glowing review is all too likely to get dismissed as just another of the thousands of similar plugs our Millie sees every month.

Unless “Who is this person, and why should I care what he thinks?” is the response you were hoping to engender?

I hate to be the one to break it to you, but usually, Millicent will simply stop reading if a query letter opens with an empty boast like that, because to her, including such statements is like a writer’s scrawling on the query in great big red letters, “I have absolutely no idea how the publishing industry works.” Which, while an interesting tactic, is unlikely to get an agent or her screener to invest an additional ten seconds in reading on to your next paragraph.

That’s right, I said ten seconds: as much as writers like to picture agents and their screeners agonizing over their missives, trying to decide if such a book is marketable or not, the average query remains under a decision-maker’s eyes for less than 30 seconds. That doesn’t seem like a lot of time to make up one’s mind, does it?

Actually, it is ample for a query letter rife with typos and unsubstantiated claims about how great the book is to turn a professional reader off. Or one that fails to mention whether the book in question is fiction or nonfiction — another mind-bogglingly frequent omission. Or one that wastes too much valuable page space telling Millicent that the book will inevitably sell well, rather than providing her with enough information about the story for her to see why it will. Or one that asks her to read a kind of book her boss simply does not represent.

It’s more than enough time, in short, to reject a self-rejecting query.

Try not to blame Millicent for speeding through those missives, automatically ruling out the ones that contain common mistakes and omissions. I can’t stress enough that agency screeners do not reject quickly merely to be mean. It’s their job, and to a certain extent, developing pet peeves and shortcuts is a necessary psychological defense for someone handling hundreds of people’s hopes and dreams in any given day’s work.

Even the best-intentioned Millicent might conceivably, after as short a time as a few weeks of screening queries, start relying pretty heavily upon her first impressions. Consider, for instance, the pervasive misconception that business format is proper for either query letters or manuscripts. It isn’t: business format for letters is, as the name implies, appropriate for business letters; query letters should be in correspondence format, with indented paragraphs, and there’s a completely different standard format for manuscripts.

That may be counter-intuitive to some writers — writing is writing, isn’t it? — but to those who handle professional manuscripts for a living, it seems self-evident. “Why would a query and a manuscript be formatted identically?” Millicent asks, genuinely astonished at the very idea. “They have utterly different functions. And since the publishing industry prides itself on maintaining standards of literacy, why would we jettison indentation just because people in other types of business that have nothing to do with books decided some years ago that indenting paragraphs was optional? Shouldn’t it be obvious to anyone who has ever picked up a traditionally published book that indentation is far from obsolete?”

Indented paragraphs are, to put it bluntly, not only the industry standard, but proper in English prose. They are an idea whose time has not only come, but remains.

It’s also darned handy at screening time: improper formatting is the single quickest flaw to spot in either a query or manuscript. So why wouldn’t Millicent free up an extra few seconds in her day by rejecting paper query letters devoid of indentation on sight? Especially when empirical experience has shown her that aspiring writers who don’t use grammatically-necessary indentation in their query letters often eschew it in their manuscripts as well?

“But Anne,” some of you demand indignantly, and who could blame you? “What does indentation have to do with the actual writing in a manuscript? Or a query, for that matter?”

Potentially plenty, from Millicent’s point of view. Remember, the competition for both client spots at agencies and publication contracts is fierce enough that any established agent fill her typically scant new client quota hundreds of times over with technically perfect submissions: formatted correctly, spell- and grammar-checked to within an inch of their lives, beautifully written, AND the kind of book the agent has an already-established track record of representing. So there’s just not a lot of incentive for her to give a query with formatting, spelling, or grammatical problems the benefit of the doubt.

Some of you still don’t believe me about the dangers of using business formatting, do you? Okay, let’s take a gander at what Millicent expects to see, a letter formatted observing standard English rules of paragraph-formation:

mars query indented

Now let’s take a look at exactly the same letter in business format:

biz style mars query

Interesting how different it is, isn’t it, considering that the words are identical? And isn’t it astonishing how many paces away a reader can be for the difference to be obvious?

Admittedly, to someone who has never seen a professionally-formatted query (or manuscript, for that matter) in person, it might not be so obvious. It also might not be obvious to those unfamiliar with correspondence format. Why, the very last time I used these examples at Author! Author! detail-oriented reader Kathy pointed out,

In your first example, you put a space between the indented paragraphs. But in our manuscripts, we don’t add that extra space.
So are we to add that extra space between indented paragraphs? And do we indent the paragraphs in an email query? I’m so confused!

I feel your pain, Kathy, but frankly, Millicent wouldn’t: the rules governing manuscript format are simply different from those governing correspondence. That’s always been true (at least since the advent of typewriters in the mid-19th century), yet many queriers seem to find it confusing. That generally comes as a surprise to folks in the publishing industry, because it would simply never occur to them that anyone would confuse a manuscript with a letter, or indeed, that anyone would believe that all writing on paper should be formatted identically. Thus the relative intolerance of business format I mentioned above.

To clear up the confusion, queries CAN have a skipped line between indented paragraphs, but it’s optional. They should be single-spaced (and limited to a single page), printed on only one side of the page (not all that difficult for a single-page letter), and have one-inch margins. Queries also have left-justified salutations and addresses, as well as middle-justified closing compliments and signatures.

Book manuscripts, on the other hand, are double-spaced, with no skipped line between paragraphs except to indicate breaks between different sections of text. Their paragraphs must always be indented — the practice of not indenting the first paragraph of a chapter is found only in published books, not properly-formatted manuscripts. They have slug lines (and if any of this is news to you, run, don’t walk to the aptly-named HOW TO FORMAT A BOOK MANUSCRIPT category on the archive list at right.)

So manuscripts really don’t look anything like letters, when you come right down to it. Nor do they look like e-mails.

A writer could get away with non-indented paragraphs in an e-mailed query these days, but it’s certainly not mandatory. As I mentioned, the Internet and most e-mail programs are set up for business format (i.e., no indentation, single-spaced). Thus, most e-mails are single-spaced with a skipped line between paragraphs, non-indented paragraphs, and left-justified closing and signature. Because that is the norm for e-mailed communications, that format is perfectly acceptable for an e-mailed query.

In a paper query, though, non-indented queries tend to be self-rejecting. Ditto with requested materials, even if you are sending them via e-mail. (Unless her agency specifies otherwise, Millicent will expect you to send any requested pages as Word attachments, not as inserts in the body of an e-mail; thus, all pages should include indented text. FYI, agencies that tell queriers to include sample pages or chapters with their queries are not technically requesting material: they simply like for Millie to have more information at her fingertips before she makes a decision. For an in-depth discussion of the differences between query packets and submission packets, please see the HOW TO PUT TOGETHER A QUERY PACKET and HOW TO PUT TOGETHER A SUBMISSION PACKET on the archive list at right.)

“Wait just a paper-wasting minute!” indentation-avoiders everywhere cry. “Let’s go back to that bit about non-indented queries being self-rejecting. Standards have changed; e-mail has eliminated the need for observing traditional paragraph standards in any context. Besides, at the risk of repeating ourselves, it’s the writing that counts, not the formatting.”

I understand the logic, of course, but it simply doesn’t apply at the query stage: Millicent cannot possibly judge the manuscript’s writing until she has requested and read the manuscript, right? A query is judged on different criteria (and yes, Virginia, I shall be going over those criteria in detail later in the series.)

Even if it were not, the agent for whom she works couldn’t possibly submit a manuscript devoid of indented paragraphs to a publisher, period; no amount of argument is going to convince Millicent otherwise. Demonstrating a familiarity with the location and function of the TAB key, then, is a pretty good idea.

Besides, not all businesses work in the same way. As anyone who works in an agency or publishing house would no doubt be delighted to tell you, there are many, many ways in which publishing doesn’t work like any other kind of business. One does not, for instance, require an agent in order to become a success at selling shoes or to become a well-respected doctor.

If you’re looking for evidence of the biz’ exceptionalism, all you have to do is walk into a bookstore with a good literary fiction section. Find a book by a great up-and-coming author that’s sold only 500 copies since it came out last year, and ask yourself, “Would another kind of business have taken a chance like this, or would it concentrate on producing only what sells well? Would it continue to produce products like this year after year, decade after decade, out of a sense of devotion to the betterment of the human race?”

Okay, so some businesses would, but it’s certainly not the norm.

Yet almost invariably, when I try to tell them that publishing is an old-fashioned industry fond of its traditions, that agents and their screeners tend to be people with great affection for the English language and its rules, and that a savvy querier should therefore be only too delighted to curry favor with these fine people by means as simple as hitting the TAB key from time to time, I receive the same huffy reply from writers who dislike indenting: some version of, “Well, I heard/read/was told that a query/marketing plan had to be businesslike. Therefore, it must be in business format. QED, tradition-hugger.”

I’m always glad when they bring this up — because I strongly suspect that this particular notion is at the root of the surprisingly pervasive rumor that agents actually prefer business format. Agents do occasionally state point-blank at conferences, in interviews, and even in their submission guidelines that they want to receive businesslike query letters. But businesslike and business format are not the same thing. Businesslike means professional, market-savvy, not overly-familiar — in short, the kind of query letter we talked about last time.

Business format, on the other hand, doesn’t dictate any kind of content at all; it’s purely about how the page is put together. There’s absolutely nothing about it, after all, that precludes opening a query with the threat, “You’ll regret it for the rest of your natural life if you let this book pass you by!”

All of these negative examples are lifted from actual query letters, by the way. My spies are everywhere.

All that being said, there’s another reason that I would strenuously advise against using business format in your query letters. A comparative glance at the two letters above will demonstrate why.

Take another look, then put yourself in Millicent’s shoes for a moment and ask yourself: based upon this particular writing sample, would you assume that Aspiring Q. Author was familiar with standard format? Would you expect Aspiring’s paragraphs to be indented, or for him/her (I have no idea which, I now realize) NOT to skip lines between paragraphs?

Okay, would your answer to those questions change if you had a hundred query letters to read before you could get out of the office for the day, and you’d just burned your lip on a too-hot latte? (Millicent never seems to learn, does she?)

No? Well, what if it also contained a typo within the first line or two, had odd margins, or began with, “This is the best book you’ll read this year!” or some similar statement? Wouldn’t you be at least a LITTLE tempted to draw some negative conclusions from the format?

Even if you wouldn’t, Millicent would — and perhaps even should. Why? Because although most aspiring writers seem not to be aware of it, every sentence a writer submits to an agency is a writing sample. And every page is proof that a writer not only has taken the time to learn the norms of the industry — like, say, that queries and manuscripts should be formatted differently — but is conscientious enough to be able to follow them consistently without coaching.

Why, yes, that is quite a lot to read into something as simple as how a writer chooses to format a query, or whether he knows not to open it with his best friend’s immortal assertion that the novel being queried is fated to sell better than JAWS, PEYTON PLACE, and the entire TWILIGHT series combined. But when a stranger comes up to sell you a meat pie, you’re going to be looking for whatever clues you can to figure out if he’s on the up-and-up before you take a bite out of it.

I can feel some of you getting depressed over this, but actually, I find it empowering that the high rejection rate is not arbitrary. Quick rejections are not about being mean or hating writers — they’re about plowing through the mountains of submissions that arrive not only daily, but since the advent of e-mail, hourly. Lest we forget, the average agency receives 800-1500 queries per week, and that’s not counting the post-Labor Day backlog or New Year’s Resolution Rush, folks. Agents and screeners have a very strong incentive to weed out as many of them as possible as rapidly as possible.

That’s why, in case you were wondering, that agents will happily tell you that any query that begins “Dear Agent” (rather than addressing a specific agent by name) automatically goes into the rejection pile. So does any query that addresses the agent by the wrong gender in the salutation. If you’re unsure about a Chris or an Alex, double-check the agency’s website; they often list bios with pronouns in them. If that fails, call the agency and ask whether the proper salutation is Ms. or Mr.; no need to identify yourself as anything but a potential querier.

And, of course, the most obvious self-rejecter of all, any query that is pitching a book in a category the agent is not looking to represent. Yes, even if the very latest agents’ guide AND the agency’s website says otherwise. Queriers don’t get to play rules lawyer; you’re just going to have to accept that these people know what their own connections are.

You are sitting down, are you not? Good, because what I have to say next may come as something of a shock: each of these self-rejecting queries will, in all probability, generate exactly the same form rejection letter as queries that were carefully considered, but ultimately passed upon.

So how precisely is an aspiring writer to learn what does and doesn’t work in a query? By finding out what Millicent has been trained to spot — and learning what appeals to her.

A great place to start: go to writers’ conferences and ask individual agents about what kind of queries they like to see, so you may compare their answers. Attend book readings and ask authors about how they landed their agents. Take writers who have successfully landed agents out to lunch and ask them how they did it.

Sound like a lot of trouble? You’re not alone in thinking so, I assure you. There’s a reason I revisit this topic so thoroughly once a year; I’m just trying to save you a little legwork.

However you decide to go about learning the ropes, do not, whatever you do, just assume that what works in other kinds of marketing will necessarily fly in approaching an agent. Almost universally, agency guidelines specifically ask aspiring writers not to use the hard-sell techniques used in other types of business: writers seeking representation are expected not to telephone to pitch, send unrequested materials, or engage in extracurricular lobbying like sending cookies along with a query letter.

Instead, be businesslike, as befits a career writer: approach them in a manner that indicates that you are aware of the traditions of their industry. We shall be talking about how to go about that next time, naturally. Keep up the good work!

September 23, 2011January 19, 2017 - No Comments

Queryfest 2011 is open for business — and the masses rejoice!

At long last, I am proud to cut the ribbon on Queryfest, this year’s intensive foray into the ins and outs of all things query-related. I had intended to kick off the festivities on Monday, but as I may have mentioned last weekend, this walking on two legs thing is a whole heck of a lot more tiring than it looks. No wonder toddlers take so many naps.

That image seems appropriate, given how many aspiring writers spend any given day scratching their heads over that most basic of submission guideline requests: query with SASE. While that phrase might not seem particularly remarkable to those of us who deal with manuscripts for a living — or, indeed, to those of you who have been agent-hunting for long — to a writer brand-new to the quest, it can be downright mystifying.

“What is a query, other than a question?” these brave souls wonder. “What does that acronym stand for, and what about a SASE is too horrible to describe in fully fleshed-out English words?”

Perfectly reasonable questions, all — and surprisingly difficult to answer conclusively with even a rather thorough Internet search. As clever and incisive reader Elizabeth commented in our discussion last fall,

My queries are getting better as I go, but each expert I follow has different advice. How to choose which will work best for me and my book? It’s a quandary.

An excellent question, Elizabeth, and one I’m quite positive that many of your fellow queriers share. There’s certainly no shortage of how-to guides for would-be queriers out there; there are almost as many formulae out there for sure-fire query letters as there are professional givers of writing advice. Heck, substantial numbers of amateurs seem to post their notions, too, mostly phrased as though the advice in question were, if not actually something that any truly talented writer should have been born knowing, at least a precept to which any sane person seeking publication should adhere or risk being laughed out of literate society. Not to mention so self-evidently true and easy to follow that no explanation is required: simply stating the rule seems to be sufficient.

But they tend to be one-size-fits-all propositions, don’t they? Often, these doubtless well-meant query guides are simple lists of rules, light on explanation but heavy on dire warnings about what will happen to the unwary writer who does not follow them down to the last period.

I hate to burst anyone’s bubble, but better that you hear it from me than learn it from agonizing experience: the perfect query applicable to every set of agents’ eyes is as mythical as a unicorn and a centaur hitched to Apollo’s chariot. Frankly, generic queries don’t work, and even a relatively good boilerplate is going to start looking like a carbon copy to agents and their screeners within just a few months of its becoming popular with queriers.

I know, I know: that’s not what you’ve been hearing elsewhere. It’s true, nevertheless: no one, but no one can give you a fill-in-the-blanks query template that will work every time. Nor will following any given set of rules — yes, even mine — produce a query that will wow every single agent in the country.

How do I know that? Well, experience: the publishing world just doesn’t work like that. It values originality and individual writing style — why on earth would it even want to see identical (or close to identical) verbiage in every query letter?

But that’s not the only reason following a template is not a good idea. Because every book — and every category of book — is different, there is no such thing as a foolproof query formula into which any aspiring writer could simply plug her own information and hit SEND. And even if a query blueprint appropriate to any book, fiction or nonfiction, actually did exist, it wouldn’t necessarily be in your best interest to use it: literary agents are, contrary to popular opinion amongst aspiring writers, not automatons programmed to respond identically to everyone else in the publishing industry, but individual people with individual tastes.

Each of ‘em likes what they like, in short. That may seem like it makes your task harder, but actually, it can be empowering: you will be a much, much happier querier if you don’t fall into the exceedingly common querier’s trap of believing that any single agent’s response to your query is necessarily (a) the response any agent would have to it, (b) proof that the publishing industry’s rejecting your book’s concept, rather than the query letter that presents it, and therefore (c) just a handful of rejections means you should give up on the book.

Because the agenting world is diverse — and needs to be, in order to get the job done — (b) and (c) cannot be true. Even if agents did not harbor personal tastes (but they do), no one agent speaks for the entire industry. Furthermore, no agent in the world represents every kind of book, so the widespread belief that sending even the best-crafted query letter to any ten randomly-selected agents will engender ten identical responses is misguided. If nine of those agents don’t have solid track records representing books in your category, that never-fail boilerplate will, I can tell you now, fail with all nine.

And it may well fail with the tenth as well, if she’s just broken her heart by investing a year or two in fruitlessly trying to sell a book like yours. Or if she did sell that book three years ago, but the market has shifted. Or if she happened to have had a terrible honeymoon in the island paradise in which your story is set.

See earlier comment about individuals’ having individual tastes. Which is why (a) is unlikely to be true as well — but I’m getting ahead of myself, amn’t I?

That doesn’t mean, though, that those diverse-minded potential agents for your work don’t share certain expectations for what a query should be — or that there are not queries that would in fact be rejected by most of the agencies currently operating in this country. A professional query looks a certain way, contains specific information, and is, above all, a compelling argument for paying attention to both the book being queried and its author.

Which is why, as those of you who have been surfing the net in search of definitive answers may well have been wondering, agents, editors, and even freelance editors like me tend to be a trifle impatient with the oft-heard (but completely understandable, from a new writer’s perspective) complaint that it’s impossible for aspiring writer to tell what to do because there isn’t a single standard how-to list out there to which every authoritative source subscribes. From a professional point of view, the expectation underlying this complaint doesn’t even make sense: queries should be individuated for the book they are pitching, period.

So how could there possibly be a one-size-fits-all boilerplate? Or even a single list of rules? Every book — and every book category — is different; every agency has its own guidelines, and every agent has his own personal likes and dislikes. That being the case, why would it even be in agents’ best interest to subscribe to a single set of querying rules?

And where would they do it, the National Agency-Oppression Convention? The Society for the Simplification of the Deliberately Complex Field of Publishing? The Association for the Destruction of Opinion-Expression on the Internet?

Another commonly-held belief amongst aspiring writers that the pros tend to find mystifying: the notion that it’s the publishing industry’s job to track down every query advice-giving entity out there and bully it into conformity. It’s not as though the Internet Fairy is out there enforcing advice standardization across the Internet on any subject, or even fact-checking, for the most part.

Like everything else you find online, querying advice should be taken with a grain of salt. Yes, even mine.

Which is why, as those of you used to barked orders on what to do may well find surprising throughout Queryfest, I shall make a point to explain not only what your querying options are, but the pros and cons of each. With concrete examples, whenever possible. (And in case any of you missed last weekend’s announcement: if you would like to have your query letter used as an example in this series, here is how to go about submitting it. Who doesn’t like free professional query critique?)

So fair warning: what I’m going to be offering in Queryfest is not a one-size-fits-all boilerplate for querying success. That would be a waste of your time. Instead of just telling you what to say and how to format it, I’ve designed this series to help you create your own individualized query letter, perfect for your book and no one else’s.

How is this possible? For the same reason that agents and editors tend to be dismissive of the notion that it’s hard for a first-time querier to figure out what to do. From a professional point of view, it’s kind of surprising that even someone who believes every piece of advice he reads, from any source, wouldn’t pick up eventually that any query needs to contain the same basic elements: title, book category, whether it is fiction or nonfiction, brief description, credentials/platform for writing that particular book, polite sign-off, SASE if querying by mail.

Don’t worry, acronym-fearers; we’ll be defining that. I shall also be going over all of these requisite elements in enough detail that you can juggle them the manner best suited to present your book.

That’s going to require learning how agents think about books — and learning to talk about your manuscript in the terms that will make sense to them. Not to mention learning how to address your new and improved query to the right people. No query gets rejected faster than one pitching a book that the agent to whom it is addressed doesn’t handle.

If more than one statement in that last paragraph came as a surprise to you, you’re not alone. The overwhelming majority of queriers don’t learn nearly that much about how the publishing industry actually works before trying to capture its interest — and that’s a pity. In today’s hyper-competitive literary market, intelligent agents are not merely looking for good manuscripts by talented writers; they are seeking good manuscripts by talented writers who have rendered themselves easy to work with by having taken the time to learn how the publishing industry — wait for it — actually works.

In my experience, the most effective query letters are the alchemical effect of a combination of a well-written, professional letter, a writer who has taken the time to learn to talk about her manuscript in terms meaningful to the publishing industry, a book concept that happens to be appealing to the current literary market, and an open-minded agent with the already-existing connections to sell it successfully. Such a confluence doesn’t occur all that often — and it virtually never happens by accident.

“Heavens, Anne,” some prospective query-writers scoff, “if that’s your standard of good querying, I’m not surprised that you believe it doesn’t happen very often. As Elizabeth Bennet told Mr. Darcy after he listed his criteria for a genuinely educated woman, I do not wonder at your not knowing many; I wonder at your knowing any at all.”

Touché, skeptics, but not entirely true. As a matter of fact, I know scads of writers who produced such query letters by dint of persistent and intelligent effort.

How did they manage to pull off that difficult high dive? By coming to terms with the fact that there is no such thing as a single query letter ideal for every conceivable agent. There is, however, such a thing as a perfectly wonderful query letter specialized to appeal to a specific agent, as well as a slightly modified version personalized for another.

For the next couple of weeks, we’re going to be talking about cobbling together such a letter. Once you have the tools in your writer’s toolkit, you can use them to construct a whole flock of such letters, each tailored to an individual agent’s likes and dislikes and the expectations of your chosen book category.

Already, I hear martyred sighs rising across the English-speaking world. “But Anne,” easy-fix advocates protest, “that sounds like a whole heck of a lot of work, and I already resent taking time away from my writing to query agents. Couldn’t I, you know, just recycle the same letter over and over again?”

Well, you could, protesters. You could, I assure you, stop reading this right now, invest less than 20 seconds in a Google search of writing the perfect query letter, and come up with literally hundreds of one-size-fits-all templates that would make your life easier in the short run.

But I don’t think you should. Candidly, I think that the literally thousands of sources out there telling writers to follow this or that fool-proof formula are doing a serious disservice to those they advise, even when the actual elements of the advice they are giving is pretty good.

Why? Writers’ notorious aptitude for unwarranted self-blame, mostly; it’s driven literally millions of talented people into giving up on their books prematurely. The cycle usually runs a little something like this:

(a) Aspiring writer (let’s call him Ambrose, for the sake of storytelling convenience) finds an allegedly sure-fire query boilerplate online, in a book, in a class, and/or on the street somewhere.

(b) Rejoicing at the apparent ease of querying, Ambrose hurriedly copies and pastes his own information in to the template and sends it off to 1/5/127 agents.

(c) Since Ambrose’s query gives an accurate picture of neither his book nor his writing — how could it, when it consists almost entirely of one-size-fits all phrasing? — it gets rejected 1/5/127 times, usually via a form-letter rejection. (Hey, agents use templates, too; they’re real time savers.)

(d) Since Ambrose believes that the template he is using cannot possibly be the problem (it’s utterly foolproof, right?), he concludes that the only possible reasons he could have been rejected are:

(1) The book was lousy; somehow, the agent managed to sense that the writing was poor without reading any of it, or,

(2) The book was lousy, because the agent read the materials her website or agency guide listing said he could include with his query, or,

(3) The book’s concept was lousy, because that’s all the agent could possibly have judged from the query itself, but regardless,

(4) Rejection can only mean that he shouldn’t have queried with the book in the first place.

(e) Ambrose gets depressed for hours/weeks/months, far too much so to risk rejection again by sending out more queries, at least not anytime soon.

Recognize the pattern? Not from your own querying history, I hope, but from one or more of your writer friends?

What renders it sad is not solely the fact that Ambrose was rejected, but that his logic has a hole in it. He has not seriously considered the many, many other reasons an agency might have chosen to reject his query.

Such as, you ask? Well, the individual taste issues I mentioned above, of course. The culprit could also be having made the right case to the wrong agent, for instance, or having made the wrong case to the right agent. Or even having made the right case to the right agent at the wrong time; market demands — and thus agents’ needs — change all the time.

Rejection at the query stage can also be the result of the writer’s having formatted the letter oddly, or having failed to follow the directions on the agent’s website, agency guide listing, or Publishers’ Marketplace page. It could even have been a matter of having adhered to the standards set forth on one of these sources after the agency has changed its rules, or because the targeted agent no longer represents one or more of the types of book one of those sources says she does.

Rejection may, in short, come flying at an aspiring writer from any number of sources. As I think would be quite apparent if querying writers talked amongst themselves more about both rejection and the nuts and bolts of querying, rejection is not always the querier’s fault.

Nor, necessarily, is it the fault of the manuscript being queried. Most queries fail on a few very basic levels that don’t have much to do with the writing quality of the manuscript.

Yes, really: the vast majority of queries are rejected on the query letter alone. There’s a good reason for that: most of the query letters currently floating through the US Mail or flying via e-mail actually do deserve to be rejected by professional standards, but not because the books they are pushing are poorly written, poor concepts, or any of the million other reasons a manuscript might not be up to publication standard.

The most popular: unprofessional presentation, non-standard spelling and/or grammar, omitting to mention necessary information, hostile tone (again: yes, really), being sent to an agent who does not represent the kind of book presented, and, most notorious of all, the query’s obviously being a generic letter designed to be sent out indiscriminately to every agent currently operating in North America.

Agents have a pet name for the latter: they’re called Dear Agent letters, because some of them are so generic that they are not even addressed to a particular agent. Virtually without exception, US-based agents simply reject Dear Agent letters unread.

Also destined for the reject pile: queries sporting overused tricks to attract an agent’s attention — strategies, it may not astonish you to learn, often borrowed from one of the zillion guides out there, each giving ostensibly foolproof guidelines for how to construct a positively infallible query letter. Perhaps it is unfair, but nothing says generic query like the hip new lead-in that some hugely popular marketing guru was advising two years ago.

In my experience, simple works better than gimmicky — and certainly better than a boastful hard sell. Quite possibly because it is significantly rarer.

Although I am confident that my readers are too savvy to fall into the pitfalls that plague the average querier, the overwhelming majority of query letters agents receive are either uncommunicative, petulant in tone, just poor marketing — or (and I suspect you will have seen this coming. obviously copied from a standard one-size-fits-all pattern. We can do better than that, I think.

So let’s start at the basement and work our way up, shall we?

For those of you absolutely new to the art of approaching publishing professionals, a query letter is a 1-page (single-spaced, with 1-inch margins) polite, formal inquiry sent out to an agent or editor in the hope of exciting professional interest in the manuscript it describes. It is also, contrary to what most aspiring writers believe, a writing sample, so if it is poorly written, it’s toast, regardless of the strength of the book being offered.

It’s equally important to talk about what a query is not. A strong query should not be, contrary to popular practice, an occasion for either begging or boasting; you will want to come across as a friendly, professional writer who has done her homework. Nor is its goal to make the agent fall down on the floor, foaming at the mouth and crying, “I will die if I do not sign this author immediately!”

So what is its goal, you ask? To prompt the agent or editor to request pages. Period.

Let’s face it: no agent worth his 15% is going to sign a writer without reading any of her work. The sooner an aspiring writer accepts that, the sooner she can stop setting herself up for Ambrose-level disappointment. Going into the querying process with realistic expectations makes the process much, much easier on the ego.

So how does one go about eliciting the admittedly less dramatic but ultimately more respectful of your writing result, a direct request to read your manuscript? Without bells and whistles: an effective query introduces the book and the author to a prospective agent in precisely the terms the industry would use to describe them.

It is, in essence, the manuscript’s personal ad, intended to attract a compatible agent or editor to ask for a first date. To put it in terms more familiar to those of you followed my recent Pitchingpalooza series, the query is a written pitch, intended not to prompt an instantaneous offer to represent the book, but a request to read some or all of the manuscript or book proposal.

Ah, I just scared some of you with that comparison to pitching, didn’t I? “That’s all very easy to say, Anne,” point out those of you who find the prospect of sitting down face-to-face with a real, live agent about as appealing as hand-feeding a hungry wolf marshmallows by balancing them on your nose, “but you just got finished telling us that there’s no such thing as a one-size-fits-all formula. So how does a writer trying to break into the biz pull it off without a prescriptive plan that tells him precisely what to do at every step?”

Well, for starters, don’t feed wild animals that way. Are you trying to get mauled?

Once you toss aside the twin preconceptions that there is only one kind of perfect query letter and you are being expected to guess what it contains, constructing a good query letter introduction for your manuscript or query letter becomes quite a bit easier. It just requires a bit of advance preparation.

I felt you tense up again, but trust me, this is prep that you — yes, YOU — are uniquely qualified to do: figuring out what your book is about, who might want to read it, and why. Once you have figured out those elements, writing the query letter is a matter of constructing a document with elements you already have on-hand.

And that’s a comparative breeze, because instead of trying to chase an elusive wraith of an ideal or copying what worked for somebody else, you’re talking about a book you love. What’s more natural to a writer than that?

I hasten to add: being natural does not mean presentation doesn’t count. Your query needs to be businesslike without using business format (long-time readers, chant it with me now: documents without indented paragraphs appear illiterate to folks in the publishing industry), discussing your book project in terms that an agent might use to describe it to an editor.

Keep taking those nice, deep breaths; you are already well prepared to do this.

Don’t believe me? Okay, let’s take a gander at the information you would need to include, so you may see for yourself just how much of it you probably already have at your fingertips. Typically, a query letter consists of five basic elements:

1. The opening paragraph, which includes the following information:

* A brief statement about why you are approaching this particular agent
Hint: be specific. “I enjoyed hearing you speak at Conference X,” “Since you so ably represent Author Q,” and “Since you are interested in (book category), I hope you will be intrigued by my book” all work better than not mentioning how you picked the agent in the first place — or putting it as bluntly as, “I did a web search under Literary Agents, and your name popped up.”

*The book’s title
Self-explanatory, I should hope, but you would be surprised how often queriers leave it out.

*The book’s category
Where your book would sit in a bookstore? Most queries omit any mention of book category, but as in a pitch, it’s essential; no agent represents every type of book on the planet.

*Word count (optional)
Actually, I never advise including this, unless the agency states specifically in its guidelines that it wants to see word count in queries. If they don’t ask, don’t include it.

Why not? Because including the word count makes it easier to reject so many queries off the bat. If your work falls within the normal word count for your genre — for most works of fiction, between 80,000 and 100,000 words (estimated)– it won’t do you any harm include it, usually, but if it is longer, it’s not worth your while. (If you don’t know how to estimate word count — most of the industry does not operate on actual word count — please see the WORD COUNT category on the archive list at right.)

2. A paragraph pitching the book.
This is the part that stymies most queriers. Relax — we’re getting to it. For now, just bear in mind that this section should not be a paraphrase of your dedication page or a preview of the blurb you’d like to see on the jacket. Don’t praise your book; describe it.

3a. A BRIEF paragraph explaining for whom you have written this book
What an agent will have in mind is an already-established target market of readers with a demonstrated interest in books like yours. Keep it realistic. Speculation that every woman/man/fly fisher in America will want to read your book will fall flat, for the exceedingly simple reason that any agent will already have seen this claim literally thousands of times.

3b. and why your book might appeal to that demographic in a way that no other book currently on the market does.
If the demographic is not especially well-known (or even if it is; agents tend to underestimate the size of potential groups of readers), go ahead and include numbers. If you can compare your book to another within the same genre that has sold well within the last five years, this is the place to do it, but make sure to make clear how your book serves the target market differently and better.

Don’t make the very common mistake, though, of having your book sound like a carbon copy of a current bestseller. You want your work to come across as unique.

4. An optional paragraph giving your writing credentials and/or expertise that renders you the ideal person to have written this book
Or, indeed, absolutely the only sentient being in the universe who could have pulled off this daunting task well. Here is where you present your platform — or, to put it in a less intimidating manner, where you explain why the agent should take you seriously as the author of this book.

Actually, this paragraph is not optional for nonfiction, and it’s a good idea for everyone. Include any past publications (paid or unpaid) in descending order of impressiveness, as well as any contest wins, places, shows, semi-finalist listings, etc., and academic degrees. (Don’t worry: we shall be talking in depth about what degrees will and will not strike an agent as relevant for a fiction writer.)

If you have no credentials that may legitimately be listed here, don’t panic: just omit this paragraph. However, give the matter some serious, creative thought first. If you have real-life experience that gives you a unique insight into your book’s topic, include it. (It need not have been paid work.) Or any public speaking experience — that’s actually a selling point for a writer, since so few ever read in public before their first books have come out. Or even ongoing membership in an established writers’ group.

Anything can count, as long as it makes you look like a writer who is approaching the publication like a professional. Or like a person who would be interesting to know, read, and represent.

5. An EXTREMELY brief, polite closing paragraph
Here is where you thank the agent for her time, mentioning any enclosed materials (synopsis, first five pages, or whatever the agent lists as desired elements), calling the agent’s attention to the fact that you’ve enclosed a SASE (self-addressed stamped envelope), if you are querying via regular mail, and giving your contact information, if it is not already listed at the top of the letter. (If you can’t afford to have letterhead printed up, just include your contact information, centered, in the header.) Say you look forward to hearing from her soon, and sign off.

There, that’s not impossible to pull off in a single page, is it?

Oh, dear, you’re tensing up again at the prospect of sitting down and writing it, aren’t you? Don’t panic: again, you may already have constructed — mentally, anyway — some or all of the constituent parts of a professional-looking query letter. You merely have to pull them together into a polite missive personalized for each agent you plan to approach.

A good way to start is to work on each element of the query individually, then snapping the pieces together. Trying to write the entire thing from beginning to end in one sitting, as most aspiring writers do, is not only more stressful than doing it piecemeal; it also tends to end in a rushed, panicked note tossed off quickly, just to have it done.

Don’t look at me that way; I know you’re in a hurry to pop that letter in the mail, but in the long run, taking the query piece by piece can save you time. Take a gander at how easily the building blocks snap together to make a log cabin — and if you’re having trouble reading the individual words, try holding down the COMMAND key and pressing + to enlarge the image:

You can pull that off without breaking a sweat, right?

I see quite a few lit-up eyes out there. “Um, Anne?” some wily sorts murmur, jotting down hasty notes. “What you’ve just shown looks suspiciously like a template. Mind if I borrow it wholesale and use it as such?”

Actually, I do, but not because I’m especially proud of having penned a sentence as immortal I enclose a SASE for your convenience, and I look forward to hearing from you soon. You should eschew copying anybody else’s query letter for the very simple reason that it is important that your query letter sounds like your book.

Not my book, or the creation of any of the small army of writing gurus out there, but yours. After all, you’re not seeking representation for a generic volume; you’re looking for the best agent for your particular manuscript.

So why on earth would you waste your time — and your manuscript’s potential — on a generic query letter? By the time we’re finished, the very suggestion that your book’s chances would be improved by utilizing boring, one-size-fits-all query copy is going to make you laugh out loud.

At least, I hope it will. Tune in tomorrow, campers, and keep up the good work!

September 8, 2011January 19, 2017 - 4 Comments

The logic behind the SASE, or, how to be prepared for something falling on you from a zeppelin

Last time, I broached the subject of the infamous and ubiquitously-requested SASE, industry-speak for the Stamped, Self-Addressed Envelope (get it?) that should accompany every mailed query letter and/or submission packet. (E-mailed queries and submissions cannot include them, obviously, as these forms of communication have no temporal heft to them.) There’s no such thing as a Get Out of Thinking About It pass on this one, I’m afraid: forgetting to include a SASE in a query is an instant-rejection offense at virtually every agency in North America.

Or, to put that in terms even Narcissus could understand, no matter how gifted, talented, and/or beautiful a writer or his work may happen to be, neglecting this small piece of industry etiquette effectively assures that Millicent the agency screener will not spend enough time with ol’ Narcissus’ query packet to find out that he and his work display any or all of these delightful attributes. The packet will simply be rejected unread.

And not merely because Narcissus’ nasty habit of assuming that the rules that apply to ordinary mortals could not possibly apply to him is darned annoying to anyone who has to deal with him professionally. If the agent decides to pick up the manuscript, the writer’s having included the expected SASE demonstrates a pleasing ability to follow directions — and if the agent decides to pass, s/he may return rejected pages at the writer’s expense.

Yes, I know: it’s trying to be expected to underwrite one’s own rejection, but there actually are some benefits for the SASE-provider in this arrangement. To name but one: actually finding out that your query has in fact been rejected, rather than gnawing your fingernails in perpetual worry for a year or two.

Oh, you would prefer to be left to wonder whether (a) the agency has a policy of not informing rejected queriers if the answer is no (quite common), (b) the agency has a policy of not reading incomplete query packets (like, say, those that omit a SASE), or (c) your packet got stuck sideways in the mailbox, and never reached the agency at all?

The expectation that an aspiring writer will always include a SASE with any kind of paper query or submission is universal, at least among U.S. agencies and publishers, so much so that I’ve noticed that many agencies don’t even explain what it means on their websites or listings in the standard guides anymore. It’s become one of those secret handshake things, a practice that the industry just assumes that any writer who is serious about getting published will magically know all about without being told.

Call me zany, but as those of you have been reading this blog for a while are already aware, I’m not a big fan of unspoken assumptions; they place the writer new to the game at a serious strategic disadvantage. So I hope those of you who have been at this for some time will forgive my taking a second post to explain to those new to querying what a SASE is and why, to put it bluntly, the writer is expected to pay the postage for a rejection letter or returned manuscript.

SASE logic seems to be counterintuitive for many aspiring writers. Contrary to popular opinion, a SASE shouldn’t always take the form of a business-size envelope; it varies according to what was sent in the first place. To accompany a single-page query, it’s letter-sized, but should you happen to be querying an agency whose guidelines call for writers to include more than five pages of additional materials (e.g., writing sample, synopsis, author bio, book proposal, a chapter or two), you’d be sending that in a Manila envelope, right? In that case, the SASE would need to be a second Manila envelope, stuffed inside the first, carrying sufficient materials to ship all of those additional materials back to you.

Oh, you hadn’t been thinking of the SASE in those terms? Or was that giant whoosh I heard not a collective gasp, but a whole bunch of eyebrows out there hitting the ceiling?

Probably the latter, I’m guessing, because I’m constantly meeting aspiring writers who are unaware that a SASE should also accompany a manuscript submission. That tends to come as a great big surprise to even writers who have been querying and submitting for a while: since the prevailing wisdom is that the point of the SASE is ease of getting back to a writer to say yes or no, it’s far from uncommon for submitters of 500-page manuscripts to include a simple business-size envelope as a SASE. While certainly understandable, this misses the primary goal of the SASE: ensuring the safe return of whatever a writer sends to an agency.

Thus, you should always include enough postage on your SASE that everything you submitted may be popped into it and mailed with a minimum of effort on the sender’s part. That means, in practice, including a shipping container (second envelope, box, or a shipping label to affix to the box in which you sent the manuscript) already addressed to you with enough postage to get all of those requested pages back to you in one piece.

Since all of that will need to be tucked into the same envelope or box that contains your query, any materials the agency’s submission guidelines request, and/or requested materials, it can get cumbersome, once the time comes to pack it all up. Not to say expensive, especially for writer submitting to US-based agencies from outside the country, who not only have to figure out what the return postage would be in dollars instead of their local currency, but have to wrap their eager fingertips around some US stamps.

Don’t worry, foreign readers: there’s a trick to it. I’ll be getting to that.

I’m constantly barraged with questions from readers about why, in the age of fairly universal paper recycling and cheap, high-quality printers, a writer shouldn’t just ask an agent to recycle a rejected manuscript. Quoth, for instance, clever reader Melospiza:

Why on earth would you want your manuscript back (after it has been rejected)? It won’t be pristine enough to send out again. Why spend the money? And any parcel over one pound can’t be dropped in a mailbox, but must be taken to the post office, not something an agent will appreciate. Let the agent recycle the paper and enclose a (business-size) SASE only.

Oh, would only that were possible, Melospiza, but there’s a rather basic, practical reason to include the SASE for safe return of the manuscript. Chant it with me now, campers: as with a SASEless query, not including a SASE in a submission is usually an automatic-rejection trigger.

Yes, you read that correctly: leaving a SASE out of the submission packet can, and often does, result in a submission’s being rejected unread; ask about it sometime at a writers’ conference. The vast majority of agents will be perfectly up front about the fact that they train their screeners accordingly.

The owners of all of those eyebrows are clutching their heads now, aren’t they, thinking of all of those SASEless submissions — or, more likely, submissions accompanied by only a #10 SASE, rather than one with sufficient postage for the manuscript’s return — they sent out in the dark days of yore. “Okay, I can understand why Millicent would reject SASE-free queries without reading them,” the head-clutchers cry, “but why, in heaven’s name, would an agent who asked to see pages reject them unread?”

Good question, retrospective panickers. The short answer: because it’s obvious to Millicent that a writer who submits without a manuscript-size SASE doesn’t know the secret handshake.

The longer answer is hardly more comforting, I’m afraid. In the publishing industry, it’s considered downright rude for a writer not to include a SASE both large enough and loaded down with enough pre-paid postage to send — wait for it — EVERYTHING enclosed back to the sender. If the SASE isn’t tucked into the packet, or if the postage is not sufficient, and if the agency is going to keep its side of the tacit agreement allowing it to read a writer’s unpublished work, it is going to have to shell out the dosh to mail the rejected manuscript back. Ditto with a query letter that arrives unaccompanied by a SASE.

The result in both cases is generally a form-letter rejection — which costs the agency not only the price of the return postage, but also an envelope and Millicent’s time to address it — or, as is increasingly popular, no response at all. Yes, even for a submission. Pages often go bye-bye, because it would be expensive for the agency to ship back the whole shebang.

I implore you, no matter how little you want to see that manuscript again, do not omit the SASE for the return of the manuscript. Unless, of course, the agency’s website or listing in one of the standard agency guides says specifically that they will recycle rejected manuscripts. (Practically none of them do, but check anyway.)

“You must be pulling our collective leg, Anne,” I hear some of you muttering. “Okay, maybe SASEless queries do tend to get rejected unread, but I can’t believe that it happens to submitted manuscripts or book proposals. By the time an agent is sufficiently interested in you to want to see actual chapters of your book, your foot is too firmly in the door for your submission to be tossed aside unread for a reason as unrelated to the quality of the writing as not including a SASE. I mean, really, what purpose would being that touchy serve?”

A fairly tangible one, actually: it would be one less manuscript for Millicent to read.

Remember, it’s her job to reject 98% of what crosses her desk; even a very successful agent at a giant agency seldom picks up more then 5 or 6 new clients per year, even including ones poached from other agencies. (Which happens all the time, by the way. It would astonish most aspiring writers to know just how many of us agented writers are unhappy with our current representation. As I say early and often, you don’t want just any agent to represent you — you want a well-connected, fully engaged agent who loves your writing and will defend it to the death.) Every submission that disqualifies itself on technical grounds is another step toward that ongoing goal of thinning the pack of contenders.

Do you really want to volunteer your precious manuscript for that particular kamikaze mission?

Admittedly, from the submitter’s point of view, a good argument could be made that this practice inevitably leads to, as Melospiza rightly points out, a big ol’ waste of money, not to mention trees, without really providing much benefit to the gentle, tolerant souls who actually pay for the return postage. After all, from the writer’s perspective, a SASE included with a submission is only going to be used if the news is bad. If the agency likes a partial, they’re going to ask to see the entire manuscript — which means your initial submission will get filed, you will send another packet (with another SASE), and your first SASE may well end up in the trash.

Or, if you’re really lucky, you’ll never see it again, because it will end up in a file drawer in your new agent’s office. Fingers crossed!

If, on the other hand, the agent of your dreams does not like it, all you are doing by providing the postage is paying to get the news that they’re turning you down in a way that will make your postal carrier’s back ache, rather than via a nice, light #10 envelope. So why not just send the manuscript along with a business-size SASE, and be done with it?

Because that’s not how the industry works, that’s why. (See commentary above re: secret handshakes.)

If you’re willing to risk it, you could always include a line in the cover letter, politely asking the agency to recycle the manuscript if they decide not to offer representation and mentioning the business-sized SASE enclosed for their reply. Do be aware, however, that this strategy sometimes backfires with screeners trained to check first for a manuscript-sized SASE: it’s not unheard-of for the Millicents of the world to toss aside such a manuscript without reading the cover letter.

As I believe I may have mentioned before, I don’t make the rules of submission; I only try to render them comprehensible. Let’s all pray that when Millicent does engage in the summary rejection of the SASEless, she flings that precious ream of paper into a recycling bin.

Originally, the whole paper-wasting arrangement was set up this way in order to protect writers. The logic behind this one is so pre-computer — heck, it’s pre-recycling, if you don’t count Abe Lincoln’s scrawling the Gettysburg Address on the back of a used envelope — that it’s likely to be counterintuitive to anyone querying or submitting for the first time today.

Return with me now to those thrilling days of yesteryear, when books were widely read, writers didn’t need agents because publishing houses still read through their slush piles, and the photocopier had not yet been invented. Prior to the advent of personal computers (and nice laser printers in workplaces that might conceivably be accessible after the boss goes home for the day), you could not print out spare copies of your precious manuscript to submit to every Tom, Dick, and Random House in the biz, obviously. Nor could you attach a Word document to an e-mail and send it off via Pony Express. Or even pop down to the corner copy store to run off half a dozen copies.

Equally obviously, no sane human being would entrust her only copy of a manuscript to the vagaries of the mails. So how did writers reproduce their work to submit to several publishing houses or agencies simultaneously?

They retyped it, that’s how. Every single page, every single syllable, every single time.

Think those hardy souls wanted to get their rejected manuscripts back? Darned tootin’. It might save them weeks of retyping time.

My long-term readers will have heard my favorite concrete example of how these returned manuscripts helped writers before, but it’s such a terrific illustration of just how much the SASE used to assist the average aspiring writer that I have no qualms about trotting it out again. Back in the far-away 1950s, my mother, Kleo, was married to Philip, a struggling science fiction writer. While she toiled away at work and went to school, Philip spent his days composing short stories.

Dozens of them. Type, type, type, week in, week out. She would come home and edit them; he would type a revised version. One or the other of them would get a good idea, and they would collaborate in writing the result: one dictating, one typing. She would take them to writing classes and the magazine editors who were already publishing her brother’s SF short stories, returning with still more feedback. Off he went to type another draft.

From scratch. Every single time either of them wanted to change a word. Hard for those of us who write on computers even to imagine, isn’t it?

As writers did in those dark days prior to e-mail, Philip and Kleo stuffed each of those short stories into gray Manila envelopes with a second envelope folded up inside as a SASE and sent them off to any magazine that had evinced even the remotest interest in SF or fantasy. (Except for the ones that Kleo hand-sold by taking to a magazine editor, which is actually how Philip got his first story published. She was, in effect, his original agent. But I digress.)

Each time a short story was rejected — as, in the beginning, all of Philip’s and Kleo’s were — and landed once again in their mailbox with the accuracy of a well-flung boomerang, they acted as professional writers should act: they submitted the rejected story to another magazine immediately. To minimize retyping, they would iron any pages that had gotten bent in the mail, slip the manuscript into a fresh envelope (yes, with a fresh SASE), and pop it into the mail.

Since there were not very many magazines that accepted SF or fantasy back then, they had to keep impeccable records, to avoid sending a rejected story back to a magazine that had already refused it. But Philip kept typing away, and kept as many stories in circulation at once as possible.

How many? Well, no one knows for sure anymore — since occasionally the only copy of a story got sent by mistake, some inevitably got lost.

(Which reminds me to nag those of you sending out manuscripts in the computer age: when was the last time you made a back-up of your manuscript? If, heaven forfend, a gigantic anvil fell from one of those anvil-toting zeppelins we’re always seeing overhead these days onto your main writing space, would it crush both your computer and your back-ups? Do you really want to be crawling about in the ashes, frantically trying to find the remnants of your hard disk?)

One day, the young couple opened their front door to find 17 rejected manuscripts spread all over their minuscule front porch. Their tiny mailbox apparently hadn’t been able to hold that many emphatic expressions of “No!”

So what did the aspiring writers of yesteryear do when faced with that many rejections on the same day? Did they toss all of that paper into the recycling bins that had not yet been invented? Did they rend their garments and give up writing forever? Did they poison their perfectly nice mail carrier for bringing so much bad news all at once?

No, they did what professional writers did back then: Philip had his wife iron the pages so they could be sent out again and resubmitted.

Lest you find the story depressing, the science fiction writer was Philip K. Dick, and one of those stories was THE MINORITY REPORT. Which a director who shall remain nameless (because he changed the ending in a way that would have caused any author’s resentful spectre to dive-bomb LA, howling) made into a rather lucrative movie, decades later.

Which only goes to show you: contrary to the common writerly fantasy/daydream/self-flagellation-after-rejection theme, even the best writers generally have to brazen through quite a bit of rejection before hitting the big time. As my mother likes to say, the only manuscript that stands NO chance of getting published is the one that sits in the bottom drawer, unseen by human eyes.

Admittedly, it was not the most comforting lullaby to have sung above one’s cradle, but she knew whereat she spoke. It’s as true today as it was six decades ago, when there were no photocopying machines, no computers, and no guarantee that the copy you sent would ever be retrievable if it went astray in some publisher’s office.

For our purposes today, the important thing to take away from this story is not the warm glow from the implied pep talk (although that’s nice, too), but the understanding that agencies don’t ask for SASEs in order to inconvenience, annoy, or impoverish aspiring writers. They do it today for precisely the same reason that they did it in the 1950s: to get your work back to you as expeditiously as possible, so you may try its fortunes elsewhere.

You’re welcome.

Also, as I mentioned last time, the practice was intended to protect the writer’s copyright. Just as an e-mailed attachment could conceivably end up, through the magic of multiple forwarding, anywhere on the planet, a loose manuscript that isn’t either in an agent or editor’s office, safely tucked away in that proverbial bottom desk drawer, or being conveyed through sleet, snow, and/or dark of night between one and the other could in fact be stolen.

I know; creepy even to consider. But think about it: is it more or less likely than something pointy falling on your house from a zeppelin?

I’ll answer that one for you: it does happen from time to time, so a savvy writer keeps very, very good track of who precisely has his manuscript when. (If this prospect tends to keep you up at night, please see the SHOULD I WORRY ABOUT MY WORK BEING STOLEN? category on the list at right for tips on how to protect your work.)

Three other things of which a savvy writer keeps very good track: which agents she has already queried (and with what unsolicited-but-permitted extra materials), which already-queried agents have requested materials (and what they requested; every agency asks for the submission packet to contain different components), and which agents are still waiting for her to send them those materials. If an aspiring writer is querying and/or submitting to multiple agents at once — and she should, unless the agent of her dreams has a no simultaneous submissions policy — she had better maintain excellent records; otherwise, it’s just too easy to mix things up.

Or not to know where to send Query #18 when the first 17 SASEs turn up in her mailbox. Or her inbox.

Speaking of minding the details, a savvy writer also takes care when applies postage to her SASE. Let’s take a gander at what postage-related fears were keeping intrepid reader Rachel up at night:

I have a question about the SASE that you put in with your materials. I understand it was always better to use stamps so that the agent can just toss it in the outgoing mail bin at the agency. But I was talking to the postal clerks yesterday and they said that post-911 rules are now in effect: any stamped package over 13 ounces has to be brought to the post. I asked to get metered mail instead, and they said it wouldn’t work because it would have that date (yesterday) on it. A dilemma!

I explained my situation to them and the clerks suggested just using a priority stamp (and the same shipping box), because if a SASE were expected, then stamps are really the only way to go. Is that how they’re doing it now?

Good question, Rachel. Before I answer it, let’s clarify the situation by reiterating the difference between a query packet’s SASE (a missive containing the query letter + any unsolicited materials an agency’s website said were permissible to send with it) and one tucked into a submission (requested materials).

When sending a query, SASE use is pretty straightforward: the writer takes a second envelope, writes his own address on it, adds appropriate postage, folds it, and stuffs it — neatly, please, as becomes a Sanitary Author — into the query envelope. (Oh, like you’ve been able to get the SA out of your mind since yesterday’s post.)

When sending a submission packet, the process is similar, but the packaging is different. If the agent only asks to see limited number of pages, few enough that they could be comfortably placed in a Manila envelope without wrinkling them (the Sanitary Author deplores crumpled pages; so do many agents), all you need to do is take a second Manila envelope, self-address it, affix the same amount of postage you’re going to use to send the whole packet to the agency, fold it, and place it neatly within the submission envelope.

Don’t worry; I shall be devoting some of our collective time in the week to come to explaining how to handle a request for a partial. I wouldn’t leave you hanging.

SASE-wrangling becomes a bit trickier if you’ve been asked to send the entire manuscript, because that generally entails using a box. (For a detailed explanation of what types of box should and shouldn’t be used, complete with glamorous photographs of cardboard in its various manifestations, again, tune in tomorrow.)

Obviously, it’s going to be unwieldy to stuff a second box inside the first, so it’s completely acceptable just to include a self-addressed mailing label and postage. Be sure to mention both in your cover letter, so they won’t get lost on the agency end. (Again, don’t panic: I’ll be talking about how to pull off including such necessary-but-prosaic details gracefully early next week.

If you have already submitted a partial, and then the agent asks for the whole manuscript, don’t just send the rest of the pages: by the time they arrive, Millicent probably will not have a clear enough recollection of the partial just to pick up the story where your initial submission left off. (Heck, by then, Millicent may already have moved on to pastures new; the turnover amongst screeners can be pretty remarkable.) Send the entire manuscript, in the aforementioned box.

Equally obviously (but I’m going to mention it anyway, just in case), the stamps on the SASE need to be US stamps, if the agency is US-based. That requirement means that SASEing is invariably a great deal more challenging — and expensive — for writers in foreign climes querying or submitting to US agencies. The far-flung are not exempt from the SASE expectation, I’m afraid, which can make e-mailed querying a more attractive option.

Good news for the far-flung: the US Postal Service’s website sells stamps at face value, rather than at the exorbitant mark-up one frequently finds for them abroad. The USPS more than happy to ship ‘em to your doorstep in exotic climes so you may stick ‘em onto your SASE before popping your submission into the mail.

But let’s get back to the crux of Rachel’s question: has the post-9/11 alteration in post office policy altered what agencies expect to see on a SASE?

The last decade has indeed seen some changes in how agencies handle packages, but actually, most of them date from before 9/11, back to the anthrax scare. Before that, virtually no agency accepted electronic submissions. A few scary mailings later, and suddenly, agencies all over New York were opening e-mail accounts. Hey, they may not pay their Millicents much, but the average agency certainly doesn’t want its screeners to get sick from opening a poisoned query envelope.

E-mailed queries and submissions don’t carry the risk of that sort of infection (and I think we can all guess how the Sanitary Author would feel about that). They do, however, occasionally contain computer viruses, so few agents will open an attachment unless they have already specifically requested an electronic submission from a writer.

That’s why, in case you’d been wondering, most agencies have policies forbidding e-queriers from sending unsolicited materials as attachments. Too much risk of computer contamination. Instead, they will usually ask queriers to copy any permissible additional materials and paste them into the body of an e-mail.

Rachel’s clerk was quite right about heavier packages having to be physically carried into the post office by human being, rather than blithely dropped into a mailbox or dumped in a mailroom — a policy shift that would affect virtually any submitted full manuscript, since they tend to be heavy little critters. However, that most emphatically does not mean is that the agent is going to be taking a rejected manuscript to the post office herself, or even that the Millicent who screened it will. Some luckless agency intern will be toting a whole mess of them there every few days.

Or not; since the USPS changed its regulations in this respect, many agencies have side-stepped the return mail problem by ceasing to return submitted manuscripts to their writers at all. (Sensing a pattern here?) Check policies before you submit.

Interestingly, agencies that operate this way virtually always still expect submitters to include SASEs with their submissions. Go figure. The moral: unless you are querying or submitting electronically OR an agency specifically says it doesn’t use SASEs, you should always include one.

And always use actual stamps, rather than metered postage. It’s called a STAMPED, self-addressed envelope for a reason, you know. The goal here is not merely convenience in mailing, but the submitter’s paying for his own manuscript’s return. Regardless of whether that means tossing it into the nearest mailbox (which would still be possible for most partial manuscripts) or assigning Millicent to do it, stamps have always served the purpose best.

That being said, I must confess that I don’t quite understand the clerk’s recommendation to Rachel to affix Priority Mail postage to the SASE, unless he was either lobbying her to use a flat-rate Priority Mail envelope as a SASE (not a bad idea, especially if the submission is just a few chapters; they fold nicely into a submission envelope) or simply trying to hawk a more expensive stamp. The distinction between Priority Mail and regular mail is the speed with which it arrives; the ease of mailing is identical.

Buying a more expensive stamp or a cheaper one to affix to the SASE is entirely up to the writer; coughing up the dosh for speedier return is not going to impress Millicent. Like overnighting requested materials vs. sending them regular mail, whether a submitter elects to pay a shipper extra money to convey a manuscript from point A to point B is generally a matter of complete indifference to the agent receiving it, as long as it gets there in one piece.

(“And looking pretty,” adds the Sanitary Author. “None of those pesky wrinkles. Print your manuscript on nice, bright-white, 20-pound paper while you’re at it, please. It’s aesthetically more pleasing than the cheap stuff.”)

To be blunt about it, the agent has absolutely no reason to care how quickly a rejected manuscript reaches its submitter. All she’s going to care about is whether you’ve included the means to mail it back to you at your expense, not hers.

And that, my friends, is the logic that most agencies’ listings in the standard agency guides and websites compress into the terse advice Include SASE. Apparently, somewhere on earth, there lurks a tribe of natural-born queriers who realize from infancy precisely what that means, so it requires no further explanation.

I’ll bet our old pal, the Sanitary Author, is one of that happy breed. For the rest of us, learning how agencies work requires a bit of homework — and the asking of trenchant questions. Keep up the good work!

August 31, 2011January 19, 2017 - No Comments

Pitchingpalooza, part XXV: riddle me this

A couple of years ago, in the midst of the test of human endurance and sheer grit known as the Seattle Ring Cycle — four Wagner operas over the course of five days, presented by the same group of singers — I saw something I had never seen before: the orchestra leaving its pit during the curtain call, at precisely the moment when the singer playing the lead in Die Walküre was walking forward for her solo curtain call. (And no, that’s not a picture of Brünnhilde; it’s Frank Gorshin as the Riddler on the old Batman show, a national treasure.)

Why would this very respectable and accomplished group of people have done such a rude and unprofessional thing? Were they simply exhausted, as the audience was, by so many consecutive hours of sitting? Did the golden hour of overtime click in thirty seconds hence? Had a swarm of hornets abruptly descended upon the string section?

All valid possibilities, I suppose, but my guess would be that they staged a walk-out for the same reason the audience members in my part of the balcony stopped yelling “Bravo,” sat down, and engaged in barely-audible golf claps when Brünnhilde tripped lightly to the front of the stage. They felt disappointed.

It wasn’t because the singer didn’t have a marvelous voice; far from it, as she demonstrated in Act III. Nor was the problem her acting: the lady was — and is — world-famous for playing this role. Unfortunately, in anticipation of Act III, she had chosen not to sing at full voice in Act II. As a result, the Valkyrie most closely associated with belting out the top notes was barely audible past the tenth row for a good hour.

An hour, alas, that contained the single best-known aria in Western opera, a little ditty that runs something like this:

To an audience committed enough to risk permanent nerve damage to its collective derrière in order to hear the famed lady with the horns on her head call her similarly-hatted sisters home, this was, at best, perplexing. Did Brünnhilde have a sore throat? Had she lost her nerve? Did her command of German fail her? Or did she merely figure that this was Seattle, not New York or Berlin, so she could afford to phone in half of her performance? Performance anxiety or medical excuse, linguistic difficulties or apathy — we in the audience will never know. The only basis we had for judging her was how she had sung that night. Just as, say, an agent or editor hearing a pitch can only respond to what actually tumbles out of the writer’s mouth during the meeting. It doesn’t matter how brilliantly the writer may have described his book out in the hallway 15 minutes ago, or how trenchant and gripping the pitch is on paper, or even how beautifully-written the manuscript may be. If the pitcher is inaudible due to nerves, loses his place in the middle of his tale, or falls prey to any of the million other perfectly understandable contretemps that routinely befall writers approaching agents and editors at literary conferences, the pitch’s chances of success are inevitably going to suffer. Had I mentioned that it would behoove you to practice? Performance anxiety is much on my mind today, campers, because I’m going to be concentrating in this post upon the delicate art of working up nerve to approach agents to pitch. Rather than focusing primarily upon what could go wrong — that way lies madness — I would encourage you to try to think of the pitching process as your interviewing agents as much as their interviewing you. Okay, perhaps not quite as much, given just how competitive the agent-finding market is these days, but certainly, it’s not a meeting to approach uncritically. As, alas, the vast majority of pitchers (and queriers, for that matter) seem to do. Oh, I’m not saying that it isn’t understandable. In the soul-grinding crush of pitching and querying, signing with an agent can start to feel like the end goal, the point at which all of the hard work is going to cease, rather than a victory to be celebrated along the long, long road to publication. Yes, you do want an agent to fall in love with your writing — but never forget that the point of having an agent is to market your book. Before an army of Valkyries shouts, “Well, duh!” at me at a volume certain divas would have done well to emulate, allow me to add a spin to that observation that may not have occurred to some pitchers. Since a pitch meeting is a professional encounter, not a social event, it is very much in your interests to consider whether the person in front of you is a good bet for helping you meet your ultimate goal of publication, rather than whether you happen to like this person. Yes, even if you happen to feel an instant personal rapport with the interesting soul across the pitching table — perhaps especially so. You’d be stunned how often a successful pitcher’s assessment of a meeting that went like gangbusters is not, “Wow, that agent really seems like she would be good at marketing my book, ” but, “I really felt like we clicked.” However simpatico an agent and writer may be at first, a pitching situation is not primarily about making friends or interpersonal chemistry; it’s about both parties trying to figure out whether they would be a good fit to work together on an ongoing basis. There’s more to an agent-writer relationship than friendship, you know. In fact, that’s often a relatively small element. Obviously, you’re going to want to be able to trust your agent, but whether the two of you hit it off during your ten-minute chat is far less important to how well you will work together than your ability to communicate — and, yes, the agent’s contacts with editors who happen to publish books in your category. So the common writerly fantasy that a friendly pitch meeting automatically equals a long-term connection is not only seldom true in actual practice; it can lead aspiring writers do make foolish choices. “Oh, but I felt such a strong connection with Agent Z,” they will protest. “I couldn’t possibly submit those pages Agent Q requested until I hear back from Z.” Sound familiar, conference-goers? No? How about this one: “Since I had such a great pitch session with Agent R, why should I bother to pitch to anyone else at this conference? He’s sure to sign me.” Or the ever-popular: “Yeah, it’s been 10 months since I submitted those pages Agent B requested, but I’m not going to keep querying or contact the agency to see if they have lost my submission packet. She seemed to like me; I don’t want to mess up our relationship.” News flash: you don’t have a relationship with Agent B, or a connection with Agent Z, or a commitment from Agent R. What you did have, pitchers, was a nice conversation at a conference. Period. So all of the statements above reflect poor strategic choices, based upon a misunderstanding of the pitching relationship. Successful pitchers’ hopes often rise sky-high, leading them to confuse a request for pages for an implied commitment. It isn’t, and it shouldn’t be interpreted as such. Far too few pitchers seem to understand that. Here’s a useful rule of thumb: until an actual offer is on the table, a good pitch meeting is just — wait for it — a nice conversation at a conference. But even if a smilingly-presented request for materials did imply more (and it doesn’t), the mere fact of liking an agent personally is not the best determinant of whether this is the right person to represent your manuscript. Or even whether the two of you can work well together under stressful conditions. Yes, I did repeat the phrase work together, now that you mention it, and with good reason. Believe me, the author’s work does not end when the ink dries on the agency contract: its nature merely changes. It’s rare that a manuscript or proposal does not go through at least some revisions after the agency contract is signed, generally at the new agent’s request. The agent will also be the person deciding which editors will be seeing your writing, how many will be seeing it at a time, and how many rejections add up to tabling the project. They will, in short, have a heck of a lot of power over you and your manuscript. So before you think about committing your manuscript or proposal to anyone’s hands, you’re going to want to ask some questions about who these people are, what they typically represent, and how they like to work with writers. Stop cringing — if you’re going to be a successful author, this is crucial information. Why? Well, agenting styles vary wildly. Some are very hands-on, line-editing the work they represent, and some prefer to, as the saying goes, leave the writing to the writers. Some enjoy explaining the publishing process to their clients, and some are infuriated by it. Some want their authors to check in regularly, while others roll their eyes if a client has the temerity to inquire whether the manuscript the agent sent out six months ago has met with any results yet. It’s really in the best interests of everyone concerned, therefore, that such preferences be aired up front. If it drives you nuts when people don’t return phone calls within a day, you’re going to be miserable if that agent with whom you clicked is a habitual message-ignorer, right? By the same token, if the agent is given to supplying his clients with tons of marginalia, he’s going to be unhappy if you’re the type of writer who regards even the slightest revision suggestion as an occasion to challenge the critiquer to a duel. Wordplay at twenty paces. Have your second meet mine at dawn by the unabridged dictionary stand at the nearest public library. I know: a pitch meeting is an intimidating situation, and you don’t want to offend anybody. But remember, these people come to a conference to discover writers like you. Don’t talk yourself out of approaching them — and don’t be intimidated out of finding out what you need to know. Yes, the deck is stacked, but that does not mean that it’s impossible to make it: writers find agents at conferences all the time. Including, incidentally, yours truly. After asking simply mountains of very pointed questions. I was merely being honest about the kind of client I would be. Fortunately, you need not wait until your pitching appointment or you have buttonholed an agent in the hallway to ask: most writers’ conferences feature panels where agents and editors talk about what kind of books they are seeking and how they like to work. Almost invariably, the moderator will ask for questions from the audience. That prospect should make you start rubbing your hands in glee like the villain in a melodrama. Here’s a risk-free chance to ask many agents at once about what they like in a book — and in a client. It’s a golden opportunity, yet much of the time, it is squandered by what I shall politely term apple-polishing, rather than hard-hitting inquiries. Let’s face it, “Isn’t it difficult to choose between so many marvelous submissions?” isn’t exactly cross-examination. Nor is it likely to elicit information that might enable a savvy pitcher to choose which agents to approach in the hallways and which to eschew. Another common question-time misstep: the too-specific inquiry of the conference newbie who thinks being called upon by the moderator constitutes an invitation to make a mass pitch to everyone on the dais. “Would you be interested,” such a fellow will stand up and ask, “in a book about a starship captain who finds himself marooned on a deserted planet where only mistletoe grows, and his only chance of escape is to court the ancient Druidic gods?” Now, personally, I would probably want to take a gander at that particular book, if only for giggles, but that’s not really the issue here. Universally, this kind of approach-disguised-as-question falls flat on its face. Why? Manners, my dears, manners. This guy is trying to side-step the rules by which every other pitcher at the conference has tacitly agreed to abide; why should any of the agents on the panel reward that kind of behavior? Let me reformulate that, as it may sound a bit strange coming from the patron saint of the hallway pitch: the agents’ and editors’ forums should not be construed as pitch sessions. You may, if you can work up the nerve, walk up to the panelists after this forum to try out your hallway pitch, but you will make a much, much better impression if you use the question time for — wait for it, Brünnhilde — questions. Still not convinced? Okay, let’s take a gander at what happens when our misguided friend ignores this dictum — as, I assure you, someone invariably does at every major conference. If the agents are feeling kind that morning, one of them will try to turn this too-specific question into an issue of more general concern, as in, “It’s interesting that you ask that, because the SF market right now is very much geared toward (some other focus entirely that would preclude serious consideration of the pitch above)…” The other, less charitable, and significantly more common response is for the agents all to say no and the moderator to ask for the next question from the audience. End of pitch attempt. Like hallway pitching, the response all depends upon the mood and generosity level of the agents approached — and how politely the writer has made the request. Even if you are Emily Post personified, however, don’t bother with the broadcast pitch approach: it’s not worth the risk. In all probability, the only result will be your getting talked about negatively in the bar that’s never more than 100 yards from any writers’ conference in North America. Trust me on this one. I’ve been there; I’ve heard the anecdotes. A popular variation on this faux pas is a writer’s standing up, describing her book, and asking how much she could expect to receive as an advance. From the writer’s point of view, this certainly seems like a reasonable question, doesn’t it? Yet to industry-trained ears, it says very clearly that the asker has not gone to the trouble of learning much about how publishing actually works. Why is that so evident to the pros? In the first place, advances vary wildly. Think about how deal memos are constructed: pretty much everything that has to do with the author’s cut is a matter of negotiation. (If you have no idea what a deal memo is, you might want to take a gander at the HOW DO MANUSCRIPTS GET PUBLISHED? category on the archive list at right. Even aspiring writers who have done their homework often harbor misconceptions about how the process works.) Second, the manuscript that attracts competitive bidding today may not interest any editor at all six months from now. When an aspiring writer asks such a question, what an agent tends to hear is, “I want you to predict the market value of a book you know absolutely nothing about, which may or may not be any good, and I expect this advice to be applicable at any time I may try to market this book concept.” Again: not really how the writer should be presenting herself, strategically speaking. So how does one use question time correctly, you ask? You’re going to want to keep your question general and, if at all possible, have everyone on the panel answer it, so you don’t appear to be targeting one of them for critique. Oh, it happens. It’s pretty to see how quickly agents — who, after all, are in competition with one another just as much as writers are — will rush to defend one of their own. Another common faux pas is to challenge what an agent on the panel has already said. Often, the writers who go this route will cite another source, for added credibility, “You said X ten minutes ago, but Miss Snark says…” If you take nothing else I say into the Q&A session, remember this: this type of question will not help you win friends and influence people. Human nature, I’m afraid: ho one particularly likes to be contradicted in front of a roomful of people. Being told that someone out there is laying down rules of her conduct is far more likely to raise hackles than provide clarification. And it’s not as though the average agent reads the many writing blogs out there, even if she happens to write one herself. So any name you cite — up to and including Miss S’, who even at the height of her blog’s popularity enjoyed at best a mixed reputation amongst agents — is unlikely to seem like an unimpeachable source. Trust me: as an opening gambit, it just won’t work. Although should you happen to bump into may agent at a conference, you may certainly feel free to preface your remarks to him with, “I really like Anne Mini’s blog,” should you be so moved. He gets a kick out of it. As long, that is, as you did not add immediately thereafter, “…and she says that what you told us a moment ago is wrong.” So what should you ask that intimidating row of agents? Here are few suggestions that designed to elicit information you would probably have a hard time gleaning anywhere else. As a fringe benefit, these will generally provoke interesting comments, rather than the usual bleak diagnoses of how tough the market is right now: “What was the last book each of you picked up at a conference? What made that book stand out from the others you heard pitched?” I love this question, as it gives pitchers hints about how the agents like to hear a book described; darned useful information. “Who is your favorite client, and why?” Agents tend to love this question, as it enables them to promote a client’s work. Make a great show of writing down names, nodding vigorously to indicate that you either you are intending to rush to the nearest brick-and-mortar bookstore the instant the conference is over and buy all of that author’s books or already own that author’s entire literary output and believe that s/he is the best thing to happen to literature since Homer first got the idea of telling the story of the Trojan war. Hey, agents make a living from their clients’ royalties. You think they don’t mention their clients at conferences in the hope of stimulating some book sales? “How long do you stick with a book you really love that’s not selling before you give up on it?” In many ways, this is the single most important thing to know about an agent with whom you’re considering signing — and it’s an agent-friendly question, because they almost invariably answer it by talking about a pet project that was hard to place, but eventually did get published. Word to the wise: while it’s tempting to be impressed by the story about how the agent showed a particular manuscript to 43 editors before it got picked up, it’s worth asking the follow-up question, “Is that your regular practice, or did you especially love that book?” It’s not unheard-of for an established agent to recycle a single heroic incident from the very beginning of his career throughout a couple of decades’ worth of writers’ conference panels. Bear in mind that what he was willing to do for the best manuscript he had ever read back in 1982 isn’t necessarily indicative of how he might handle your book now. “If I were looking to understand what a great first novel (or first book in your chosen category) would read like from an agent’s point of view, what books recently out would you suggest I read?” Another question that tends to be popular with panelists — because, trust me, no agent on earth is going to name a book that s/he DIDN’T represent. “How is selling a first-time author’s book different from selling the work of someone more established?” They’ll like this question less, but it will give you a pretty good idea of who has sold a debut novel lately and who hasn’t. “When you consider a submission, are you looking for a career-long relationship with that writer, or are you only thinking about the book in front of you? If you thinking in the long term, how often do you expect your clients to produce new books?” This last varies a lot, but in the last couple of years, many fiction agents have specifically been on the look-out for career writers, rather than those with only one great book in them. Asking panelists this question will let you know to whom to mention the other three manuscripts you have sitting in a drawer. “How much feedback do you give your clients before you submit their manuscripts? Do you usually ask for a revision before you send a book out? How much do you like to get involved in the revision process?” Yes, this is an enormous, multi-part question, but the agents who never edit at all will usually say so immediately. Translation: they don’t like to take on unpolished manuscripts, even if they have great market potential. Wouldn’t you prefer to know that before you submit, rather than after? “Is there any kind of book you specifically do NOT want to hear pitched this weekend?” Hey, someone’s got to pull the pin on that grenade. Sometimes they will answer this question unsolicited, however, so do keep an ear out during the forum. What was the last book you picked up from a conference pitch and why? What made that pitch stand out to you? The benefits of this question are twofold: it will enable agents to gush about clients whose books have not yet been released (always fun for them), and you might just glean a pitching tip or two. Do be aware, however, that some agents will respond defensively to this type of question, disliking the implication that they might EVER sign a writer without having read the manuscript in question. The usual deflecting response: “Well, I don’t really judge by the pitch; it all depends upon the writing.” The other reason this question can be a bit risky is — you are sitting down, I hope? — there are some agents who habitually attend conferences, but rarely pick up new clients. Perhaps they just like talking to writers, or maybe they just want a tax-deductible excuse to get out of town for a long weekend. For this reason, pay attention to which agents on the panel don’t volunteer to answer this question; you might want to do a little checking about how many first books those agents have sold within the last couple of years. “I’ve been hearing that many of the big agencies employ submission screeners. How many other people need to read a submission before it will reach your desk, and what kinds of comments do you like to see from them?” It can be difficult to get an answer to this question, but it can reveal quite a lot about the unwritten rules of screening. “What’s the worst query letter you ever got, and why?” This is a great question to ask if you’re not planning to do any hallway pitching, but only intend to query the attending agents after the conference. (Beginning your query, naturally, with the magic words, I so enjoyed hearing you speak at the recent XYZ conference…) The responses are usually pretty colorful. Take good notes; every other aspiring writer you know will probably want to see them. Do you have any automatic red flags for submissions? Any pet peeves we all should avoid? This will feel daring as it exits your mouth, but you are well within your rights to ask this one — and everyone in the room will bless you for it. Every agent has a different representation style, and you want to know about any pet peeves or preferences before you stick your pages under their respective noses, right? Fair warning about the response to this one: it’s very, very common for agents to imply that their individual pet peeves are shared by every other agent currently treading the earth’s crust. Sometimes it’s true; sometimes it isn’t. However, should you ever hear an agent mention a personal pet peeve on a panel, scour your work for that problem before you send that agent anything. If an agent makes the effort to warn you, s/he means it. What about the editors’ forum, you ask? After all that, you’ll be pleased to hear that there is really only one question that someone absolutely needs to ask the attending editors — although most of the questions above will work in this context, too. Since most publishing houses now have policies forbidding their editors from picking up unagented work, everyone in the room will be happier in the long run if you just pluck the pin from the grenade: “If you found a fabulous book here at the conference, may I ask which of you could sign the author directly, and which of you would have to refer her to an agent?” Yes, it’s a bit in-your-face, but the fact is, all of the major US publishing houses currently have policies forbidding editors from signing unrepresented writers — a policy of which editors tend to assume that pitchers are already aware. So much so that editors new to conferences are sometimes surprised that writers want to pitch to them. Often, senior editors are at the conference merely to give classes, network, or make connections with the already-established authors that often hang out at their local conferences; they may only have agreed to participate in pitch meetings to fill the time in between. (Hey, some conferences are boring.) Asking to know whether you’ll be pitching to someone who could act directly or not can help you streamline your pitching attempts. Generally speaking, an editor from a small publishing house is more likely to be able to say yes to a manuscript, but if, for instance, an editor at HarperCollins is given to perusing its <a href="http://www.authonomy.com/">online competitive submission site</a>, asking about direct submissions will probably elicit that information. These questions will also help you decide to whom to pitch on a more professional basis than whether the agent or editor struck you as a nice person whilst speaking on the dais. This is not the best criterion to use, and certainly not the best ONLY criterion to use, because: <blockquote> (a) Most people are rather different when speaking to large groups than one-on-one, which is how a signed writer would be dealing with an agent. Thus, your first impression from twenty feet away might not be an accurate predictor of what it would be like to work with them. (b) Agent and editor fora tend to be rather early in the morning, and folks in the arts are often not morning people. (See conclusion on previous point). (c) The pro who comes across as nastiest may in fact just be trying to save writers some chagrin. Telling the hard truth from a podium is not usually a big audience-pleaser, but the truth about the publishing industry is what you paid to come to the conference to hear, right? (d) The pro who just oozes affection for writers and good writing may not have the best track record for picking up clients. </blockquote> Finding out more about these people’s personal tastes and professional interests is also just good manners — and this is an industry where manners do count, to a surprisingly great extent. From a more self-interested perspective, wouldn’t you rather learn in an impersonal forum that Agent A isn’t remotely interested in your kind of book than during a face-to-face, one-on-one meeting? Of course you would. See why I was so adamant about your picking a book category? Once you have figured out which agents and editors from small houses (<a href="/index_p_1120.html">again</a>, all of the major US publishers currently have policies against picking up unagented authors) represent books in your category and like your type of voice (not always the same thing, in practice), try to get appointments with ALL of them. Standing by the appointment desk and listening for cancellations is a good way to do this; so is talking to other prospective pitchers, to see if anyone is looking to switch or was so discouraged by what he heard coming from the dais that he’d changed his mind about pitching at all. Fair warning: both practices can annoy the volunteers manning the appointment desk, so do make sure to request, not demand. Also, many conferences lay down rules barring signing up for extra appointments (unless you pay for them). However, even at such conferences, the eager beaver who happens to be standing by the desk when someone cancels can sometimes nab the extra slot. A great, great time to take your stand: immediately after the agents’ forum. Would-be pitchers who have just heard their assigned agents declare from the dais that the appointment was a mismatch are often overjoyed to switch appointments with someone else, or even just cancel their own. If you can’t get appointments, try to pitch to your likely candidates in the hallways. Again, immediately after the agents’ forum is an opportune moment for this. I felt your chest seize up, but please, don’t be afraid: you’re there to learn how to market your work better, and they are there to pick up new writers. You are not a second-class citizen begging the nobility for a favor, as so many first-time pitchers seem to think. You are trying to find the best collaborators for your writing career. As Francis I of France put it: “The sun shines for me as for others. I should very much like to see the clause in Adam’s will that excludes me from a share of the world.” You deserve to be heard. Don’t let ‘em intimidate you. But if you do find yourself too intimidated to walk up to someone in the industry and gasp out your magic first hundred words, do not despair: that information you gathered at the agents and editors’ forum will still serve you well. After the conference, you can query all of them — or at least the ones on your narrowed-down list. And do you know what I would do in your quivered-in shoes? (Hint: I mentioned it above.) If you said, “By Jove, you would go ahead and write the name of the conference on the outside of the envelope or put it in the subject line an e-mailed query,” give yourself a gold star for the day. Why is this a dandy idea? Because in most agencies, conference-goers are regarded as a bit savvier than the average querier; their queries, therefore, tend to be taken a bit more seriously AND read with greater attention. So it’s well worth your while. Oh, and before I forget: make sure to write REQUESTED MATERIALS in great big letters on the outside of the envelope or place it in the subject line of your e-mail, for the reasons above. (Assuming, of course, that an agent or editor did indeed request those materials. Don’t scrawl it otherwise.) But whatever you do, don’t be a silent wallflower at a writers’ conference. Take a few polite risks, and don’t be afraid to approach editors from smaller presses. The Brünnhilde who perpetually saves her voice for the final act has a hard time making a good first impression. Sing out, Hildy. This could be your big break. Tomorrow, I’ll be sharing a few hints on maintaining your energy throughout what can be a pretty exhausting event — and then, I have a few treats in store for the long weekend. Keep up the good work! </div> </div> </article> <article id="post-4087" class="post-4087 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-2-minute-pitch category-after-you-have-queried-or-pitched category-after-you-receive-a-request-for-pages category-after-youve-made-a-successful-pitch category-approaching-agents-at-conferences category-being-an-agents-dream-client category-but-ive-heard category-conference-etiquette category-conference-faux-pas category-conference-lore category-conference-pitching category-conferences-that-cater-to-writers category-how-much-of-a-book-must-be-written-before-i-can-pitch-or-query-it category-how-to-write-a-pitch category-industry-etiquette category-keeping-the-faith category-pitch-rejection category-pitching-a-multiple-protagonist-novel category-pitching-faux-pas category-pitching-memoir category-pitching-tips category-pitching-to-editors-at-conferences category-pitchingpalooza category-post-conference-etiquette category-post-pitch-etiquette category-realistic-expectations-for-pitchers category-realistic-expectations-for-writers category-should-i-bring-my-manuscript-to-a-pitch-meeting category-what-are-the-polite-ways-to-approach-an-agent category-what-do-i-do-if-my-pitch-works category-what-not-to-say-to-an-agent-interested-in-your-work category-why-might-i-consider-pitching-instead-of-querying category-why-might-my-pitch-get-rejected"> <header class="entry-header"> <div class="entry-meta">Posted on <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/08/29/pitchingpalooza-part-xxiii-how-soon-is-too-soon-how-much-information-is-too-much-and-other-burning-questions-of-conference-life-19/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark"><time class="entry-date published" datetime="2011-08-29T00:00:00+00:00">August 29, 2011</time><time class="updated" datetime="2017-01-19T06:36:12+00:00">January 19, 2017</time></a> - <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/08/29/pitchingpalooza-part-xxiii-how-soon-is-too-soon-how-much-information-is-too-much-and-other-burning-questions-of-conference-life-19/industry-etiquette/#respond">No Comments on Pitchingpalooza, part XXIII: how soon is too soon, how much information is too much, and other burning questions of conference life</a></div><h2 class="entry-title"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/08/29/pitchingpalooza-part-xxiii-how-soon-is-too-soon-how-much-information-is-too-much-and-other-burning-questions-of-conference-life-19/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark">Pitchingpalooza, part XXIII: how soon is too soon, how much information is too much, and other burning questions of conference life</a></h2> </header> <div class="entry-content"> <div class="entry"> <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/lie-detector.jpg" alt="lie-detector" title="lie-detector" width="493" height="337" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6280"/> Remember back at the beginning of this series, when I introduced you to <a href="/index_p_15559.html">the world’s worst salesman</a>, that genial soul who evinced continual exasperation because consumers insisted upon wandering into his flooring emporium and demanding, well, flooring? If only all of the benighted souls pursuing Marmoleum and carpet would leave him alone for a while, perhaps he could get some real work done — like, say, selling some flooring. I may have met his match over the weekend: a delightful gentleman whom Home Depot had, perhaps unwisely, entrusted with the task of translating the customer’s choice of paint chip into a bucket of something that might conceivably resemble that hue if applied judiciously to a wall. “Oh, I couldn’t possibly match that,” he told me in a tone that implied I was a mad scientist, bent upon world domination through vicious color manipulation. “I’d have to special-order the base for something like that. Might take weeks.” The color in question was, should you care to know it, royal blue. The wall behind him was painted approximately the same color as my proffered paint chip. I could, had I been so inclined, simply reached onto the shelf immediately behind his head and grabbed a can of spray paint in the shade I was requesting. Besides, he had said something quite similar to the beige-loving lady in front of me in line. I waved paint chips from three different manufacturers under his nose, suggesting that if he did not have the base for my first choice in stock, he might conceivably be able to try one of the others. He snorted derisively. “Yeah, but I’d have to go into the back for either of those.” He was visibly surprised when this piece of sterling logic did not instantly dissuade me from wanting to paint anything, ever. He pointed out that he would actually have to walk all the way to the back of the store in order to fulfill my madcap request, but I remained adamant. “Maybe you could come back tomorrow,” he suggested. Eventually, I cajoled him into attempting to mix some royal blue for my trim, just to see if it was possible. If it turned out not to be, I assured him, I would follow his advice and paint the room in question flat white. But at least the question of whether royal blue was a color extant only in theory would have been resolved for the ages. Mirabile dictu, it is in fact feasible for a well-equipped hardware store to produce a can of non-white paint. Feeling that the paint gods were on my side, I recklessly requested a couple of gallons of light blue paint for the rest of the room. He sighed so gustily that customers in adjacent aisles wheeled around to see who had been punched in the gut. “Lady, if you want colors like that, you should go to a specialty store. Now, if you could pick something more reasonable…” “Well, I could gold-leaf the room, but that might be a trifle hard on the eyes.” He appeared pleased with the suggestion. “That would be beautiful. Of course, we don’t carry anything like that here.” Clearly, the man was a minion of the wallpaper industry. By dint of persistent cross-examination, however, I did manage to elicit an admission that a light blue could in fact be produced by — I hope I’m not giving away an artist’s secret here — mixing a blue tint with white paint. Who knew? Not wanting to press my luck, I apprehended my paint cans and fled. I was halfway through turning the third wall light blue before I was forced to resort to the second gallon. The paint within appeared to be a brilliant orange. “Well, that happens,” my hero informed me when I returned. “Some of these tints are unstable.” Why am I sharing this story of woe and disillusionment toward the end of Pitchingpalooza, you ask? Because like this paint-monger, many a conference pitcher seems to believe, wrongly, that communicating his resentment about having to pitch at all will not fundamentally color his hearer’s perception of whether he knows what he is talking about. Judging by the tone and speed of many conference pitches, quite a few pitchers’ primary goal is just to get the agent or editor listening to it to decamp as swiftly as possible. But we know better, right? Pop quiz: what’s the actual purpose of a conference pitch? Help yourself to a gold star out of petty cash if you instantly shouted, “Why, to convince the agent or editor to ask to see pages!” But if your first instinct was to say, “Um, to survive my pitch meeting without dying of fright?” we need to talk. Conference pitching was not invented by sadists in order to torture innocent writers, you know — in theory, it’s intended to save aspiring writers some time. Instead of having to proceed through a tedious and often protracted querying process that does not always result in requests for pages, a writer can approach several agents at a conference, present her book’s premise convincingly, and walk out with one or more materials requests. But that doesn’t mean that the people hearing your pitch won’t notice if you appear to be hurried, hostile, or just plain petrified; how you present yourself and your book does matter. It’s okay to acknowledge that you’re nervous; it’s not okay to act as though the agent or editor harbors a grudge against writers in general and you in particular, simply because she asks what category would most comfortably fit your book. Resentment of the process shows up beautifully within the context of a tense pitching appointment, and for good reason. Just as a query that begins Since agents like you have set yourself up as the gatekeepers of the publishing industry, I guess I have to go through you to get published is much less likely to succeed than on that introduces one’s book politely, a pitch accompanied by a bitter denunciation of the business that keeps the hearer shod, fed, and with a roof over her head is substantially less likely to engender a request to see pages than one that doesn’t. Go figure. Remember, it’s human nature to prefer to work with upbeat, friendly people, rather than angry, sullen ones. A good agent will expect to have a lot of contact with his clients; you’re going to want to come across as easy to work with on a long-term basis. You don’t have to smile constantly, naturally, or heap the agent with compliments on her attire. (“A blue suit — well, I can certainly see that you live in the fashion capital of North America.”) Just be pleasant, will ya? I sense some disgruntlement out there. Go ahead, get it out — far better that you air it here than in a pitch meeting. “But Anne,” the annoyed many cry, “that’s not fair! I want my book to be judged on its writing and my great premise, not how likable I am.” Seriously? If the agent of your dreams asks to see the first 50 pages of your manuscript, you’re going to quibble about why? But okay, if you insist: logically, it is impossible for an agent or editor to assess anyone’s writing based upon a verbal pitch alone. The pro can glean quite a bit of information about whether he is likely to be a good fit for a particular book project from a pitch — the book’s category, for instance, or its target audience, the inherent excitement of its central conflict, whether the intended reader will sympathize with the protagonist’s dilemma — but if the only way that you will accept representation is if the agent reads your first two sentences and falls in love with your voice, pitching is not going to produce the outcome you want. Sorry to be the one to break it to you. If, however, you are the kind of writer who approaches conference pitching as a means of leap-frogging over the query stage and straight to submission, it’s in your best interest to be as pleasant as possible. It will get your great premise a more hospitable hearing. Is everyone clear on that? If not, please speak up; that’s what the comments section is for, people. Remember, too, that in addition to maintaining a positive attitude, striving for clarity, rather than mere accuracy of description, will help you win friends for your book. Aspiring writers very, very frequently forget this, but the author is not the only one who is going to have to pitch any given book. Your agent will be pitching it to editors; the editor that picks it up will be pitching it to an editorial committee. Indeed, it’s scarcely an exaggeration to say that one of the main points of conference pitching is to render pitching a book someone else’s responsibility. Making it pellucidly clear what your book is about will go a long way toward convincing an agent that it would be worth her time to take a gander at your pages. Obviously, clarity of presentation is especially challenging for writers of multiple-protagonist novels. <a href="/index_p_15794.html">Earlier in this series</a>, I went over a few reasons that it’s a better idea to pitch the overall story of a multiple-perspective book, rather than try to replicate the various protagonists’ personal story arcs or talk about voice choices. It tends to be substantially less confusing for the hearer this way, but there’s another very good reason not to overload the pitch with too much in-depth discussion of how the story is told, rather than what the story is. So please, I implore you, do not open your pitch with, “My novel is a multi-perspective first-person narrative, alternating between the point of view of a color-blind house painter, a tone-deaf piano teacher, and a pianist who has entirely lost the sense of touch.” It’s not that these characters are uninteresting; your hearer will want to hear the story. Don’t make that face at me, multiple perspective-lovers. Presumably, you chose the multiple POV narrative style because it fits the story you want to tell, not the other way around, right? That’s the writer’s job, figuring out the most effective means of telling the tale. That doesn’t change the fact that in order for an agent to sell the book to an editor, or the editor to take the book to committee, he’s going to have to be able to summarize the story. That’s right — precisely the task all of you would-be pitchers out there have been resenting for a month now. And inveterate queriers have been resenting for years. If the story comes across as too complex to be able to boil down into terms that the agent or editor will be able to use to convince others that this book is great, your pitch may raise some red flags. It really does behoove you, then, not to include every twist and turn of the storyline — or every point of view. If you get stuck about how to tell the overarching story of a book with multiple protagonists (or multiple storylines, for that matter), you could conceivably pick one or two of the protagonists and present his/her/their story/ies as the book, purely for pitching purposes. Ooh, that suggestion generated some righteous indignation, didn’t it? “But Anne,” I hear some of you upright souls cry, “isn’t that misleading?” Not really. Remember, the point of the pitch is not to distill the essence of the book: it is to convince the agent or editor to ask to read it. No one on the other side of the pitching table seriously expects to learn everything about a book in a 2-minute speech, any more than he would from a synopsis. If it were possible, how much of a storyline could there possibly be? Why, in fact, would it take a whole book to tell it? “But Anne,” the upright whimper, “I don’t want to lie. Won’t I get in trouble for implying that my book has only two protagonists when it in fact has twelve?” Trust me, this strategy is not going to come back and bite you later, at least not enough to fret over. What makes me so sure of that? Frankly, it would require the memory banks of IBM’s Big Blue for a pitch-hearer to recall everything he heard over the average conference period. Blame it on pitch fatigue. After an agent or editor has heard a hundred pitches at a conference this weekend, and two hundred the weekend after that, he’s not going to say when he receives your submission, “Hey! This has 4 more characters than the author told me it did!” I know, I know: we all want to believe that our pitches are the exception to this — naturally, the agent of our dreams will remember every adjective choice and intake of breath from OUR pitches, as opposed to everyone else’s. But that, my dears, is writerly ego talking, the same ego that tries to insist that we must get our requested submissions out the door practically the instant the agent or editor’s request for them has entered our ears. In practice, it just isn’t so. And shouldn’t be, actually, in a business that rewards writing talent. Given the choice, it’s much, much better for you if the agent of your dreams remembers that the writing in your submission was brilliant than the details of what you said in your 10-minute meeting. As to the question of being misleading…well, I’ll get back to the desirability of telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth a little later in this post. For now, let’s move on to the next reader’s question. Insightful long-term reader <a href="/index_p_554.html">Janet wrote in some time ago to ask</a> how to handle the rather common dilemma of the writer whose local conference occurs whilst she’s in mid-revision: “What do you do when you realize that you might have to change the structure of the novel?” she asked. “Pitch the old way?” I hear this question all the time during conference season, Janet. The answer really goes back to the pervasive writerly belief I touched upon briefly above, the notion that an agent or editor is going to remember any given pitch in enough detail down the road to catch discrepancies between the pitch and the book. But realistically, they’re going to be too tired to recall every detail by the time they get on the plane to return to New York, much less a month or two from now, when they get around to reading your submission. Stop deflating, ego — this isn’t about you. It’s about them. At a conference, the average agent or editor might be hearing as many as hundred pitches per day. Multiply that by the number of days of the conference — and multiply THAT by the number of conferences a particular agent or editor attends in a season, not to mention the queries and submissions she sees on a daily basis, and then you can begin to understand just how difficult it would be to retain them all. I hate to bruise anyone’s feelings, but now that you’ve done the math, I ask you: how likely is it that she’s going to retain the specifics of, say, pitch #472? You shouldn’t fret about that, because — pull out your hymnals, long-term readers — the purpose of a book pitch is to get the agent or editor to ask to read it, not to buy the book sight unseen. Since that request generally comes within a few minutes of the writer’s uttering the pitch, if it’s going to come at all, what you need to do is wow ‘em in the moment. Although it is nice, admittedly, if yours is the pitch that causes an agent to scrawl in her notes, “Great imagery!” That’s why, in case you’ve been wondering, I’ve been harping so much throughout Pitchingpalooza about the desirability of including memorable details in your pitch. You have the pitch-hearer’s attention for only a few moments, and 9 times out of 10, she’s going to be tired during those moments. A vividly-rendered sensual detail or surprising situation that she’s never heard before is your best bet to wake her up. Under the circumstances, that’s not an insignificant achievement. Don’t lessen your triumph by insisting that she be able to reproduce your pitch from memory six weeks hence — or that you need to get those requested materials to her before she forgets who you are. Accept that she may not remember you by the time she gets on the plane to go home from the conference, and take the time to whip your manuscript into shape before submission. The upside of short memory spans: you don’t really need to worry if your story changes between the time you pitch or query it and when you submit the manuscript pages. That’s par for the course. Writers rewrite and restructure their books all the time; it’s not considered particularly sinister. That being said, your best bet in the case of a book in the throes of change is to tell the story that you feel is the most compelling. If you haven’t yet begun restructuring, it will probably be the old one, as it’s the one with which you are presumably most familiar, but if you can make a good yarn out of the changes you envision, it’s perfectly legitimate to pitch that instead. It honestly is up to you. As long as the story is a grabber, that is. While we’re on the subject, let’s talk about the ethics of not mentioning those aspects of the book one is afraid might negatively influence a pitch-hearer’s view of the manuscript. The most popular proposed omissions: the book’s length and whether it is actually finished on the day of the pitching appointment. Let me take the second one first, as it’s easier to answer. There is a tacit expectation, occasionally seen in print in conference guides, that a writer will not market a novel until she has a complete draft in hand, because it would not be possible for an agent to market a partial first novel. In fact, most pitching and querying guides will tell you that you should NEVER pitch an unfinished work. Except that it isn’t quite that simple. Agented writers pitch half-finished work to their agents all the time, for instance. Does that mean that you should? Well, it depends. It would most definitely be frowned-upon to pitch a half-finished book that might take a year or two to polish off — unless, of course, the book in question is nonfiction, in which case you’d be marketing it as a book proposal, not as an entire manuscript, anyway. Let me repeat that, because it’s important: nonfiction books are typically sold on proposals, not the entire manuscript. Yes, even if it’s a memoir; although some agents do prefer to see a full draft from a previously unpublished writer, the vast majority of memoirs are still sold in proposal form. So I ask you: could you realistically have your novel in apple-pie order within the next six months? If so, that’s not an unheard-of lapse before submitting requested materials. And if you have a chapter of your memoir in terrific shape, could you pull a book proposal together within that timeframe? (For some guidance on what that might entail, please see the aptly-named HOW TO WRITE A BOOK PROPOSAL category on the archive list at the bottom right-hand side of this page.) If the answers to all of those questions are a resounding “No, by gum!” you should consider holding off. Unless, of course, you’d just like to get in some pitching practice while the stakes are still low. But if you are pitching a novel just to get the hang of it (a marvelous idea, by the way), don’t make the mistake of saying that the manuscript isn’t done yet. It’s considered rude. You’re supposed to have a fiction project completed before you pitch or query it, you know. Confused? You’re not alone. Like so many of the orders barked at conference attendees, the expectation of market-readiness has mutated a bit in translation and over time. Take, for instance, the prevailing wisdom that maintains you should have a full draft before you pitch because an agent or editor who is interested will ask you for the entire thing on the spot. As in they will fly into an insensate fury if you’re not carrying it with you at the pitch meeting. But as I have mentioned earlier in this series, demanding to see a full or even partial manuscript on the spot doesn’t happen all that often anymore (and the insensate fury part never happened in the first place). 99.9% of the time, even an agent who is extremely excited about a project will prefer that you mail it — or e-mail it. Seriously, she’s not in that great a hurry — and trust me, she’s not going to clear his schedule in anticipation of receiving your submission. I’ll bring this up again when I go over how to prep a submission packet (probably in September; I want to go over query basics first, so PLEASE, if you have pitched within the last few weeks and are impatient to send things off, read through the HOW TO PUT TOGETHER A SUBMISSION PACKET category before you drop anything in the mail) but I always advise my clients and students not to overnight anything to an agency or publishing house unless the receiving party is paying the postage. Yes, even if an agent or editor asks you to overnight it. I heard that horrified gasp out there, but the fact is, it’s a myth that overnighted manuscripts get read faster — yes, even if the agent asked you to send it instantly. That request is extremely rare, however; most submitters simply assume that they should get it there right away — or that their work will be seem more professional if it shows up in an overnight package. That might have been true 20 years ago, when overnighting a manuscript would have been a rarity but here’s a news flash: FedEx and other overnight packaging is just too common to attract any special notice in a crowded mailroom these days. If you’re worried about speed, Priority Mail (which gets from one location to another within the US in 2-3 days) is far cheaper — and if you write REQUESTED MATERIALS in great big letters on the outside of the package, might actually get opened sooner than that spiffy-looking overnight mail packet. Besides, even if you did go to the trouble and expense to get your manuscript onto the requester’s desk within hours of the request, it can often be months before an agent reads a manuscript, as those of you who have submitted before already know. Which means, in practical terms, that you need not send it right away. And that, potentially, means that a savvy writer could buy a little time that could conceivably be used for revision. Or even writing. Catching my drift here? After all, if you’re going to mail it anyway…and the agent is going to be on vacation until after Labor Day…and if you could really get away with sending requested materials anytime between now and Christmas…and if the agent has asked for only the first three chapters… Or, to put it in querying terms: if the agencies are going to take a month to respond to the letter…and then ask for the first 50 pages…and that has to get by a couple of screeners before they can possibly ask for the rest? Starting to get the picture? There’s no reason not to work those predictable delays into your pitching and querying timeline. Naturally, I would never advise anyone to pitch a book that isn’t essentially done, but let’s face it, it may well be months before the person sitting across the table from you in a pitch meeting asks to see the entire manuscript. And you know what? You’re under no obligation to send it out instantly, even then. If you can get requested materials out the door within a few months, you should be fine. Although I would not encourage any of you to join the 40% of writers who are asked to submit requested materials but never do, anyone who has ever written a novel can tell you that where writing is concerned, there is finished — as in when you’ve made it all the way through the story and typed the words THE END on the last page — and then there is done — as in when you stop tinkering with it. Then there’s REALLY done, the point at which you have revised it so often that you have calculated the exact trajectory of the pen you will need to lob toward Manhattan to knock your agent or editor in the head hard enough to get him to stop asking for additional changes. And then there’s REALLY, REALLY done, when your editor has changed your title for the last time and has stopped lobbying for you to transform the liberal librarian sister into a neo-conservative professional squash player who wrote speeches for Ronald Reagan in his spare time. But frankly, from the point of view of the industry, no manuscript is truly finished until it is sitting on a shelf in Barnes & Noble. Until the cover is actually attached to the book, it is an inherently malleable thing. The fact that everyone concerned is aware of this, I think, renders a bit of sophistry on the writer’s part over the question of whether a manuscript is completed somewhat pardonable. This does NOT mean, however, that it is in your best interests to waltz into a pitch meeting and announce that the book isn’t finished yet — in a word, don’t. Because agents and editors are, as a group, perfectly aware that writers are prone to levels of tinkering that would make Dante’s inferno appear uncomplex, it’s actually not a question that gets asked much. If you are asked? Sophistry, my dears, sophistry, of the type that agented and published writers employ all the time: “I’m not quite happy with it yet, but I’m very close.” You are close to finishing it, aren’t you? And you aren’t completely happy about every syllable of the current text, right? The question of whether to mention manuscript length is a bit more tortured, as it tends to generate a stronger knee-jerk response in pitches and query letters than the question of submission timing. Or so I surmise, from the response to the inevitable moment at every writers’ conference I have ever attended when some stalwart soul stands up and asks how long a book is too long. Without fail, half the room gasps at the response. I hesitate to give limits, for fear of triggering precisely the type of literalist angst I deplored a couple of days ago, but here are a few ballpark estimates. Currently, first novels tend to run in the 65,000 – 100,000 word range — or, to put it another way, roughly 250 – 400 pages. (That’s estimated word count, by the way, 250 x # of pages in Times New Roman, standard format. For the hows and whys of estimation vs. actual word count, please see the WORD COUNT category at right.) Standards do vary a bit by genre, though — check the recent offerings in your area to get a general sense. If your book runs much over 400 pages, be prepared for some unconscious flinching when you mention the length. Or just don’t mention the length in your pitch; it’s not a required element. And remember, these are general guidelines, not absolute prohibitions. Few agency screeners will toss out a book if it contains a page 401. Do be aware, though, that after a book inches over the 125,000 word mark (500 pages, more or less), it does become substantially more expensive to bind and print. (For more on this point, please see the <a href="/index_p_1126.html">rather extensive exchange</a> in the comment section of a past post.) If at all possible, then, you will want to stay under that benchmark. If you have not, don’t mention the length in your pitch or query. Not just for marketing reasons, or at any rate not merely to preclude the possibility of an instinctive response to a book’s length. If a manuscript is too long (or too short, but that is rarer since the advent of the computer), folks in the industry often have the same response as they do to a manuscript that’s not in standard format: they assume that the writer isn’t familiar with the prevailing norms. And that, unfortunately, usually translates into the submission’s being taken less seriously — and often, the pitch or query as well. If your book is over or under the expected estimated length for your genre, you will probably be happier if you do not volunteer length information in either your pitch or your query. This is not dishonest — neither a pitcher nor a querier is under any actual obligation to state the length of the manuscript up front. I’m not recommending that you actually lie in response to a direct question, of course — but if the question is not asked, it will not behoove you to offer the information. Remember, part of the art of the pitch involves knowing when to shut your trap. You will not, after all, be hooked up to a lie detector throughout the course of your pitch. Although that would be an interesting intimidation strategy, one I have not yet seen tried on the conference circuit. Given the current level of distrust aimed at memoirists these days, I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see it come into fashion. Yes, I know: many experts will tell you that you MUST include word count in your query, but as far as I know, no major agency has a policy requiring Millicent to reject queries where it’s not mentioned. Some agents will say they like to see it, for the simple reason that it makes it easier to weed out the longest and the shortest manuscripts — but if your book would fall into either of those categories, is it really in your interest to promote a knee-jerk rejection? I’ll answer that one for you: no, it isn’t. For any reason. Keep up the good work! </div> </div> </article> <article id="post-4092" class="post-4092 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-2-minute-pitch category-3-line-pitch category-approaching-agents-at-conferences category-but-ive-heard category-conference-etiquette category-conference-faux-pas category-conference-lore category-conference-pitching category-conferences-that-cater-to-writers category-do-i-need-to-memorize-my-pitch category-elevator-speech category-hallway-pitching category-how-to-write-a-pitch category-im-a-finalist-what-now category-industry-etiquette category-keeping-the-faith category-literary-fiction-pitching category-nonfiction-pitching category-pitch-rejection category-pitching-faux-pas category-pitching-memoir category-pitching-tips category-realistic-expectations-for-pitchers category-realistic-expectations-for-writers category-what-are-the-polite-ways-to-approach-an-agent category-when-should-i-not-approach-an-agent-at-a-conference category-writers-conferences category-writing-advice-truisms"> <header class="entry-header"> <div class="entry-meta">Posted on <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/08/18/pitchingpalooza-part-xviii-location-location-and-did-i-mention-location-13/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark"><time class="entry-date published" datetime="2011-08-18T00:00:00+00:00">August 18, 2011</time><time class="updated" datetime="2017-01-19T06:36:14+00:00">January 19, 2017</time></a> - <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/08/18/pitchingpalooza-part-xviii-location-location-and-did-i-mention-location-13/industry-etiquette/#comments">2 Comments on Pitchingpalooza, part XVIII: location, location, and did I mention location?</a></div><h2 class="entry-title"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/08/18/pitchingpalooza-part-xviii-location-location-and-did-i-mention-location-13/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark">Pitchingpalooza, part XVIII: location, location, and did I mention location?</a></h2> </header> <div class="entry-content"> <div class="entry"> <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/overkill-signage.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/overkill-signage-768x1024.jpg" alt="" title="overkill signage" width="512" height="683" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-15749"/></a> Is it me, or did someone assume that the folks driving the delivery trucks needed just a tad more prompting about where to drop those packages than a reasonable person might in fact need? Wouldn’t everyone’s life have been a whole lot simpler if the manager of this facility just sprung to have a sign made that would blare LOOK — IF YOU HAVE A DELIVERY, COME DOWN THIS ROAD. EVERYONE ELSE SHOVE OFF or some similarly blunt and unambiguous statement? You know me, folks — I’m a huge fan of clarity. (Oh, that didn’t occur to you during last January’s 23-part series on how to format a book manuscript? Next winter, it will be 24 parts — a reader asked a really good question in the archives.) I’m also, when it comes to hallway pitching, a big fan of writers’ being absolutely clear on where and when it is and is not appropriate to accost an agent in a hallway (or bar) at a writers’ conference, politely ask if s/he could spare thirty seconds, and give the shortened version of your pitch known as the elevator speech. Where is particularly important. And not only because the single most frequently-expressed concern writers have about hallway pitching is appearing rude. It’s not surprising that first-time pitchers tend to be worried about this — a hefty percentage of the information on conference pitching floating around out there consist of some form of there are agents and editors who just hate it when a writer comes up to them at a conference and pitches a book without an appointment. Therefore, all agents and editors must hate it. Even if a writer happens to find herself seated next to the agent of her dreams at a rubber chicken luncheon, under no circumstances should she even consider preparing a coherent answer to the friendly question, “So what do you write?” I get that fear; honestly, I do. If you happen to have heard an agent say point-blank in an interview that he hates being buttonholed in hallways, by all means, do not buttonhole him in hallways. But to assume that all agents and editors share identical opinions on this subject is to fall into the same trap that aspiring writers so often do about querying and submission: it doesn’t take very many repetitions for a single agent’s personal preference, expressed on a conference dais or on a blog, to get magnified by that great game of Telephone we call the Internet into a dictum ostensibly crafted to be applicable to every pitching opportunity, anytime, anywhere: thou shalt not pitch at all outside a scheduled pitch meeting — and if the conference organizers schedule you for an appointment with someone who does not represent your kind of book, well, too bad. Better luck at next year’s expensive conference. I’ve spoken at some length in this series about the vast difference between a polite, professional pitch — one that includes delightful and emollient phrases like, “Excuse me, may I disturb you for a moment?” “You mentioned at the agents’ forum that you represent books like mine, and I could not obtain an appointment with you,” and/or “Thank you very much for your time. I shall be going now.” — and the kind of rude, blustery pitch that most hallway pitch-haters have in mind when they express negative opinions about it. While it might be safe to draw a general conclusion about the inadvisability of being rude to any stranger one wants to approach to ask any favor, it seems like overkill (rather like the signage above) to swear off the possibility of making a connection with an agent who might love your work because some other agent got offended once. It just isn’t logical. But it makes a whole lot more sense if one bears in mind the possibility that the original, “Ooh, I hate it when aspiring writers stop me in the hallway to pitch,” statement was part of a sentence that continued, “when I am trying to race to the bathroom,” does it not? And who could blame the agent — or indeed, any agent — for feeling that way? I suspect, though, that the primary appeal of the surprisingly pervasive conference circuit truism against hallway pitching is not so much its underlying logic as its implicit permission — nay, admonition — for a would-be pitcher at a conference not muster the courage to walk up to that agent who is three feet away and ask politely to pitch. For the nervous, the ostensible ban on hallway pitching is a virtual Get Out of Pitching Free card, relieving them of the obligation to try to find an agent via a face-to-face approach. Unfortunately, many literary contest winners and finalists regard their status (and the fact that at many conferences that give out such awards, winners and placers are singled out for public praise, always delightful) as a Get Out of Pitching Free card, too. They expect — wrongly, usually, but not without reason — that having done so well in the contest sponsored by the same organization that is throwing the conference, the agents and editors in attendance would seek them out, not the other way around. Or at least that the conference’s organizers would go out of their way to throw contest winners and agents who might snap ‘em up together in the same room. I hate to be the one to break it to you, but this happens surprisingly seldom. Most of the time, contest winners and finalists are given no more pitching opportunities than other conference attendees, and it’s far from the norm that contest winners are automatically mobbed by agents. The latter are usually more receptive to winners and finalists, but by and large, it’s the writer’s responsibility to walk up and make that connection. Which generally entails — wait for it — giving a hallway pitch. I say this, incidentally, not just as the writers’ booster who often ends up holding contest-winners’ hands at the end of the conference as they say over and over again, “I can’t believe that no agent asked me to submit pages!” I also say this as a writer who has actually been in this position. When I won my first big award for my memoir, I was lucky: the president of the award-granting organization actually did corral yours truly and the winner of the main fiction award, lecture us on the importance of not wasting any or all of the pitching opportunities that the rest of the conference would afford, and herded us into a party with a couple of dozen agents. We both pitched more or less non-stop for the rest of the conference. Fortunately, I had come prepared for it: several friends of mine had won similar contests, so I had been on the receiving end of many a pep talk. I walked out of it with more than a dozen requests for pages. As a direct result, I had the luxury of choosing between offers from several agents. How many requests do you think I would have generated had I not pitched like a fiend? Ask the winners from subsequent years, the ones who did not heed the president’s pep talk. I’ve ended up holding their hands at the end of conferences, too. I’m bringing this up not to gloat about my success, but because not all contest winners and finalists were as lucky as I was to know that it was my job, not the attending agents’, to take advantage of that first-place ribbon fluttering from my name tag. I’m hoping my experience will believe me when I tell you a basic truth of conference pitching: while the pitch you are bold enough to make might get rejected, the pitch you never work up nerve to give will certainly be rejected — by you. Please, contest winners and finalists, do not remain passive here: although contest wins are undoubtedly excellent Eye-Catching Query Letter Candy (ECQLC), at no place or time will your having done so well in that contest be as easy to parlay into a conversation with an agent as when that agent has just seen you handed a ribbon. How might a savvy contest winner initiate such a conversation? How about like this: “Excuse me, but could you spare me a moment? I’ve just won Award X for my book, and you mentioned at the agents’ forum that you represent work in that book category. Would you be interested in hearing a quick pitch?” I can already hear those of you whose entries did not do quite so well breathing a sigh of relief. “Okay, Anne,” the time-conscious cry, “that lets me out. Unless I just happen to fall into conversation with an agent — if, say, someone digs a large pit in the middle of a conference center’s hallway and we both tumble into it at the same time — probably won’t be pitching. But even assuming that I’m willing to prepare a pitch for that particular eventuality, I’m not going to memorize two different speeches. If the elevator speech is so effective at piquing interest, why shouldn’t I just use it as my pitch in my meetings with agents and editors? Since I’m already crunched for time to write, let alone to find an agent, why do I need to invest the time in preparing more than one conference pitch?” The short answer: so you can be flexible. As I pointed out last time, you never know when — or where — you may end up pitching. The long answer: let’s face it, it’s not as though simply memorizing a pitch, be it 3-sentence or 2-minute, is sufficient to prepare a writer for a meeting with an agent or editor who might be interested in the book. In fact, a pretty good argument could be made for not memorizing either, but reading one’s pitch from a handy piece of paper, index card, etc., to avoid the glassy-eyed, zombie-like delivery that regurgitation of memorized material. Besides, as intrepid reader Dave likes to point out each time we discuss pitching (and bless you for it, Dave), a full-scale pitch is an interactive process, not a speech declaimed to an audience who can only clap or boo at the end. If an agent or editor likes your hallway or full pitch, she’s probably going to ask some questions. Perhaps — and this comes as a substantial shock to most first-time pitchers — even DURING your pitch. Do you really want to be caught tongue-tied and unable to speak coherently about your book? Stick your head between your knees until the dizziness induced by that last image passes. I’ll wait. That’s why I’ve spent the last couple of weeks trying to nudge all of you away from the all-too-common notion of the three-line pitch, practiced over and over as if they were lines in a play. If you concentrate too much on the words themselves, and the short amount of time you have to say them, it’s too easy to freeze up when an unexpected question knocks you off script. Call me zany, but in my experience, helping people learn to talk about their work professionally and comfortably in a broad variety of contexts works far better in practice than ordering people to write, memorize, and blurt a specific number of lines of text. The rules lawyers out there aren’t satisfied with those excellent reasons, though, are they? “But Anne,” I hear some of you protest, “I can always add to my pitch on the fly, but I can hardly subtract from it. So why wouldn’t I be best off just preparing the 30-second version and using it no matter where I’m called upon to pitch?” Okay, okay, I’ll admit it: a lot of people do use the 3-sentence elevator speech as their only pitch; to be fair, it has been known to work, just as hallway pitches work. Just let me ask you a couple of questions: a 30-second pitch leaves quite a bit of a 10-minute appointment unused, doesn’t it? And why would you want to trade an opportunity to say MORE about your book for a format that forces you to say LESS? I have another, more strategic reason for advising you to prepare both a short and a long pitch: not all conferences are equally open to hallway pitching. Especially, I’ve noticed, the ones that charge would-be pitchers per pitching appointment. Not too astonishing, I suppose. Brace yourself, because I’m about to be subversive again: my experience has been that even at pay-for-pitch conferences, a brave writer can pretty much always buttonhole an agent or two after an agents’ forum or in the lunch line. It’s pretty difficult for conference-organizers to prevent any extra-appointment chance encounters between agents and the writers who came to the conference to pitch to them. However, even at some conferences that don’t charge by the appointment, the organizers do try to discourage hallway pitching. I’ve seen many a conference brochure that featured rhetoric telling attendees that it is always rude to pitch outside a formal appointment, for example, or that forbade attendees to switch appointments after their assigned agents announced from a dais that they’re no longer accepting a particular kind of book. Other conferences offer only a small handful of appointment times on a first-come, first-served basis, so late registrants are left with only the options of hallway pitching or not pitching at all. It’s also not at all uncommon for agents and editors to be whisked away to private parties or hospitality suites, so that they are seldom seen in the hallways for accosting purposes. Seldom seen sober, at any rate (allegedly). Not much point in pitching to someone who thinks you’re just one of the dancing pink elephants. Even when the rules and/or schedule do not discourage casual pitching, it can require significant bravery to place oneself at the right place at the right time. Even at fairly inclusive conferences, attendees often report feeling like comparative outcasts, unwelcome at the luncheon tables where the bigwigs hobnob. I’ve been to many a conference where the organizers and invited guests sat on one end of a banquet hall, and the paying attendees on the other. Heck, I stopped by a conference (which shall remain nameless) a couple of years back where the visiting literati were whisked off their respective airplanes, driven immediately to a party at a local NYT bestselling author’s house for abundant merry-making, and then plied with alcohol so steadily throughout the course of the conference that the following Monday morning, one of the agents e-mailed me from New York to ask what had happened over the weekend. Rumor has it that some of the invited guests did not even show up for scheduled a.m. pitch meetings. Which, I imagine, played some havoc with those pitchers whose assigned pitchees did not appear. My point is, writers often pay a lot to attend these conferences, yet find themselves with relatively few pitching opportunities — and not always the ones they expected to have. Sometimes, a writer has to be pretty creative in order to snag those precious few moments for pitching, at least without coming across as obnoxious. Which brings me to <a href="/index_p_5647.html">a perfectly marvelous question posted earlier in this series by insightful first-time commenter Penelope</a>. So trenchant was it that I’ve been saving it to share with the entire class: <blockquote> This is a wonderful post! I especially like the advice on what to do in the case that you’re paired with an agent who doesn’t represent your genre; which I had no idea could happen. I do find one part of this post confusing, though. I have read on the internet (agent’s blogs, mostly) of how much agents despise being cornered and pitched to in places like elevators, hallways, bars, etc, yet you seem to be saying that this is okay. Is there a certain way to go about pitching in an elevator (for example) that would help an agent be more open to the pitch? </blockquote> I find this question excellent — rather than passively accepting that what I’ve been advising is true, Penelope has thought it over, weighed advice from a variety of sources, and asked for clarification. This is a great strategy when dealing with anyone who has been immersed in the biz for a good, long while — as counter-intuitive as its ins and outs may be, once one gets used to them, their underlying logic can start to seem obvious, believe it or not. Bear that in mind the next time you hear confusing pronouncements from the dais at a literary conference, please. Back to the matter at hand: Penelope is quite right that there are some agents out there who hate, loathe, and detest aspiring writers asking to pitch outside scheduled appointments. Perhaps because they’ve never been in the position of a writer assigned to meet with an inappropriate match, these agents don’t believe that a polite writer would ever accost them in a hallway. Fortunately, the relative few who feel this way — and they are few, at least amongst agents who habitually go to writers’ conferences — tend to be quite vocal about it. They post it on their websites; they announce it from the conference dais; they write articles and give interviews about it. Thus, they have good reason to be insulted if an aspiring writer walks up to them and just starts pitching: they could hardly have made their preferences clearer. Approaching them on the fly, then, is every bit as likely to offend as picking up the phone and cold-calling an agent instead of sending a query letter. Or querying an agency that states on its website or in the standard agency guides that it is not currently accepting queries. The result of ignoring these stated preferences will be the same: instant rejection. So here is my advice: do not, under any circumstances, attempt to pitch informally to an agent who has ever stated publicly that s/he abhors it. How can a writer new to the biz avoid this faux pas, you ask? At the risk of repeating myself, do your homework. Performing a simple Google search on each attending agent before you head off to the conference should turn up any statements on the subject. If not, listen closely to what the various agents have to say at the agents’ forum. Chances are, though, that you won’t turn up too many hallway-haters; it’s a common enough practice that folks who are seriously turned off by it tend to avoid the conference experience altogether. (Hey, it’s stressful for the pitch-hearers, too — listening to that many people’s hopes and dreams is mighty tiring.) After all, agents go to conferences in order to pick up clients, and it honestly is a waste of everyone’s time if they only hear pitches from the 10 writers who happen to be assigned formal appointments with them, if there are 75 writers there who write what they’re looking to represent. Especially if 5 of those appointments turn out to be mismatches, where writers are pitching types of books that they do not represent. If a writer’s polite about approaching, it’s usually fine. That’s a big if, though — unfortunately, there are PLENTY of rude aspiring writers up there who will simply walk up to an agent they’ve never met before and start launching into a pitch, without so much as a “Hello” or “Could you spare me thirty seconds to tell you about my book?” Typically, when agents complain about informal pitches, that’s the kind they’re talking about, by the way, not the nice folks who approach them respectfully. You can’t really blame them for resenting the rude approach: anyone would despise being accosted right after he had just swallowed a mouthful of pasta or as she was unlocking the door to her hotel room. Yes, it happens — but I cling firmly to the belief that none of my lovely readers would be that obnoxious. Use your common sense, be polite at all times, and be prepared for the possibility that any given agent may have a personal pet peeve about being disturbed in some specific locale. As far as I have been able to tell in a couple of decades of going to writers’ conferences, the only UNIVERSALLY agreed-upon do-not-pitch zone is the bathroom. Other than that, whether the smoking area or the make-up mirror in the ladies’ lounge is off-limits honestly is a personal preference. Hey, not everyone considers that part of the bathroom per se. I would err on the side of caution and avoid pitching at all between the WOMEN’S sign and the stalls, but hey, that’s me. The trick to approaching gently lies in both timing and courtesy. If an agent is lying prone on a hallway bench with a wet towel over her face, clutching her head and moaning about a migraine, that might not be the best time to try to catch her eye, for instance. Nor is the moment just after she walks out of the room where she has been listening to pitches all day, or when she is deep in conversation with an author she hasn’t seen in 25 years. Remember, she is under no obligation to agree to hear you out. Listening to an informal pitch is a favor, and should be treated as such. So don’t, for instance, walk up to an agent who is laughing with her friends, tap her on the shoulder, and start talking about your book. Instead, walk up to the dais after she’s given a talk, wait politely until it’s your turn, and say something along the lines of: <blockquote> “Excuse me, but I was enthralled by how you talked about your clients. I couldn’t get a pitch appointment with you, but I think you may be interested in my book. May I give you my thirty-second pitch? Or if now is not a good time, could we set up an appointment later?” </blockquote> Hard to find that offensive. It clearly gives the agent the opportunity to say no, but still makes it flatteringly plain that you are taking her time seriously. Works in an elevator, too, as long as the would-be pitcher remembers that no really does mean no. And no, in response to what some timorous souls out there just thought very loudly indeed, none of this is particularly pushy; it’s being smart about promoting your work. By preparing to be able to speak about your book in a variety of contexts, social and official both, you can be ready to take advantage of that chance meeting with the agent with whom you found it impossible to make a formal appointment. In, say, an elevator. The other way a hallway pitcher can avoid seeming rude is to keep the hallway pitch BRIEF. If you ask for 30 seconds of the agent’s time, do not take up more unless he asks follow-up questions. I’m quite serious about this: don’t go overboard. This is not the appropriate time to give your full-fledged 2-minute pitch; save that for a scheduled pitch meeting or, if you’re lucky, the appointment the agent you caught in the hallway agreed to give you later in the conference. This is where the formula we discussed last time will save your bacon: MAGIC FIRST 100 WORDS + ELEVATOR SPEECH = HALLWAY PITCH. If you follow this prescription (oh, there I go again; the book doctor is apparently in), you should not go over the promised 30 seconds. That means that you won’t have to keep checking your watch while you’re talking. See why I’ve been so adamant about urging you to prepare an elevator speech in advance? An audience granted at the last minute is no time to wing it. Out come the broken record and the dead horse again: by emphasizing the 3-sentence pitch to the exclusion of all others, I think the standard sources of writerly advice have left first-time pitchers ill-prepared to address those other vital issues involved in a good pitch, such as where the book will sit in Barnes & Noble, who the author thinks will read it, why the target market will find it compelling… In short, all of the information contained in the magic first 100 words. All that being said, if an agent has stated publicly (on an agent’s panel, for instance) that he hates informal pitches, steer clear — but don’t necessarily write that agent off as a possibility. Instead, send a query letter after the conference, beginning, “I enjoyed your talk at Conference X, and since I was not lucky enough to obtain a pitch appointment with you…” But whatever you do, don’t swear off hallway pitching just because a few agents dislike being pitched informally. Not everything every agent says is applicable to all agents — nor do the agents who make such pronouncements necessarily expect everything they say in public on the subject to become codified as The Law Eternal. Sometimes, a personal preference is just that: personal. By preparing yourself to talk about your work in a variety of contexts, you will be substantially less likely to be caught with nothing coherent to say when the pitching opportunity of your dreams presents itself. Trust me, you will be happier in the long run if you don’t self-reject your pitch. Try it on the agent of your dreams; the results might be spectacular. Oh, I’m sensing some impatient seat-shifting out there again, amn’t I? “I get it, Anne,” some of you say, rolling your eyes, “you believe that I’ll be happier in the long run if I prepare to be able to give my pitch in a house, with a mouse, in a hat, near a rat, and anywhere else that an agent with a successful track record selling books in my category happens to be. Fine — I’m going to practice my elevator speech AND my pitch. But I’m hardly going to forget my own name or the title of my book. I do have social skills — I don’t seriously need to practice introducing myself, do I?” I’m sure that you have social skills that are the pride and joy or your mother under normal circumstances, but hear me out, please: while it may seem a tad silly to have to practice saying your own name, or to remind yourself to mention that your book is a novel (or a memoir, or a nonfiction book), most writers are nervous when they pitch. I know; shocking. Practice will help you remember to hit the important points, no matter how brief or how strange the locale of your pitching experience. Especially if you practice saying them in a number of different ways. Yes, you did extrapolate correctly: I am seriously suggesting that you do dry runs where you have only a minute, only thirty seconds, five minutes, etc., in order to get comfortable talking about your work. And I’m not just saying that because I once found myself stuck in the same tiny airport with a very famous agent for five hours, waiting for the same flight. True story. Nice guy. But surprise openings are not the only reason practicing rolling with the punches is a good idea. You’d be amazed (at least I hope you would) at how many first-time pitchers come dashing into their scheduled pitch appointments, so fixated on blurting those pre-ordained three sentences that they forget to: <blockquote> (a) introduce themselves to the agent or editor, like civilized beings, (b) mention whether the book is fiction or nonfiction, (c) indicate whether the book has a title, or (d) all of the above. </blockquote> I find this sad: these are intelligent people, for the most part, but their too-rigid advance preparation has left them as tongue-tied and awkward as wallflowers at a junior high school dance. We’ve all been there, right? And don’t even get me started on the sweat-soaked silence that can ensue after the 3-sentence pitcher has gasped it all out, incontinently, and has no more to say. In that dreadful lull, the agent sits there, blinking so slowly that the pitcher is tempted to take a surreptitious peek at his watch, to make sure that time actually is moving forward at a normal clip, or stick a pin in the agent, to double-check that she isn’t some sort of emotionless android with its battery pack on the fritz. “And?” the automaton says impatiently after approximately 150 years of silence. “Are you done?” Call me unorthodox, but I don’t think this is a desirable outcome for you. But that doesn’t mean that you should just prepare a hallway pitch and trust your luck to be able to handle questions about it for the rest of your pitch appointment. You will be happier in that meeting if you have prepared at least the outline of a 2-minute pitch. (And yes, Virginia, we are going to talk about that next time.) And, by the way, you should time it as you say it out loud, to make sure it can be said in under two minutes without leaving you so breathless that oxygen will have to be administered immediately afterward. Why? Well, even more common than pitchers who dry up after 45 seconds are writers who talk on and on about their books in their pitch meetings so long that the agent or editor hasn’t time to ask follow-up questions. You really do want to keep your pitch to roughly two minutes (as opposed to your hallway pitch, which should be approximately 30 seconds), so that you can discuss your work with the well-connected, well-informed industry insider in front of you. A pitch meeting is a conversation, after all, not a stump speech: you want it to start an interesting exchange, not to engender stony silence, right? Come prepared to talk about your work — and in terms that will make sense to everyone in the industry. In a box, with a fox — or balanced in a crabapple tree with a dirt-encrusted good luck charm. (I thought I wouldn’t make you guess that time.) Trust me, you can do this. I have faith in you. Okay, now we’re coming up on the main course: the two-minute pitch. But that, my friends, is a subject for another day. Thanks for the fabulous questions, Penelope and the rest of you who contacted me privately. (You’d be amazed at how often the floating voices I cite here are the result of ex parte approaches; just for the record, I vastly prefer that questions be posted as comments on the blog, so everyone may benefit from the answers.) Keep up the good work! </div> </div> </article> <article id="post-4093" class="post-4093 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-3-line-pitch category-after-youve-made-a-successful-pitch category-after-youve-made-an-unsuccessful-pitch category-annes-favorite-posts category-approaching-agents-at-conferences category-but-ive-heard category-changing-nature-of-publishing category-conference-etiquette category-conference-faux-pas category-conference-lore category-conference-pitching category-conferences-that-cater-to-writers category-elevator-speech category-hallway-pitching category-how-can-i-keep-myself-from-freaking-out-mid-pitch category-how-to-write-a-pitch category-how-will-i-know-if-my-pitch-did-work category-ive-just-signed-up-to-give-a-conference-pitch-what-do-i-do-now category-industry-etiquette category-keeping-the-faith category-literary-fiction-pitching category-nonfiction-pitching category-pitch-rejection category-pitching-faux-pas category-pitching-memoir category-pitching-tips category-pitchingpalooza category-post-pitch-etiquette category-realistic-expectations-for-pitchers category-realistic-expectations-for-queriers category-realistic-expectations-for-submitters category-realistic-expectations-for-writers category-requested-revisions category-strategizing-a-writing-career category-the-magic-first-hundred-words category-the-mythical-right-words-to-use-in-a-pitch category-what-are-the-polite-ways-to-approach-an-agent category-what-should-i-do-if-my-pitch-doesnt-seem-to-be-working category-when-should-i-not-approach-an-agent-at-a-conference category-why-havent-i-heard-back-yet"> <header class="entry-header"> <div class="entry-meta">Posted on <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/08/11/pitchingpalooza-part-xvii-there-are-boundaries-and-there-are-boundaries-15/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark"><time class="entry-date published" datetime="2011-08-11T00:00:00+00:00">August 11, 2011</time><time class="updated" datetime="2017-01-19T06:36:15+00:00">January 19, 2017</time></a> - <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/08/11/pitchingpalooza-part-xvii-there-are-boundaries-and-there-are-boundaries-15/industry-etiquette/#comments">11 Comments on Pitchingpalooza, part XVII: there are boundaries, and there are BOUNDARIES</a></div><h2 class="entry-title"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/08/11/pitchingpalooza-part-xvii-there-are-boundaries-and-there-are-boundaries-15/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark">Pitchingpalooza, part XVII: there are boundaries, and there are BOUNDARIES</a></h2> </header> <div class="entry-content"> <div class="entry"> <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/oath-of-the-horatii.jpg" alt="oath-of-the-horatii" title="oath-of-the-horatii" width="474" height="359" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5985"/> Before I launch into Pitchingpalooza’s much-anticipated step-by-step guide to approaching a real, live agent to ask if you may pitch without an appointment, would everyone please stand and salute? Today may not be a national holiday in the country at large, but here at Author! Author!, it could hardly be more important. As of today, I have been writing this blog for six years. That’s 1,442 posts, about 5,000 questions, and so many thousands of pages of text that I actually don’t have time right now to sit down and tote them up. The publishing world has changed quite a bit over that period, has it not? Back when we first began confabbing about the life literary, aspiring writers would complain about the necessity of promote their work to agents; published writers would grumble about the imperative to show up for readings and book signings scheduled by their publishing houses. Pretty much everyone on the writing side of the equation was vaguely disgruntled about having to put in that level of effort, or at least the fact that a first-time author’s advance no longer enabled her to take any serious time off work to make requested revisions. One might, if one was lucky, be able to purchase a used car, but unless one happened to toss off a surprise bestseller, small-but-serious authors often did not quit their day jobs until their fourth or fifth book was doing rather well. At the time, we writers liked to get together and bemoan how much harder it was to get published and have one’s books sell well than it had been a dozen years before. Those concerns seem almost quaint now, don’t they? In the interim, we’ve all watched in hushed anticipation as the publishing industry has been declared dead, not just once, but over and over again. Not since the advent of television had so many prophesied so much literary doom so often. Forget the fact that used book sales actually went up during this period, e-books have taken off, U.S. self-publishing releases have risen to three times the annual rate of traditional publishing (which, contrary to popular opinion, has hovered around a quarter of a million releases per year), and the increase in library patronage has almost exactly matched the decline in the new book sales market. As of 2008, we were all told, the world simply stopped reading. Poppycock. If you look at even new book sales in the U.S. today, they are up in every major category. The book market is expanding. People haven’t stopped reading, bless their literature-loving hearts; they are simply doing it in different venues and in different formats. That doesn’t mean, however, that we’re necessarily going to see a reversal in all or even any of the shifts in how writers are expected to relate to their books. Now, aspiring writer not only need to market themselves in an ever-more-competitive agent-seeking market, but first-time authors also frequently end up as their books’ primary pusher to the reading public at large. It’s common for an editor to tell the author of a newly-acquired to ramp up her web presence on her own, and pronto; authors often schedule their own book signings, as budgets for book tours have dried up. This, at a juncture when the average advance on a first novel often is not enough to purchase a new laptop upon which to write the second. As editing staffs at the major publishers have dwindled, it has become commonplace for the acquiring editor not to follow the book all the way through publication, and for the new sheriff in town to want to take the book in a different direction; I’m constantly hearing from authors flabbergasted at learning that their book has just fallen into the hands of its fourth or fifth editor. Editorial staffs are more crunched for time, too, as are agencies. In the face of less hands-on support and greater competition for readers’ attention, many authors now chooses to bring in book docs like me to help whip their manuscripts into shape before plopping them into the print queue. And because we writers are so devoted to seeing our words in print, as a group, we have done all of this largely without complaining (well, at least in front of company), during a period when we have seen advances for celebrity memoir and established bestselling novelists skyrocket, but advances for first novels drop precipitously. It’s not our imagination; it genuinely is harder than it used to be, by quite a bit. Yet if the members of the Author! Author! community have groused about anything, it has tended to be about manners. And who could blame you? Six years ago, most first-time submitters considered it rude if their submissions were rejected by form letters at the end of two-month reading periods. I used to field incredulous comments from writers who had not yet heard back a couple of weeks after sending out queries. Three weeks used to be standard for exclusives. Today, we barely blink at agency websites that announce up front that they will not respond at all to queries if the answer is no. Six- to eight-month turn-around times are the norm now, even if the writer grants an exclusive, and it’s not unheard-of for a writer to be left wondering nine or ten months after sending off requested materials if the manuscript is still being considered, has been rejected without notice (as is increasingly common), or just didn’t arrive in the first place. These have been a hard six years to be a writer, but still, I have tried to remain upbeat through it all. There have been times — and now that they are behind me, I can admit this with impunity — when ambient conditions have been so bad that I have felt a trifle guilty for continuing to be your practical-minded cheerleader, urging you to keep moving forward down the path to publication. There have been weeks when I simply couldn’t bring myself to look at the lists of new book acquisitions, because I knew I would find so few first-time authors there. I had moments, days, and even months when, as I boldly answered questions about whether it is okay to contact an agent who has had your manuscript for four months to ask what’s going on (it isn’t) or whether a writer can submit adult fiction to the major publishing houses directly (you can’t) or whether it was still possible to land a first novel that didn’t include a supernatural element (it has always been, but sometimes just barely), I wondered bleakly if I should be advising you instead to rush out and become a celebrity in another field, so that you could get a book published in your chosen one. And let’s not even talk about the many, many dark nights of the soul where I bearded heaven with my bootless cries of, “Why do I seem to be the only writing guru talking about standard format, when there actually is only one way to present a manuscript properly to a U.S. agent? And why are my mother and I apparently the only people in the nation who still wince when writers mix up farther and further, much less to, too, and two?” It’s important to have standards: surely, I felt, there must still be at least a small cadre of us who believe that the distinction between imply and infer should be recognized and maintained by all right-thinking people, even though it’s difficult even to remember now the literary outrage in the 1980s when newscasters first began using impact as a verb. When did feeling this way stop being the norm amongst writers? I did not start out with ambitions to be a literary radical. But now that I’ve been besmirched (or honored, depending upon how one chooses to look at it) with the moniker, there’s something else I’ve been dying to get off my chest: real vampires do not sparkle. Under any circumstances, really. Refraction requires the ability to reflect light, so a beastie who cannot admire himself in a mirror will in all probability have a hard time bouncing those light particles back at easily-dazzled virgins. Especially if he is prone to bursting into flames the instant a stray shaft of sunlight hits him. I’m just saying. If a writer decides to present the world with a physically-limited being, I don’t think it’s too much to ask that writer to respect those boundaries. These have indeed been trying times to be literate. Let’s hear it for all of us for hanging in there, scrambling to bolster the printed page’s apparently crumbling plaster ceiling while the same types of Chicken Littles who had placed the written word on the critical list sometime in the middle of the Boer War have run around screaming that the entire building is about to crash to the street. But people are still reading. And good writers are still producing great books. I like to think that we here at Author! Author! have done our small part in perpetuating that. Three cheers for persistence! <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/fireworks.gif"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/fireworks.gif" alt="" title="fireworks" width="100" height="100" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5030"/></a><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/fireworks.gif"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/fireworks.gif" alt="" title="fireworks" width="100" height="100" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5030"/></a><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/fireworks.gif"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/fireworks.gif" alt="" title="fireworks" width="100" height="100" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5030"/></a> That’s enough frivolity for one day, I think. Let’s get back to work. This pitch-preparing series been a long road, hasn’t it? And not an easy one: I’ve been blithely asking each and every one of you to knuckle down and take your own work seriously enough to learn to talk about it in the language of the publishing industry. I’m aware that it’s been hard, intensive work, both time- and emotion-consuming. But trust me: all of this effort will feel very worthwhile indeed ten minutes before your first scheduled pitch meeting. Or thirty-two seconds into your first hallway pitch. Feeling positively faint at the prospect of the either, particularly the latter? Don’t worry; more timorous souls than you have braved the hallway pitch and survived it. Oh, they may not have enjoyed it while it was going on, but I’ve never yet had a pitching student keel over at the moment of truth. Honest. I wouldn’t put you through the pain of creating an elevator speech unless I were very confident that you’d actually be able to put it to some use. And yet, I feel as though I have been discussing elevator speeches — those 3-4 line gambits for use in informal pitching situations, as opposed to the 2-minute pitch reserved for formal appointments and other actual sit-down conversations — so intensely over the past few post that I may be inducing a phobia of lifts in my readers. (Not the shoes, the elevators.) So I’m going to take out my magic wand and relieve you of a bit of that tension. <blockquote> <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/glinda-the-good-150x150.jpg" alt="glinda-the-good" title="glinda-the-good" width="150" height="150" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-5995"/>As of this moment, you have my permission to get into an elevator with an agent or editor without pitching, if you so desire. Live long and prosper. </blockquote> Feel better? Good. In return, I am going to ask something else of you. Here and now, raise your dominant writing hand (or both of ‘em, if you work primarily on a keyboard) and repeat after me: <blockquote> <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/johnson-taking-the-oath-of-office-150x150.jpg" alt="johnson-taking-the-oath-of-office" title="johnson-taking-the-oath-of-office" width="150" height="150" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-6002"/>I hereby solemnly swear that I shall not have learned the magic first hundred words and elevator speech in vain. The next time I attend a writers’ conference, I will pitch to at least three agents or editors with whom I do not have a previously-scheduled appointment. </blockquote> I’m going to hold you to that, you know. Oh, and you can put your hand(s) down now. Why did I foist such a dreadful oath upon you? Because I know from experience that the only thing better than walking out of a conference with a request to send pages to an agent you like is walking out with 5 requests to send pages to agents you like. Is that not a good enough reason for some of you? Okay, here’s an even better one: I’ve heard from no less than seven members of the Author! Author! community that at a certain local literary conference that shall remain nameless, every single available agent appointment was booked. That meant that those attendees who were mistakenly assigned to meet with agents who did not represent their book categories were simply out of luck. Too bad; come back next year and try again. You weren’t in a hurry to find an agent for your work or anything, were you? In instances like this, the only other alternative is hallway pitching. So even if you think that you will never, ever, EVER be able to work up the nerve to buttonhole the agent of your dreams outside of a pre-arranged meeting, I strongly recommend coming up with a plausible hallway pitch. You just never know when you’re going to need it, do you? But even if you never (knock on wood) find yourself in the unenviable position of not being able to pitch formally at a conference whose main selling point is pitching appointments, a savvy writer honestly does need to be aware of her own book’s selling points and how to market them. Why, you ask? Well, in this economy and the current publishing market — see above — it’s actually not all that astonishing that the Conference That Shall Remain Nameless’ appointments sold out. Writing a book is a LOT of people’s Plan B, after all. Predictably, that fact translates into higher writers’ conference attendance in slow economic times, a greater volume of queries and submissions arriving at well-established agencies, and, ultimately, significantly heightened competition for both agents and publishing contracts. Sorry to depress you, but one of the reasons you keep visiting Author! Author! because you know I won’t whitewash the truth just because it’s unattractive, right? So let’s take arms against the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, shall we? Let’s talk about how to instigate a hallway pitch. I just felt you tense up, but relax. You already have in your writer’s tool bag all of the elements you need for a successful hallway pitch — or, indeed, an informal pitch in virtually any social situation. Did that one creep up on you? I swear, it’s true: <blockquote> <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/singing-in-the-rain-150x150.jpg" alt="singing-in-the-rain" title="singing-in-the-rain" width="150" height="150" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-6006"/>MAGIC FIRST 100 WORDS + ELEVATOR SPEECH = HALLWAY PITCH. </blockquote> Ta da! It honestly is that simple. You thought I was talking at random when I made you promise that at the next conference you attended, you would pitch to at least three agents or editors with whom you do NOT have a pre-arranged appointment, didn’t you? Well, gotcha: I already knew that you the skills to do it. How did I know? Well, we’ve been working hard for weeks on your toolkit. We’ve gone over <a href="/index_p_15523.html">how to narrow down your book’s category</a>, <a href="/index_p_15539.html">identify your target market</a>, as well as coming up with <a href="/index_p_15539.html"> graceful ways of letting an agent know how big that audience might be</a>, <a href="/index_p_15559.html">brainstorm selling points for your book</a>,) and <a href="/index_p_15673.html">a platform for you</a>, and construct <a href="/index_p_15563.html">a snappy keynote statement</a>. We’ve seen how to introduce ourselves and our work with <a href="/index_p_15608.html">the magic first 100 words</a>, as well as how to tease the premise with <a href="/index_p_15633.html">the elevator speech</a>. Not only that, but we’ve also wrested some of the most basic fears most writers harbor about pitching out from under that space under the bed that they share with the bogeyman and dealt with ‘em as they came up. So you have all of the requisite tools. All that you need to add to that mix is the guts to walk up to an agent who represents your type of book, smile, and begin: <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/salesman.jpg" alt="salesman" title="salesman" width="99" height="124" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6010"/> <blockquote>“Hi, I’m (YOUR NAME), and I write (BOOK CATEGORY). My latest project, (TITLE), is geared toward (TARGET MARKET). See how it grabs you: (KEYNOTE).” Wait for encouraging look, nod, or ask if it’s okay to continue. “(ELEVATOR SPEECH).”</blockquote> I’m not saying that working up the guts to do this is easy; it certainly isn’t, especially the first time. But if you watch the flow of bodies at conferences, as I do, you will notice something: except for when the agents and editors are in assigned locations — on a dais, teaching a class, in pitching appointments — or socializing amongst themselves, they have two states of social being: swamped and alone. With virtually no significant chunk of time that cannot legitimately be categorized as one or the other. Sit in a corner and watch — you’ll see that I’m right. In social situations, there will always be many, many more writers giving an agent or editor a wide berth, in order to avoid the possibility of having to give a hallway pitch, than walking up and saying hello. For this reason, it’s often easier than one might think to engage an agent or editor’s attention at a conference. Especially if the people in question happen to smoke. At any literary shindig thrown within the continental United States, the designated smokers’ area outside the hotel or conference center will be positively swarming with agents looking for a light. Be there to offer it to them, strike up a conversation along with the match — and then, after a discreet interval, ask if they would be willing to spare a moment or two to hear your 30-second pitch. As with any alone-phase approach, the key is to be unobtrusive and polite. Ask before you pitch, and always give the agent the opportunity to say she’s too tired or busy to hear a pitch right now. You can always offer to meet her later in the conference, if another time is better for her. Your mother was right, you know: good manners are the best calling card. Don’t be shy; you’re prepared for this now. Just walk right up to ‘em. Remember, they come to the conference in order to meet writers — writers, in fact, provide their bread and butter on a daily basis. Actually, it’s not uncommon for an agent or editor not to know anyone at a conference, other than other agents and editors. If the agent of your dreams is standing alone, waiting for his turn in the coffee line, he may not mind at all if you introduce yourself. He might, believe it or not, actually be grateful. (He will mind, however, if you pursue this line of logic in the bathroom, the swimming pool, the sauna, the shower in the hotel’s gym, or anyplace else that finding oneself barricaded in a small space with a stranger might be a tad, well, uncomfortable. Trust me on this one; there’s a fine line between persistent and creepy.) Public venues are safer: hallways, seminar rooms, and banquet halls, especially just after the keynote speaker has signed off for the night. Agents tend to get swamped in those places, true, but at least you don’t need to worry about whether you’re imposing. Another fringe benefit to choosing one of the more conventional venues: the approach is typically easier. Heck, if you choose to walk up to an agent immediately after the agents’ forum, you may even be able to stand in line with other would-be informal pitchers. In fact, if it’s your first time giving a hallway pitch, I would recommend going and standing in one of those let-me-talk-to-you line. That way, you can watch others in action before you jump in yourself. Where would I recommend you try after that? Moments when a formal presentation is giving way to whatever is scheduled next tend to be rife with informal pitching opportunities. Between the morning’s last seminar and the rubber chicken luncheon, for instance, or immediately after the dinner’s speaker has reclaimed her seat. Or during the break in a seminar the agent happens to be teaching, just before it starts or right after it ends. Another popular choice: remember that bar I keep mentioning, the one that is reliably a hundred yards or less from any writers’ conference? Guess where the pros — agents, editors, authors in town to promote their books, local authors seeking companionship amongst their own kind, vampires savvy enough to realize that if they want to talk literature, it would behoove them to track down those who love to chat about it late into the night — tend to hang out in their spare moments? Suppose that’s a good place to find pitching prospects? One very important caveat about bar or party pitching: if an agent or editor is already engrossed in social conversation in said bar, it is considered a trifle rude to interrupt that conversation so you can give your hallway pitch. The accepted method is to act as though this were any other party, introducing yourself and chatting until someone asks you, “So, Georgette, what do you write?” Yes, that IS the invitation you think it is. Grab it. Don’t equivocate, as so many aspiring writers do, by sighing and giving an evasive or 20-minute answer. Instead, smile and answer like the professional writer that you are: <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/mr-smith-goes-to-washington-150x150.jpg" alt="mr-smith-goes-to-washington" title="mr-smith-goes-to-washington" width="150" height="150" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-6014"/> <blockquote>“I write (BOOK CATEGORY). My latest project, (TITLE), is geared toward (TARGET MARKET). See how it grabs you: (KEYNOTE). Would you like to hear more? Yes? (ELEVATOR SPEECH).” </blockquote> After you have said all this, though, both etiquette and strategy dictate that you do one thing more. Chant it with me now, campers: stop talking. Most hallway pitchers — at least, the ones who muster the nerve to go through with it — get so excited that they have absolutely no idea when to shut up. Don’t let nervousness prompt you to keep chattering. This is a social situation, after all, not a pitch appointment: if the agent or editor who asked what you write is intrigued, trust me, she’ll ask you to continue. Or, if you really hit the pitch out of the park, she’ll hand you a card and ask you to send pages. If she does neither, don’t push. Treat it like any other business interaction that hasn’t gone as you would like: smile, thank the agent for her time, and retreat. The same rules apply to the bar and the smokers’ area, by the way. These are public spaces, true, but they are also designated as relaxation places, rather than places of business. If the agent of your dreams is disinclined to shop talk, you are honor-bound to honor that preference. (Oh, and if you plan to pitch in the bar, keeping the refreshments light on the alcohol is an excellent idea. I usually settle for club soda and lime — the better to keep my wits about me, my dear.) Regardless of the locale you pick for your informal speech, stick to the script. That way, you will know for a fact that you’re not rambling on endlessly. I’m not kidding about this. Other than serving as a reliable, professional-sounding introduction for yourself and your work, this formula for a hallway pitch has another benefit: if you put it together properly, you will not have to waste precious seconds of informal pitching time checking your watch. The hallway pitch is self-timing, you see. With advance preparation and practice, you should be able to say all of it comprehensibly within 30 – 45 seconds, certainly a short enough time that you need not feel guilty about turning to the agent next to you in the dinner line, or walking up to her after that interminable class on nonfiction proposals, and asking if she can spare a minute to hear your pitch. To set your conscience at ease, we’re not talking about a big imposition here: if you follow the guidelines above, you will be taking up less than a minute of her time. So you may feel professional, not intrusive, by giving your hallway pitch immediately after saying, “Please pass the rolls.” I had I mentioned that you should always ask first to make sure it’s okay, right? Oh, and because hallway pitches are almost invariably delivered standing, do me a favor: just before you start speaking, bend your knees a little. No need to do a deep, ballerina-style plié; just soften those joints. Pitching with locked knees can make a person get light-headed. Which means that she can faint. Don’t think about it too much; it will only give you nightmares. As should a vampire that sparkles, but I guess there’s no accounting for taste. The hallway pitch and its constituent parts are tools of the trade, nothing more. It’s up to you to use them effectively and appropriately. How? Well, as many benefits as a pre-prepared hallway pitch offers for interacting with agents and editors, the elevator speech also gives you a concise, professional follow-up after ANYONE you meet at a conference responds to your magic first hundred words with, “Wow. Tell me more.” Yes, you read that correctly. Don’t be afraid to give your hallway speech to other writers at the conference — it’s great practice, and it is absolutely the best way imaginable to meet other people who write what you do. Other than starting a blog, of course. Conservatively, I’d estimate that in the last six years, it’s been the medium of my meeting in the neighborhood of 15,000 writers at various stages of their careers. Not reaching that many readers, mind you — my statistics have been stronger than that — but making actual personal connections. Top that, sparkle boy. The elevator speech has other uses as well. It makes a stellar describe-your-book paragraph in your query letter. There, too, you will be incorporating the elements of the magic first hundred words — minus the “Hi, my name is” part, they make a terrific opening paragraph for a query. We have, in short, been pulling together a complex set of implements for your writer’s tool bag. A hammer is not going to be the right tool for a job that requires a screwdriver, but that doesn’t mean that a hammer doesn’t have a heck of a lot of uses. All of which is a nice way of saying: while you might not want to give everyone you see at a conference a 5-minute pitch, you could conceivably work the magic first hundred words into any conversation. But now that you have the tools to make a hallway pitch, get out there and do it! But let the agent finish her drink, for heaven’s sake. She’s only just gotten rid of that pesky vampire. Happy sixth anniversary, campers, and keep up the good work! </div> </div> </article> <article id="post-3271" class="post-3271 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-2-minute-pitch category-3-line-pitch category-after-youve-been-rejected category-after-youve-made-an-unsuccessful-pitch category-annes-favorite-posts category-approaching-agents-at-conferences category-conference-etiquette category-conference-faux-pas category-conference-lore category-conference-pitching category-conferences-that-cater-to-writers category-elevator-speech category-hallway-pitching category-how-can-i-keep-myself-from-freaking-out-mid-pitch category-how-to-write-a-pitch category-how-will-i-know-if-my-pitch-did-work category-im-a-finalist-what-now category-ive-just-signed-up-to-give-a-conference-pitch-what-do-i-do-now category-industry-etiquette category-keeping-the-faith category-literary-fiction-pitching category-nonfiction-pitching category-pitch-examples category-pitch-rejection category-pitching-faux-pas category-pitching-memoir category-pitching-tips category-pitching-to-editors-at-conferences category-pitchingpalooza category-realistic-expectations-for-pitchers category-realistic-expectations-for-writers category-what-are-the-polite-ways-to-approach-an-agent category-what-should-i-do-if-my-pitch-doesnt-seem-to-be-working category-why-might-my-pitch-get-rejected category-your-next-book"> <header class="entry-header"> <div class="entry-meta">Posted on <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/08/06/pitchingpalooza-part-xv-youve-got-moxie-kid-and-other-delightful-responses-to-hallway-pitching-11/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark"><time class="entry-date published" datetime="2011-08-06T00:00:00+00:00">August 6, 2011</time><time class="updated" datetime="2017-01-19T06:36:16+00:00">January 19, 2017</time></a> - <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/08/06/pitchingpalooza-part-xv-youve-got-moxie-kid-and-other-delightful-responses-to-hallway-pitching-11/industry-etiquette/#respond">No Comments on Pitchingpalooza, part XV: “You’ve got moxie, kid!” and other delightful responses to hallway pitching</a></div><h2 class="entry-title"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/08/06/pitchingpalooza-part-xv-youve-got-moxie-kid-and-other-delightful-responses-to-hallway-pitching-11/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark">Pitchingpalooza, part XV: “You’ve got moxie, kid!” and other delightful responses to hallway pitching</a></h2> </header> <div class="entry-content"> <div class="entry"> <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/grant-and-west.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/grant-and-west.jpg" alt="" title="grant and west" width="288" height="222" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-15682"/></a> Okay, so that’s not really what Our Lady of the Quips was saying to her young admirer in this particular instance. Nor, apparently, is Mae about to say, “My, but that’s an original book concept. I haven’t heard anything like it at this writers’ conference, even though I have been listening to pitches all weekend.” But clearly, the lady likes what she is hearing. Please imbed this image in your brainpan, so you may recall it while you are pitching. In hallway pitching, as in life in general, you can tell a lot about how open a hearer is to suggestion by paying attention to expression and body language. No, I didn’t mean that; what minds you people have. I’m talking about basic common sense here: if an agent’s eyes start to glaze over, you might want to think about cutting it short, thanking her for her time, and walking away with your dignity intact. Yes, really. Standing there talking while your fine writer’s instincts are screaming that your hearer has lost interest can feel pretty terrible — and believe me, it will feel worse in retrospect. I’ve never attended a pitching-oriented writers’ conference where I didn’t overhear at least one poor soul say something along the lines of, “Oh, it was so awful, but I just couldn’t stop talking! I knew the answer was no, but I just kept piling on more and more detail!” Actually, you can stop talking, and you should. Brevity is the essence of a hallway pitch, after all, so unless the agent asks to hear more — and we all hope she might — you’re going to want to stop talking after about 30 seconds, anyway. Ditto in a formal meeting, when you reach the end of your prepared (yes, we’re getting to it) 2-minute pitch. And that’s going to be hard, if you’re like most writers, whether the agent seems to be interested or not: since this is a solitary craft, it’s not at all uncommon for a pitcher to be so relieved at being able to talk about his book to someone in a position to comment knowledgeably upon its publication prospects that he hears himself just keep babbling on and on in one continuous run-on sentence not unlike this one until he’s practically ready to perish from oxygen deprivation or the agent glances at her watch and announces it is time for her next scheduled appointment. You even stopped breathing while you were reading that, didn’t you? Take a moment to restock your lungs; I’ll wait. That impulse is understandable, of course, when an agent is leaning forward like a bird dog that’s spotted a partridge, eyes moist and mouth dry with mercantile lust, firing questions at you about your book. You’re going to want to remember to breathe, and you’re going to want to shut up and allow her time to speak, but it won’t be easy. It’s pretty nice to have someone looking at you as though you’re her next meal and she’s famished, at least in this context: to a savvy agent, an exciting new writer is her next meal, in a manner of speaking; she’s planning to be dining out on the proceeds of that writer’s work for years. Shall I pause again to allow you to revel in that mental image? Or may I move on? Unfortunately, the tendency to talk too much is not limited to pitches that a perceptive observer could tell from the other end of the hallway are going well. For many pitchers new to the game — and it is a game, lest we forget, with standing rules — the impulse to babble becomes even stronger when the pitch seems to be falling flat. While reason may be battering on the inside of the writer’s hippocampus, bellowing, “Jamie! Didn’t you hear her just say that she doesn’t think she can sell a book about tennis right now? Stop pitching, thank her for her time, and walk away!” poor James keeps hearing himself describing that ball flying back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. Adrenaline kicks in either way, you see. So does, alas, that third grade teacher in all of our heads that likes to shout at us to try, try again, and harder. That teacher was wrong. So was your Little League coach, at least as his advice applies to this type of pitching. (Oh, you thought I’d be able to resist the pun throughout this entire series?) In this game, while working up the nerve to step up to the plate is a necessary prerequisite to winning, the umpire’s not going to be judging you on effort. You’re going to have to swing. And in order to become a good player, you’re going to need to develop an eye for assessing when it’s time to let a ball go by when it’s outside your batting range. I think I’ve mined just about all of the available ore out of that metaphor, don’t you? There’s a reason I’ve mentioned in at least every other Pitchingpalooza post that it’s not worth your energy to pitch to an agent who does not already represent your type of book: not only are the chances of generating a request for pages much, much lower than with an agent that habitually sells manuscripts like yours; even if the former did fall in love with your work, he might not have the connections at publishing houses to sell it in the current hyper-competitive market. The same holds true for an agent who hasn’t sold a book like yours recently: editorial turnover at the major publishers has been astronomical over the last couple of years. This is, after all, a connections-based business; your manuscript has to land on the right editorial desk before a publisher can snap it up. So when an agent who used to sell your kind of book stands up at the agents’ forum and announces that she’s not longer looking for new clients who write it, it’s in your interests to believe her. Don’t waste energy fretting over it; just take your pitch elsewhere. Don’t even try to pitch to her informally — and if it’s a big conference, don’t be afraid to ask to change a scheduled pitch meeting. Yes, even if you signed up to meet with her specifically because her blurb in the conference brochure said that she did represent books in your category. The literary market changes fast; trust that she knows what she can and cannot sell right now. No matter how good your pitch is, you’re not going to alter that perception. The same logic holds true even if you don’t find out until you are already face-to-face with her that she does not handle books like yours. Or if she’s disinclined to try selling another, because she’s still chagrined that she couldn’t place the last similar manuscript. Or if she’s just broken up with a professional lacrosse player, and your novel is set at a lacrosse camp. How could you possibly have anticipated that she would never want to hear the word goal again? Don’t bother to argue. If she’s decided it’s ix-nay on the ports-say, there’s nothing you can do about it. Stop pitching, thank her for her time, and walk away. Oh, you’ll want to scream and engage in some heavy battery on the nearest padded surface (in a conference center, a couch is always a nice choice), but I can tell you now that’s not going to help. Listen to me as if I were your third-grade teacher: in the long term, it’s best for your writing career if you handle this contretemps with aplomb. After all, just because that agent is not interested in your current book doesn’t mean that she won’t be fascinated by your next. Or that she won’t be opening an agency two years from now with the agent of your dreams. And had you considered the possibility that her sister might have been your future editor’s college roommate? Your brain-batterer was right, Jamie: stop pitching, thank her for her time, and walk away. Not only is she quite likely to be grateful for your professionalism; your response will be memorable for its novelty. You’re probably not going to be the only pitcher who runs afoul of her no net sports policy at that conference, but it’s entirely possible that you will be the only one to take the news well. She’ll appreciate that you understand the industry well enough to get that she’s not rejecting your book per se; she’s rejected the notion of spending her days reading about balls of any sort. (You should have seen her ex flying down the field after that ball. Sheer poetry. But she’s not going to think about it any more, darn it.) You’re almost certainly going to be the only pitcher, hallway or not, who has the great good sense and courtesy to stop talking immediately after she’s indicated that she’s averse to sports stories. (Her sister’s roommate will be able to fill you in on why. For all you know, that agent covered hockey, soccer, and water polo for her college paper with a zeal that made the Journalism Gods glance down from Olympus and murmur, “Really?”) That will be smart of you: you’re sensitive enough to realize that by now, she’s darned sick of explaining herself. And of arguing with aspiring writers bent upon foisting stories about basketballs upon her. Oh, the pitchers in question probably didn’t think of it as argument, but if they’re trying to change her categorical no into a yes, how else could she take it? From the pro’s point of view, how many pitchers seem not to be able to hear the sound spelled N-O until it’s hit their eardrums half a dozen times is one of the great eternal mysteries. (Another is why so many writers seem to hear, “I’m sorry, but I don’t represent books in that category,” as “I am rejecting you personally. Your writing is terrible — something I know telepathically, so I shan’t bother to read it — and you should just give up. Begone from my sight, loser.” It honestly is just a professional choice.) To be fair, though, what sounds like a no to a nice person who spends her days rejecting people doesn’t always sound like rejection to an excited pitcher in love with his book. The exchange often runs a little something like this: <blockquote> Writer (cornering agent after she’s just participated in a panel): Hi. I really enjoyed your talk. You had said at the agents’ forum this morning that you were looking for murder mysteries with tough female protagonists, but I couldn’t get an appointment with you. Do you have time for a 30-second pitch for a mystery as we walk to the rubber chicken luncheon? Agent: Yes, if it’s quick. Writer (overjoyed): Thank you! Here goes: when Allan, a roguishly handsome lacrosse player… Agent (turning the dull green of day-old pea soup): I’m sorry, but I don’t represent books about sports anymore. Writer: …a real ladies’ man, is found dead after he’s just jilted a beautiful-but-naïve journalist… Agent (clutching her roiling abdomen): Really, there’s no market right now for novels about field sports. Writer: …the police are stumped. Honestly, given the wide swathe he cut through the newspaper world romantically… Agent (looking around frantically for an escape route): I wouldn’t be a good fit for this. Writer: …the likely suspect pool seems to encompass half the female population. Knowing that the authorities have their eye on her, the journalist starts tracking down the other 57 women he had been seeing over the past month… Agent (contemplating murder herself): Ah, here’s the restroom. Will you excuse me? Writer (mentally kicking himself): Darn, I broke the cardinal rule of hallway pitching: never accost an agent on her way to the restroom. How could I have made such a basic mistake? </blockquote> From the agent’s point of view, she was practically shouting, “Please don’t take it personally, but this is the last book in the world I would consider spending the next year of my life trying to sell. Go away! Now, if at all possible!” Her mother brought her up to be nice, though, so she expressed herself gently. Unfortunately, our lacrosse-loving writer got too caught up in spitting out his prepared elevator speech to pay attention to the not-so-subtle indications she was giving him that he was wasting both of their time by continuing. How should he have handled it, you ask? Do I really need to repeat today’s mantra? Hint: it begins with stop talking. Let’s see that exchange again. <blockquote> Writer (cornering agent after a panel): May I speak with you for a moment? I really enjoyed your talk. Agent: Thanks. Writer: At the agents’ forum this morning, you said that you were looking for murder mysteries with tough female protagonists, but I couldn’t get a pitch appointment with you. Do you have time for a 30-second pitch for a mystery that might be right up your alley? Agent (wincing at the bowling reference): Yes, if it’s quick. Writer (delighted): Thank you! The book’s called LACROSSE MY HEART AND HOPE TO DIE. Agent (blood draining from her visage): I’m sorry, but I don’t represent books about sports anymore. Writer: Oh, I’m so sorry — I didn’t know that. (Begins to back away.) Thank you for your time. I really did get a lot out of your talk. Agent (astonished that he is taking it so well): Wait. A friend of mine just loves sports novels. She works at another agency, so I can’t give you her card, but here’s her name. (Spells her sister’s college roommate’s name for him.) Writer (scribbling frantically on the back of his notebook): Thank you so much. And may I say that you recommended I query her? Agent: Yes. She might get a kick out of that, actually. </blockquote> Of course, it does not always work out quite that well, but as my aphorism-addicted third grade teacher might have said (over and over), you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. And a stitch in time saves nine. Oh, you thought that I was born spouting proverbs? That sort of thing is learned. In Mrs. Eliopoulos’ classroom, by a level of phrase repetition that would have made Patty Hearst’s kidnappers think, “Darn — why didn’t we think of that?” And that, my friends, is how little girls with long braids and good eyes for curve balls grow up to become editors scrawling in margins, “You have already used this metaphor twice,” 234 pages after its first appearance and 42 pages after its second. We were the 8-year-olds visibly shaking with the effort of not screaming, “Cut that entire last speech! It was utterly redundant,” as we bent our rebellious little heads over our multiplication tables. Paying attention to your pitch-hearer’s reactions is also learned behavior, and as such, benefits from practice. Were you able to hit the first curve ball that came flying at you? If you are planning to engage in any pitching at all, hallway or otherwise, it’s very worth your while not to reserve the first, second, or even thirtieth time you say your elevator speech out loud for when an agent or editor is standing in front of you. Do some dry runs with kith, kin, and that guy sitting next to you right now at that café with the good tables for laptop use, taking note of any changes in their facial expressions or body language. You may be stunned by how obvious it is when a hearer has lost interest. Or how often people will begin to zone out around the time you need to take your first breath. Think that’s a good place to work in that startling metaphor you were saving for pp. 138, 372, and 413? Or to mention a surprising twist? Or would you rather go droning on about lacrosse? I sense some of you tuning me out right now. “I get what you’re saying, Anne,” some conference-attendees drawl, “but I’m not planning to do any hallway pitching. Too scary. Within the context of a scheduled pitch meeting, I at least know that the agent will hear me out. So why should I waste my energies preparing to assess the nuances in a situation in which he might not?” Two reasons, drawlers. First, if an agent does not represent your type of book, he’s actually quite likely to interrupt you to say so, even in a formal meeting. Knowing that you have the option of stopping your pitch, thanking him for his time, and walking away can spare you both the 9 1/2 uncomfortable minutes remaining in your 10-minute appointment. Oh, pick your jawbones off the floor; it’s considered perfectly acceptable, as long as you exit politely. Do you think that agent wants to spend those 9 1/2 minutes watching you glower at him and pipe plaintively, “But why?” Or arguing about whether he really meant to say no? Second, writers often find themselves pitching unexpectedly. You might have an opportunity to give your elevator speech at a luncheon, for instance, when an off-duty agent or editor sitting across the table asks, “So what do you write?” Or you might decide during a seminar that the agent teaching it is perfect for your book. I speak from experience here. I once found myself pitching at a behind-the-scenes conference party at 4 am while fending off a senior editor from a major publishing house’s astonishingly persistent attempts to convince me to accompany him into a nearby hot tub. Something about his approach did not strike me as completely professional. Or so I surmised from his body language, facial expression, and the fact that he kept tugging my arm in the direction of steam. But when one’s agent is at one’s elbow, hissing, “Give him your pitch,” a good writer obeys. Then one gets the heck out of there. As Mrs. Eliopoulos would have been happy to tell anyone several dozen times, discretion is the better part of valor. Since informal pitch opportunities generally entail speaking up gamely under less-than-ideal circumstances, it can take some guts to take advantage of them. Let’s face it, not every writer has the pure, unadulterated moxie to stop a well-known agent in the buffet line and say, “I’m sorry to bug you while you are nabbing your third dessert, but I’ve been trying for two days to get an appointment with you. Could you possibly spare thirty seconds after dinner to hear my pitch?” And, frankly, not every conference organizer is going to be thoroughly pleased with the writers brave enough to do it. Allow me to let you in on a little professional secret, though: if you did an anonymous poll of agented writers who found representation by pitching at conferences (including, incidentally, your humble correspondent), most of them would tell you that they’ve engaged in hallway pitching. Shamelessly. And constantly, at conference after conference, until they have landed an agent. “Quitters never win,” Mrs. Eliopoulos used to say. “And winners never quit.” Statistically, it makes perfect sense: the more agents to whom one pitches, the greater one’s probability of being picked up. (In the signed-by-an-agent sense, mind you; stop thinking about that editor at the publishing house that shall remain nameless. In his defense, he claimed he had just broken up with his girlfriend — a lacrosse player, no doubt.) At most conferences that offer pitch meetings, writers are given only one or two appointments, so simple math would tell us that those who generated their own extra pitching opportunities would be more likely to land agents. That level of persistence need not involve being rude to anybody. I know a perfectly respectable author who landed his agent by the simple expedient of beginning at one end of a conference dais immediately after a panel and moving sideways like a crab for the next 15 minutes, pitching to every agent remotely likely to be interested in his writing. The agent of his dreams turned out to be waiting in the eighth chair, her eyes glazed over after listening for several minutes to a writer talking about a book that she knew she did not have the connections to sell. How did he pull that off without alienating anyone? By paying attention to subtle hints like facial expression, eye-glazing, and the agent in front of him saying, “Sorry, that’s not my cup of tea,” to tell him when to stop pitching, thank her for her time, and walk away. Sensing a pattern here? I hope so. All too often, pitchers perceive themselves to be entirely powerless in the situation, supplicants at the feet of a whimsical monarch magically empowered to speak for the entire publishing industry. But that’s just not true. A pitch is a conversation, and as a participant in it, you may chose to terminate it if you feel it is not going well. Remember that, please, if the agent you picked for your field hockey romantica manuscript because her blurb mentioned that she successfully represented LACROSSE THE RIVER LOVE, NETTED BY PASSION, and HEY, LADY, MY STICK HAS A NET ON IT. Don’t torture her or yourself by pitching a book she has already told you she will not consider representing. Move on, even if that means working up the nerve for unplanned hallway pitching. You came to that conference to find an agent, didn’t you? As long as you are polite, that goal need not be unattainable simply because you didn’t know that agent’s preferences had changed when you signed up to pitch to her. Oh, dear, I said goal, didn’t I? I beg your pardon; I’m going to walk away now. Keep up the good work! </div> </div> </article> <article id="post-4251" class="post-4251 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-3-line-pitch category-approaching-agents-at-conferences category-but-ive-heard category-conference-etiquette category-conference-lore category-conference-pitching category-conferences-that-cater-to-writers category-dealing-with-fear-of-rejection category-elevator-speech category-freshness-in-a-pitch category-hallway-pitching category-how-can-i-keep-myself-from-freaking-out-mid-pitch category-how-to-write-a-pitch category-how-to-write-a-pitch-only-three-sentences-long-if-you-must category-how-will-i-know-if-my-pitch-did-work category-ive-just-signed-up-to-give-a-conference-pitch-what-do-i-do-now category-industry-etiquette category-literary-fiction-pitching category-nonfiction-pitching category-pitch-examples category-pitch-rejection category-pitching-faux-pas category-pitching-memoir category-pitching-or-querying-nonfiction category-pitching-tips category-pitchingpalooza category-realistic-expectations-for-pitchers category-the-mythical-right-words-to-use-in-a-pitch category-voice-choices-and-your-pitch category-what-are-the-polite-ways-to-approach-an-agent category-why-might-my-pitch-get-rejected"> <header class="entry-header"> <div class="entry-meta">Posted on <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/07/31/pitchingpalooza-part-xii-because-30-seconds-is-not-much-time-and-it-will-feel-like-less-13/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark"><time class="entry-date published" datetime="2011-07-31T00:00:00+00:00">July 31, 2011</time><time class="updated" datetime="2021-04-14T22:17:33+00:00">April 14, 2021</time></a> - <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/07/31/pitchingpalooza-part-xii-because-30-seconds-is-not-much-time-and-it-will-feel-like-less-13/industry-etiquette/#comments">5 Comments on Pitchingpalooza, part XII: because 30 seconds is not much time — and it will feel like less</a></div><h2 class="entry-title"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/07/31/pitchingpalooza-part-xii-because-30-seconds-is-not-much-time-and-it-will-feel-like-less-13/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark">Pitchingpalooza, part XII: because 30 seconds is not much time — and it will feel like less</a></h2> </header> <div class="entry-content"> <div class="entry"> <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="<img" title="dali-clocks" src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/dali-clocks.jpg" alt="dali-clocks" width="500" height="360" /> My, it’s quiet out there in the Author! Author! community. I’ve been hearing from some of you prospective pitchers privately — although again, it honestly does make more sense for readers to post questions in the comments here, rather than e-mailing me; that way, not only I am less likely to answer the same question fifteen times in a day, but other curious souls can see the answer — but for the most part, folks have been keeping the comments to a minimum throughout this series. It’s fine just to observe, of course, but I have to say, I am starting to worry that some of you with pitching opportunities coming up might be reluctant to come forward with your concerns and fears. Call me zany, but it concerns me. It makes me fearful. Please, if you have questions, ask them — I would much, much rather devote a bit of extra time to responding to comments than have even a single one of you walk into a pitching session unsure what to do. Use a pseudonym in the comments, if you like, but honestly, there’s no shame in feeling insecure. Believe me, you’re not the only prospective pitcher out there overcome with worry; your speaking up might even help someone who is too shy to ask. Of course, the silence may also be attributable to shock at just how much there is to learn about pitching. We’ve covered a tremendous amount of territory over the last couple of weeks, you must admit. We’ve discussed <a href="/index_p_15523.html">how to identify your book’s publishing category</a>, <a href="/index_p_15539.html">identifying your target market</a>, coming up with <a href="/index_p_15539.html"> graceful ways of letting an agent know how big that audience might be</a>, come up with <a href="/index_p_15559.html">a few strong selling points</a>, develop <a href="/index_p_15563.html">a snappy keynote statement</a>, and pull all of these elements together into <a href="/index_p_15608.html">the magic first 100 words</a>. All of that, my friends, will enable you to move gracefully and professionally into conversation with anyone even vaguely affiliated with the publishing industry. Now you’re ready to start practicing what to say after that. Oh, stop groaning — this is where it starts to get exciting. Now that we have the building blocks of the pitch assembled, from here on out, we’re going to be talking about what you should say after the agent of your dreams responds to your magic first hundred words with, “Why, yes, stalwart writer, I would like to hear more about this marvelous book of which you speak. Enlighten me further, humble scribe, and don’t forget to awe me.” Okay, so maybe the average Manhattanite agent doesn’t speak like an extra in a production A MIDSUMMER NIGHT’S DREAM. (Not that anyone in my neck of the woods is dreaming much on these sticky midsummer nights. We had an impromptu block party at 3 am, just because no one could sleep.) The fact remains, if you’ve been following this series and doing your homework, you already have something prepared for that precious moment when someone in the industry turns to you and asks that question so dreaded by aspiring writers, “So what do you write?” Now, we’re preparing for that even more fruitful moment when an agent sighs, glances longingly at the pasta bar just a few feet ahead of her, and says, “Yeah, sure, intrepid writer who has just accosted me while I was spooning wilted green salad onto my plate, you may have 30 seconds of my time. Do you mind if I finish making my way through the buffet first?” Moments like this were just made for the elevator speech. Or, if you’re going to be polite about it — and you are, aren’t you, if only to make your mother and me proud? — the moments two minutes after a conversation like this, after the agent in question has had a chance to heap her plate to overflowing and set it down on a nearby table, were just made for this. So are the moments right after an agents’ panel, while you are waiting in line for any of the many, many conference festivities that seem for no apparent reason to require waiting in line, and fifteen minutes after the really nice first-time author with whom you’ve been chatting in that bar that’s never more than 100 yards from any writers’ conference in North America says, “Oh, there’s my agent. Mind if he joins us for a drink?” Trust me, you will want to be prepared for these moments. Even if you are so terrified of the prospect of pitching that you have promised yourself that you will not utter word one about your manuscript until you have actually shaken hands with the agent with whom you have a scheduled meeting, you’re going to be a much, much happier camper if you have worked up something to say if asked in any context other than a formal pitch session. Like, say, the entire rest of the conference. Or, to put it another way: you know those 30 seconds that seemed so short to you when you were trying to compose an elevator speech? The surest means of making them feel eternal is not to have an answer prepared when an agent you have just met socially says, “Mavis, was it? Tell me what you write.” You’ll be glad then that you took the time to work up an elevator speech, a 3 — 4 sentence description of the protagonist and central conflict of your book, couched in the present tense (for novels and nonfiction about current events) and the past tense (for memoir and nonfiction about the distant past). Regardless of the narrative voice of the work, the elevator should be in the third person (and not waste valuable seconds mentioning the narrative voice of the work) — unless, of course, it is for a memoir, which should be pitched in the first person. As we discussed last time, an elevator speech is not a plot summary, but an introduction to the main character(s) by name, a brief introduction to the challenges s/he faces, and an implied invitation to the listener to ask for more details. Then — and this is the hardest part for many nervous pitchers — you are going to stop talking. Do not pass GO, do not collect $200, and definitely do not proceed to give your formal 2-minute pitch until that agent asks to hear it. I’m serious about the invitation part: a 3-sentence elevator speech is not an automatic preamble to a pitch; it is a means of judging a stranger’s interest. Assuming that interest is, in a word, rude. You need to pause in order to allow a well-meaning agent who doesn’t represent your kind of book to tell you that — wait for it — he doesn’t represent your kind of book, and thus it would be a waste of both of your time to continue. Stop gritting your teeth. An agent’s being willing to tell you that up front is actually a kindness: instead of plowing ahead with a pitch that is doomed from the outset for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with the writing quality of your manuscript, you can simply thank the agent and move on. Preferably to another agent who does represent your kind of book. How does a savvy writer know to do that? Chant it with me now, those of you who have been following Pitchingpalooza from the beginning: it’s simply not worth your time to approach an agent who does not have a solid track record representing books in your category. Remember, the single most common reason that pitches and queries get rejected is being aimed at the wrong person. There is absolutely nothing a writer can do about a mismatch other than accept gracefully that this is not going to work and move on — because agents specialize, no amount of persuasion is going to convince an agent who habitually represents nothing but memoir that your fantasy novel is the next great bestseller. He’s looking for memoir, period. But that didn’t address your central fear about giving an elevator speech, did it? “Oh, no, it didn’t, Anne,” those of you quaking in your proverbial boots cry. “I’m not just nervous about an agent’s saying no to me — even the notion of sitting down and trying to…well, not summarize, since you said an elevator speech should not be a summary, but to talk about my book in just a few sentences makes me feel like I’m being invited to waltz on quicksand. I’ve never done anything like this before, and…” Pardon my interrupting you, boot-quakers, but that last bit probably is not true. If you have ever queried, you actually do have some relevant experience upon which to draw. How so, you cry, and wherefore? Well, a 3-4 paragraph teaser for a book is typically the second paragraph of a classically-constructed query letter. That’s not too astonishing, I hope — a pitch is, after all, more or less a verbal query letter. (If anything I’ve said in this paragraph is a major surprise to you, I would strongly advise checking out the mysteriously-titled HOW TO WRITE A REALLY GOOD QUERY LETTER category on the list at right.) Query letters and elevator speeches often share focus problems. All too often, for instance, the constructors of both will go off on tangents, detailing how difficult it is to find an agent or boasting about how this is the best book ever written. Or how it’s a natural for Oprah, even though Oprah’s book club has been defunct for quite some time now. Like the descriptive paragraph of a query letter, elevator speeches often get bogged down in plot details. But summarization is not what’s required, in either instance — and if more aspiring writers realized that, people on both ends of the querying and pitching processes would be significantly happier. Do I hear some of you out there moaning, or are you merely thinking dissenting thoughts very loudly indeed? “But Anne,” disgruntled pitch- and query-constructors the world over protest, “I spent MONTHS over my query letter, and I never managed to trim the descriptive part to under two-thirds of a page! How do you expect me to be able to make my book sound fascinating in half that many words, and out loud?” In a word: strategy. To be followed shortly by a second word, as well as a third and a fourth: practice, practice, and practice. Let’s begin with the strategy. You can feel a step-by-step list coming on, can’t you? Here goes. (1) Don’t panic or berate yourself about not coming up with a great pitch the first time you sit down to do it. Oh, you may laugh, but panicking and self-blame are the two most common responses amongst most would-be pitchers confronted with the task of writing a 3-line pitch. That’s not a particularly rational response: contrary to popular belief, the mere fact of having written a good book does not magically endow one with the skills necessary to construct a 3-line pitch. Like querying, pitching is a learned skill; nobody is born knowing how to do it. So calm down and learn the skills before you start to judge yourself. Give yourself some time to get good at it. Feeling better? Excellent. Let’s move on to step 2. (2) Sit down and write a straightforward description of the central conflict or argument of your book. I’m not talking about summarizing the plot here, mind you, but the answer to a very simple, albeit multi-part, question: <blockquote>a) Who is your protagonist? I’m not just looking for a name here, but characteristics relevant to the story that will make her seem like an interesting person in an interesting situation. Ermintrude is a twenty-seven-year-old North American may well be factually accurate, but you must admit that it’s a heck of a lot less memorable than Wild boar huntress and supermodel Ermintrude is struggling to complete her doctorate in particle physics. b) What does s/he want more than anything else? If the central conflict of the book is not about this, shouldn’t it be? c) What’s standing in the way of her getting it?</blockquote> Easier to think of summing things up when you limit the parameters that way, isn’t it? It also works for memoir: <blockquote>a) Who is the narrator of this book? And no, “Why, it’s me!” is not a sufficient answer. Show that you are an interesting person in an interesting situation. b) What did you want more than anything else out of that interesting situation? c) What was standing in the way of your getting it?</blockquote> Got those answers firmly in hand? Good. Now let’s mop our perspiring brows and proceed to the next step. (3) Replace generalities with specifics. Nothing makes a pitch hearer’s eyes glaze over faster than a spate of generalities that might apply to the nearest 100,000 people. Besides, a generalized description usually isn’t particularly accurate, at least on a philosophical level. In a novel or memoir, events do not happen to people in general: they happen to a particular person or group of people with individual quirks. Give a taste of that. How? By being specific about who your protagonist(s) is (are) and what’s happening to him/her/it/them. Yes, you’re trying to give an overall sense here, but the less you generalize, the more memorable your protagonist and situation will seem. Ambrose was a florist with a dream is not uninteresting, but let’s face it, Forced into being a florist by his controlling great-uncle, Ambrose dreams daily of becoming a lion tamer is more likely to make you want to read the book. I know it’s hard in such a short speech, but believe me, a single memorable character trait or situational twist is worth paragraphs and paragraphs of generalities. Mara was an offbeat girl with a problem is significantly less memorable than Mara learned to use her first prosthetic limb when she was three, isn’t it? Have you obliterated summary and gotten concrete? Great. Now let’s work on making your elevator speech sound original. (4) Emphasize what is fresh about your story, not its similarities to other books. That loud thumping sound you just heard reverberating throughout the ether was the jaw of every pitcher who has ever said something like, “It’s THE DA VINCI CODE, but with 21rst-century sheep herding instead of multi-century religious conflict!” hitting the floor. Amongst a certain type of pitcher — typically, the type who picked up the idea somewhere that a pitch and a Hollywood hook are the same thing — drawing parallels with a bestseller, any bestseller, regardless of the aptness of the analogy, is downright common. If I had a penny for every time I’ve heard a pitcher say, “It’s just like BESTSELLER X, but with Twist Y,” I would build a rock-candy mountain just south of Winnipeg and invite all the children in Canada to feast for a month and a half. It’s just not very efficient use of brief elevator speech time; the keynote is a better place to draw such parallels, if you feel you must. Why isn’t it efficient? The elevator speech is not about indicating genre or book category — which, to someone in the industry, is all citing an earlier successful book in your chosen book category achieves. Besides, once you’ve told an agent or editor what your book category is in your magic first hundred words, referring to a similar book is actually a trifle redundant. It also makes your book seem less original, at least at the elevator speech stage, where you need to wow your hearers with the uniqueness of your premise, your protagonist, and your approach. Making your book sound like a rehash of a well-worn concept is not usually the best way to accomplish that. All freshened up? Fabulous. Let’s sharpen our critical eyes still further. (5) Try not to bottom-line the plot — and definitely avoid clichÃ©s. That advice about cliché-hunting doesn’t just apply to hackneyed concepts: well-worn phrases are notorious pitch-killers, too. Bear in mind that someone who hears pitches for a living may have a stronger sense of what’s a clichÃ© than does the population at large. While a romance-reader may not exclaim, “Oh, no, not another heroine with long, flowing red hair!”, an agent or editor who routinely handles romance might. So fine-tune your phraseology. Steer clear of sweeping statements on the order of …and in the process, he learned to be a better axe murderer — and a better human being. Or Their struggles brought them closer together as a couple and won her the mayoral election. Or, heaven preserve us, Can they learn to live happily ever after? Remember, you’re trying to convince the hearer that you can write; echoing the latest catchphrase — or one that’s been floating around the zeitgeist for forty years — is generally not the best way to achieve that. Writers often incorporate the sort of terminology used to promote TV shows and movies — but in an elevator speech (or a query letter — or a pitch, for that matter), the last reaction a writer wants to evoke is, “Gee, this sounds like the movie-of-the-week I saw last night.” Translation: this technique doesn’t show off your creativity as a plot-deviser, any more than the use of clichés would display your talent for unique phraseology. You want to make your story sound original and fresh, right? Is your draft now free of time-worn concepts and wording? Marvelous. Now comes the hard part. (6) Enliven your account with concrete, juicy details that only you could invent. Include at least one strong, MEMORABLE image. Create a mental picture that your hearer will recall after you walk away, business card and request for the first fifty pages clutched firmly to your heaving bosom. Ideally, this image should be something that the hearer (or our old pal Millicent, the agency screener) has never heard before. And it needn’t be a visual detail, either: the other senses tend to be seriously under-utilized in elevator speeches. Just makes sure it sticks in the mind. Yes, in 3-4 sentences. You’re a writer: making prose interesting is what you DO, right? Have you come up with an original image, vividly described? Tremendous. Now let’s make your plot sound fascinating. (7) Present your protagonist as the primary actor in the plot, not as the object of the action. Don’t underestimate the importance of establishing your protagonist as active: believe me, every agent and editor in the biz has heard thousands of pitches about protagonists who are buffeted about by fate, forced by circumstances beyond their control, and are pushed almost unconsciously from event to event not by some interior drive or conflict, but because the plot demands it. Long-time readers of this blog, chant with me now: “Because the plot requires it” is never a sufficient answer to “Why did that character do that?” Stop laughing — you wouldn’t believe how many pitches portray characters who only have things happen to them, rather than characters who do things to deal with challenging situations. If I had a penny for each of those I’ve heard, I’d build three of those rock-candy mountains, one in each of the NAFTA nations, for the delight of local children. The sad thing is that the books being pitched this way may not actually have passive protagonists. Honestly, though, it’s very easy to get so involved in setting up the premise of the book in an elevator speech that the protagonist can come across as passive, merely caught in the jaws of the plot. There are a few code words that will let an industry-savvy listener know that your protagonist is fully engaged and passionately pursing the goals assigned to her in the book. They are, in no particular order: love, passion, desire, dream, fate (kismet will do, in a pinch), struggle, loss, and happiness. Any form of these words will do; a gerund or two is fine. This is recognized code; take advantage of it. Does your protagonist come across as passionately engaged in the struggle to pursue her dream, embrace her fate, and assure her happiness. Pat yourself on the back. Time to talk about voice. (8) Make sure that the tone, language, and vocabulary of your elevator speech matches the tone of your book. You’d be astonished — at least I hope you would — at how often this basic, common-sense principle is overlooked by your garden-variety pitcher. Most elevator speeches and pitches come across as deadly serious. Oh, you smile incredulously; you think a funny premise speaks for itself, don’t you, and that it does not require a funny presentation? Au contraire. Nothing kills a funny premise faster than a deadpan delivery, just as a hilarious elevator speech for a serious book would make an agent who represents the ultra-serious think twice about asking to see pages. Don’t believe that the wrong tone can undermine ? Okay, tell me where you would expect to see these two books shelved in a library: <blockquote>A womanizing, shallow reporter becomes unstuck in time. Forced to repeat the same day over and over again, he loses hope of ever moving on with his life. In the process, he becomes a better man. A shy woman with a past moves to Brooklyn and falls in love with her wacky neighbor. When a young Southern writer takes up residence in their offbeat apartment house, he can’t believe what he sees going on! Will he be able to win her heart before her boyfriend tires her to death with his high jinks?</blockquote> Did you recognize either of those stories, devoid of the tones that characterized them? I’m guessing not, although both of these elevator speeches are factually accurate renditions of the stories in question: the first was the comedy GROUNDHOG DAY. The second was the tragedy SOPHIE’S CHOICE. Make the tone of the elevator speech match the tone of the book. If the book is a steamy romance, let the telling details you include be delightfully sensual; if it is a comic fantasy, show your elves doing something funny. Just make sure that what you give is an accurate taste of what a reader can expect the book as a whole to provide. (9) Try saying the result out loud to someone who hasn’t read your book, to see how she/he/the lamp in the corner of your office responds. The lamp is a suggestion for those of you too shy to buttonhole a co-worker or that guy sitting next to you at Starbucks, but you see my point, right? You simply cannot know how a pitch is going to sound out loud until you actually say it out loud. I’m not merely talking about coherence here — I’m also thinking of practicalities like breath control. Is it possible to speak your three-line speech in three breaths, for instance? If not, you’re not going to be able to get through your elevator speech within 30 seconds without fainting. Oh, you may laugh now, but I’ve seen it happen. Writers just keel over sideways because they forget to breathe. Remember not to lock your knees. Oh, and write a 3-line pitch that’s possible to say without turning blue. Be on the look-out, too, for words that are hard to say — or are hard to say together. Tongue-twisters and rhymes may seem cute on the page, but trust me, you’re not going to want to say, Tina Tweezedale tried tremendously to tie Trevor up with twine. Also, if you’re not ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE how to pronounce a word, do not use it in your elevator speech. Ditto if you aren’t sure that you’re using it correctly. Writers often use words that they’ve never heard spoken aloud; most inveterate readers do. But do you really want the agent to whom you’re pitching to correct your pronunciation of solipsistic, or to tell you that you didn’t actually mean that your protagonist implied something, but that he inferred it? Check. Double-check. And if you’re still not certain, track down the best-read person you know and ask her to hear your pitch. And to define solipsistic, while she’s at it. I sense some furrowed brows out there. “Okay, Anne,” some perplexed souls murmur, “I get why I might want to make sure that I can say my entire elevator speech out loud correctly. But if I’m sure that I can, why do I need to say it to — ugh — another living, breathing human being?” For a couple of very good reasons, shy brow-knitters. First, you’re going to have to say it out loud eventually; it’s literally impossible to give a verbal pitch silently. All saving your elevator speech for the great moment when you are face-to-face with the agent of your dreams actually achieves is depriving you of the opportunity to practice. Or, to put it less obliquely: if your elevator speech doesn’t make sense aloud, would you rather find that out in the midst of giving the pitch to the agent of your dreams, or a few days before, when you still have time to fix it? I thought as much. Second, if you’ve never pitched before, saying your 3-line pitch is going to sound ridiculous to you the first few times you do it. That’s just the nature of the beast. Again, would you rather feel silly while you’re pitching to an agent, or days/weeks/months before? Third — and this is the most important — if you practice on a reasonably intelligent hearer, you can ask a vitally important follow-up question: “Would you mind telling the story back to me?” If s/he can’t, you might want to take another gander at your elevator speech. Chances are, it’s not particularly memorable. I’m itching to give a few concrete examples of these principles in action, but that’s a task for another day — like, say, tomorrow. Keep up the good work! </div> </div> </article> <article id="post-4077" class="post-4077 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-3-line-pitch category-approaching-agents-at-conferences category-being-an-agents-dream-client category-building-blocks-of-a-pitch-or-query category-but-ive-heard category-conference-etiquette category-conference-faux-pas category-conference-lore category-conference-pitching category-conferences-that-cater-to-writers category-dealing-with-fear-of-rejection category-how-can-i-keep-myself-from-freaking-out-mid-pitch category-how-to-write-a-pitch category-ive-just-signed-up-to-give-a-conference-pitch-what-do-i-do-now category-industry-etiquette category-industry-terminology category-keeping-the-faith category-literary-fiction-pitching category-meeting-fellow-writers-and-other-kindred-spirits category-nonfiction-pitching category-pitch-examples category-pitch-rejection category-pitching-a-multiple-protagonist-novel category-pitching-faux-pas category-pitching-memoir category-pitching-tips category-pitchingpalooza category-realistic-expectations-for-pitchers category-realistic-expectations-for-writers category-strategizing-a-writing-career category-the-magic-first-hundred-words category-what-are-the-polite-ways-to-approach-an-agent category-why-might-my-pitch-get-rejected"> <header class="entry-header"> <div class="entry-meta">Posted on <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/07/28/pitchingpalooza-part-x-the-cat-doesnt-have-to-get-your-tongue-you-know-8/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark"><time class="entry-date published" datetime="2011-07-28T00:00:00+00:00">July 28, 2011</time><time class="updated" datetime="2017-01-19T06:36:18+00:00">January 19, 2017</time></a> - <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/07/28/pitchingpalooza-part-x-the-cat-doesnt-have-to-get-your-tongue-you-know-8/industry-etiquette/#respond">No Comments on Pitchingpalooza, part X: the cat doesn’t have to get your tongue, you know</a></div><h2 class="entry-title"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/07/28/pitchingpalooza-part-x-the-cat-doesnt-have-to-get-your-tongue-you-know-8/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark">Pitchingpalooza, part X: the cat doesn’t have to get your tongue, you know</a></h2> </header> <div class="entry-content"> <div class="entry"> <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/divided-highway-3.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/divided-highway-3.jpg" alt="" title="divided highway 3" width="363" height="577" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-15621"/></a> Some interesting rumors have been flying around for the last couple of days, campers. While book lovers in general have been fretting over the demise of Borders, a lot of us have been worrying about the perhaps less sympathetic but still important to the book-moving trade Barnes & Noble’s future. There’s been quite a bit of <a href="http://www.bgr.com/2011/07/28/does-apple-have-any-interest-in-buying-barnes-noble/">speculation that Apple might step in and buy up the latter</a> for its immense book catalog; there has also been talk of <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2011/07/28/apple-and-barnes-probably-not-says-gleacher/">taking on a chunk of Borders</a>, possibly just for the retail space, possibly not. I have no idea whether any of these rumors are true, mind you, or even probable. Such is the nature of tittle-tattle. Since folks have been flinging their hands in the air and prophesying the imminent demise of the brick-and-mortar bookstore as an institution so much over the last few weeks, though, I thought you might find it refreshing to hear a bit of countervailing gossip. Back to business. So far in this series, we have been mostly talking about taking the preliminary steps to constructing a conference pitch, rather than writing the pitch itself. We’ve covered <a href="/index_p_15523.html">selecting a book category</a>, <a href="/index_p_15539.html">the desirability of narrowing down your target audience</a> to something more specific than the ever-popular every woman under 50 in America, <a href="/index_p_15539.html">finding out how big that audience might be, </a><a href="/index_p_15559.html">figuring out your book’s selling points</a>, and <a href="/index_p_15563.html">coming up with a one-line book concept or keynote</a>, as well as <a href="/index_p_15479.html">deciding whether pitching is right for you in the first place</a> and <a href="/index_p_15510.html">what to do if you find yourself in a pitch meeting with an agent who does not now and probably will not ever represent books like yours</a>. To put all that in terms of gaining fluency in a foreign language, you’ve already learned enough to order a meal in a fancy restaurant in Publishingland. By the end of the next couple of posts, you’re going to be able to chat with the waiter. Do those loud harrumphing noises bouncing around the ether indicate a certain level of skepticism? “I get that I will need to define my work in the language and according to the logic of the publishing industry, Anne,” some of you admit, rattling your feet on the floor and glancing frequently at the door, fearful of being overheard by an agent. “I also have faith that you’re going to walk me through constructing a strong formal pitch because, well, that’s the kind of thing you do in your multi-part -Paloozas. What’s keeping me up nights, though, is the creeping fear that no matter how prepared I am, I might suddenly clam up. Heck, I’m so nervous that I might not even lose my nerve in front of an agent or editor; I live in terror that I might lose the ability to answer coherently if the writer sitting next to me in a conference seminar asks me, ‘So what kind of book are you here to pitch?’” Oh, I am very familiar with that particular dead-of-night fearful fantasy, campers; I help aspiring writers prepare pitches all the time. It’s a very, very common concern amongst first-time pitchers. Which is why I can tell you with relative assurance that while you currently feel as if someone asking you to talk about your writing at a conference will be as threatening as this: <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/lion-and-tamer1.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/lion-and-tamer1.jpg" alt="" title="lion and tamer" width="236" height="301" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10165"/></a> If you walk into the conference prepared, it can feel a lot more like this: <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/lion-licking-tamer.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/lion-licking-tamer.jpg" alt="" title="lion-licking-tamer" width="300" height="225" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-15618"/></a> Still frightening, of course — there’s no way around that, I’m afraid — but not nearly so confrontational. How might that semi-miraculous transformation be achieved? Well, learning not to hear the question as a clarion call to justify writing at all, for one thing. Doing precisely the kind of pre-conference homework we’ve been discussing throughout this series, for another. And most effective of all, pulling the pin in the panic grenade before you walk into your first pitch meeting. How? By approaching fellow writers at conferences and talking about your work. Yes, on purpose — and before you start telling me that you are nowhere near ready to take such a bold step, allow me to point out that you already have the skills. How do I know? Because we’ve been adding them to your writer’s toolkit for a couple of weeks now. Today, I’m going to show you how to pull all of the elements you’ve already constructed together into the first hundred words you will want to say to anyone you meet at a writer’s conference — and that’s including “Hello.” With these first hundred words in hand (and mouth), even the shyest, most reclusive writer can launch into a professional-sounding discussion with anyone in the publishing industry. And I do mean anyone, be it an agent or editor to whom you are pitching, the aforementioned chatty guy sitting next to you in a class, or the person standing next to you while you are dunking your teabag in hot water, trying to wake up before the 8 a.m. agent and editor forum. Nifty trick, eh? And a darned useful one, in my humble opinion: no matter what you’ve heard, it’s darned hard to land an agent via a pitch unless you can talk fluently about your book. As in during an actual conversation, not in the few lines most first-time conference-goers regard as a pitch.. Once again, I must add a disclaimer about my own tendency toward iconoclastism: this strategy is an invention of my own, because I flatly hate the fact that the rise of pitching now often makes it necessary for people whose best talent is expressing themselves at length and in writing to sell their work in short, verbal bursts. I feel that pitching unfairly penalizes the shy and the complex-minded, in addition to tending to sidestep the question that agents and editors most need to know about a brand-new writer: not can she speak, but can she write? However, as long as aspiring writers in North America are stuck with pitching and querying as the only polite means of landing agents, we need to make the best of it. But — as some of you MAY have figured out by now — I don’t believe that just telling writers to compress their lives’ work into three sentences is sufficient preparation for doing it successfully. Why? Well, among other reasons, it tends to make first-time pitchers feel a little like that lion tamer in the top picture: putting so much effort into not showing perfectly rational fear in the face of what your body is quite likely to interpret as a life-threatening situation (because your psyche knows it to be a potentially ego-eviscerating one) that you can barely move. Clutching a chair and a whip, even mentally, is not the best way to begin what can be a very cordial conversation. For that reason — and I warn you, conference organizers tend to dislike my expressing it this way — I believe that encouraging writers to think that those three sentences are all that is needed to sell a book is short-sighted, inaccurate, and is an almost sure-fire recipe for ending up feeling tongue-tied and helpless in a pitching situation. I’m not convinced that all pitching disasters are, as conference organizers often imply, the result of writers who simply don’t prepare adequately; flubbed pitches are often the result of mismatched appointments, lack of confidence, or even over-preparation. I’m quite serious about that last one. Over the years, I’ve watched hundreds and hundreds of stammering writers struggle to express themselves at conferences all over the country. They flounder not merely because pitching is genuinely hard, but also because they had blindly followed the pervasive pitching advice and prepared only three sentences — no more, no less — about their books. Why is that structure problematic? Ask those stammering pitchers: focusing solely upon brevity left them with precisely nothing else to say about it, or at least nothing else that they had polished enough to roll smoothly off their tongues. This species of brain freeze happens all the time to good writers, squelching their big chance to make a connection with the right person to help their book to publication. You’d be astonished at how frequently these poor souls forget even to introduce themselves prior to giving their official 3-line pitch; most of the time, they walk out of the pitch without having told the agent what kind of book it is. That leaves the agent or editor understandably confused and frustrated, as you may well imagine. The results, I’m afraid, are relatively predictable: a meeting that neither party can feel good about, and one that ends without a request to submit pages. Frankly, I think it’s rather cruel to place talented-but-inexperienced writers in this position. There is certainly a place in the publishing industry for the three-sentence pitch — quite a significant place, as we will be discussing later in this ‘Palooka — but there is information about you and your book that should logically be mentioned before those three sentences, so the agent or editor to whom you are pitching knows who you are and what the heck you are talking about. In answer to that gigantic unspoken cry of, “What do you mean, I have to say something to an agent or editor BEFORE I pitch! I was told I had to prepare only three sentences, total, and I would be home free!” we all just heard bouncing off the moon and back into the atmosphere, I can only reply: yes, yes, I know. I’ve never seen a conference brochure that gave advice on what to say before a pitch. But such is my faith in your mother that I believe she did not raise you to be rude to people you want to do you professional favors. Let’s face it: simple etiquette forbids charging up to a total stranger, even if you have an appointment with her, and blurting, “There’s this good actor who can’t get a job, so he puts on women’s clothing and auditions. Once he’s a popular actress, he falls in love with a woman who doesn’t know he’s a man.” That’s a screenplay-type pitch for TOOTSIE, by the way, a great story. But even if you run up to an agent and shout out the best pitch for the best story that ever dropped from human lips, the agent is going to wonder who the heck you are and why you have no manners. “That writer’s mother can’t possibly know that he acts this way,” the agent will mutter, turning away. Don’t tell me that you don’t have time for manners: presenting yourself politely, as a reasonable person should, requires only about a hundred words. Even in the swiftest pitching situation, you will have the ten seconds to utter a hundred words. Even writers who limit their pitches to three lines have time for that, right? The goal of my Magic First Hundred Words formula is to give you a lead-in to any conversation that you will have at a writer’s conference, or indeed, anywhere within the profession. Equipped with this talisman, you can feel confident introducing yourself to anyone, no matter how important or intimidating, because you will know that you are talking about your work in a professional manner. Now doesn’t that sound more civilized than walking into a pitch meeting with a whip and a chair, terrified and desiring only to keep criticism at bay? While mastering the MFHW will not necessarily transform you from the Jerry Lewis of pitchers into the Cary Grant of same — although we can all hope — it will go a long way toward helping you calm down enough to give an effective pitch. Ideally, both pitcher and pitchee should feel at ease. Observing the niceties is conducive to that. And not just for reasons of style; I’m being practical here. Trust me, in the many, many different social situations in which a professional writer is expected to be able to speak coherently about her work, very few are conducive to coughing up three sentences completely out of context. There are social graces to be observed. Ready to learn how to introduce yourself gracefully? Relax — it’s going to be easy. Here’s the formula: <blockquote> ”Hi, I’m (YOUR NAME), and I write (BOOK CATEGORY). My latest project, (TITLE), is geared toward (TARGET MARKET). See how it grabs you: (KEYNOTE).” </blockquote> Voilà! You are now equipped to start a conversation with anybody at any writing event in the English-speaking world. These magic words — which, you will note, are NOT generic, but personalized for YOUR book — will introduce you and your work in the language used by the industry, establishing you right off the bat as someone to take seriously. You’re welcome. The beauty of the MFHW formula (if I do say so myself) is its versatility. If you learn these few sentences by heart, you can walk into any pitching situation — be it a formal, 15-minute meeting with the agent of your dreams or a chance encounter at the dessert bar when you and an editor are reaching for the same miniature éclair — confident that you can comport yourself with ease and grace. Why is so important to introduce yourself urbanely — and get to your point quickly? Well, agents and editors are MAGNIFICENTLY busy people. They honestly do prefer to work with writers to whom they will not have to explain each and every nuance of the road to publication. That’s my job, right? Look, it’s natural to be hesitant when approaching someone who could conceivably change your life. But think about what even a brief flare-up of shyness, modesty, or just plain insecurity at the moment of approach can look like from their perspective. By the time the average pitcher has gotten around to mentioning the actual content of her book after several minutes of shilly-shallying, the agent in front of him has usually already mentally stamped his foreheads with “TIME-CONSUMING” in bright red letters. Which means, in practical terms, that in any subsequent pitch, his book is going to have to sound amazing, rather than merely good, for the agent to want to see it. And in a hallway encounter, he might not get to pitch at all. By introducing yourself and your work in the lingua franca of the industry, however, you will immediately establish yourself as someone who has taken the time to learn the ropes. Believe me, the pros will appreciate it. I’ve pushed a few insecurity buttons out there, haven’t I? “But Anne,” I hear some of the more modest amongst you protest, “I don’t know much about how publishing works. They’ll see through my false mask of confidence right away. And look — that agent has a knife! AHHHHHH!” (Sound of talented body thudding onto the ground.) Would this be a good time to point out that the vast majority of aspiring writers radically overestimate how scary interacting with an agent or editor will be, building it up in their minds until it makes a facing a firing squad seem like a carefree social encounter? Which is, of course, ridiculous: in my experience, very few agents come to conferences armed. In their natural habitat, they will only attack writers if provoked, wounded, or very, very hungry. No, but seriously, folks, writers tend to freak themselves out unnecessarily with fantasies about agents and editors being mean to them, but that’s hardly the universal pitching experience. Most conference-attending agents and editors genuinely like good writing and good writers; apart from a few sadists who get their jollies bullying the innocent, they’re not there to pick fights. Or, to put it a bit more poetically: when an agent or editor agrees to hear a writer’s pitch, either in a formal or an informal context, he’s virtually never trying to trick an aspiring writer into making a career-destroying mistake. They come to these conferences to find talent. They want to like you, honest. But they will like you better if you meet them halfway — and observe the niceties. Worried? I can’t say as I blame you; would it set your mind at ease to gain a sense of how most aspiring writers begin pitch meetings? Assuming that we all already know why the ever-popular sit-there-in-terrified-silence approach might not charm and agent or editor, let’s take a look at a couple of other common entrance speeches. First, the super-vague: <blockquote> ”There’s this woman who is in love with a man, but they work together, so it’s a problem. After a while, something happens to lock them in an elevator together, where they discover that they’ve actually been yearning after each other for years.” </blockquote> Non-specific, isn’t it? Most rambling pitches are. The hearer is left to guess: what kind of a book is it? Who are these characters, and why should I care about them? And, lest we forget, who is saying this, beyond the person who happened to be assigned to the 10:45 pitching slot? See the problem, from the agent or editor’s point of view? Good. Now let’s look at another popular entrance strategy, the self-rejecting: <blockquote> ”Well, my book isn’t really finished, and you’re probably not going to be interested in it, but I’ve been working on it for eight years and I keep getting rejected, so maybe…well, in any case, here goes: there’s this woman who is in love with a man, but they work together…” </blockquote> Doesn’t exactly ooze confidence, does it? Let’s try the book report method on for size: <blockquote> “My fiction novel is a first-person narrative from the points of view of three different narrators, all unreliable. The writing is very literary, but I’m hoping to market it to a mainstream audience. The imagery is extremely filmic, so it would be a natural to make into a movie.” </blockquote> Okay, but what is this book about? At the first-introduction stage, why should an agent care about the narrative voice or the number of narrators? It’s not as though she’s going to stop the writer before he even mentions the plot and say, “Oh, fantastic — I was talking to an editor just the other day who begged me to bring her more first-person narratives from multiple perspectives. You, sir, are my new client!” And by the way, all novels are fiction, just as all memoirs are based on true stories. So saying that your novel is fiction is just about as redundant as telling an agent that you have taken the original approach of printing words on pages; trust me, she will have assumed that. The book report pitch is not the most common, believe it or not. That honor would go to the ever-popular book review technique: <blockquote> “This is the most exciting debut novel since THE VIRGIN SUICIDES, although it’s neither written in the first person plural nor a closely-examined depiction of a dysfunctional family. Searing in its intensity, the plot builds to a climax of Cinemascope proportions. The ending will leave you breathless and eager for a sequel. </blockquote> At the risk of repeating myself, what is this book about? Why is the comparison relevant? And why would an agent believe a writer’s critical assessment of his own work, rather than waiting to make that call herself after reading the manuscript? With those querying faux pas firmly embedded in your brainpans, let’s take another gander at those magic first hundred words, to see precisely how far your approach is likely to try their patience. You’ve just walked into your pitch appointment and said: <blockquote> ”Hi, I’m (YOUR NAME), and I write (BOOK CATEGORY). My latest project, (TITLE), is geared toward (TARGET MARKET). See how it grabs you: (KEYNOTE).” </blockquote> Believe me, to an agent or editor who has been listening to writers stammer helplessly all day, this simple speech will be downright refreshing. Quite apart from the content conveying what they actually want to know — again, something of a rarity in a three-line pitch — the magic first hundred words also convey: <blockquote> ”Hi, I’m (YOUR NAME) a polite and professional writer who has taken the time to learn how you and your ilk describe books. I understand that in order to make a living, you need to be able to pitch good books to others, so I have been considerate enough to figure out both the BOOK CATEGORY and TARGET MARKET. Rather than presuming that you are an automaton, an industry stooge with no individual tastes, I am now going to run the premise by you to see how you like it: (KEYNOTE).” </blockquote> That’s perfectly honest, right? Over the past couple of weeks, you have done all these things, haven’t you? Practice your magic first hundred words until they flow out of your sweet lips smoothly, without an initial pause — you know, like a conversation. Only repetition will make them feel like natural speech. And don’t just say them in your mind: practice OUT LOUD, so you get used to hearing yourself talk about your work like a professional. It’s going to sound a bit strange and more than a little pushy the first seventy or eighty times that convenient little speech pops out of your mouth. That’s a perfectly lovely reason not to save the MFHW for the important folks at a conference, but to use them to introduce yourself to the writer standing ahead of you in the registration line. And the one behind you, as well as the people sitting around you at the first seminar on the first day. In fact, it would be perfectly accurate to say that any writers’ conference anywhere in the world will be stuffed to capacity with people upon whom to practice this speech. Knock yourself out. You might make a few friends. One caveat about using these words to meet other writers: they’re a great introduction, but do remember to give the other party a chance to speak as well. It is accepted conference etiquette to ask the other party what she writes before you start going on at too great length about your own work. Courtesy counts, remember? So if you find that you have been speaking for more than a couple of minutes to a fellow writer without hearing anyone’s voice but your own, make sure to stop yourself and ask what your listener writes. In this context, the very brevity of the MFHW will ensure that you are being polite; if your new acquaintance is interested, she will ask for more details about your book. I mention this because it’s been my experience that writers, especially those attending their first conferences, tend to underestimate pretty radically how much they will enjoy talking to another sympathetic soul about their work. After plugging away in one’s literary garret for so long, it can be a huge relief. It’s not at all unusual for a writer to realize with a shock that he’s been talking non-stop for twenty minutes. Completely understandable, of course. We writers are, by definition, rather isolated creatures: we spend much of our time by ourselves, tapping away at a keyboard. Ours is one of the few professions where a touch of agoraphobia is actually a professional advantage, after all. It can be very lonely — which is precisely why you’re going to want to use the MFHW to introduce yourself to as many kindred souls as you possibly can at a conference. What better place to meet buddies to e-mail when you feel yourself starting to lose momentum? Where else are you more likely to find talented people eager to form a critique group? And who will be more thrilled to hear that you’ve landed an agent, sold your first book, or will be in town for a book signing? (Oh, you thought writers who hit the big time didn’t have support networks?) If that’s not enough to get you chatting, consider this: there’s a distinct possibility that one of those people sitting next to you in seminars is going to be a household name someday. Every writer has to start out somewhere. Just think how cool you’ll feel saying casually, “Oh, her? Great writer. I met her at a conference years ago. Look, there’s my name in the acknowledgements of her book.” This is, in fact, an excellent place for a writer to find new friends who get what it’s like to be a writer. And at that, let no one sneeze, at least not in my general vicinity. Let’s face it, most of our non-writing friends’ curiosity about what we’re doing for all that time we’re shut up in our studios is limited to the occasional, “So have you finished the novel yet?” and the extortion of a vague promise to sign a copy for them when it eventually comes out. If they know a little — just a little — about the publishing industry, they may even joke about the day when you will hand them free copies. Word to the wise: get out of the habit NOW of promising these people copies of your future books. Nowadays, authors get comparatively few free copies; you don’t want to end up paying for dozens of extra books to fulfill all those past promises, do you? Back to my original point: at a writers’ conference, or even in a pitch meeting, the euphoria of meeting another human being who actually wants to hear about what you are writing, who is THRILLED to discuss the significant difficulties involved in finding time to write when you have a couple of small children scurrying around the house, who says fabulously encouraging things like, “Gee, that’s a great title!” can be pretty overwhelming. It’s easy to get carried away. For the sake of the long-term friendships you can make at a conference, make sure you listen as much as you talk. For that, too, you are already more prepared than you think. For your conversational convenience, the MFHW transform readily into conversation-sparking questions: <blockquote> ”Hi, what’s your name? What do you write? What is your target audience? What’s your premise? </blockquote> Sensing a theme here? By all means, though, use your fellow conference attendees to get used to speaking your MFHW aloud — and your pitch, while you’re at it. It’s great practice, and it’s a good way to meet other writers working in your genre. Most writers are genuinely nice people — and wouldn’t it be great if, on the day your agent calls you to say she’s received a stellar offer for your first book, if you already had the e-mail addresses of a dozen writers that you could call immediately, people who would UNDERSTAND what an achievement it was? Trust me on this one: you won’t want to have to wonder whom to call when that happy day comes. Practice, practice, practice those MFHW, my friends, until they roll off your tongue with the ease of saying good morning to your co-workers. They are going to be your security blanket when you’re nervous, and your calling card when you are not. Next time, we’ll be moving to the elevator speech, those pesky three sentences we’ve all heard so much about. After that, we’ll be ready for the home stretch: pulling it all together for the pitch proper. Can the query letter be far behind? Congratulations on all of the progress you’ve made over the last couple of weeks: you honestly are building up your professional acumen. Keep up the good work! </div> </div> </article> <article id="post-4078" class="post-4078 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-3-line-pitch category-approaching-agents-at-conferences category-book-concept category-book-jackets-and-the-things-that-go-on-them category-building-blocks-of-a-pitch-or-query category-but-ive-heard category-common-agents-pet-peeves category-conference-etiquette category-conference-faux-pas category-conference-lore category-conference-pitching category-conferences-that-cater-to-writers category-freshness-in-a-pitch category-giving-good-author-readings category-hallway-pitching category-hollywood-hooks category-how-to-write-a-pitch category-ive-just-signed-up-to-give-a-conference-pitch-what-do-i-do-now category-industry-etiquette category-industry-terminology category-keeping-the-faith category-literary-fiction-pitching category-nonfiction-pitching category-pitch-examples category-pitch-rejection category-pitching-faux-pas category-pitching-memoir category-pitching-or-querying-nonfiction category-pitching-tips category-pitching-to-editors-at-conferences category-pitchingpalooza category-public-readings category-realistic-expectations-for-pitchers category-what-are-the-polite-ways-to-approach-an-agent category-when-should-i-not-approach-an-agent-at-a-conference category-why-might-my-pitch-get-rejected category-your-books-selling-points"> <header class="entry-header"> <div class="entry-meta">Posted on <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/07/27/pitchingpalooza-part-ix-anne-frank-and-godzilla-meet-cute-at-the-tour-eiffel-and-love-blossoms-or-how-to-get-conceptual-without-sounding-reductionist-12/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/common-agents-pet-peeves/" rel="bookmark"><time class="entry-date published" datetime="2011-07-27T00:00:00+00:00">July 27, 2011</time><time class="updated" datetime="2017-01-19T06:36:19+00:00">January 19, 2017</time></a> - <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/07/27/pitchingpalooza-part-ix-anne-frank-and-godzilla-meet-cute-at-the-tour-eiffel-and-love-blossoms-or-how-to-get-conceptual-without-sounding-reductionist-12/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/common-agents-pet-peeves/#respond">No Comments on Pitchingpalooza, part IX: Anne Frank and Godzilla meet cute at the Tour Eiffel, and love blossoms! Or, how to get conceptual without sounding reductionist</a></div><h2 class="entry-title"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/07/27/pitchingpalooza-part-ix-anne-frank-and-godzilla-meet-cute-at-the-tour-eiffel-and-love-blossoms-or-how-to-get-conceptual-without-sounding-reductionist-12/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/common-agents-pet-peeves/" rel="bookmark">Pitchingpalooza, part IX: Anne Frank and Godzilla meet cute at the Tour Eiffel, and love blossoms! Or, how to get conceptual without sounding reductionist</a></h2> </header> <div class="entry-content"> <div class="entry"> <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/300px-godzilla_1954_extras-1.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/300px-godzilla_1954_extras-1-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="300px-godzilla_1954_extras-1" width="150" height="150" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-1087"/></a> + <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/splash1.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/splash1.jpg" alt="" title="splash1" width="148" height="137" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1140"/></a> + <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/images.jpeg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/images.jpeg" alt="" title="images" width="130" height="130" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1141"/></a> Did some of you find yourself getting just a trifle antsy when I didn’t post yesterday, campers? I couldn’t really blame you, especially if you happen to be in a great big hurry to polish a pitch — if, say, you happen to be attending a Conference That Shall Remain Nameless in the greater Seattle area the weekend after this. It’s eight days away — can you hear Washington State’s collective blood pressure rising at the very thought of it? — and frankly, I have about twice that many posts’ worth of observations to make about pitching. There goes that blood pressure again. Take some nice, deep breaths, local pitchers-to-be, and let’s think about our options. First, if you are planning to pitch next week, please feel free to take the express route. The posts gathered under the HOW TO WRITE A PITCH AT THE LAST MINUTE category on the archive list at right will take you through the basics at record speed. (I know — how do I come up with those esoteric category names?) Second, I could ramp up the pace, in the manner of ‘Paloozas past. I’m reluctant to start posting twice per day (and thrice on Sunday!) in mid-summer, because I assume that most of you who are not planning to pitch as early as next week might conceivably want to engage in some leisure activities, get some work done, and/or spend enough time with your families that your kith and kin could pick you out of a police lineup (“That’s she, officer — or that’s what Mom looked like before she took up writing.”) In the midst of one of my hectic ‘Palooza marathons, any of those things could in theory take a back seat to furious reading. So here is what I propose: let’s take a poll. If you’d like me to pick up the pace, gearing the rest of the series to the assumption that many of you will in fact be pitching the weekend after next, drop me a note in the comments. If, on the other hand, you would feel that boosting my already voluminous blog output would stretch your reading capacities, you need say nothing. I’ll get the hint. And for those of you who do not plan on pitching anytime soon — or, indeed, ever, if you can possibly avoid it — please hang tight, either way. As I may PERHAPS have intimated before, the essential skills a writer uses for creating a pitch and crafting a query are, if not the same, at least closely related. Note that I called them skills, and not talents. Contrary to popular belief, success in marketing one’s work is not entirely reliant upon the quality of the writing; it’s also about professional presentation. Pitching and querying well require skills that have little to do with writing talent. No baby, however inherently gifted in finding la mot juste, has ever crawled out of the womb already informed by the celestial talent-handlers how to make her work appealing to the publishing industry, I assure you. . As in any other business, there are ropes to learn if you want to get published. No shame in that. I wish this were a more widely-accepted truth on the conference circuit. Writers so often plunge into pitching or querying with sky-high hopes, only to have them dashed by what is in fact a perfectly acceptable response to a pitch: a cautious, “Well, that sounds interesting, but naturally, it all depends upon the writing. Send me the first three chapters.” That’s if everything happened to go well in the pitch, of course. If it didn’t, a polite but firm, “I’m sorry, but that’s just not for my agency/publishing house,” is the usual dream-crusher. In the stress of pitching or querying, it can be hard to remember that quite apart from any interest (or lack thereof) an agent might have in the story being told, an unprofessionally-presented pitch or query letter will often get rejected on that basis alone, not necessarily upon the book concept or the quality of the writing. So until a book has been marketed properly, it’s virtually impossible to glean writing-related feedback from rejections at all. Allow me to repeat that, as it’s hugely important for you to remember as you are walking nervously into a pitch meeting: giving a poor pitch will not hurt your book’s long-term publication process; like inadvertently sending a query addressed to Agenta McMarketpro to Pickyarbiter O’Taste, Jr., the worst that will happen is that you will engender some minor irritation in the person on the receiving end. There are other agents and editors, after all. Learn what you can from the experience, then pick yourself up, dust the leaves and bracken from your ego, and move on. Doesn’t your book deserve the compliment of persistence? Yes, yes, I know: when you’re prepping a pitch, it feels as though not only the fate of your book, but the prospects of Western civilization hang on whether you can give a coherent and appealing account of your plot or argument. “It’s not just the idea of sitting face-to-face with a real, live agent that’s so intimidating, Anne,” nail-gnawers all over the Pacific Northwest point out. “It’s the shortness of the darned pitch meeting. I’m a complex person who writes in a complex matter about complex things — how on earth am I supposed to cram several years’ worth of concentrated creative thought into just three sentences?” Ah, you’re suffering from Pith Petrification. This dire syndrome’s tell-tale symptoms are clearly visible in the hallways of half the literary conferences in North America. Aspiring writers walk into walls, muttering to themselves, the sure sign that they’ve embraced the antiquated pitching method so favored by conference organizers, and so hated by everyone else: trying to cram the entire plot of a book into three sentences, memorizing them (thus the muttering and wall-battery), and spitting them out in one long breath at the pitch meeting. As some of you MAY have figured out by this point in the series, I am not a big fan this approach, however often conference brochures and websites tout it as the proper — or only — way to pitch a book. In my experience, it’s far, far better pitching strategy for a writer to learn to talk about her book effectively and in professional terms than to swallow a pre-fab speech whole, hoping to God that the agent or editor at whom she plans to spit it won’t do anything disorienting like ask follow-up questions or sneeze while she’s in the midst of delivering it. News flash to those who adhere to the three-line approach: people sneeze, and asking follow-up question is what agents and editors do when they hear a pitch they like. It’s the happy outcome — so why not prepare for it? With that laudable goal in mind, I sent you off last time with some homework. How is coming up with a list of why your book will appeal to your target audience going? If you find you’re getting stuck, here’s a great way to jump-start your brainstorming process: hie ye hence to the nearest well-stocked bookstore (preferably an air-conditioned one, if you happen to reside in the northern hemisphere right now), stand in front of the shelves holding your chosen book category, and start taking a gander at how those books are being marketed to readers. Yes, I know: the major chain bookstore to which you might have hied yourself a year ago may well be closed today. Try not to think about that; find another brick-and-mortar purveyor of books. Given the recent events at Borders and B&N, I’m sure the staff will be delighted to see you. As fond as I am of public libraries, checking out the new release shelf there is no substitute for browsing at a bookstore. Neither is surfing through the offerings on your favorite online book emporium’s website — and not just because all of us who write might feel just a little bit better about our futures if more people got up from their desks, locked the doors of their respective domiciles behind them, and strolled into the nearest bookstore. The idea here is to discover at whom new releases in your field are being aimed, and how. The front and back covers are a fabulous place to start, since every syllable that appears on either will have been specifically crafted by the publisher’s marketing department to reach the book’s target demographic. That last term, for those of you tuning in late, refers to the people who have already demonstrated interest in buying similar books. How is that delightful propensity manifested, you ask? Generally, by that most straightforward means of fan self-identification: by actually plunking down the cash for a book in that category. Once you have found the general section in the bookstore where your book will sit one happy day, try to find stories that share characteristics with yours. Is the voice similar? Is the subject matter roughly equivalent? Do your book and the one in front of you both contain long sections of historical flashback? I don’t mean to tout my psychic powers, but here’s a modest prediction: once you’ve made a small pile of books that resemble yours, you will notice that they all seem to be aimed at a specific group of readers. They will all have something else in common, too. In all probability, several somethings: back jacket blurbs aimed at a particular readership often repeat key words. Think those words might be ones it might behoove you to consider including in your pitch? Seriously, marketing efforts are not known for their vast vocabulary. In the late 1980s, I got a job writing back labels for wine bottles. (Oh, you thought those colorless little quips just wrote themselves?) When I was handed my first set of bottles, I was laboring under the impression that my job was to describe to the potential buyer what the wine within might taste like. As I was new to the game — and, to be completely honest, under 21 at the time, and thus not legally empowered to sample any of the wine I was supposed to be describing — I wrote lengthy, adjective-heavy descriptions for each and every wine. Okay, so I wasn’t actually guessing. Having grown up literally in the middle of a Zinfandel vineyard, I had a certain amount of prior experience nailing down precisely what nuances the palette might find pleasing. After a week or two of being on the receiving end of some frankly much too long descriptions (some of them would have had to be continued on the next bottle), the marketing manager called me into his office. “You’re making this harder on yourself than it needs to be, honey,” he told me, “and you’re going to make it harder for the buyer.” I was flabbergasted. Hadn’t I been tying myself in knots to produce accurate descriptions? He waved away my objections. “Sweetie, the people who would understand your descriptions don’t buy wine based on the label copy; they buy it based upon knowledge of the winery, the year, the soil conditions, and every other piece of information you’re cramming onto the back label. But the back label is for people who don’t know much about wine, who want to know what the varietal is like. Every varietal has five or six adjectives already associated with it: oaky, for instance, or vanilla undertones. If you’re writing a description of a Chardonnay, haul out the Chardonnay adjectives and make sure you use most of them somewhere on the back label. Got it?” As a writer, I was crushed, but I must admit, it was great marketing advice: I had mistaken the target market for my wine descriptions. To those readers, an overly-technical description was off-putting. The same logic may be productively applied to the language of a pitch or a query letter: an overly -detailed description, not matter how accurately it represents the book, is not what agents and editors are hoping to hear. Since they think of manuscripts in terms of target demographics, book categories, and what has already proven successful in selling to a particular market, not speaking of your work in those terms isn’t the most effective way to present your book concept. In other words, you’ve probably been working too hard, trying to shoehorn too many extraneous details into your pitch. Shout hallelujah, citizens, for we are finally ready to tackle reducing your book to a single quip of bon mot-iness that would make Oscar Wilde blush furiously, if discreetly, with envy. For the rest of this post, I am going to talk about coming up with your book’s KEYNOTE, also known colloquially as a BOOK CONCEPT. (Did you know that when Wilde gave public readings, he NEVER read the published versions of his own work? Ditto with Mark Twain, another writer known to wow ‘em with great readings, and I’m quite sure I’ve never heard David Sedaris read the same story the same way twice. Sedaris seems — wisely — to use audience feedback to judge what jokes do and do not work, but Wilde and Twain apparently deliberately added extra laugh lines, so that even audience members very familiar with their published writing would be surprised and delighted.) Brevity is the soul of the keynote. It is the initial, wow-me-now concept statement that introduces your book to someone with the attention span of an unusually preoccupied three-year-old. Why assume you’ve got that little time? Because if you can impress someone that distrait, you can certainly catch the ear of a perpetually rushed agent — or the eye of Millicent, the exhausted agency screener. Before you pooh-pooh the idea of wanting to discuss your marvelously intricate book with someone whose attention span precludes sitting through even an average-length TV commercial, let me remind you: even if the agent of your dreams is given to twenty-minute conversations with aspiring writers, sometimes, you will have only a minute or so to make a pitch. After a very popular class, for instance, or when the aforementioned agent happens to be trying to attract the bartender’s attention at the same time as you are. I ask you: since any reasonably polite mutual introduction will take up at least half a minute, wouldn’t you like to be ready to take advantage of the remaining 30 seconds, if the opportunity presents itself? I know, I know: it’s not very glamorous to approach the agent of your dreams in the parking lot below the conference center, but the market-savvy writer takes advantage of chance meetings to pitch — where politeness doesn’t preclude it, of course. (Just so you know: it’s considered extremely gauche to pitch in the bathroom line, but at most conferences, pretty much any other line is fair game.) You’re not going to want to shout your keynote at her the instant you spot an agent, of course, but a keynote is a great third sentence after, “I enjoyed your talk this morning. Do you have a moment for me to run my book concept by you?” I feel the shy quailing, but here’s a thought that might make you feel a whole lot better about doing this: if you have a keynote prepared, you honestly are going to take up only a few seconds of her time. The keynote’s goal is to pique your listener’s interest as quickly as possible, so he will ask to hear more, not to pitch the book all by itself. And you are going to do that charmingly, professionally, and most of all, courteously. (You didn’t think I was just going to urge you to buttonhole agents in conference hallways without showing you how to do it politely, did you?) Like the pitch as a whole, the keynote’s purpose is not to sell the book unread, but to intrigue the hearer into wanting to read your manuscript — and to act upon that feeling by asking the writer to submit the manuscript. Often by way of asking those pesky follow-up questions I mentioned earlier. How do you arouse this level of interest without drowning the hearer in details? By providing a MEMORABLY INTRIGUING PREMISE within a swift single sentence. The keynote is not a substitute for a full-blown pitch; it is a conversational appetizer to whet the appetite of the hearer so he will ask to hear the entire pitch. Think of the keynote as the amuse-bouche of the publishing world: just a bite, designed to intrigue the hearer into longing to hear your formal pitch. In your keynote, your job is to fascinate, not to explain — and certainly not to summarize. Allow me to repeat that, because it’s crucial: the goal of the keynote is NOT to summarize the plot of the book; merely to make its PREMISE sound exciting enough to make a hearer want to know more. It is not — and I cannot stress this enough — a pitch proper for a book. No matter how clever a single-sentence keynote is, you will still need to write a pitch (if you are successful in piquing an agent or editor’s interest, anyway). Naturally, I am not suggesting that you routinely utilize only a single sentence to promote your book in person or in print; the keynote is designed to help open doors so that you may create pitching opportunities. Some of you are becoming a trifle impatient with my vehemence, aren’t you? “Jeez, Anne,” these finger-drummers observe, “don’t you think I’ve been paying attention? Why on earth would I limit myself to a single sentence when I have a ten-minute pitch appointment scheduled?” Well, it could be because at every conference I attend, I see aspiring writers knocking themselves out, trying to come up with a single sentence that summarizes everything good about a book, but that’s really not the point at the moment. The point is that in an impromptu first contact with a publishing professional, you’re there to tease, not to satisfy. And did I mention that it should be both memorable and brief? There are two schools of thought on how best to construct a keynote statement. The better-known is the Hollywood hook, a single sentence utilizing pop culture symbolism to introduce the basic premise of the book. (Note: the Hollywood hook should not be — but often is — confused with a hook, the opening paragraph or line of a book or short story that grabs the reader and sucks her into the story. Unfortunately, conference-going writers get these two terms mixed up all the time, leading to sometimes-tragic communication lapses.) Hollywood hooks tend to run a little like this: <blockquote> “It’s SPIDERMAN meets DRIVING MISS DAISY — on Mars!” “It’s JAWS, but on dry land and with turtledoves!” “Queen Elizabeth II finds herself suddenly deposed, penniless, and forced to work in a particle physics lab on the day aliens invade!” </blockquote> It’s no accident that each of the examples above ends in an exclamation point: you want your HH to be just a bit jarring; a spark of the unexpected will make your book concept sound fresh. Logical contradiction provides the shock of a Hollywood hook, the combination of two icons that one would not generally expect to be found together. For instance, a Hollywood hook for: <blockquote> …a book that teaches children the essentials of the Electoral College system might be, “Bill Clinton teaches Kermit the Frog how to vote!” …a book on alternative medicine for seniors might be expressed as, “Deepak Chopra takes on the Golden Girls as patients!” …a novel about sexual harassment in a tap-dancing school could conceivably be pitched as “Anita Hill meets Fred Astaire!” </blockquote> See all those exclamation points? There’s a certain breathlessness about the Hollywood hook, a blithe disregard for propriety of example. There’s a reason for this: in order to be effective as an enticement to hear more, the icons cited should not go together automatically in the mind. Otherwise, where’s the surprise? Remember, the whole point of the exercise is to intrigue the listener, to make him ask to hear more. Think about it: if someone pitched a book to you as “A private investigator chases a murderer!” wouldn’t you yawn? If, on the other hand, if someone told you her book was “Mickey Mouse goes on a killing spree!” wouldn’t you ask at least one follow-up question? Starting to get the picture? The point here is not to produce a super-accurate description, but a memorable sound bite. All that being said, I should mention that I’m not a big fan of the Hollywood hook method of keynoting. Yes, it can be attention-grabbing, but personally, I would rather use those few seconds talking about my book, not demonstrating my encyclopedic knowledge of pop culture. And that’s not just about ego, honest. Not every storyline is compressible into iconic shorthand, whatever those screenwriting teachers who go around telling everyone who will listen that the only good plotline is a heroic journey would like us to believe. (Use the Force, Luke!) The other school of thought on constructing a keynote statement — and my preferred method — is the rhetorical teaser. The rhetorical teaser presents a thought-provoking question (ideally, posed in the second person, to engage the listener in the premise) that the book will presumably answer. For example, a friend of mine was prepping to pitch a narrative cookbook aimed at celiacs, people who cannot digest gluten. Now, there are a whole lot of celiacs out there, but (as we should all know after our recent discussion on the helpfulness of statistics) she could not legitimately assume that any agent or editor to whom she pitched the book would either be unable to eat wheat or know someone who couldn’t. (Remember that great rule of thumb from earlier in the series: you can’t presume that an agent or editor has ANY knowledge about your particular subject matter.) So she employed a rhetorical tease to grab interest: “What would you do if you suddenly found out you could never eat pizza again?” Thought-provoking, isn’t it? It may not have been a strictly honest way to present a book proposal that, if memory serves, included a recipe for gluten-free pizza dough, but it does present the problem the book sets out to solve vividly to the hearer. Rhetorical teasers are more versatile than Hollywood hooks, as they can convey a broader array of moods. They can range from the ultra-serious (“What if you were two weeks away from finishing your master’s degree — and your university said it would throw you out if you wouldn’t testify against your innocent best friend?”) to the super-frivolous (“Have you ever looked into your closet before a big date and wanted to shred everything in there because nothing matched your great new shoes?”). Remember, you don’t want to give an overview of the plot here — you want to intrigue. Again, the keynote is NOT a summary of your book; it’s a teaser intended to attract an agent or editor into ASKING to hear your pitch. So you will want to make it — say it with me now — both BRIEF and MEMORABLE. By now, I imagine the mere sight of those two words within the same line is making you squirm a bit, isn’t it? “I understand why pith that might be a good idea,” I hear some of you grumble, “but I’m a writer of BOOKS, not one-liners. How does a novelist accustomed to luxurious, page-long descriptions of individual dust motes floating in beams of light pull off being simultaneously brief and memorable?” That’s a great question, mote-lovers, and it deserves a direct answer: don’t be afraid to use strong imagery, particularly strong sensual imagery that will stick in the hearer’s mind for hours to come. To put it bluntly, if you’re ever going to use adjectives, this is the time. “What would you do if you suddenly found yourself knee-deep in moss everywhere you went?” is not as strong a keynote as “The earth will be covered thirty feet deep in musty grey lichen in three days — and no one believes the only scientist who can stop it.” Notice how effective it was to bring in the element of conflict? Your keynote should make your book sound dramatically exciting — even if it isn’t. You shouldn’t lie, obviously, but this is the time to emphasize lack of harmony, not how likable your protagonist is. I’m quite serious about this. If I were pitching a book set in a convent where nuns spent their days in silent contemplation of the perfections of the universe, I would make the keynote sound positively conflict-ridden. How? Well, off the top of my head: “What would you do if you’d taken a vow of silence — but the person you worked with every day had a habit that drove you mad?” Okay, perhaps habit was a bit much. But you get my drift: in a keynote, as in a pitch, being boring is the original sin. Thou shalt not bore on my watch, sunshine. I would advise emphasizing conflict, incidentally, even if the intent of the book overall is to be soothing. A how-to book on relaxation techniques could accurately be keynoted as, “Wrap your troubles in lavender; this book will teach you how to sleep better,” but that’s hardly a grabber, is it? Isn’t “What would you do if you hadn’t slept in four nights? Reach for this book!” is actually a better keynote. Why? Experienced book-promoters, chant it with me now: because the latter encourages the hearer to want to hear more. And that, by definition, is a more successful come-on. Did some eyebrows hit some hairlines just then? Weren’t you aware that both pitching and querying are species of seduction? Or, if you prefer, species of storytelling. As Madame de Staël so memorably wrote a couple of centuries ago, “One of the miracles of talent is the ability to tear your listeners or readers out of their own egoism.” That’s about as poetic a definition of marketing art as you’re going to find. Use the keynote to alert ‘em to the possibility that you’re going to tell them a story they’ve never heard before. Another effective method for constructing a keynote is to cite a problem — and immediately suggest that your book may offer a plausible solution to it. This works especially well for nonfiction books on depressing subjects. A keynote that just emphasizes the negative, as in, “Human activity is poisoning the oceans,” is, unfortunately, more likely to elicit a shudder from an agent or editor than, “Jacques Cousteau said the oceans will die in our lifetimes — and this book will tell you what you can do about it.” Fact of living in these post-Enlightenment days, I’m afraid: we like all of our problems to have solutions. Preferably ones that don’t require more than thirty seconds to explain. I can tell you from recent personal experience that the problem/solution keynote can be very effective with dark subject matter: there were two — count ‘em, TWO — dead babies in the sample chapter of the book proposal I sold a few years ago, and scores of preventably dying adults; a crucial scene in the memoir I was hawking took place at the height of the Ethiopian famine. It was a fascinating story, but let me tell you, I really had to sell that to my agents, even though they already had a high opinion of my writing. If I’d just told them, “There are scores of people dying because of a plant that produces something that’s in every American household,” we all would have collapsed into a festival of sobs, but by casting it as, “There are scores of people dying because of a plant that produces something that’s in every American household — and this is the story of a woman who has been fighting to change that,” the book sounded like a beacon of hope. Or it would have been, if I hadn’t caught mono and pneumonia simultaneously, forcing me to cancel the book contract. Oh, and the book’s subject apparently gave up the fight. These things happen. My point, should you care to know it: if I had stubbornly insisted upon trying to pique everyone’s interest with only the sad part of the story, I doubt the proposal would have gotten out of the starting gate. My agents, you see, harbored an absurd prejudice for my writing books that they believed they could sell. They were right to be concerned, you know. Heads up for those of you who deal with weighty realities in your work: even if a book is politically or socially important, interesting hearers in heavy subject matter tends to be harder than attracting them with comedy, regardless of whether you are pitching it verbally or querying it. Particularly if the downer subject matter hasn’t gotten much press attention. This is true whether the book is fiction or nonfiction, interestingly enough. Why? Well, think about it: an agent or editor who picks up a book is committing to live with it on a fairly intensive basis for at least a year or two, often more. Even with the best intentions and working with the best writing, that can get pretty depressing. So it’s a very good idea to accentuate the positive, even in the first few words you say to the pros about your book. And avoid clichés like the proverbial plague, unless you put a clever and absolutely original spin on them. Actually, steering clear of the hackneyed is a good rule of thumb for every stage of book marketing: you’re trying to convince an agent or editor that your book is unique, after all. Reproducing clichés without adding to them artistically just shows that you’re a good listener, not a good creator. If you can provoke a laugh or a gasp with your keynote, so much the better. Remember, though, even if you pull off the best one-liner since Socrates was wowing ‘em at the Athenian agora, if your quip doesn’t make your book memorable, rather than you being remembered as a funny or thought-provoking person, the keynote has not succeeded. Let me repeat that, because it’s a subtle distinction: the goal of the keynote is not to make you sound like a great person, or even a great writer — it’s to get them interested in your BOOK. I’m continually meeting would-be pitchers who don’t seem to realize that. Instead, they act as though an agent or editor who did not ask to see pages following a pitch must have based his decision on either (a) whether he liked the pitcher personally or (b) some magically intuition that the manuscript in question is poorly written. realistically, neither could be true. Okay, so that’s a bit of an exaggeration: if a pitcher is extremely rude to the pitchee, the latter won’t ask to see pages. But logically, no assessment of a VERBAL pitch could possibly be construed as a MANUSCRIPT critique. They can’t possibly learn that you’re a fabulous writer until they read some of your prose. While I’m morally certain that to know, know, know my readers is to love, love, love them, that too is something the industry is going to have to learn over time. And remember, good verbal delivery is not the same thing as book concept memorability. I once went to a poetry reading that still haunts my nightmares. A fairly well-known poet, who may or may not come from a former Soviet bloc country closely associated in the public mind with vampire activity, stalked into a well-attended reading and declaimed, to everyone’s surprise, a prose piece. I don’t remember what it was about, except that part of the premise was that he and his girlfriend exchanged genitals for the weekend. And then, as I recall, didn’t do anything interesting with them. (Speaking of the downsides of not adding artistically to a well-worn concept.) Now, this guy is a wonderful public reader, a long-time NPR favorite and inveterate showman. Yet to make his (rather tame) sexual tale appear more salacious, every time he used an Anglo-Saxon word relating to a body part or physical act, he would lift his eyes from the page and stare hard at the nearest woman under 40. I’ll spare you the list of words aimed at me — I was a sweet young thing at the time — lest my webmaster wash my keyboard out with soap; suffice it to say, some of them would have made a pirate blush. By the end of his piece, everyone in the room was distinctly uncomfortable — and to this day, years later, everyone there seems to remember his, ahem, performance. But when I get together with writer friends who were there to laugh about it now, can any of us recall the basic storyline of his piece? No. Not even those of us who happened to be under 40 at the time. But then, we were all busy getting out of the guy’s line of sight. What went wrong, you ask? He made his performance memorable by good delivery, rather than his writing. Sure, I remember who he is — I’m hardly likely to forget a man who wrote an ode to his own genitalia, am I? (I suspect all of us would have been substantially more impressed if somebody ELSE had written an ode to his genitalia, but that’s neither here nor there.) But did his flashy showmanship make me rush out and buy his books of poetry? No. Did it make me avoid him at future conferences like the aforementioned proverbial plague? You bet. And, like an agent or editor who has been the object of an inappropriate pitch in a conference bathroom, do I share the horror story on a regular basis? Need I answer that? Exaggerated showmanship is a problem shared by a lot of pitches, and even more Hollywood hooks: too many one-line pitchers concentrate merely on delivery or sounding clever, rather than promoting the book in question. Please don’t make this mistake; unlike other sales situations, it’s pretty difficult to sell a book concept on charm alone. Even if you are the next Oscar Wilde, Mark Twain, or strange Eastern European sex fiend/poet. Drama, conflict, vivid imagery, shock, cause for hope — these are the elements that will render your keynote memorable. And that’s extremely important, when you will be talking to someone who will have had 150 pitches thrown at her already that day. Next time, I shall show you how to transform what you’ve already learned into a great opening gambit for striking up a conversation with anyone — and I do mean ANYONE — you might meet at a writers’ conference. Think of it as my midsummer present to the shy. Keep up the good work! </div> </div> </article> <article id="post-2050" class="post-2050 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-conference-pitching category-how-do-i-know-which-agent-at-a-conference-would-be-the-best-to-approach category-how-to-write-a-pitch category-ive-just-signed-up-to-give-a-conference-pitch-what-do-i-do-now category-nonfiction-pitching category-pitching-memoir category-pitchingpalooza category-realistic-expectations-for-pitchers category-realistic-expectations-for-writers category-what-are-the-polite-ways-to-approach-an-agent category-what-is-conference-pitching-and-why-would-i-want-to-do-it category-why-might-i-consider-pitching-instead-of-querying"> <header class="entry-header"> <div class="entry-meta">Posted on <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/07/13/pitchingpalooza-has-arrived-3/realistic-expectations-for-writers/" rel="bookmark"><time class="entry-date published" datetime="2011-07-13T00:00:00+00:00">July 13, 2011</time><time class="updated" datetime="2021-04-13T22:16:04+00:00">April 13, 2021</time></a> - <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/07/13/pitchingpalooza-has-arrived-3/realistic-expectations-for-writers/#respond">No Comments on Pitchingpalooza has arrived!</a></div><h2 class="entry-title"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/07/13/pitchingpalooza-has-arrived-3/realistic-expectations-for-writers/" rel="bookmark">Pitchingpalooza has arrived!</a></h2> </header> <div class="entry-content"> <div class="entry"> <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/tickertape-parade.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13123" title="tickertape parade" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/tickertape-parade.jpg" alt="" width="512" height="384" /></a> That’s right, campers: it’s time to crank up the ‘Palooza machinery once more. This time, by popular request, I am going to spend the next few weeks to run through the tricks, tactics, and strategies for constructing and delivering a verbal pitch for a manuscript. And the masses rejoice! Okay, so wild cheering is not the typical writer’s first response to the prospect of giving a face-to-face pitch to a real, live agent or editor. More often, the response wavers between guarded optimism and wild, insensate terror, seasoned with a healthy dash of Wait — why am I doing this to myself? Why don’t I just query instead, and thus avoid the hair-raising possibility of getting rejected in person? It tends to be a pretty complicated reaction, in short. Even those wouldn’t be caught dead signing up for a pitch session feel their blood pressure rise at the very notion of it. Heck, sometimes even a simple “So what do you write?” at a cocktail party can induce stuttering, fainting — or, still worse, an apparent inability to describe a perfectly straightforward plot in under 45 minutes. Given that writers are, let’s face it, communication-oriented people, the near-universality of reluctance to talk out loud about our work — at least briefly and in marketing terms — is a trifle puzzling. <a href="/index_p_15355.html">as thoughtful and intrepid reader Robin put it recently</a>: <blockquote>I won’t be pitching at conferences anytime soon, but I can still use help on this. Even though I’ve written a multitude of ever-shorter-pitches, whenever a hapless friend asks what I’m writing, they’re in for a long rambling ride. If I were to meet an agent in an elevator, I’d—well, it wouldn’t be pretty. How do we make it sound conversational without being wordy? Surely they don’t want us to just memorize our back-cover copy? (Or do they…?)</blockquote> Robin’s cut to the crux of the matter: most potential pitchers assume, wrongly, that what a verbal pitch entails is not a short, pithy, entertaining description of what the book’s about, who the target audience is, and what the book will offer to those readers that nothing else on the market currently does (for nonfiction) or a brief, fascinating introduction of the protagonist, the conflict or challenge s/he faces, and what’s at stake (for fiction). Instead, they believe that what they should do is spout promotional copy. Which frequently comes as a surprise to agents and editors, frankly: why, they wonder, is this complete stranger boasting about this story, rather than telling me what it is? What’s wrong with pitching a book the way a publisher’s marketing department would on a dust jacket? That’s promotion, not description; in essence, it’s a review. Listen: <blockquote>Hello there, agent of my dreams, I’ve got this great book idea, something that half the women in America can relate to strongly. It’s the deeply moving yet humorous tale of a beautiful but insecure woman with family problems — her stepmother hates her, so she turns to a series of men for support while she waits for Prince Charming. Because it speaks to issues that plague many women, it’s a natural for Oprah…Hey, where are you going? </blockquote> This is brief, you must admit, but it suffers from two rather serious drawbacks as a pitch. First, it tells the agent what to think of a book she hasn’t yet read: it’s a great idea, it’s moving and humorous, it’s a natural for Oprah. None of this is credible: professional writers don’t review their own books, for the exceedingly simple reason that they cannot be impartial about it. So why would an agent pay the slightest attention to a pitcher’s unsubstantiated claims about her book’s wonderfulness? What’s the second problem, you ask? Let me turn around and ask you a couple of questions: what kind of a book is it? To which already-existing group of readers might it appeal, and how is it different from anything else on the market? Who is the protagonist, and why is she inherently interesting enough for a reader to want to follow her for 400 pages? Let’s face it, a pitch that does leaves all of these questions unanswered has not done its job very well. (Half the women in America is not a serious description of a target demographic: it’s a wild guess.) Some of you still are not convinced that the back jacket approach isn’t working, are you? Okay, consider the most salient question of all: what is this book about? “How am I supposed to know?” many a potential pitcher demands defensively. “I haven’t read the book.” Exactly the objection the agent is likely to raise, as it happens, but not one that I’m prepared to accept at the moment. Why? Well, I’m pretty darn certain that at some point in your life, you actually have read the story I pitched above. Or at least had it read to you. Give up? It’s Snow White. Don’t feel bad if you didn’t catch it, though; the agent probably wouldn’t have, either, based on the vague, self-promoting pitch. “But Anne,” shy writers everywhere point out, “none of this has anything to do with the book in question, does it? I want my manuscript to be judged on its WRITING, not whether I can resist the urge to review my own book — and certainly not on whether I can describe it in thirty seconds. Since anyone who has ever sat through a public reading could tell you that there’s no necessary correlation between being able to produce a readable manuscript and being able to talk about it effectively in front of others, why on earth would I want to put myself through such a stressful experience?” You make a pretty good point, shy ones. If you’re like most aspiring writers, the very idea of sitting down across a table from a real, live agent or editor and making a verbal argument in favor of your manuscript’s marketability probably ranks right up there with getting a root canal or leaping in front of a speeding car in order to rescue a wandering toddler: necessary, but not something a sane person free of masochistic tendencies would want to do just for fun. I can, however, give you two very, very good reasons that every sane aspiring writer owes to himself to at least consider to either signing up for a pitch session or sitting down and coming up with a pitch as if he were. First, a successful pitch allows you to skip the querying stage of agent-seeking. . How so? Well, if you pull it off, you move straight to the submission stage — and given how high a percentage of queries get rejected this days, are you certain you wish to sneeze at that? Try to think of a pitch as an in-person query letter, given in an environment that lets the agent or editor hearing it know without your having to say so that you’re a professional enough writer to come to a conference and learn something about your craft. Second, learning to pitch well will help you write better query letters. Yes, really. You’re going to have to read the rest of this series to find out how and why, but you may take my word for now that it’s true. Third (yes, I know that I said there were only two, but I’m tossing one in for free because I’m a generous person), if you’re going to make a living as a writer, you will undoubtedly end up having to pitch your work verbally at some point, anyway, if only to your agent before you start a new book project. It’s a professional skill that every career writer is expected to have mastered, so grumbling about it isn’t going to get you out of it. Sorry to be the one to break it to you. Will you learn to love it? Probably not. Learning to survive it with your dignity intact might be a more reasonable long-term goal. But hey, in a situation where plenty of writers feel as though they’re wearing a bright red clown nose and speaking in tongues, for all the impact their pitch seems to be having on its intended recipient, doing a basic good job and walking out feeling good about yourself and your book is nothing at which a first-time pitcher should be sneezing. You seem to be doing that a lot today. Bless you. To that laudable if not especially spectacular end, this series will be geared toward the nitty-gritty of that most dreaded of writerly self-promotional exercises, the verbal pitch, a light-hearted exercise wherein an aspiring writer sits face-to-face with someone who has the power to get his book published — typically, an agent or an editor who keeps glancing at her watch — and tries to convince that intimidating soul to take a gander at some actual pages before making up her mind whether she thinks the book is marketable or not. What about that might make a normally courageous person blanch and want to run, screaming, toward the nearest large, dark cave, eh? As is true of writers’ conferences in general, quite a bit of the stress inherent to pitching lies in unrealistic expectations of what might happen — on both the bad and good extremes. The average writer tends to waltz into a conference with high expectations and a nervous stomach, mentally toting a fairly hefty wish list: to meet the agent of his dreams, who will fall flat on the floor with astonishment at his pitch and sign him on the spot; for an editor at a major publishing house to be so wowed that she snaps up the book practically before the writer finishes speaking, and to be whisked off to New York immediately for literary cocktail parties and glowing adulation. Could the New York Times’ bestseller list be far behind? The book would have been a natural for Oprah, if she were still on the air. It’s a lovely dream, certainly, but this is not what actually happens. Yes, even if you give your pitch perfectly. So strolling into a pitching situation believing that instant contracts are even possible, let alone the norm and the only reasonable standard of conference success, is bound to end in tears. Call me zany, but I don’t like to see a reader of mine sobbing in a hallway, convinced that he’s blown his one big chance just because an agent actually wants to read a manuscript before flinging her arms around a writer and shoving a contract into his hand. So let’s begin this series with a few cold, hard facts, to set the record straight: <blockquote>*No credible US agent will sign a writer before having read the book in question, or a proposal for nonfiction. (In other parts of the world, this is not always the case.) *All of the major U.S. publishing houses have strict policies against acquiring books from unrepresented writers (although a couple do run competitions for that purpose), so even if that editor from Simon & Schuster just adored your pitch, there would be significant structural impediments to his signing you to a three-book contract on the spot. *Even agented works often circulate for months or more before they are picked up by publishers, so speed of sale alone is not generally considered the best measure of literary success. *There is generally at least a year-long lapse between the signing of a book contract and when that book appears in bookstores. More often, it’s closer to two.</blockquote> Translation: even for writers who actually are pitching the next DA VINCI CODE, the process takes a heck of a lot longer than the average conference-goer expects. Even authors of brilliant, super-marketable books do not typically experience the conference fantasy treatment. At most, a great book well pitched will garner an array of, “Gee, that sounds terrific. Send me the first 50 pages,” requests. Yet even with a flurry of initial enthusiasm, months often pass between initial pitch and requests to represent. Itâ€™s important to realize all of that going in. Otherwise, pitching at a conference will almost inevitably feel like a tremendous letdown. Or, still worse, like a sight-unseen review of your writing talent. Which, as the shy grumblers above pointed out, is a trifle bizarre, when you think about it: how precisely could any agent or editor, no matter how gifted, determine whether someone can write without actually reading anything she’s written? Telepathy? Worst of all, a belief that the truly talented will necessarily be signed and sold within a matter of nanoseconds leads every year to that oh-so-common writerly misstep, rushing home to send out requested materials within a day or so of receiving the request — and realizing only after the fact that since the mad rush to get the manuscript out the door before that agent or editor changed her mind about wanting to see it meant sending it out without reading the submission IN ITS ENTIRETY, IN HARD COPY, and OUT LOUD. I can sense my long-time readers of this blog shuddering at the ghastly fate that tends to greet such hastily sent-off submissions: “Next!” For those of you who are not yet cringing, let me ask you: how would you feel if you realized only after you’d popped a requested manuscript in the mail that there were four typos on page 1? Or that the margins were the wrong width? Or that you’d forgotten to change your memoir protagonist’s name back to your own after you’d changed it for a blind contest entry? Oh, good — now everyone’s shuddering. Remember that creepy feeling running up your spine, and don’t even consider sending off requested materials without a thorough review. A request for pages is not going to vanish as soon as the agent forgets your name. You have time to proof the darned thing. But that didn’t convince all of you, did it? “Yeah, right, Anne,” the complacent say. “I understand that you need to say this so the run-of-the-mill illiterate bothers to spell-check his manuscript before submitting, but I’m a smart person. My manuscript was in good shape before I signed up for the conference. So I can safely ignore what you’ve just said, right?” Not so fast, smarty-pants: intelligence is no barrier to typos. Don’t believe me? Okay, let me share an anecdote that reality was kind enough to provide just the other day. Not to boast like back jacket copy, but I graduated from what is widely considered one of the best universities in the world — fellow alumni would say that it is THE best, but what would you expect them to say? — so the ranks of its alumni are well populated with readers who, like me, don’t consider adherence to the rules of grammar and time-honored ways of spelling things optional. These are folks who know how to use a semicolon and aren’t afraid to use it. So when one of the undergraduate clubs sent out an e-mail the other day, asking alumni to sign up for an online newsletter, I was shocked — shocked! — to see that it was crammed to the gills with what I charitably assumed were typos. Nouns were capitalized that had no business being capitalized; the next-to-last sentence just stopped in the middle. As I am rather fond of the club in question, I took the time to respond to the e-mail, not so much to point out the vast array of errors unbecoming a Harvard man as to alert undergraduates probably not much accustomed to trying to raise money from crusty old alumni like me to the very, very high probability that educated people would take umbrage at said errors. I said it gently, in the hope that they might actually pay attention, rather than brushing me off, suggesting that perhaps they might want to proofread their next missive before hitting the SEND button. The undergraduate who took the time to respond (surprisingly politely) did in fact promise to mend the group’s spelling. However (he pointed out in his own defense), four members and two administrative offices had signed off on the wording before it was sent, so they had every reason to believe that it would pass muster. I knew instantly what had happened — as would, incidentally, any professional reader who has been handling manuscripts within the last ten years. Any guesses? (Hint: the undergraduate was almost certainly telling the truth.) Give yourself a gold star if you said that each of the proofreaders read the letter on a computer, rather than IN HARD COPY; it’s substantially harder to catch errors that way, since backlighting tempts the human eye to skim. (Which is why, in case you’d been wondering, e-mail recipients so often send back non-responsive answers; it’s just harder to absorb nuances on a screen.) And give yourself seven gold stars if you added that the sentence that ended in the middle was probably the result of someone’s having started to edit the sentence, but getting distracted in the middle of doing it. Think you’re smarter than the people who collaborated on that message? Even if you are, it’s not enough to make revisions; a sensible submitter proofs requested pages IN HARD COPY, IN THEIR ENTIRETY, and preferably OUT LOUD before mailing them, to catch precisely this type of mistake. Or hitting the SEND key. But I seem to have digressed, haven’t I? Allow me to veer back to my original point: realistic expectations about what pitching success does and does not mean, as well as how it would serve you best to respond to the various contingencies, can save you a lot of grief. So what would be a realistic set of goals for a conference? An excellent choice would be to embrace the suggestion I made above: use the conference to skip the very annoying and time-consuming querying stage and jump directly to a request to read your manuscript. What would working toward this goal look like in practice, you ask? Pitching your work to at least one agent who has a successful track record representing books like yours, with an eye to convincing at least one agent ask you to mail a submission would be even better. As would having an editor who is empowered to pick up new writers ask to see part or all of the book, or pitching to every publishing professional at the conference who deals in your kind of work. And let’s not forget the less marketing-oriented goals, such as learning a great deal from good seminars. (Although, let’s face it, not all conference seminars are equally scintillating; it’s not all that uncommon for speakers to be far, far more interested in pushing their own latest books than providing concrete assistance to those looking to get their own published.) Or — and too many conference-goers forget to add this to their to-do lists — making connections with other writers, established AND aspiring, who write what you do. Amazing mutual support groups don’t just happen, you know; they are often built over years. If you can pull any or all of that off, you will have achieved conference success, by my standards. It’s not as sexy as the fantasy version, I know, but eminently doable — and definitely worthwhile for your writing career. After all, skipping the querying stage can cut years from your agent search; think of every pitching opportunity as one less raft of a dozen query letters you are going to have to send out. Feeling a bit better about pitching now? Excellent. Truth compels me to mention that your chances of pitching successfully will be SUBSTANTIALLY higher if you do a bit of prep work before you go. But never fear: over the course of this series, I shall be guiding you though the steps you need to take in order to walk in confident and prepared. Fringe benefit: these steps are very useful to marketing any book, anywhere, anytime. If you invest the hours in developing these skills and materials (oh, yes: I’m going to be giving you writing assignments), you will not only be able to pitch your work verbally; you will be able to talk about it like a pro AND transplant your pitch to your query letters. Don’t tense up. You can do this. But it is going to take some work. I could sign off for the day at this point, but let’s get started right away: the first step to a successful pitch is to understand your book’s market appeal. Please stop gnawing your nails — this is a perfectly reasonable thing for an agent to want to know. Who is your target reader, and why will your book, out of the tens of thousands a good agent will see this year, satisfy that reader like nothing else currently on the market? In order to either pitch or query your work successfully, you’re going to want to come up with at least provisional answers to these questions. The second step to a successful pitch, as for a successful query, is to be familiar with the work of the person to whom you will be pitching. Find out what that agent has sold lately; find out what that editor has bought. Find out, in short, who at the conference would be receptive to you and your book, so that you may know which to approach and pitch. This will involve some research on your part — which is why I am mentioning this at the BEGINNING of this series, and not toward its end. If you’ve got a conference coming up, or are thinking about signing up for one, you’re going to want to get started as soon as possible figuring out which of the attending agents would be worth your time to track down for a hallway pitch, if you can’t obtain a pitching appointment. In response to that indignant gasp: not being able to land a formal appointment with any given agent attending a conference is not all that uncommon an eventuality. Conference organizers usually do their best, but attendees don’t always get assigned to the agent who’s the best fit for the manuscripts they are pitching. Passive writers allow that to prevent them from pitching to the right agent — but my readers are more proactive than that, aren’t they? To help you be politely proactive, I’m planning to give you tips not only on pitching within a formal meeting, but whenever you happen to be able to buttonhole the agent of your dreams. “But Anne,” I hear those of you clutching registration forms protest, “I understand doing the prep work if I have a plethora of conferences from which to select, but I’m already registered for my local one. Since I’ve already been assigned a pitch appointment and I already know that I’m too shy to walk up to the dais after the agents’ forum, why should I bother checking up on all of the agents who might be attending?” Well, for a couple of reasons. First, any book could be pitched in a number of different ways — and since the goal of pitching is not absolute uniformity between every pitch attempt, but rather to garner a request for pages, it makes a heck of a lot of sense to tailor your pitch to the agent who happens to be listening to it at any given moment, doesn’t it? And no, I have absolutely no idea why conference literature so often tells potential attendees the exact opposite. I’ll be dealing with the one-size-fits-all pitch concept next week. For now, suffice it to say that all three pictures above are from the same negative. You probably have a favorite among them; so do I. So would an agent. But they’re all the same angle on the same rose. The only difference is presentation. Seem cryptic? Trust me, within a couple of weeks, it will seem downright obvious. The other reason to do some background research on the agents to whom you may be pitching is, as I mentioned, that it’s far from uncommon for writers to be assigned to pitch to agents who do not represent their kinds of books at all. Which means, practically inevitably, that the pitch cannot end in a request for pages. Yes, you read that correctly. Sit down and breathe deeply until that feeling of dizziness passes. As anyone who has ever endured the agony of a mismatched pitch appointment can tell you, if your book falls outside the agent or editor’s area of preference, it doesn’t matter how good your pitch is: she will stop you as soon as she figures out that your book is categorically not for her. No amount of argument is going to help you at that point, so advance research is a very, very good idea, if only so you can try frantically to switch appointments with another writer. I know, I know: it’s not the writer’s fault. But in fairness, conference organizers very frequently do not have enough information about prospective attendees to make a good match; most of the time, they simply rely upon the writersâ€™ expressed preferences or — sacre bleu! — assign appointments randomly. This means, unfortunately, that it is up to the conference attendee to check up on the agents and editors, over and above their blurbs in the conference program. Even those bear double-checking: as my long-time readers already know, the blurb agents and editors write about themselves is not always the most reliable indicator of the type of work they represent. It’s not that they’re trying to be misleading, of course; most just reuse their standard bio blurbs from their websites, which tend not to be updated all that often. So it’s worth your while to check the agents’ websites, standard agents’ guides,<a href="http://anotherealm.com/prededitors/pubagent.htm">Preditors and Editors</a>, the <a href="http://www.absolutewrite.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=22">Absolute Write water cooler</a>, and anywhere else that you would normally go to check out an agent you were planning to query. You don’t need to be able to write a 500-page biography for each of these people, but you absolutely do need to be aware of what they’re representing these days. And you definitely need to be aware of what they are not representing these days. Had I mentioned that it is a waste of both your time and the agent’s to pitch to someone who does not handle your kind of book? These days being the operative term: while agents frequently list the better-known books they’ve represented in those little blurbs in the conference guide, they don’t necessarily update those blurbs every time they use them. (Also true of the preferences listed in agents’ guides, by the way.) And even if they did, the market changes far too fast for blurbs usually submitted months before the conference to reflect what an agent is looking to represent NOW. I hear you groaning: yes, this is every bit as much work as finding an agent to query. But you don’t want to end up pitching to the wrong agent, do you? When you’re doing your research, do be aware that since there is usually a significant time lag between when an agent signs an author and when the book hits the shelves (see above), it may be difficult to track down client lists for some agents. This does not necessarily mean that they are not active. The <a href="http://www.publishersmarketplace.com/">Publishers Marketplace database</a> tracks sales as they happen AND provides client lists, so it’s a great place to check. This site does require a subscription ($20/month), so you might want to round up some of your writing friends and pool the expense. If you can’t find evidence that the agent to whom you are assigned to pitch is actively representing your kind of book, don’t be afraid to ask to switch appointments. Most of the time, conference organizers will do their best honor such requests — but they’ll usually be happier about it if you can suggest an alternative agent for an appointment. Yet another reason that — wait for it — it’s an excellent idea to check out ALL of the agents scheduled to attend a conference (there’s usually a list on the conference’s website), not just to one to whom you’ve been assigned. Ideally, you will want to try to pitch to anyone who might conceivably be a reasonable fit. And if none of the scheduled agents represent your kind of book, you should think very seriously about taking your conference dollars elsewhere. Yes, having to do this level of background research is kind of a pain, but if it saves you even one wasted pitch, it’s worth it. The more information you have, the more likely you are to find your best fit. Doing your homework maximizes the probability that you will be pitching to someone who can help you get published — and not someone who will stop you three sentences in to say, “I’m sorry, I don’t represent that kind of book.” Remember, not all agents are the same, any more than all editors are (of which more tomorrow); they have both professional specialties and personal preferences. It doesn’t make any more sense to pitch sensitive coming-of-age literary fiction to an agent who concentrates primarily on thrillers than it does to query a nonfiction-only agency with a novel, does it? Do those of you who have never pitched before feel as though you’ve just fallen into very, very deep water? Not to worry: you’ll feel much less disoriented in the days to come. Which is to say: PLEASE don’t be too hard on yourself if your learning curve is a bit sharp throughout this series. After all, no one is born knowing how to market a book — or how to pitch it without sounding like a talking dust jacket. You can do this, honest. Keep up the good work! </div> </div> </article> <article id="post-4057" class="post-4057 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-author-author-interview-videos category-after-you-land-a-publisher category-after-you-land-an-agent category-after-youve-been-rejected category-annes-book-picks category-annes-favorite-posts category-author-readings-and-why-you-should-attend-them category-autobiographical-fiction category-back-jacket-blurbs category-character-development-tips category-craft-in-depth-analysis category-dealing-with-readers-reactions-to-ones-books category-dealing-with-rejection category-dialogue-that-adds-to-the-scene category-dialogue-that-rings-true category-finding-the-right-contest-to-enter category-giving-a-good-author-interview category-guest-blogs-interviews category-im-a-finalist-what-now category-interviews-guest-blogs category-keeping-the-faith category-literary-fiction-craft category-literary-fiction-defined category-literary-fiction-marketing category-multiple-protagonist-novels category-must-reads category-originality-in-manuscripts category-plot-development category-point-of-view-choices category-post-conference-etiquette category-protagonist-memorability category-public-readings category-realistic-dialogue category-realistic-expectations-for-writers category-referrals-to-agents category-rejection-letters-decoded category-revise-and-resubmit category-what-are-the-polite-ways-to-approach-an-agent category-what-if-they-think-my-fictional-protagonist-is-me"> <header class="entry-header"> <div class="entry-meta">Posted on <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/02/18/ladies-and-gentlemen-i-bring-you-the-premiere-of-author-author-interviews-a-chat-about-literary-fiction-with-bellwether-prize-winner-heidi-durrow-10/realistic-expectations-for-writers/" rel="bookmark"><time class="entry-date published updated" datetime="2011-02-18T00:00:00+00:00">February 18, 2011</time></a> - <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/02/18/ladies-and-gentlemen-i-bring-you-the-premiere-of-author-author-interviews-a-chat-about-literary-fiction-with-bellwether-prize-winner-heidi-durrow-10/realistic-expectations-for-writers/#respond">No Comments on Ladies and gentlemen, I bring you the premiere of Author! Author! Interviews: a chat about literary fiction with Bellwether Prize winner Heidi Durrow</a></div><h2 class="entry-title"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/02/18/ladies-and-gentlemen-i-bring-you-the-premiere-of-author-author-interviews-a-chat-about-literary-fiction-with-bellwether-prize-winner-heidi-durrow-10/realistic-expectations-for-writers/" rel="bookmark">Ladies and gentlemen, I bring you the premiere of Author! Author! Interviews: a chat about literary fiction with Bellwether Prize winner Heidi Durrow</a></h2> </header> <div class="entry-content"> <div class="entry"> <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Anne-Mini-and-Heidi-Durrow.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Anne-Mini-and-Heidi-Durrow-1024x768.jpg" alt="" title="Anne Mini and Heidi Durrow" width="512" height="384" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-14203"/></a> Welcome back, campers! How was your week? Mine was, as predicted, hectic, but the niece is married, the dishes washed (no mean feat, considering the family produced a five-course sit-down dinner for the wedding reception), and we are now living on leftovers. How stressful was it all? Well, let me put it this way: my doctor offered to write me a note to excuse me from all of this ostensible frivolity. But off with the shackles of the past — on to a monumental new development in the ever-evolving Author! Author! community offerings. Today, I am delighted to bring you the first in what I hope will be may in-depth conversations with wonderful recently-published authors about not only their books, but also the art and craft of writing itself. You know, the kind of chat that writers find fascinating, but disillusions non-writers and those who would prefer to believe that good writing simply falls from the heavens into the author’s mind, with no actual work involved. In this series, I’m going to be talking with these authors about the actual work of writing. I’m very excited about this, not only because I suspect that these conversations will prove inspirational and educational to members of the Author! Author! community — and to that end, please feel free to post questions and comments; I shall forward them to the authors — but also because, frankly, when a book comes out, 99% of interviewers will ask precisely the same set of questions. All of us who read author interviews are familiar with the standards, right? So how did you get the idea for this book? Is this novel autobiographical? How did you get started writing in the first place? Did you always want to be a writer — as opposed to, say, a fireman? Are any of the characters based upon real people? What’s your next book about? No, really, what part of this novel is based upon real life? It’s all fun and interesting for the author the first dozen or so times, but after that, one begins to feel that one’s part in the interview process could very adequately be played by a tape recorder. Nor is this phenomenon new: I spent a large part of my childhood and adolescence helping science fiction author Philip K. Dick prepare for interviews — oh, you thought that established authors didn’t rehearse? In what sense is an author interview not a public performance? — and believe me, in any given year, we could count the original questions interviewers asked on the fingers of two hands. Believe me, we longed to be able to start counting on our toes. So part of my goal in this interview series is to allow good authors more latitude than they are generally allowed in literary interviews — because, let’s face it, what is likely to interest other writers about a book is not necessarily what will fascinate other readers. These interviews will be by writers, for writers. Are you picturing yourselves chatting with me when your first book comes out? Excellent — you’re in the perfect mindset to enjoy my January 11, 2011 conversation with the exceptionally talented <a href="http://heidiwdurrow.com/">Heidi Durrow</a>, author of the recent literary fiction debut, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1565126807?ie=UTF8&tag=heiwdur-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1565126807">The Girl Who Fell from the Sky</a>, now available <a href="<a href=">in paperback</a>. If Heidi’s name sounds familiar, you’ve probably either been perusing Best Books of 2010 lists or were hanging out here at Author! Author! in recent months. For those of you who missed <a href="/index_p_13946.html">my glowing tribute to what I consider the best debut of last year</a>, allow me to introduce you to a writer I believe is going to be remembered as one of the greats. Take a peek at the publisher’s blurb: Take a gander at the publisher’s blurb: <blockquote> <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/885319505_KwXPQ-L-150x150.jpg" alt="Durrow book cover" title="Durrow book cover" width="150" height="150" class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-13950"/>Rachel, the daughter of a Danish mother and a black G.I., becomes the sole survivor of a family tragedy after a fateful morning on their Chicago rooftop. Forced to move to a new city, with her strict African-American grandmother as her guardian, Rachel is thrust for the first time into a mostly black community, where her light brown skin, blue eyes, and beauty bring a constant stream of attention her way. It’s there, as she grows up and tries to swallow her grief, that she comes to understand how the mystery and tragedy of her mother might be connected to her own uncertain identity. This searing and heartwrenching portrait of a young biracial girl dealing with society’s ideas of race and class is the winner of the Bellwether Prize for best fiction manuscript addressing issues of social justice. In the tradition of Jamaica Kincaid’s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Annie-John-Novel-Jamaica-Kincaid/dp/0374525102/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1293449240&sr=1-1">Annie John</a>,Toni Morrison’s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Bluest-Eye-Vintage-International/dp/0307278441/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1293449280&sr=1-1">The Bluest Eye</a>, and Sandra Cisneros’ <a href="http://www.amazon.com/House-Mango-Street-Sandra-Cisneros/dp/0679734775/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1293449323&sr=1-1">The House on Mango Street</a>, here is a portrait of a young girl—and society’s ideas of race, class, and beauty. </blockquote> The book has developed something of a cult following amongst lovers of serious literary fiction. How much do its fans respect it? Well, let me put it this way: when I first discovered the novel in a wee bookstore in Lexington, Kentucky, the clerk nearly knocked me over, so eager was she to rush to my side to recommend the book. Apparently, that enthusiasm was catching, for by the time my plane was over the Rockies, heading home to Seattle, was already raving about the book to everyone in the seats near me. Flight attendants will remember that as the time two of them sidled down the aisle to ask, “Um, why are all of you talking about falling from the sky? Flying is perfectly safe, you know.” The intriguing mystery of just how and why an entire family fell from a Chicago apartment building’s roof — yes, veteran interviewers, based upon a real-life incident — may be the unusual premise of the story, but the core of the writing is centered upon the growth and development of incredibly real-feeling characters. <a href="/index_p_13946.html">As I mentioned before</a>, Heidi pursued character in a completely original manner, calculated to delight those intrigued by the interesting use of language: via punctuation in dialogue. THE GIRL WHO FELL FROM THE SKY depicts social class and intellectual development through such subtle nuances in the characters’ speech patterns that at first, I kept having to re-read lines to make sure I was not imagining it. I wasn’t; it’s one of the most brilliant uses of dialogue I’ve seen in years. (And trust me, I read a lot of dialogue in any given year.) Join me, please, for a discussion of it, conducted at the ever-fabulous <a href="http://www.thirdplacebooks.com/">Third Place Books</a>, just north of Seattle. A quick technical note before you click on the video: my apologies for the background noise; the Author! Author! staff did not realize that the microphone would pick it up so well, or that it should have been placed a trifle closer to Heidi. Turning up the volume on your computer before you start watching might prove helpful. <iframe loading="lazy" width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/4bXvKJbT_cM?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""/> The conference mentioned in that clip, by the way, was New Orleans’ <a href="http://www.wordsandmusic.org/">Words and Music conference</a>, held every November. We were both speaking there in 2010, and I hope that I, at least, will be teaching there again next year. (Hint, hint, calendar-markers.) As you may see, I was — and remain — awfully excited about Heidi’s fresh approach to dialogue. Even in the relatively innovation-friendly literary fiction market, genuinely experimental writing has a hard time getting published. Dialogue as fresh as Heidi’s is as rare as a yeti sighting in downtown Manhattan. And that’s odd, considering that one of the standard definitions of literary fiction is a narrative that deliberately deviates from mainstream storytelling norms in order to illuminate character while stretching the language in new and lovely ways. (A few other defining features of the breed: typically, its vocabulary and sentence structure assumes a college-educated readership, and characterization, rather than plot, provides the driving force of the narrative.) Oh, quite a few new offerings are labeled as experimental, but that’s usually because the works in question resemble other, earlier books that were experimental in their day. The moniker has become as often an indicator of a certain school of literary writing as a neon sign flashing FIND SOMETHING NEW HERE. So why was it so difficult to find a publisher brave enough to take on THE GIRL WHO FELL FROM THE SKY? Why, in fact, was this brilliant debut novel not published until after it won the prestigious <a href="http://www.bellwetherprize.org/">the Bellwether Prize</a>, a competition that includes a publishing contract as a prize? Search me. If I ran the universe — or even the literary portion of it — this would not be the case; genuinely innovative writing that stretches the definitions of its book category would be recognized, rewarded, and published far more easily than it is today. But then, if I ran the universe, good books actually would always find a home, libraries and bookstores would be as common as Starbucks franchises, and Dorothy Parker, Truman Capote, and Madame de Staël’s birthdays would be national holidays. Nay, international holidays. But let’s get back to talking about craft. Specifically, let’s hear about how dialogue can be used as a tool to develop character. <iframe loading="lazy" width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jE9-PqkIY_o?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""/> Nice to hear an author speaking of craft, character, and plot choices as inextricably linked, isn’t it? That’s never truer than in good literary fiction: literary fiction is not, as so many aspiring writers tend to assume, simply a non-genre story told in beautiful language. In theory, really good literary fiction adds something new to the reader’s understanding of the inherent possibilities of the language, rather than adapting an already-successful author’s approach (and bag of narrative tricks) to a new story. The too-common expectation that a plot must follow established themes and storylines can be painfully constricting for an imaginative writer. What happens, though, when a writer resists easy plot resolution, choosing instead to follow her characters’ individual development arcs where they lead her? <iframe loading="lazy" width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/pR01-XiYaCc?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""/> Since the first mention of literary fiction in this post — and debut literary fiction at that — I could feel the hearts of all of you who write it palpitating with excitement. “But Anne,” you ask, descending with a bump from the heights of abstract discussion, “I could talk craft all day, but I’m faced with a practical dilemma. I’ve been having a really hard time finding an agent who both represents literary fiction and is open to new writers. Any advice about how to go about finding one?” Glad you asked, palpitators. Heidi and I had a little chat on that very subject. <iframe loading="lazy" width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ppx2v5GwXfM?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""/> My, that was a lot of specific references, wasn’t it? To lead you to the one that probably made your ears prick up most, the grant-giving organization Heidi mentioned was the <a href="http://www.awpwriter.org/contests/wccscholarship.htm%3EAWP%20scholarship%20competition%3C/a%3E;%20a%20complete%20list%20of%20the%20kind%20and%20generous%20Michael%20Pettit%E2%80%99s%20books%20may%20be%20found%20on%20%3Ca%20href=">his website</a>. Heidi is represented by <a href="http://www.wendyweil.com/">the Wendy Weil Agency</a>, who also represents <a href="http://alicewalkersgarden.com/">Alice Walker</a>. The favorite memoirist I mentioned was <a href="http://www.wendyweil.com/">Barbara Robinette Moss</a>, author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/074320218X/o/qid=970257526/sr=8-1/ref=aps_sr_b_1_3/104-6410083-9032703">Change Me into Zeus’ Daughter</a> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Fierce-Memoir-Barbara-Robinette-Moss/dp/0743229452/ref=pd_sim_b_1">Fierce</a>. Since every good writer receives quite a few rave rejections — those infamous I love your writing/this story/everything about this manuscript, but I’m going to have to pass statements that leave aspiring writers so nonplused — I cannot overemphasize the importance of continuing to query and submit even if the agent currently reading your requested materials has already praised the book. All too often, submitters relax at this point (if a writer with an agent considering a manuscript can ever be considered relaxed), thinking that their querying days are over, but remember, a nice conversation with an agent is just a nice conversation with an agent; don’t stop seeking the right representation for your book until you have received an actual offer from an agent. It’s also a good idea, as Heidi mentioned, to keep working any connections you may have, in order to garner recommendations to agents; for a few tips on how to ask for such a recommendation without being a pest, please see the posts under the REFERRALS TO AGENTS category on the archive list conveniently located at the lower right-hand corner of this page. Done bookmarking those links? Good. Let’s move on to just how much winning the Bellwether Prize changed Heidi’s writing life. <iframe loading="lazy" width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/xL3zFdMODBs?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""/> As promised, I did look up the deadline for the next <a href="http://www.bellwetherprize.org/">Bellwether Prize</a>. Entries are accepted in the Septembers of odd-numbered years — which means, for those of you playing along at home, you can apply this coming September. Mark your calendars! You also might want to drop by the prize’s website, just to see what interesting things are being written on social justice issues lately. <a href="http://www.kingsolver.com/">Barbara Kingsolver</a>, author of such bestselling novels as <a href="http://www.kingsolver.com/books/the-lacuna.html">The Lacuna</a> established the prize, and the winning books tend to be fascinating. <a href="http://www.workman.com/algonquin/">Algonquin Books</a> publishes the top honorees; 2006 winner <a href="http://hillaryjordan.com/">Hillary Jordan’s</a> lovely debut, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mudbound-Hillary-Jordan/dp/1565126777/ref=tmm_pap_title_0">Mudbound</a>, is already out. And, of course, THE GIRL WHO FELL FROM THE SKY is now available in paperback at <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1616200154?ie=UTF8&tag=workmanpublis-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1616200154">Amazon</a>, or, if you prefer to patronize an independent bookseller, <a href="http://www.powells.com/biblio?isbn=1616200154">Powell’s</a>. Please join me in thanking Heidi for being generous enough to share her insights and experience with everyone in the Author! Author! community. And, as always, keep up the good work! </div> </div> </article> <article id="post-3585" class="post-3585 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-advances category-after-you-land-a-publisher category-agency-contracts category-agents category-book-contracts category-conference-etiquette category-conference-faux-pas category-conference-lore category-conference-pitching category-e-mailing-queries category-editorial-committees category-editorial-memos category-editors category-getting-paid-for-your-writing category-hallway-pitching category-hardcover-vs-trade-paper category-how-authors-get-paid-for-their-books category-how-do-manuscripts-get-published category-how-much-time-passes-between-contract-and-publication category-industry-etiquette category-industry-terminology category-is-it-ok-to-query-several-agents-at-once category-keeping-the-faith category-must-reads category-nonfiction-marketing category-nonfiction-proposals category-pitching-faux-pas category-pitching-tips category-querying category-realistic-expectations-for-queriers category-realistic-expectations-for-writers category-should-i-bring-my-manuscript-to-a-pitch-meeting category-titling-your-work category-unsolicited-submissions category-wait-i-might-not-get-to-choose-my-books-title category-what-an-agent-will-expect-a-new-client-to-know-about-the-publishing-industry-a-crash-course category-what-are-the-polite-ways-to-approach-an-agent category-who-has-ultimate-say-over-a-books-title category-why-do-i-need-an-agent category-why-you-shouldnt-query-every-agent-in-the-country category-writing-samples"> <header class="entry-header"> <div class="entry-meta">Posted on <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/01/20/just-what-am-i-getting-myself-into-part-ii-the-money-matters-13/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark"><time class="entry-date published updated" datetime="2011-01-20T00:00:00+00:00">January 20, 2011</time></a> - <a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/01/20/just-what-am-i-getting-myself-into-part-ii-the-money-matters-13/industry-etiquette/#comments">2 Comments on Just what am I getting myself into? Part II: the money matters</a></div><h2 class="entry-title"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/2011/01/20/just-what-am-i-getting-myself-into-part-ii-the-money-matters-13/industry-etiquette/" rel="bookmark">Just what am I getting myself into? Part II: the money matters</a></h2> </header> <div class="entry-content"> <div class="entry"> <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/public-market-sign.JPG"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/public-market-sign-1024x768.jpg" alt="" title="public market sign" width="512" height="384" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-10120"/></a> After our long, in-depth foray into the delights of standard format for manuscripts, and as a segue into what I hope will be an extended romp through craft, with particular emphasis upon problems that tend to generate knee-jerk rejection responses, I’m devoting a few days this week to explaining briefly how a manuscript moves from the writer’s fingertips to publication. (My, that was lengthy sentence, was it not? The late Henry James would have been so proud.) There are several ways that this can happen, of course, and but for now, I’m concentrating upon what most people mean by a book’s getting published: being brought to press and promoted by a large publisher. In the US, that publisher’s headquarters will probably be located in New York, Los Angeles, or San Francisco. Everyone clear on the parameters — and that what I am about to say might not be applicable to a big publishing house in Paris, Johannesburg, or Vladivostok, or to a small publisher domestically? Good. Let’s recap a bit from last time. While we’re at it, let’s get conversant with some of the terms of the trade. How a manuscript typically comes to publication at a major U.S. publishing house these days (as opposed to way back when) As we discussed, fiction is typically sold as a completed manuscript; nonfiction is usually sold as a book proposal, a packet of marketing materials that includes a sample chapter and a competitive market analysis, showing how the proposed book will offer the target readership something different and better than similar books already on the market. While the proposal will also include a summary of each of the chapters in the book-to-be-written (in a section known as the annotated table of contents; for tips on how to construct this and the other constituent parts of a book proposal, please see the HOW TO WRITE A BOOK PROPOSAL category on the archive list at right), the editor will often ask the writer to add or subtract chapters or change the book’s running order. Which underscores a point I made last time: a nonfiction book proposal is essentially a job application wherein the writer is trying to convince the publisher to pay him to write the book being proposed; a novel is a product that the author is trying to sell. I can already feel some of your eyes glazing over from jargon fatigue, can’t I? Hang in there; I assure you that there are plot twists to come. A hundred years ago, writers who wished to get their books published went about it in a fairly straightforward manner, by approaching editors at major publishing houses directly. If the editor the author approached liked the book, he would take it to what was (and still is) known as an editorial committee, a group of editors and higher-ups who collectively decided what books the house would bring out in the months and years to come. If the editorial committee decided to go ahead with the project, the publisher would typically pay the author an advance against projected royalties, edit the manuscript, and have it typeset (by hand, no less). Today, a writer who intends to approach a large U.S. publisher must do so through an agent. The agent’s job is to ferret out which editors might be interested in her clients’ books and pitch to them. Unless an editor happens to be exceptionally well-established at his or her house, however, s/he is not the only one who needs to approve a book’s acquisition: typically, the book will still go before an editorial committee. At that point, it’s the acquiring editor’s turn to be the advocate for the book s/he wants to publish — and that’s not always an easy task, because other editors will be fighting for their pet projects as well. Since a publishing house can only afford to bring out a very small number of books in any given marketing season, the battle for whose project will see print can become quite intense, and not necessarily only amongst the editors around the table. At a large publishing house, the marketing and legal departments might weigh in as well. If a manuscript makes it through the hurly-burly of the editorial committee, the editor will offer the writer a publication contract. (Actually, s/he will offer it to the writer’s agent, who will in turn discuss it with the author, but it amounts to the same thing.) Contractual terms vary widely, but at base, they will stipulate that in return for pocketing the lion’s share of the profits, the publisher would bear all of the production and promotional costs, as well as responsibility for getting the book onto bookstore shelves. In return, the author will agree to provide the manuscript for by a particular date (usually quite soon for a novel — which, please recall, is already completely written before the agent takes it to the editor) or as much as a year and a half later for a book proposal. If the editor wants changes, s/he will issue an editorial memo requesting them. Some of you just had a strong visceral reaction to the idea of being asked to alter your manuscript, didn’t you? If your heart rate went up by more than a third at the very suggestion, you might want to sit down, put your feet up, and sip a soothing beverage whilst perusing the next section. (Camomile tea might be a good choice.) Why? Because when an author signs a book contract, she’s agreeing to more than allowing the publisher to print the book. Such as… Control over the text itself While the author may negotiate over contested points, the editor will have final say over what will go into the finished book. The contract will say so. And no, in response to what you’re probably thinking: you’re almost certainly not going to be able to win an argument over whether something your editor wants changed will harm the artistic merit of the book. Sorry to be the one to break the bad news, but it’s better that you know the score going into the situation. Pretty much every first-time author faced with editorial demands has attempted to declare something along the lines of, “Hey, buddy, I’m the author of this work, and what you see on the page represents my artistic vision. Therefore, I refuse to revise in accordance with your <del datetime="2011-01-20T19:26:08+00:00">misguided</del> <del datetime="2011-01-20T19:26:08+00:00">boneheaded</del> <del datetime="2011-01-20T19:26:08+00:00">downright evil</del> suggestion. Oh, well, that’s that.” Or at least thought it very loudly indeed. That’s an argument that might conceivably work for a well-established, hugely marketable author, but as virtually all of those aforementioned first-time authors could tell you, no one, but no one, at a publishing house is going to find the “My art — my way!” argument particularly compelling. Or even original. Why? Well, remember my earlier quip about how publishing houses can only bring out a few titles in any book category per year, far, far more than their editors would like to bring to press? It’s never wise to issue a take-it-or-leave-it ultimatum to people so well equipped with alternatives that they can easily afford to leave it. Especially if the issue in question is something as small as cutting your favorite paragraph. I’m telling you all this not to depress you — although it’s not all that difficult to imagine those last couple of paragraph having that effect — but so that you will not waste your energy and reputation on battling with your editor over every single requested change. Editorial control is built into the publishing process, after all; if you bring a book to successful publication, I can virtually guarantee that you will have to compromise on something. Learning to pick your battles, figuring out when give in gracefully and when to go to the mat, will serve both your interests and your book’s best in the long run. May I hear an amen? No? How about a few begrudging grunts of acknowledgment? Well, suit yourself, but if you found that last argument trying, you might want to find something to bite down upon before you read on. Why, you ask with trembling voice? Well, final say over the actual text and the ability to determine the timing of publication are not generally the only authorial rights one signs over via a publishing contract. A few matters that most first-time authors are stunned to learn that they cannot dictate for their own books: the typeface, the type of binding, the use of italics or special fonts, the number of illustrations, if any, when it will come out, and what the cover will look like. Also almost always beyond a first-time author’s ability to do anything about: the book’s title (that’s generally the marketing department’s call, believe it or not) and whether there is an acknowledgments page (the reason that they have become rarer in recent years is not that authors as a group have magically become less grateful, but that, like the dedication and epigraphs — those nifty quotes from other authors that often appear in published works — they take up extra page space, and thus render publishing a book more expensive). Hey, I’m just the messenger here. As a memoirist whose title was summarily changed by her publisher from something she expected to be changed (Is That You, Pumpkin?) to one that was bizarrely ungrammatical (A Family Darkly, a coy reference to A Scanner Darkly, which is in itself a reference to 1 Corinthians 13), believe me, my sympathies are squarely on the writers’ side on this one. (And no, Virginia, no employee of my former publishing house was ever able to explain to me with any degree of precision what they thought their preferred title meant.) The moral, should you care to know it: while landing a publication contract for a first book is certainly a coup, you’ll have a much, much happier life as a professional writer if you don’t expect it all to be one big literary luncheon where the glitterati congratulate you warmly on the beauty of your prose and the insight of your book’s worldview. It’s going to be hard work — for a crash course in just how hard many first-time authors find it, take a gander at the GETTING GOOD AT INCORPORATING FEEDBACK category on the archive list at right — and if you’re going to be successful at it, you’re going to need to come to terms with what you can and cannot control. Speaking of which… The hows and whens of book publishing Another matter that the publication contract will specify is the format in which the publisher will release the book — and no, it won’t be up to you whether your book will be released in hardcover or not. Historically, the author’s percentage has been higher for a hardcover book than for a paperback; until fairly recently, newspapers and magazines habitually reviewed only hardcovers for most novel categories, since that was the standard for high-quality fiction releases. In the last 15-20 years, however, fiction (and quite a bit of nonfiction, too) has increasingly been released in trade paper, those high-quality softcovers that so conveniently may be rolled and stuffed into a pocket or backpack, so the earlier review restriction has softened. That’s definitely good news for first-time novelists, as well as those of us who like to lug around several different books when we travel. Hey, a Kindle’s an electronic device — it has to be turned off for takeoff and landing. Once an editor has acquired a manuscript, it is assigned a place in the publisher’s print queue. In other words, they will tell the author when the book will actually be printed. Since much must happen between the time the editor receives a finished manuscript and when it goes to press, the contracted date by which the author must provide the book is typically months prior to the print date. This often comes as a great big surprise to a first-time author. If you wish to see your books published, though, you will have to come to terms with the fact that an author’s life is a hurry up/wait/hurry up/wait existence. The main manifestation of this: how long it takes for a major publisher to bring out a book. Although they sometimes will do a rush job to meet the demands of a current fad or news story, the typical minimum time between an author’s signing a book contract and the volume’s appearance in bookstores is at least a year. More often two. And that’s for fiction — which, as you will no doubt recall, is already written before the publisher has any contact with the book at all. For nonfiction, the time lapse is often substantially longer, in order to permit the author to write the book in question. So although one does indeed see books on current news stories hitting the shelves within a matter of weeks (the OJ Simpson trial, anyone?), that is most emphatically not the norm. A savvy writer takes this into account when constructing a narrative, avoiding references that might seem absolutely up-to-the-minute when he first types them, but will be as stale as last year’s fashions a year or two hence, when the book is finally available for readers to buy. I could go on and on about timing and control issues, but I’m seeing some raised hands out there. “Um, Anne?” the excellent folks attached to those hands ask timidly. “I don’t mean to seem shallow about my writing, but I notice that you haven’t said much about how and when an author actually gets paid for her work. Since I will have invested years of unpaid effort in writing a novel or perhaps months in constructing a marketable book proposal, is it unreasonable for me to wonder when I might start to see some tangible return on that investment?” Of course it isn’t. Let’s take a closer look at how and when a writer might conceivably start cashing in for those manuscripts and/or book proposals she’s written on spec. How authors get paid for their books An author who publishes through a large publisher is paid a pre-agreed proportion of the book’s sale price, known as a royalty. An advance against royalties (known colloquially just as an advance) is an up-front payment of a proportion of what the publisher expects the author’s percentage of the jacket price for the initial print run (i.e., the total number of books in the first edition). Thus, the more spectacularly the publisher expects the book to sell, the larger the advance. And because the advance is by definition an estimate of a number that no human being could predict with absolute accuracy, if the publisher’s estimate was too high, and thus the advance too large for the royalties to exceed, the author is seldom expected to pay back the advance if the book doesn’t sell well. However, once the book is released, the author does not receive further royalty payments until after her agreed-upon share of the books sold exceeds the amount of the advance. Since approximately 2/3rds of you just gasped audibly, let me repeat that last bit: the advance is not in addition to royalties, but a prepaid portion of them. An advance is not a signing bonus, as most people think, but a down payment toward what a publisher believes it will eventually owe the author. While your jaw is already dropped, let me hasten to add that royalties over and above the advance amount are usually not paid on an as-the-books-sell basis, which could entail the publisher’s cutting a check every other day, but at regularly-scheduled intervals. Once every six months is fairly standard. Don’t feel bad if you were previously unaware of how writers get paid; half the published authors I know were completely in the dark about that last point until their first books had been out for five months or so. Yet another moral: it behooves you to read your publication contract carefully. If you don’t understand what it says, ask your agent to explain it to you; it’s her job. Those hands just shot up again, didn’t they? “I’m glad you brought that up, Anne. You’ve made it clear why I would need an agent to help me though this process, which sounds like a drawn-out and somewhat unpredictable one. So how do I go about finding the paragon who will protect me and my work?” I’m glad you asked, hand-raisers. Many aspiring writers believe, mistakenly, that all that’s necessary for a book to get published is to write it. However, as any author whose first book came out within the last decade could tell you, bringing one’s writing to the publishing industry’s attention can be almost as much work as the composition process — and has been known to take just as long or longer. Again, sorry to be the one to break it to you, but it’s vital to a good writer’s happiness to understand that extended, frustrating, and difficult roads to publication are the norm for first books these days, not the exception. Clinging to the common writerly misconception that if writing is any good, it will always be picked up by the first or second agent who sees it, or that a manuscript that doesn’t find a publisher within the first few submissions must not be well-written, is a sure road to discouragement, if not outright depression. Certainly, it makes a writer more likely to give up after just a few rejections. Since the competition in the book market is fierce by the standards of any industry, realistic expectations are immensely helpful in equipping even the most gifted writer for the long haul. It can also be hugely beneficial in tracking down and working well with the helpful friend who will be toting your manuscript to publishers for you, your agent. So how does a writer go about acquiring this valuable assistant? Unless one happens to be intimate friends with a great many well-established authors, one has two options: verbally and in writing. But first, let’s talk about what an aspiring writer should NEVER do Querying and pitching are an aspiring writer’s only options for calling a US-based agent’s attention to his or her work. Picking up the phone and calling, stopping them on the street, or other informal means of approach are considered quite rude. Translation: they’re not going to work. Don’t even try. The same holds true for mailing or e-mailing a manuscript to an agent without asking first if s/he would like to see it, by the way. This is universally an instant-rejection offense. Unlike in the old days, simply sending to an agent who has never heard of you will only result in your work being rejected unread: uniformly, agencies reject pages they did not actually ask to see (known as unsolicited submissions). Is everyone clear on how to avoid seeming rude? Good. Let’s move on to the accepted courteous means of introducing yourself and your book. Approaching an agent in writing: the query letter The classic means of introducing one’s book to an agent is by sending a formal letter, known in the trade as a query. Contrary to popular belief, the query’s goal is not to convince an agent to represent the book in question — no agent is going to offer to represent a book or proposal before she’s read it — but to prompt the agent to ask the writer to send either the opening pages of the manuscript or the whole thing. After that, your good writing can speak for itself, right? Think of the query as your book’s personal ad, intended to pique an agent’s interest, not as the first date. Always limited to a single page in length, the query letter briefly presents the agent with the bare-bones information s/he will need in order to determine whether s/he wants to read any or all of the manuscript the writer is offering. This will be familiar to those of you who worked through my <a href="/index_p_11697.html">Querypalooza series</a> last fall, but for the benefit of all of you New Year’s resolvers new to the game, here’s a list of the information a good query should include: (1) Whether the book is fiction or nonfiction. You’d be surprised at how often queriers forget to mention which. (2) The book category. Basically, the part of the bookstore where the publishing book will occupy shelf space. Since no agent represents every kind of book, this information is essential: if an agent doesn’t have connections with editors who publish the type of book you’re querying, he’s not going to waste either your time or his by asking to see it. (For guidance on how to determine your book’s category, please see the aptly-named HOW TO FIGURE OUT YOUR BOOK’S CATEGORY listing on the archive list on the lower-right side of this page.) It’s also a good idea, but not strictly required, to point out who might be interested in reading your book and why; an agent is going to want to know that at some point, anyway. Of course, I’m not talking about boasting predictions like, “Oh, Random House would love this!” or “This is a natural for Oprah!” (you wouldn’t believe how often agents hear that last one) or sweeping generalizations like, “Every woman in America needs to read this book!” Instead, try describing it the way a marketing professional might: “This book will appeal to girls aged 13-16, because it deals with issues they face in their everyday lives. (For tips on figuring out who your book’s audience might be with this much specificity, please see the IDENTIFYING YOUR TARGET MARKET category at right.) (3) A one- or two-paragraph description of the book’s argument or plot. No need to summarize the entire plot here, merely the premise, but do make sure that the writing is vivid. For a novel or memoir, this paragraph should introduce the book’s protagonist, the main conflict or obstacles she faces, and what’s at stake if she does or does not overcome them. For a nonfiction book, this paragraph should present the central question the book addresses and suggest, briefly, how the book will address it. (4) The writer’s previous publishing credentials or awards, if any, and/or expertise that renders her an expert on the book’s topic. Although not necessarily indicative of the quality of a book’s writing, to an agent, these are some of your book’s selling points. For tips on figuring out what to include here, please see the YOUR BOOK’S SELLING POINTS category on the list at right. (5) Some indication of why the writer thinks the agent to whom the letter is addressed would be a good representative for the book. As I mentioned above, agents don’t represent books in general: they represent specific varieties. Since they so often receive queries from aspiring writers who are apparently sending exactly the same letter indiscriminately to every agent in the country, stating up front why you chose to pick THIS agent is an excellent idea. No need to indulge in gratuitous flattery: a simple since you so ably represented Book X or since you represent literary fiction (or whatever your book category is) will do. Should any of you have been considering querying every agent in the country, be warned: it’s a sure route to rejection, especially if a writer makes the mistake of addressing the letter not to a specific person, but Dear Agent. Trust me on this one. (6) The writer’s contact information. Another one that you might be astonished to learn is often omitted. Yet if the agent can’t get hold of you, she cannot possibly ask to you to send her your manuscript, can she? (7) A stamped, self-addressed envelope (SASE) for the agent’s reply. This isn’t part of the letter, strictly speaking, but it absolutely must be included in the envelope in which you send your query. No exceptions, not even if you tell the agent in the query that you would prefer to be contacted via e-mail. I’m serious about this: don’t forget to include it. Queries that arrive without SASEs are almost universally rejected unread. (For tips on the hows and whys of producing perfect SASEs, please see the SASE GUIDELINES category on the list at right.) Is there more to constructing a successful query letter than this? Naturally — since I’ve written extensively about querying (posts you will find under the perplexingly-named HOW TO WRITE A QUERY LETTER category on the archive list, if you’re interested) and how it should look (QUERY LETTERS ILLUSTRATED), the list above is not intended to be an exhaustive guide to how to write one. Speaking of realistic expectations, do not be disappointed if you do not receive an instantaneous response to your query. Because a well-established agent may receive 800 to 1500 queries per week (yes, you read that correctly), it’s not uncommon for a regularly mailed query not to hear back for a month or six weeks. Some agencies do not respond at all if the answer is no. So it’s just poor strategy to query agents one at a time. (For a fuller explanation, please see the QUERYING MULTIPLE AGENTS AT ONCE category at right.) Approaching an agent in writing, part II: the electronic or website-based query Because of the aforementioned slow turn-around times for queries sent via regular mail, increasing numbers of aspiring writers are choosing to send their query letters via e-mail. There are pros and cons to this — which I shall go over at length in a day or two, when I fulfill a reader request for a Formatpalooza take on the subject. Some agencies ask queriers fill out an electronic form that includes some or all of the information that’s in a traditional query letter. While some aspiring writers have landed agents in this manner, I tend to discourage this route, since typically, the word count allowed is sharply limited. (Some agency sites permit as few as 50 words for plot summaries, for instance.) Also, most writers just copy and paste material from their query letters into the boxes of these forms, substantially increasing the likelihood of cut-off words, missed punctuation, and formatting errors. If you just cringed, in recognition of how people who read manuscripts for a living tend to react to these types of tiny errors: congratulations. Your chances of querying successfully are substantially higher than someone who doesn’t know to conduct intense proofreading upon ANYTHING that’s s/he sends an agent. Remember, literally every sentence you send a potential agent is a sample of how good your writing is. Regardless of whether you choose to query electronically or via regular mail, it’s in your best interests to make sure that every syllable is impeccably presented. Which is why, in case you were wondering, written queries were the only means of approaching agents until just a few years ago, and still the means that most of them prefer. (Short of a personal introduction, of course. Writers whose college roommates or best friends from elementary school grew up to be agents enjoy an undeniable advantage in obtaining representation that the rest of us do not enjoy.) If a potential client has trouble expressing himself in writing, is ignorant of the basic rules of grammar, or is just plain inattentive to those itsy-bitsy details I mentioned above, a written query will tend to show it. To be fair, aspiring writers often prefer to query in writing, because that, after all, is presumably their strength. Besides, there are a lot of very talented but shy writers out there who would infinitely prefer to present their work from a distance, rather than in person. However, direct interaction with an agent is sometimes a plus. Approaching an agent verbally: the pitch A face-to-face presentation of a book concept to an agent is called a pitch, and it’s actually not indigenous to publishing: it’s borrowed from the movie industry. Screenwriters pitch their work verbally all the time. The reason that the publishing industry has been rather reluctant to follow suit is a corollary of the proof-is-in-the-pudding reason I mentioned above: not everyone who can talk about a book well can write one successfully, just as not every writer capable of producing magnificent prose is equally adept at describing it in conversation. However, since writers’ conferences often import agents to speak, many set up formal pitching sessions for attendees. Sometimes they charge extra for the privilege; sometimes it’s included in the conference fee. It’s also sometimes possible to buttonhole an agent after a seminar or in a hallway, but many conference organizers frown upon that. (Contrary to conference-circuit rumor, it’s typically the conference bigwigs who object to hallway pitching, not the attending agents. Virtually nobody objects to being approached politely immediately after a conference panel — and if they do, they simply say no and walk away. But no matter how much you want a particular agent to represent you, it’s NEVER considered acceptable to attempt to pitch in a conference or literary event’s bathroom. Don’t let me catch you doing it.) Like the query letter, the purpose of the pitch is not to convince the agent to sign a writer to a long-term representation contract on the spot, but to get the agent to ask the writer to mail him or her chapters of the book. (To engage in another parenthetical just-between-us chat: contrary to what conference brochures often imply, agents virtually never ask a pitcher to produce anything longer than a five-page writing sample on the spot. Since manuscripts are heavy, they almost universally prefer to have writers either mail or e-mail requested pages. I don’t know why conference organizers so often tell potential attendees otherwise.) In order to achieve that, you’re going to need to describe your book compellingly and in terms that will make sense to the business side of the industry. In essence, then, a pitch is a verbal query letter. Thus, it should contain the same information: whether it is fiction or nonfiction, the book category, the target audience, any writing credentials or experience you might have that might provide selling points for the book, and a BRIEF plot summary. Most conference organizers are adamant about the brief part: their guidelines will commonly specify that the summary portion should take no more than 2 minutes. Did I just hear all of you novelists out there gulp? You honestly do not have a lot of time here: scheduled pitch sessions may range in length anywhere from 2-15 minutes, but most are 5-10. Usually, they are one-on-one meetings in a cramped space where many other writers are noisily engaged in pitching to many other agents, not exactly an environment conducive to intimate chat. At some conferences, though, a number of writers will sit around a table with an agent, pitching one after the other. Yes, that’s right: as if this situation weren’t already stressful enough, you might have to be doing this in front of an audience. While the opportunity to spend telling a real, live agent about your book I’m going to be honest with you: the vast majority of aspiring writers find pitching absolutely terrifying, at least the first time they do it. Like writing a good query letter, constructing and delivering a strong pitch is not something any talented writer is magically born knowing how to do: it’s a learned skill. For some help in learning how to do it, please see the HOW TO PREPARE A PITCH category on the list at right. In case I’m being too subtle here: if you are looking for in-depth analysis on any of these subjects or step-by-step how-tos, try perusing the category list at right. Since I usually tackle these issues on a much more detail-oriented basis — a hazard of my calling, I’m afraid — I’m finding it quite interesting to paint the picture in these broad strokes. Next time, I shall talk a bit about what happens after a query or submission arrives at an agency — and perhaps use that as a segue into that aforementioned additional Formatpalooza post, by special reader request. The joint is going to be jumping here at Author! Author! Keep up the good work! </div> </div> </article> </main> </div> <aside id="secondary" class="widget-area" role="complementary" aria-label="Blog Sidebar"> <section id="search-2" class="widget widget_search"> <form role="search" method="get" class="search-form" action="https://www.annemini.com/"> <label for="search-form-1"> Search for: </label> <input type="search" id="search-form-1" class="search-field" placeholder="Search …" value="" name="s" /> <button type="submit" class="search-submit"><svg class="icon icon-search" aria-hidden="true" role="img"> <use href="#icon-search" xlink:href="#icon-search"></use> </svg>Search</button> </form> </section><section id="text-7" class="widget widget_text"> <div class="textwidget"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/annes-bio">Anne’s Bio</a> <div style="display:none;"> <a href="https://www.jamberrynails.net/">agen bola euro 2021</a> <a href="https://adtoken.com/">bandar bola</a> <a href="https://www.ilion.com/">bandar bola terbesar</a> <a href="https://slotonline.pages.dev/">games slot online</a> <a href="http://www2.se.senac.br/includes/includes/">judi online</a> <a href="https://www.campuscribz.com/">slot casino</a> <a href="https://liveskor888.com/">live skor</a> </div> </div> </section><section id="archives-2" class="widget widget_archive"><h2 class="widget-title">Archives</h2><nav aria-label="Archives"> <ul> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2024/09/'>September 2024</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2020/06/'>June 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2019/12/'>December 2019</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2015/01/'>January 2015</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2014/11/'>November 2014</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2014/10/'>October 2014</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2014/05/'>May 2014</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2014/04/'>April 2014</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2014/02/'>February 2014</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2013/11/'>November 2013</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2013/07/'>July 2013</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2013/05/'>May 2013</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2013/04/'>April 2013</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2013/03/'>March 2013</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2013/02/'>February 2013</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2013/01/'>January 2013</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2012/12/'>December 2012</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2012/11/'>November 2012</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2012/10/'>October 2012</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2012/09/'>September 2012</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2012/08/'>August 2012</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2012/07/'>July 2012</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2012/06/'>June 2012</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2012/05/'>May 2012</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2012/04/'>April 2012</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2012/03/'>March 2012</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2012/02/'>February 2012</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2012/01/'>January 2012</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2011/12/'>December 2011</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2011/11/'>November 2011</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2011/10/'>October 2011</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2011/09/'>September 2011</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2011/08/'>August 2011</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2011/07/'>July 2011</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2011/06/'>June 2011</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2011/05/'>May 2011</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2011/04/'>April 2011</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2011/03/'>March 2011</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2011/02/'>February 2011</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2011/01/'>January 2011</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2010/12/'>December 2010</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2010/11/'>November 2010</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2010/10/'>October 2010</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2010/09/'>September 2010</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2010/08/'>August 2010</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2010/07/'>July 2010</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2010/06/'>June 2010</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2010/05/'>May 2010</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2010/04/'>April 2010</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2010/03/'>March 2010</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2010/02/'>February 2010</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2010/01/'>January 2010</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2009/12/'>December 2009</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2009/11/'>November 2009</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2009/10/'>October 2009</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2009/09/'>September 2009</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2009/08/'>August 2009</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2009/07/'>July 2009</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2009/06/'>June 2009</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2009/05/'>May 2009</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2009/04/'>April 2009</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2009/03/'>March 2009</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2009/02/'>February 2009</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2009/01/'>January 2009</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2008/12/'>December 2008</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2008/11/'>November 2008</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2008/10/'>October 2008</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2008/09/'>September 2008</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2008/08/'>August 2008</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2008/07/'>July 2008</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2008/06/'>June 2008</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2008/05/'>May 2008</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2008/04/'>April 2008</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2008/03/'>March 2008</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2008/02/'>February 2008</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2008/01/'>January 2008</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2007/12/'>December 2007</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2007/11/'>November 2007</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2007/10/'>October 2007</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2007/09/'>September 2007</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2007/08/'>August 2007</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2007/07/'>July 2007</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2007/06/'>June 2007</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2007/05/'>May 2007</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2007/04/'>April 2007</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2007/03/'>March 2007</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2007/02/'>February 2007</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2007/01/'>January 2007</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2006/12/'>December 2006</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2006/11/'>November 2006</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2006/10/'>October 2006</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2006/09/'>September 2006</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2006/08/'>August 2006</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2006/07/'>July 2006</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2006/06/'>June 2006</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2006/05/'>May 2006</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2006/04/'>April 2006</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2006/03/'>March 2006</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2006/02/'>February 2006</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2006/01/'>January 2006</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2005/12/'>December 2005</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2005/11/'>November 2005</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2005/10/'>October 2005</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2005/09/'>September 2005</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2005/08/'>August 2005</a></li> <li><a href='https://www.annemini.com/2004/04/'>April 2004</a></li> </ul> </nav></section><section id="categories-2" class="widget widget_categories"><h2 class="widget-title">Categories</h2><nav aria-label="Categories"> <ul> <li class="cat-item cat-item-573"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/author-author-interview-videos/">*Author! Author! Interview videos</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1780"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pnwa-resident-writer-columns/">*PNWA Resident Writer columns</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-985"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/">*Start here if you are a beginner at trying to get published</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-873"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/the-rules-for-posting-comments-at-author-author/">— The rules for posting comments at Author! Author!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1364"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/so-why-arent-you-published/">"So why aren't you published?"</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1362"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/why-january-isnt-necessarily-the-best-time-to-act-upon-your-new-years-resolution-to-query-or-submit/">*Why January isn't necessarily the best time to act upon your New Year's resolution to query or submit</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1251"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/a-one-post-guide-to-what-a-book-manuscript-should-look-like/">A one-post guide to what a book manuscript should look like</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-956"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/help-im-scared-to-send-out-the-pages-that-agent-requested/">Help! I'm scared to send out the pages that agent requested!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-928"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/how-are-book-manuscripts-different-from-published-books/">How are book manuscripts different from published books?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1229"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/if-you-read-only-one-post-on-author-author-this-should-be-it/">If you read only one post on Author! Author — this should be it</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-484"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/if-you-read-only-one-post-on-querying-this-should-be-it/">If you read only one post on querying — this should be it</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-194"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/new-years-resolutions-on-writing/">New Year's resolutions on writing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-151"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/query-letters-for-beginners/">Query letters for beginners</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1113"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/the-manuscript-formatting-rules/">The manuscript formatting rules</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-879"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/what-is-conference-pitching-and-why-would-i-want-to-do-it/">What is conference pitching and why would I want to do it?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-979"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/what-should-my-submission-look-like/">What should my submission look like?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-562"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/why-are-author-author-posts-so-long/">Why are Author! Author! posts so long?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1381"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/why-are-the-explanations-here-at-author-author-so-extensive/">Why are the explanations here at Author! Author! so extensive?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-372"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/why-are-there-so-many-different-sets-of-writing-rules-online/">Why are there so many different sets of writing rules online?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-488"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/why-is-there-so-much-conflicting-advice-about-queries/">Why is there so much conflicting advice about queries?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-201"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/why-shouldnt-i-just-query-every-agent-i-can-find/">Why shouldn't I just query every agent I can find?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1348"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/why-you-might-not-want-to-send-out-requested-pages-immediately-after-a-successful-pitch/">Why you might not want to send out requested pages immediately after a successful pitch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1387"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/why-you-should-be-making-regular-backups-of-your-writing/">Why you should be making regular backups of your writing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1292"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-here-if-you-are-a-beginner-at-trying-to-get-published/why-you-should-not-submit-your-manuscript-the-second-after-you-finish-drafting-it/">Why you should not submit your manuscript the second after you finish drafting it</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-940"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/academic-writing/">Academic writing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-594"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/adding-complexity-to-a-plot/">Adding complexity to a plot</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1724"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/advances-and-how-they-do-and-dont-work/">Advances and how they do (and don't) work</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-773"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/advances-and-how-they-do-and-dont-work/advances/">Advances</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1389"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/advances-and-how-they-do-and-dont-work/is-it-okay-to-ask-agents-at-conferences-how-much-of-an-advance-a-book-like-mine-might-garner/">Is it okay to ask agents at conferences how much of an advance a book like mine might garner?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1061"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/advances-and-how-they-do-and-dont-work/may-i-reasonably-expect-my-advance-to-permit-me-to-take-time-off-work-to-promote-my-book/">May I reasonably expect my advance to permit me to take time off work to promote my book?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-543"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/advances-and-how-they-do-and-dont-work/may-i-reasonably-expect-the-advance-on-my-first-book-to-be-large-enough-to-enable-me-to-quit-my-day-job-and-write-full-time/">May I reasonably expect the advance on my first book to be large enough to enable me to quit my day job and write full time?</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1375"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after-youve-received-a-request-for-pages-as-an-exclusive/">After you've received a request for pages as an exclusive</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1721"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/">After…</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-532"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-a-publisher-has-decided-to-publish-your-book/">After a publisher has decided to publish your book</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-261"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-an-agent-has-said-no/">After an agent has said no</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-770"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-an-agent-makes-an-offer/">After an agent makes an offer</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-959"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-an-agent-or-editor-has-asked-for-an-exclusive-look-at-your-work/">After an agent or editor has asked for an exclusive look at your work</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-358"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-an-editor-decides-to-acquire-a-book/">After an editor decides to acquire a book</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1052"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-you-have-published-the-first-book-in-a-series/">After you have published the first book in a series</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-848"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-you-have-published-your-first-book-what-then/">After you have published your first book — what then?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-204"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-you-have-queried-or-pitched/">After you have queried or pitched</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-688"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-you-land-a-publisher/">After you land a publisher</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-359"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-you-land-an-agent/">After you land an agent</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-205"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-you-receive-a-request-for-pages/">After you receive a request for pages</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-790"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-you-submit/">After you submit</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-206"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-youve-been-rejected/">After you've been rejected</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1152"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-youve-finishing-writing-your-first-draft/">After you've finishing writing your first draft</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-554"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-youve-made-a-successful-pitch/">After you've made a successful pitch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1220"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/after-youve-made-an-unsuccessful-pitch/">After you've made an unsuccessful pitch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-556"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/getting-that-submission-out-the-door/">Getting that submission out the door</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-961"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/help-ive-granted-an-agent-an-exclusive-and-another-agent-just-asked-to-see-pages/">Help! I've granted an agent an exclusive and another agent just asked to see pages!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-647"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/time-between-sale-publication/">Time between sale & publication</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1201"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/what-happens-after-a-memoirist-sells-a-book-proposal/">What happens after a memoirist sells a book proposal</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-235"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/what-happens-when-a-writer-sends-out-a-manuscript-too-soon/">What happens when a writer sends out a manuscript too soon</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-787"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/what-if-more-than-one-agent-asks-to-see-my-manuscript/">What if more than one agent asks to see my manuscript?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-665"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/what-not-to-say-to-an-agent-interested-in-your-work/">What NOT to say to an agent interested in your work</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1095"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/what-to-ask-an-agent-who-offers-to-represent-you/">What to ask an agent who offers to represent you</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-685"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/after/why-its-usually-prudent-to-wait-a-few-days-before-responding-to-revision-suggestions/">Why it's usually prudent to wait a few days before responding to revision suggestions</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1729"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agencies-and-how-to-work-with-them/">Agencies and how to work with them</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1098"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agencies-and-how-to-work-with-them/agency-contracts/">Agency contracts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-240"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agencies-and-how-to-work-with-them/being-an-agents-dream-client/">Being an agent's dream client</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-882"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agencies-and-how-to-work-with-them/deal-memos/">Deal memos</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-680"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agencies-and-how-to-work-with-them/my-agent-has-asked-me-to-send-multiple-copies-of-my-manuscript-how-do-i-ship-it/">My agent has asked me to send multiple copies of my manuscript — how do I ship it?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-983"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agencies-and-how-to-work-with-them/what-an-agent-means-by-a-book-proposal/">What an agent means by a book proposal</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-567"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agencies-and-how-to-work-with-them/what-an-agent-will-expect-a-new-client-to-know-about-the-publishing-industry-a-crash-course/">What an agent will expect a new client to know about the publishing industry — a crash course</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-258"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agencies-and-how-to-work-with-them/what-an-agent-will-expect-your-manuscript-to-look-like/">What an agent will expect your manuscript to look like</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-259"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agencies-and-how-to-work-with-them/what-an-agent-will-expect-your-query-to-look-like/">What an agent will expect your query to look like</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-684"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agencies-and-how-to-work-with-them/what-if-my-agent-wants-me-to-revise-my-manuscript-before-she-submits-it/">What if my agent wants me to revise my manuscript before she submits it?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1746"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agencies-and-how-to-work-with-them/why-you-should-make-backups-before-you-send-a-manuscript-to-an-agent-or-editor/">Why you should make backups before you send a manuscript to an agent or editor</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-703"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agencies-and-how-to-work-with-them/working-well-with-an-agent/">Working well with an agent</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-239"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agency-guides/">Agency guides</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-275"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents/">Agents</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1723 current-cat-parent current-cat-ancestor"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/">Agents – landing the right one for your book</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-262"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/agency-submission-guidelines-and-how-to-read-them/">Agency submission guidelines and how to read them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-826"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/approaching-agents-at-conferences/">Approaching agents at conferences</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-147"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/approaching-agents-online-or-by-e-mail/">Approaching agents online or by e-mail</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-148"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/common-agents-pet-peeves/">Common agents' pet peeves</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-211"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/does-getting-rejected-mean-i-dont-have-talent/">Does getting rejected mean I don't have talent?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1249"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/does-it-matter-what-font-i-use-in-my-submission/">Does it matter what font I use in my submission?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-376"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/first-pages-agents-tend-to-dislike/">First pages agents tend to dislike</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-279"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/generating-a-querying-list/">Generating a querying list</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1038"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/how-can-i-tell-if-an-agent-is-reputable/">How can I tell if an agent is reputable?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-653"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/how-much-of-a-book-must-be-written-before-i-can-pitch-or-query-it/">How much of a book must be written before I can pitch or query it?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-963"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/ive-granted-an-exclusive-and-i-have-not-heard-back-what-are-my-options/">I've granted an exclusive and I have not heard back! What are my options?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-307"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/is-it-acceptable-to-query-or-submit-to-us-based-agents-on-a4-paper/">Is it acceptable to query or submit to US-based agents on A4 paper?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-223"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/is-it-ok-to-approach-two-agents-at-the-same-agency/">Is it OK to approach two agents at the same agency?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-269"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/is-it-ok-to-query-several-agents-at-once/">Is it OK to query several agents at once?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-224"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/is-it-ok-to-re-query-or-resubmit-to-the-same-agent-twice/">Is it OK to re-query or resubmit to the same agent twice?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-365"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/is-it-ok-to-submit-to-several-agents-at-once/">Is it OK to submit to several agents at once?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-495"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/is-it-okay-to-include-a-longer-writing-sample-with-a-query-than-the-agencys-submission-guidelines-specify/">Is it okay to include a longer writing sample with a query than the agency's submission guidelines specify?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-225"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/is-it-okay-to-re-approach-an-agent-that-has-already-rejected-my-book/">Is it okay to re-approach an agent that has already rejected my book?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1204"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/is-it-okay-to-send-more-pages-than-an-agent-has-requested/">Is it okay to send more pages than an agent has requested?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-637"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/realistic-expectations-for-pitchers/">Realistic expectations for pitchers</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-154"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/realistic-expectations-for-queriers/">Realistic expectations for queriers</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-180"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/realistic-expectations-for-submitters/">Realistic expectations for submitters</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-231"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/so-you-have-pitched-successfully-to-an-agent-what-now/">So you have pitched successfully to an agent — what now?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-157 current-cat"><a aria-current="page" href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/what-are-the-polite-ways-to-approach-an-agent/">What are the polite ways to approach an agent?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1184"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/what-does-a-cover-letter-for-a-submission-look-like/">What does a cover letter for a submission look like?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-968"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/what-does-it-mean-if-an-agency-says-it-accepts-only-exclusive-submissions/">What does it mean if an agency says it accepts only exclusive submissions?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1335"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/what-does-it-mean-if-an-agency-says-it-only-accepts-queries-from-previously-published-writers/">What does it mean if an agency says it only accepts queries from previously-published writers?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-272"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/what-info-should-be-in-a-query/">What info should be in a query?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-487"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/what-should-a-query-look-like/">What should a query look like?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1170"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/why-a-savvy-submitter-always-proofreads-before-submitting/">Why a savvy submitter ALWAYS proofreads before submitting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-988"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/why-a-savvy-writer-never-submits-unnumbered-pages/">Why a savvy writer NEVER submits unnumbered pages</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-297"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/why-agencies-so-often-use-screeners/">Why agencies so often use screeners</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-236"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/why-an-aspiring-writer-should-neither-cold-call-an-agency-nor-show-up-on-its-doorstep/">Why an aspiring writer should neither cold-call an agency nor show up on its doorstep</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-785"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/why-do-i-need-an-agent/">Why do I need an agent?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-200"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/why-havent-i-heard-back-yet/">Why haven't I heard back yet?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-890"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/why-might-i-consider-pitching-instead-of-querying/">Why might I consider pitching instead of querying?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1332"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/why-shouldnt-i-query-agents-one-at-a-time/">Why shouldn't I query agents one at a time?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-202"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/why-shouldnt-i-send-the-same-query-to-every-agent/">Why shouldn't I send the same query to every agent?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1747"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/why-you-should-never-grant-an-exclusive-at-the-querying-stage-unless-an-agencys-submission-guidelines-specifically-ask-for-it/">Why you should never grant an exclusive at the querying stage unless an agency’s submission guidelines specifically ask for it</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1738"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/why-you-should-not-assume-that-the-agent-you-liked-so-much-at-a-conference-should-have-an-exclusive-look-at-your-manuscript/">Why you should not assume that the agent you liked so much at a conference should have an exclusive look at your manuscript</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1205"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/why-you-should-not-just-pick-up-the-phone-and-call-your-favorite-authors-agent/">Why you should not just pick up the phone and call your favorite author's agent</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1111"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agents-landing-the-right-one-for-your-book/why-you-shouldnt-query-every-agent-in-the-country/">Why you shouldn't query every agent in the country</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1521"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/agentseditors-who-used-to-attend-the-ctsrn/">Agents/Editors who used to attend the CTSRN</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-766"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/annes-book-picks/">Anne's Book Picks</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-160"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/annes-editorial-pet-peeves/">Anne's editorial pet peeves</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-191"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/annes-favorite-posts/">Anne's favorite posts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-161"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/art-of-revision/">Art Of Revision</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-470"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/author-bio/">Author bio</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-502"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/author-photo/">Author photo</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1068"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/author-readings-and-why-you-should-attend-them/">Author readings and why you should attend them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-388"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/author-author-awards-for-expressive-excellence/">Author! Author! Awards for Expressive Excellence</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1655"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/author-author-housekeeping-issues/">Author! Author! housekeeping issues</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-509"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/autobiographical-fiction/">Autobiographical fiction</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-847"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/back-jacket-blurbs/">Back jacket blurbs</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1039"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/back-up-copies/">Back-up copies</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-427"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/bad-laughter/">Bad laughter</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1053"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/better-answers-than-umm-to-so-what-do-you-write/">Better answers than "Umm…" to "So what do you write?"</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-915"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/binding-your-work/">Binding your work</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1654"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/bits-of-site-related-business/">Bits of site-related business</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1779"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/blog-housekeeping/">Blog housekeeping</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1751"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/">Book categories</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1014"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/appropriate-vocabulary-for-your-chosen-book-category-and-why-you-will-want-to-observe-its-strictures/">Appropriate vocabulary for your chosen book category and why you will want to observe its strictures</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-241"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/but-my-book-doesnt-fit-comfortably-into-just-one-category/">But my book doesn't fit comfortably into just one category!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-609"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/genres-and-their-conventions/">Genres and their conventions</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1331"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/how-specific-should-i-be-about-my-books-category-in-my-query/">How specific should I be about my book's category in my query?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-404"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/how-to-figure-out-your-books-category/">How to figure out your book's category</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-931"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/should-i-indent-the-first-paragraph-of-a-chapter-if-published-books-in-my-chosen-genre-sometimes-do-not/">Should I indent the first paragraph of a chapter if published books in my chosen genre sometimes do not?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1120"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/should-i-mention-the-book-category-on-my-title-page/">Should I mention the book category on my title page?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-422"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/what-is-a-book-category/">What is a book category?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1316"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/whats-the-difference-between-literary-fiction-and-just-good-writing/">What's the difference between literary fiction and just good writing?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1049"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/whats-the-difference-between-memoir-and-narrative-nonfiction/">What's the difference between memoir and narrative nonfiction?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1065"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/whats-the-difference-between-science-fiction-and-fantasy/">What's the difference between science fiction and fantasy?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-198"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/why-do-i-have-to-pick-a-category-at-all/">Why do I have to pick a category at all?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-591"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-categories/why-what-would-constitute-good-writing-in-one-book-category-might-not-wow-readers-in-another/">Why what would constitute good writing in one book category might not wow readers in another</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1227"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-concept/">Book concept</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-471"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-jackets-and-the-things-that-go-on-them/">Book jackets and the things that go on them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1426"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-keynote/">Book keynote</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-441"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-length/">Book length</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-804"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-marketing-101/">Book marketing 101</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1752"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/">Book promotion from the author's perspective</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-927"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/author-blogs-and-why-your-publisher-will-want-you-to-write-one/">Author blogs and why your publisher will want you to write one</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1054"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/blog-tours/">Blog tours</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1055"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/blog-tours-and-why-you-should-do-them/">Blog tours and why you should do them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-510"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/book-promotion/">Book promotion</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-285"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/book-reviews-and-how-they-work/">Book reviews and how they work</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1430"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/book-tours/">Book tours</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1432"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/book-trailers-do-they-work/">Book trailers — do they work?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1317"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/coming-up-with-a-marketing-plan/">Coming up with a marketing plan</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-522"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/dealing-with-readers-reactions-to-ones-books/">Dealing with readers' reactions to one's books</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-643"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/figuring-out-your-books-selling-points/">Figuring out your book's selling points</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1057"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/figuring-out-your-target-market-and-how-to-reach-it/">Figuring out your target market and how to reach it</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-855"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/getting-a-good-author-photo/">Getting a good author photo</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-634"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/giving-a-good-author-interview/">Giving a good author interview</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-635"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/giving-good-author-readings/">Giving good author readings</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-676"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/how-to-be-an-effective-and-polite-guest-blogger/">How to be an effective and polite guest blogger</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1062"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/promotion-burnout-and-how-to-avoid-it/">Promotion burnout and how to avoid it</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-907"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/setting-up-your-own-book-signings/">Setting up your own book signings</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1109"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/wait-i-might-not-get-to-choose-my-books-title/">Wait — I might not get to choose my book's title?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-857"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/what-makes-a-good-author-bio-or-photo/">What makes a good author bio or photo?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1066"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/why-are-authors-now-expected-to-promote-their-own-books-so-much-more-vigorously-than-in-days-of-yore/">Why are authors now expected to promote their own books so much more vigorously than in days of yore?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-550"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-promotion-from-the-authors-perspective/why-you-shouldnt-promise-your-kith-and-kin-free-copies-of-your-books/">Why you shouldn't promise your kith and kin free copies of your books</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1685"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals/">Book proposals</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1755"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals-and-how-to-pull-them-together/">Book proposals and how to pull them together</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1082"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals-and-how-to-pull-them-together/a-quick-reference-guide-to-book-proposal-presentation/">A quick reference guide to book proposal presentation</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-861"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals-and-how-to-pull-them-together/demonstrating-your-platform-in-a-proposal/">Demonstrating your platform in a proposal</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-794"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals-and-how-to-pull-them-together/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-book-proposals-but-were-afraid-to-ask/">Everything you wanted to know about book proposals but were afraid to ask</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-981"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals-and-how-to-pull-them-together/how-does-one-go-about-writing-a-book-proposal/">How does one go about writing a book proposal?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-379"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals-and-how-to-pull-them-together/how-should-i-format-my-book-proposal/">How should I format my book proposal?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-863"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals-and-how-to-pull-them-together/how-to-mail-or-e-mail-a-book-proposal/">How to mail or e-mail a book proposal</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1048"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals-and-how-to-pull-them-together/ive-written-a-memoir-why-do-i-need-to-write-a-book-proposal-for-it/">I've written a memoir — why do I need to write a book proposal for it?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-655"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals-and-how-to-pull-them-together/must-i-have-a-full-manuscript-in-hand-before-i-propose/">Must I have a full manuscript in hand before I propose?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-545"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals-and-how-to-pull-them-together/revising-a-book-proposal-successfully/">Revising a book proposal successfully</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-316"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals-and-how-to-pull-them-together/submitting-a-book-proposal-to-a-us-based-agent-from-outside-the-us/">Submitting a book proposal to a US-based agent from outside the US</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1730"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals-and-how-to-pull-them-together/whats-the-overview-and-how-do-i-construct-one/">What’s the overview and how do I construct one?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-658"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-proposals-and-how-to-pull-them-together/why-do-some-agencies-want-to-see-a-proposal-and-some-the-full-manuscript/">Why do some agencies want to see a proposal and some the full manuscript?</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-442"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/book-publishing-basics/">Book publishing basics</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1211"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/building-blocks-of-a-pitch-or-query/">Building blocks of a pitch or query</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-793"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/building-your-writing-resume/">Building your writing résumé</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1114"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/but-dont-i-have-to-be-a-celebrity-in-order-to-get-a-personal-memoir-published/">But don't I have to be a celebrity in order to get a personal memoir published?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1164"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/but-i-like-that-characters-name-why-shouldnt-i-use-it-as-often-as-possible-in-the-text/">But I like that character's name! Why shouldn't I use it as often as possible in the text?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1311"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/but-i-want-to-get-the-story-on-the-page-as-fast-as-humanly-possible/">But I want to get the story on the page as fast as humanly possible!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-517"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/but-it-really-happened-that-way/">But it really happened that way!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1009"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/but-why-shouldnt-i-use-my-favorite-word-as-often-as-i-can/">But why shouldn't I use my favorite word as often as I can?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-699"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/calls-for-submissions/">Calls for submissions</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-897"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/censorship-subtle-and-otherwise/">Censorship subtle and otherwise</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-360"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/changing-nature-of-publishing/">Changing nature of publishing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-375"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/chapter-headings-and-openings/">Chapter headings and openings</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-343"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-and-conflict-development-in-memoir/">Character and conflict development in memoir</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1657"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-development/">Character development</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-595"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-development/building-a-better-expert-character/">Building a better expert character</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-321"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-development/character-development-in-synopses-or-queries/">Character development in synopses or queries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-390"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-development/character-development-tips/">Character development tips</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-596"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-development/character-revealing-dialogue/">Character-revealing dialogue</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1126"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-development/creating-a-protagonist-the-reader-will-want-to-follow-through-a-whole-book-or-a-series/">Creating a protagonist the reader will want to follow through a whole book — or a series</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-616"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-development/creating-sufficiently-odious-antagonists/">Creating sufficiently odious antagonists</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-173"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-development/introducing-physical-descriptions/">Introducing physical descriptions</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-606"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-development/relationship-development/">Relationship development</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-628"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-development/secondary-characters/">Secondary characters</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1283"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-development/selecting-distinctive-character-names/">Selecting distinctive character names</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-599"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-development/showing-not-telling-character/">Showing (not telling) character</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1021"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/character-development/subtle-ways-to-make-characters-seem-more-or-less-intelligent/">Subtle ways to make characters seem more or less intelligent</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-282"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/collaboration/">Collaboration</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-461"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/conference-etiquette/">Conference etiquette</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-462"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/conference-faux-pas/">Conference faux pas</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-276"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/conference-lore/">Conference lore</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-361"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/conference-pitching/">Conference pitching</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-898"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/conference-selection/">Conference selection</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-875"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/conferences-that-cater-to-writers/">Conferences that cater to writers</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1728"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/">Contests and how to enter them successfully</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-300"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/contest-entry-bugbears/">Contest entry bugbears</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-761"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/contest-entry-prep/">Contest entry prep</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-393"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/contest-judging-criteria/">Contest judging criteria</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-301"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/contest-rules-and-how-to-follow-them/">Contest rules and how to follow them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-302"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/contest-synopsis-writing/">Contest synopsis-writing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-303"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/entering-us-literary-contests-from-outside-the-us/">Entering US literary contests from outside the US</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-716"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/entering-writing-contests-with-aplomb-and-a-chance-of-winning/">Entering writing contests with aplomb — and a chance of winning</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-896"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/finding-the-right-contest-to-enter/">Finding the right contest to enter</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1147"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/how-can-i-tell-if-entering-a-contest-is-worth-the-entry-fee/">How can I tell if entering a contest is worth the entry fee?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1070"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/how-can-i-tell-if-im-entering-the-right-category/">How can I tell if I'm entering the right category?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-490"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/how-serious-are-contest-judges-about-length-restrictions/">How serious are contest judges about length restrictions?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1075"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/how-should-i-format-my-contest-entry/">How should I format my contest entry?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1141"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/how-to-construct-a-title-page-for-a-contest-entry/">How to construct a title page for a contest entry</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1144"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/how-to-read-a-writing-contest-entry-form/">How to read a writing contest entry form</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-722"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/how-to-write-a-1-page-synopsis-for-a-contest/">How to write a 1-page synopsis for a contest</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-764"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/im-a-finalist-what-now/">I'm a finalist — what now?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1148"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/is-it-okay-to-enter-writing-in-a-contest-and-submit-it-to-agents-simultaneously/">Is it okay to enter writing in a contest and submit it to agents simultaneously?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1176"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/is-the-humor-in-my-entry-likely-to-amuse-mehitabel/">Is the humor in my entry likely to amuse Mehitabel?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1074"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/must-i-submit-the-opening-pages-of-my-manuscript-to-a-contest-with-categories-for-book-length-works/">Must I submit the opening pages of my manuscript to a contest with categories for book-length works?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1142"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/poetry-contest-entries/">Poetry contest entries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-813"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/realistic-expectations-for-contest-entrants/">Realistic expectations for contest entrants</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1072"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/should-i-ever-consider-writing-something-new-for-a-contest/">Should I ever consider writing something new for a contest?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1315"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/should-i-ever-pay-a-fee-to-enter-a-writing-contest/">Should I ever pay a fee to enter a writing contest?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1678"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/should-my-entrys-title-page-be-included-in-the-page-count/">Should my entry's title page be included in the page count?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1136"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/the-make-us-want-to-eat-it-literary-competition-a-step-by-step-guide-to-preparing-an-entry/">The Make Us Want to Eat It Literary Competition — a step-by-step guide to preparing an entry</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1016"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/the-make-us-want-to-eat-it-literary-competition-of-2012/">The Make Us Want to Eat It Literary Competition of 2012</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1139"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/the-sensual-surfeit-literary-competition-a-step-by-step-guide-to-formatting-your-entry/">The Sensual Surfeit Literary Competition — a step-by-step guide to formatting your entry</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1258"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/the-sensual-surfeit-literary-competition-of-2012/">The Sensual Surfeit Literary Competition of 2012</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1145"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-and-how-to-enter-them-successfully/wait-read-this-post-before-you-mail-off-that-entry/">Wait! Read this post before you mail off that entry!</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1711"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/contests-that-are-worth-your-time-to-enter/">Contests that are worth your time to enter</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-564"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/copyright-issues/">Copyright issues</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1658"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/">Craft and plenty of it</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-425"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/action-scenes/">Action scenes</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-533"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/at-the-risk-of-repeating-myself/">At the risk of repeating myself…</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-808"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/avoiding-killing-your-darlings/">Avoiding killing your darlings</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-426"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/backstory-and-how-to-work-it-into-a-plot/">Backstory and how to work it into a plot</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-389"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/beginning-and-ending-a-book/">Beginning and ending a book</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-615"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/building-suspense/">Building suspense</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-534"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/but-i-like-that-phrase-why-shouldnt-i-use-it-twice/">But I like that phrase! Why shouldn't I use it twice?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-590"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/but-ive-heard-that-i-should-never/">But I've heard that I should never…</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-586"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/but-my-writing-is-original-why-should-i-worry-about-a-readers-reaction/">But my writing is original! Why should I worry about a reader's reaction?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-428"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/character-blurring/">Character blurring</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-809"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/character-naming/">Character naming</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1401"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/cliche-avoidance/">Cliché avoidance</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1045"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/comic-voice-and-how-to-develop-it/">Comic voice and how to develop it</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-639"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/conflict-building/">Conflict-building</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-163"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/consistency-and-why-it-is-important-to-develop/">Consistency and why it is important to develop</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-392"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/constructing-a-narrative/">Constructing a narrative</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1064"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/continuity-and-why-it-is-important-to-maintain/">Continuity and why it is important to maintain</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-394"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/craft-in-depth-analysis/">Craft! In-depth analysis</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-597"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/cutting-to-the-chase-and-why-it-isnt-always-the-best-idea/">Cutting to the chase and why it isn't always the best idea</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-598"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/descriptive-shortcuts-and-narrative-shorthand/">Descriptive shortcuts and narrative shorthand</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1019"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/false-suspense/">False suspense</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-767"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/flashbacks/">Flashbacks</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1161"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/funny-on-the-page-vs-funny-in-real-life/">Funny on the page vs. funny in real life</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-618"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/good-writing-habits-to-form/">Good writing habits to form</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1020"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/hollywood-narration/">Hollywood narration</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-403"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/hooks/">Hooks</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1232"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/italics-use/">Italics use</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-405"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/jargon-usage/">Jargon usage</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1153"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/logical-flow/">Logical flow</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1157"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/making-the-past-come-alive/">Making the past come alive</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-605"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/narrative-consistency/">Narrative consistency</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-434"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/pacing-a-scene/">Pacing a scene</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-626"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/passive-protagonists/">Passive protagonists</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-728"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/passive-voice-and-why-you-should-eschew-it/">Passive voice and why you should eschew it</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-520"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/plausibility/">Plausibility</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-627"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/plot-development/">Plot development</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-407"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/protagonist-likability/">Protagonist likability</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-408"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/protagonist-memorability/">Protagonist memorability</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-514"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/real-stories-told-as-fiction/">Real stories told as fiction</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-436"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/realistic-dialogue/">Realistic dialogue</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1158"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/reimagining-a-classic-tale/">Reimagining a classic tale</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1178"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/run-on-sentences-and-why-professional-readers-dont-like-them/">Run-on sentences and why professional readers don't like them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-641"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/running-order/">Running order</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1262"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/series-writing-and-plotting/">Series writing and plotting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-580"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/setting-time-and-place/">Setting time and place</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-410"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/show-dont-tell/">Show don't tell</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-607"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/story-arc-and-why-a-good-book-needs-one/">Story arc and why a good book needs one</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-413"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/storytelling-structure/">Storytelling structure</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-623"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/suspense-building/">Suspense-building</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-624"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/tense-switching/">Tense-switching</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-642"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/tension-building/">Tension-building</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-992"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/the-end/">The End</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-419"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/vivid-details/">Vivid details</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-420"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/voice/">Voice</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1342"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/what-are-the-proper-ways-to-format-thought-in-a-manuscript/">What are the proper ways to format thought in a manuscript?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-581"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/what-makes-a-great-page-1/">What makes a great page 1?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-625"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/why-sounding-like-your-favorite-author-from-a-decade-ago-might-not-work-well-now/">Why sounding like your favorite author from a decade ago might not work well now</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1163"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/why-sounding-like-your-favorite-comedian-might-not-result-in-funny-writing/">Why sounding like your favorite comedian might not result in funny writing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-549"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/why-what-worked-in-the-19th-century-might-not-work-on-the-page-today/">Why what worked in the 19th century might not work on the page today</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-630"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/why-what-worked-in-the-latest-bestseller-might-not-work-tomorrow/">Why what worked in the latest bestseller might not work tomorrow</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1177"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/will-that-cultural-reference-seem-dated-five-years-hence/">Will that cultural reference seem dated five years hence?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-515"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/write-what-you-know/">Write what you know</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-439"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/writing-comedy/">Writing comedy</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-691"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/writing-love-scenes/">Writing love scenes</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1017"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/writing-on-dark-topics/">Writing on dark topics</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-592"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/writing-the-real/">Writing the real</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1733"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/craft-and-plenty-of-it/writing-the-unreal/">Writing the unreal</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-632"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dark-comedy/">Dark comedy</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1175"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dated-references/">Dated references</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1369"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/de-facto-exclusives/">De facto exclusives</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1370"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/de-facto-exclusives-and-why-they-are-a-bad-idea/">De facto exclusives and why they are a bad idea</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-672"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/deadlines-and-how-to-meet-them/">Deadlines and how to meet them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-192"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/deadlines-that-writers-create-for-themselves/">Deadlines that writers create for themselves</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1756"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/">Dialogue and how to write it well</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-429"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/dialogue-that-adds-to-the-scene/">Dialogue that adds to the scene</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-771"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/dialogue-that-moves-quickly/">Dialogue that moves quickly</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-395"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/dialogue-that-moves-too-quickly/">Dialogue that moves TOO quickly</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-518"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/dialogue-that-rings-true/">Dialogue that rings true</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-396"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/dialogue-only-scenes/">Dialogue-only scenes</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-946"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/formatting-dialogue/">Formatting dialogue</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1341"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/how-do-i-punctuate-one-characters-quoting-another/">How do I punctuate one character's quoting another?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1011"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/humor-in-dialogue/">Humor in dialogue</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1191"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/interview-scenes-that-work/">Interview scenes that work</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1284"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/is-it-effective-characterization-to-give-a-character-a-catchphrase/">Is it effective characterization to give a character a catchphrase?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1276"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/jargon-in-dialogue/">Jargon in dialogue</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-810"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/redundant-dialogue/">Redundant dialogue</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1247"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-and-how-to-write-it-well/should-i-use-italics-every-time-a-character-would-emphasize-a-word-out-loud/">Should I use italics every time a character would emphasize a word out loud?</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1010"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/dialogue-complexity-and-realism/">Dialogue complexity and realism</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1392"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/does-it-matter-what-font-i-use-in-my-manuscript/">Does it matter what font I use in my manuscript?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-953"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/does-rejection-mean-i-dont-have-talent/">Does rejection mean I don't have talent?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-973"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/double-checking-that-your-manuscript-is-formatted-correctly-a-quick-reference/">Double-checking that your manuscript is formatted correctly — a quick reference</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1273"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/drama-vs-melodrama/">Drama vs melodrama</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1334"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/e-publishing/">E-publishing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1314"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/ecqlc-whats-that/">ECQLC? What's that?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-397"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-dialogue/">Editing dialogue</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1726"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/">Editing your own manuscript</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-651"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-fantasy/">Editing fantasy</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-164"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-for-clarity/">Editing for clarity</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-430"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-for-complexity/">Editing for complexity</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-398"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-for-freshness/">Editing for freshness</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-633"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-for-humor/">Editing for humor</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-431"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-for-length/">Editing for length</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1167"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-for-logical-flow/">Editing for logical flow</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-432"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-for-pacing/">Editing for pacing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-601"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-for-plausibility/">Editing for plausibility</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1056"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-for-self-publishing/">Editing for self-publishing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-165"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-for-style/">Editing for style</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-536"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-for-voice/">Editing for voice</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-346"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-memoir/">Editing memoir</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-166"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-out-redundancy/">Editing out redundancy</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-399"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/editing-the-opening-pages/">Editing the opening pages</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-652"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/how-and-why-politeness-can-make-a-scene-drag/">How and why politeness can make a scene drag</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-610"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/is-my-manuscript-dated/">Is my manuscript dated?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-604"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/making-physical-contact-come-to-life-on-the-page/">Making physical contact come to life on the page</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-175"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/manuscript-megaproblems/">Manuscript megaproblems</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-544"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/minimizing-structural-repetition-and-conceptual-redundancy/">Minimizing structural repetition and conceptual redundancy</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1001"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/perspective-switching/">Perspective switching</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-998"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/plot-flares/">Plot flares</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-768"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/pulling-the-reader-out-of-the-story/">Pulling the reader out of the story</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-707"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/purging-protagonist-passivity/">Purging protagonist passivity</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-708"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/sagging-in-the-middle/">Sagging in the middle</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-934"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/slow-openings/">Slow openings</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-751"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/tag-lines-and-how-to-minimize-them/">Tag lines and how to minimize them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1172"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/the-fine-art-of-making-nouns-plural/">The fine art of making nouns plural</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-182"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/the-little-things-that-drive-the-pros-nuts/">The little things that drive the pros nuts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1741"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/why-its-a-good-idea-to-double-check-your-manuscripts-formatting-as-well-as-its-style/">Why it’s a good idea to double-check your manuscript’s formatting as well as its style</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-709"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editing-your-own-manuscript/writing-cliches/">Writing clichés</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1757"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/">Editors and how to work with publishing houses</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-669"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/a-brief-history-of-requested-revisions-and-rejections/">A brief history of requested revisions and rejections</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1105"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/book-contracts/">Book contracts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-362"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/editorial-committees/">Editorial committees</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1168"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/editorial-eye/">Editorial eye</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-673"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/editorial-memos/">Editorial memos</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-264"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/editors/">Editors</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1058"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/galleys-and-how-to-work-with-them/">Galleys and how to work with them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1106"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/hardcover-vs-trade-paper/">Hardcover vs trade paper</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1107"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/how-authors-get-paid-for-their-books/">How authors get paid for their books</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1309"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/how-big-may-i-expect-my-initial-print-run-to-be/">How big may I expect my initial print run to be?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1060"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/how-do-self-published-books-get-edited-or-do-they/">How do self-published books get edited — or do they?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1108"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/how-much-time-passes-between-contract-and-publication/">How much time passes between contract and publication?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1071"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/how-much-will-my-publisher-expect-me-to-promote-my-own-book/">How much will my publisher expect me to promote my own book?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-678"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/ive-pitched-at-a-conference-and-an-editor-asked-to-see-pages-what-do-i-do-now/">I've pitched at a conference and an editor asked to see pages — what do I do now?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-884"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/pitching-to-editors-at-conferences/">PItching to editors at conferences</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1677"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/should-i-use-my-manuscript-submission-to-show-my-typeface-and-book-cover-preferences/">Should I use my manuscript submission to show my typeface and book cover preferences?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-560"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/unsolicited-submissions/">Unsolicited submissions</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-371"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/what-happens-if-an-editor-falls-in-love-with-my-book/">What happens if an editor falls in love with my book?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-683"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/what-happens-if-the-acquiring-editor-and-i-disagree-about-revising-my-book/">What happens if the acquiring editor and I disagree about revising my book?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-547"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/whats-the-difference-between-an-acquiring-editor-and-a-copyeditor-or-a-developmental-editor/">What's the difference between an acquiring editor and a copyeditor — or a developmental editor?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1110"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/who-has-ultimate-say-over-a-books-title/">Who has ultimate say over a book's title?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-551"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/will-my-publisher-give-me-free-copies-of-my-book-for-my-kith-and-kin/">Will my publisher give me free copies of my book for my kith and kin?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-686"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/editors-and-how-to-work-with-publishing-houses/working-on-revision-with-an-editor/">Working on revision with an editor</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1759"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/">Electronic querying and submission</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-208"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/are-there-times-i-should-avoid-e-querying/">Are there times I should avoid e-querying?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1248"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/does-it-matter-how-e-mailed-submissions-are-formatted/">Does it matter how e-mailed submissions are formatted?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-212"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/e-mailed-submissions/">E-mailed submissions</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-186"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/e-mailing-queries/">E-mailing queries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1133"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/e-mailing-writing-contest-entries/">E-mailing writing contest entries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-213"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/e-querying-pros-and-cons/">E-querying pros and cons</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-557"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/how-to-e-mail-requested-materials/">How to e-mail requested materials</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-481"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/how-to-format-an-e-mailed-query/">How to format an e-mailed query</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-248"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/is-it-okay-to-format-queries-or-submissions-for-a4-paper-if-im-sending-them-via-e-mail/">Is it okay to format queries or submissions for A4 paper if I'm sending them via e-mail?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-227"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/querying-forms-on-agency-websites/">Querying forms on agency websites</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1676"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/should-i-include-a-title-page-with-requested-materials-im-e-mailing-and-does-it-count-toward-the-number-of-pages-the-agent-asked-me-to-send/">Should I include a title page with requested materials I'm e-mailing — and does it count toward the number of pages the agent asked me to send?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-188"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/the-one-thing-a-savvy-e-querier-must-do-before-hitting-send/">The one thing a savvy e-querier must do before hitting send</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-237"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/why-you-might-not-want-to-e-mail-requested-materials-immediately-after-receiving-a-request-for-pages/">Why you might not want to e-mail requested materials immediately after receiving a request for pages</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1343"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/why-you-might-want-to-think-twice-about-sending-an-agent-or-editor-an-e-mail/">Why you might want to think twice about sending an agent or editor an e-mail</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1745"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/electronic-querying-and-submission/why-you-should-include-a-cover-letter-when-e-mailing-requested-materials/">Why you should include a cover letter when e-mailing requested materials</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-781"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/epigraphs/">Epigraphs</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1322"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/ergonomics/">Ergonomics</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-451"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-book-proposal-but-were-afraid-to-ask/">Everything you wanted to know about book proposal but were afraid to ask</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1376"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/exclusive-requests-what-do-they-mean/">Exclusive requests — what do they mean?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1377"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/exclusive-wrangling/">Exclusive-wrangling</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-923"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/exclusives-and-multiple-submission/">Exclusives and multiple submission</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-786"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/exclusives-to-agents/">Exclusives to agents</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1037"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/fee-charging-agencies/">Fee-charging agencies</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1760"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/feedback-on-your-writing/">Feedback on your writing</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1313"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/feedback-on-your-writing/contests-that-offer-feedback/">Contests that offer feedback</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-701"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/feedback-on-your-writing/critique-groups/">Critique groups</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-796"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/feedback-on-your-writing/feedback-incorporation/">Feedback incorporation</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-844"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/feedback-on-your-writing/feedback-thats-actually-helpful/">Feedback that's actually helpful</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-674"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/feedback-on-your-writing/getting-good-at-accepting-feedback/">Getting good at accepting feedback</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-463"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/feedback-on-your-writing/getting-good-feedback/">Getting good feedback</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-677"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/feedback-on-your-writing/ive-gotten-some-negative-feedback-how-seriously-should-i-take-it/">I've gotten some negative feedback — how seriously should I take it?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-548"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/feedback-on-your-writing/whats-the-difference-between-professional-feedback-and-what-i-might-get-from-a-friend/">What's the difference between professional feedback and what I might get from a friend?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1180"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/feedback-on-your-writing/why-getting-feedback-is-more-important-for-if-you-are-trying-to-be-funny-on-the-page/">Why getting feedback is more important for if you are trying to be funny on the page</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1050"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/feedback-on-your-writing/why-getting-objective-feedback-is-even-more-important-for-memoir-and-fact-based-fiction-than-more-fanciful-creations/">Why getting objective feedback is even more important for memoir and fact-based fiction than more fanciful creations</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-511"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/finances-for-writers/">Finances for writers</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-278"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/finding-agents-to-query/">Finding agents to query</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-892"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/finding-time-to-write/">Finding time to write</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-617"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/first-lines-famous-and-otherwise/">First lines famous and otherwise</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-304"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/folders-for-book-proposals/">Folders for book proposals</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-377"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/formatpalooza/">Formatpalooza!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-584"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/formatting-a-book-manuscript-a-step-by-step-guide/">Formatting a book manuscript — a step-by-step guide</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-378"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/formatting-manuscripts/">Formatting manuscripts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1761"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/frankenstein-phenomena-in-submissions/">Frankenstein phenomena in submissions</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-746"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/frankenstein-phenomena-in-submissions/frankenstein-contest-entries/">Frankenstein contest entries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-433"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/frankenstein-phenomena-in-submissions/frankenstein-manuscripts/">Frankenstein manuscripts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1169"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/frankenstein-phenomena-in-submissions/frankenstein-narrative-logic/">Frankenstein narrative logic</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-167"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/frankenstein-phenomena-in-submissions/frankenstein-queries/">Frankenstein queries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-717"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/frankenstein-phenomena-in-submissions/frankenstein-synopses/">Frankenstein synopses</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-168"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/frankenstein-phenomena-in-submissions/frankenstein-voice-and-punctuation-issues/">Frankenstein voice and punctuation issues</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-602"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/frankenstein-phenomena-in-submissions/hasnt-the-narrative-made-that-point-already/">Hasn't the narrative made that point already?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-169"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/frankenstein-phenomena-in-submissions/hasnt-the-narrative-used-that-phrasing-already/">Hasn't the narrative used that phrasing already?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1230"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/frankenstein-phenomena-in-submissions/inconsistent-formatting-choices-and-how-they-can-harm-a-submission/">Inconsistent formatting choices and how they can harm a submission</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-537"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/freelance-editors/">Freelance editors</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-512"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/freelance-writing/">Freelance writing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1762"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/freshness/">Freshness</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-828"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/freshness/freshness-in-a-pitch/">Freshness in a pitch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-816"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/freshness/freshness-in-book-proposals/">Freshness in book proposals</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1160"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/freshness/freshness-in-comic-writing/">Freshness in comic writing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-401"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/freshness/freshness-in-manuscripts/">Freshness in manuscripts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-538"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/freshness/freshness-in-phrasing/">Freshness in phrasing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-265"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/freshness/freshness-in-queries/">Freshness in queries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-575"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/freshness/freshness-in-synopses/">Freshness in synopses</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-608"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/freshness/freshness-on-page-1/">Freshness on page 1</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-644"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/freshness/how-long-current-events-remain-current/">How long current events remain current</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1159"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/freshness/updating-a-classic-tale/">Updating a classic tale</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1059"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/galleys-and-why-authors-have-to-deal-with-them/">Galleys and why authors have to deal with them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-402"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/genre-fiction/">Genre fiction</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-443"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/getting-a-book-published-basics/">Getting a book published basics</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-523"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/getting-a-book-reviewed/">Getting a book reviewed</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-775"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/getting-paid-for-your-writing/">Getting paid for your writing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-776"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/getting-started-on-your-next-book/">Getting started on your next book</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1196"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/getting-your-writing-session-started-productively/">Getting your writing session started productively</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1155"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/giving-yourself-permission-to-write/">Giving yourself permission to write</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-799"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/great-gifts-for-writers/">Great gifts for writers</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-524"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/guest-blogs-interviews/">Guest blogs & interviews</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-870"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/guidelines-for-posting-comments/">Guidelines for posting comments</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-149"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/handwritten-manuscripts/">Handwritten manuscripts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-955"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/help-im-afraid-to-keep-querying-or-submitting-because-ive-been-rejected-before/">Help! I'm afraid to keep querying or submitting because I've been rejected before!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-986"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/help-im-confused-by-this-welter-of-online-writing-advice/">Help! I'm confused by this welter of online writing advice!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1378"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/help-ive-been-asked-for-an-exclusive-look-at-my-manuscript/">Help! I've been asked for an exclusive look at my manuscript!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1366"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/help-my-kith-and-kin-dont-seem-to-support-my-writing/">Help! My kith and kin don't seem to support my writing!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1371"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/help-several-agents-have-asked-to-read-my-work-and-ones-asked-for-an-exclusive/">Help! Several agents have asked to read my work — and one's asked for an exclusive!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-987"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/help-what-does-a-professionally-formatted-book-manuscript-look-like/">Help! What does a professionally-formatted book manuscript look like?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-619"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/helpful-habits-for-writers/">Helpful habits for writers</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1134"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/hey-will-any-of-this-writing-advice-help-me-write-essays-for-school/">Hey — will any of this writing advice help me write essays for school?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-214"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-can-i-know-if-i-have-enough-talent-to-get-published/">How can I know if I have enough talent to get published?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-797"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-do-books-get-published/">How do books get published?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1372"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-do-i-decide-where-to-submit-first/">How do I decide where to submit first?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1135"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-do-i-prepare-a-writing-contest-entry/">How do I prepare a writing contest entry?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-782"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-do-manuscripts-get-published/">How do manuscripts get published?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1435"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-expensive-do-writers-conferences-tend-to-be/">How expensive do writers' conferences tend to be?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-215"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-long-before-a-request-for-pages-expires/">How long before a request for pages expires?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-823"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-long-before-the-request-for-pages-expires/">How long before the request for pages expires?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-363"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-long-is-too-long-for-a-manuscript/">How long is too long for a manuscript?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-539"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-much-of-my-manuscript-should-i-bring-to-a-writing-conference-its-heavy/">How much of my manuscript should I bring to a writing conference? It's heavy.</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1165"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-should-my-characters-address-one-another/">How should my characters address one another?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-444"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-the-publishing-industry-works-and-doesnt/">How the publishing industry works — and doesn't</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1379"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to-handle-a-request-for-an-exclusive/">How to handle a request for an exclusive</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1373"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to-handle-multiple-requests-for-pages-including-an-exclusive/">How to handle multiple requests for pages — including an exclusive</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1380"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to-submit-exclusively/">How to submit exclusively</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1367"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to-survive-when-people-ask-you/">How to survive when people ask you</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1197"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to-work-through-writers-block/">How to work through writer's block</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1753"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/">How to…</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1300"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-are-the-goals-of-writing-different-lengths-of-synopsis-different/">How are the goals of writing different lengths of synopsis different?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-480"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-can-i-choose-between-competing-advice/">How can I choose between competing advice?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1084"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-can-i-tell-at-a-glance-if-my-book-proposal-is-formatted-correctly/">How can I tell at a glance if my book proposal is formatted correctly?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-975"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-can-i-tell-at-a-glance-if-my-manuscript-is-formatted-correctly/">How can I tell at a glance if my manuscript is formatted correctly?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1069"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-can-i-tell-if-a-writing-contest-is-worth-my-time-to-enter/">How can I tell if a writing contest is worth my time to enter?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1156"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-can-i-tell-if-im-talented-enough-to-get-published/">How can I tell if I'm talented enough to get published?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1162"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-can-i-tell-if-my-comic-touches-are-genuinely-funny/">How can I tell if my comic touches are genuinely funny?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-718"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-can-i-tell-if-my-synopsis-is-good-enough-to-send-or-if-it-still-needs-fine-tuning/">How can I tell if my synopsis is good enough to send or if it still needs fine-tuning?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1483"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-do-i-find-a-freelance-editor/">How do I find a freelance editor?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-620"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-not-to-write-a-first-line-of-a-manuscript/">How not to write a first line of a manuscript</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1236"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-not-to-write-a-first-page/">How NOT to write a first page</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1384"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-back-up-your-writing-files-at-the-last-minute/">How to back up your writing files at the last minute</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-962"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-cope-with-multiple-submission-requests-if-you-are-lucky-enough-to-garner-them/">How to cope with multiple submission requests if you are lucky enough to garner them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-513"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-decide-which-contests-are-worth-your-time-to-enter/">How to decide which contests are worth your time to enter</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1047"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-define-a-memoirs-story-arc/">How to define a memoir's story arc</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-721"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-enter-a-writing-contest-and-do-it-well/">How to enter a writing contest — and do it well</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-364"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-estimate-word-count-and-why/">How to estimate word count — and why</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-280"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-find-agents-to-query/">How to find agents to query</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-747"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-format-a-book-manuscript/">How to format a book manuscript</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1112"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-format-a-book-manuscript-just-the-facts/">How to format a book manuscript — just the facts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-380"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-format-a-book-proposal/">How to format a book proposal</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1085"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-format-a-book-proposals-title-page/">How to format a book proposal's title page</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1255"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-format-a-manuscript-if-you-are-visually-oriented/">How to format a manuscript if you are visually-oriented</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-976"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-format-a-manuscript-if-youre-in-too-much-of-a-hurry-to-read-the-logic-behind-each-rule/">How to format a manuscript if you're in too much of a hurry to read the logic behind each rule</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-323"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-format-a-query-letter-for-a-book/">How to format a query letter for a book</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1076"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-format-a-synopsis/">How to format a synopsis</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1025"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-format-a-title-page/">How to format a title page</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1496"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-format-a-title-page-if-your-book-has-a-subtitle/">How to format a title page if your book has a subtitle</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1243"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-insert-a-chapter-break-into-a-manuscript/">How to insert a chapter break into a manuscript</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-849"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-move-from-your-first-book-to-your-next-with-aplomb/">How to move from your first book to your next with aplomb</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-492"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-put-together-a-query-packet/">How to put together a query packet</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-558"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-put-together-a-submission-packet/">How to put together a submission packet</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-266"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-query-via-e-mail/">How to query via e-mail</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-287"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-read-an-agency-listing/">How to read an agency listing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-840"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-remove-a-slug-line-from-a-title-page/">How to remove a slug line from a title page</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1116"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-respond-if-an-agent-or-editor-asks-for-pages-after-you-pitch/">How to respond if an agent or editor asks for pages after you pitch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-559"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-respond-to-a-request-for-a-partial/">How to respond to a request for a partial</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-906"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-set-up-book-signings/">How to set up book signings</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-850"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-start-that-next-book/">How to start that next book</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-525"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-1-page-synopsis/">How to write a 1-page synopsis</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-723"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-1-page-synopsis-in-a-tearing-hurry/">How to write a 1-page synopsis in a tearing hurry</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-950"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-book-proposal/">How to write a book proposal</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-332"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-memoir-query/">How to write a memoir query</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-474"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-memoir-synopsis/">How to write a memoir synopsis</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1101"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-nonfiction-pitch/">How to write a nonfiction pitch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-475"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-nonfiction-synopsis/">How to write a nonfiction synopsis</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-830"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-pitch/">How to write a pitch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1569"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-pitch-at-the-last-minute/">How to write a pitch at the last minute</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-831"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-pitch-only-three-sentences-long-if-you-must/">How to write a pitch only three sentences long (if you must)</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-333"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-query-for-a-travel-memoir/">How to write a query for a travel memoir</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-244"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-query-letter-from-scratch/">How to write a query letter from scratch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-482"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-query-letter-in-a-hurry/">How to write a query letter in a hurry</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-246"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-querys-book-description-paragraph/">How to write a query's book description paragraph</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-498"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-querys-credentials-paragraph-if-you-have-not-published-before/">How to write a query's credentials paragraph if you have not published before</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-247"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-querys-opening-paragraph/">How to write a query's opening paragraph</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-483"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-really-good-query-letter/">How to write a really good query letter</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-738"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-really-good-synopsis/">How to write a really good synopsis</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-476"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-synopsis-for-a-contest/">How to write a synopsis for a contest</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-739"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-synopsis-for-a-multiple-protagonist-novel/">How to write a synopsis for a multiple-protagonist novel</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-735"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-synopsis-from-scratch/">How to write a synopsis from scratch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-820"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-a-synopsis-in-a-hurry/">How to write a synopsis in a hurry</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-472"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/how-to/how-to-write-an-author-bio/">How to write an author bio</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1345"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/i-feel-i-made-a-personal-connection-in-my-pitch-meeting-does-that-mean-the-agent-will-necessarily-sign-me/">I feel I made a personal connection in my pitch meeting — does that mean the agent will necessarily sign me?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-217"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/i-pitched-before-my-book-was-finished-what-do-i-do-now/">I pitched before my book was finished — what do I do now?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-832"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/ive-just-signed-up-to-give-a-conference-pitch-what-do-i-do-now/">I've just signed up to give a conference pitch — what do I do now?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-334"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/identifying-your-target-market/">Identifying your target market</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-777"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/independent-presses/">Independent presses</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-150"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/industry-etiquette/">Industry etiquette</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-268"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/industry-terminology/">Industry terminology</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-526"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/interviews-guest-blogs/">Interviews & guest blogs</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-493"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/is-it-ever-ok-to-send-more-pages-than-an-agent-requests/">Is it ever OK to send more pages than an agent requests?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-748"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/is-it-ever-okay-to-alter-formatting-to-fit-more-words-on-a-page/">Is it ever okay to alter formatting to fit more words on a page?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1393"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/is-it-ever-okay-to-submit-my-manuscript-on-non-white-paper/">Is it ever okay to submit my manuscript on non-white paper?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-587"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/is-it-legitimate-to-borrow-elements-from-tv-shows-and-movies-for-my-novel/">Is it legitimate to borrow elements from TV shows and movies for my novel?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-366"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/is-it-okay-to-look-for-an-agent-before-ive-written-a-complete-draft/">Is it okay to look for an agent before I've written a complete draft?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-749"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/is-it-okay-to-tinker-with-the-formatting-to-make-my-entry-short-enough-to-fall-under-the-page-limit/">Is it okay to tinker with the formatting to make my entry short enough to fall under the page limit?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1406"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/is-it-worthwhile-to-pitch-to-an-editor-at-a-conference/">Is it worthwhile to pitch to an editor at a conference?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-541"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/just-how-closely-do-the-pros-read/">Just how closely do the pros read?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-174"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/keeping-the-faith/">Keeping the faith</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-783"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/legal-issues-for-writers/">Legal issues for writers</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-757"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/lets-talk-about-this/">Let's talk about this</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1659"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction/">Literary fiction</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1754"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction-and-its-challenges/">Literary fiction and its challenges</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-724"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction-and-its-challenges/literary-fiction-contest-entries/">Literary fiction contest entries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-445"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction-and-its-challenges/literary-fiction-craft/">Literary fiction craft</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-690"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction-and-its-challenges/literary-fiction-defined/">Literary fiction defined</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-576"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction-and-its-challenges/literary-fiction-marketing/">Literary fiction marketing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-640"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction-and-its-challenges/literary-fiction-pacing/">Literary fiction pacing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-833"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction-and-its-challenges/literary-fiction-pitching/">Literary fiction pitching</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-499"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction-and-its-challenges/literary-fiction-queries/">Literary fiction queries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-725"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction-and-its-challenges/literary-fiction-synopses/">Literary fiction synopses</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-542"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction-and-its-challenges/literary-fiction-voice/">Literary fiction voice</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-546"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction-and-its-challenges/revising-literary-fiction/">Revising literary fiction</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1179"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction-and-its-challenges/should-i-try-to-be-funny-in-a-serious-toned-book/">Should I try to be funny in a serious-toned book?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1263"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/literary-fiction-and-its-challenges/what-are-my-options-if-my-manuscript-runs-long/">What are my options if my manuscript runs long?</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1750"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/">Manuscripts and how to format them properly</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-972"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/a-quick-reference-guide-to-the-various-parts-of-a-properly-formatted-manuscript/">A quick reference guide to the various parts of a properly-formatted manuscript</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1252"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/a-visual-tour-of-a-properly-formatted-manuscript/">A visual tour of a properly-formatted manuscript</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1339"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/are-single-quotation-marks-ever-acceptable-to-use-in-american-english-other-than-to-designate-quotes-within-quotes/">Are single quotation marks ever acceptable to use in American English other than to designate quotes within quotes?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1207"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/chapter-breaks-and-how-to-format-them/">Chapter breaks and how to format them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-836"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/clean-manuscripts-and-why-they-are-desirable/">Clean manuscripts and why they are desirable</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1132"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/contest-entries-and-how-to-format-them/">Contest entries and how to format them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-727"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/date-and-time-announcements/">Date and time announcements</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-945"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/dialogue-formatting/">Dialogue formatting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-991"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/ending-your-manuscript/">Ending your manuscript</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-305"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/formatting-for-us-letter-size-if-you-wrote-the-manuscript-for-a4/">Formatting for US letter size if you wrote the manuscript for A4</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-974"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/formatting-quotations-and-citations/">Formatting quotations and citations</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-838"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/how-do-i-make-the-page-numbering-start-somewhere-other-than-the-first-page-of-the-document/">How do I make the page numbering start somewhere other than the first page of the document?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1495"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/how-does-one-handle-a-subtitle-in-formatting-the-title-page-and-slug-line/">How does one handle a subtitle in formatting the title page and slug line?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1242"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/how-much-should-paragraphs-be-indented/">How much should paragraphs be indented?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1015"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/how-should-recipes-be-formatted-in-a-manuscript/">How should recipes be formatted in a manuscript?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-930"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/is-it-ever-okay-to-open-a-chapter-with-an-unindented-paragraph-as-i-see-done-in-published-books/">Is it ever okay to open a chapter with an unindented paragraph as I see done in published books?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1231"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/is-it-ever-proper-to-underline-words-in-a-book-manuscript/">Is it ever proper to underline words in a book manuscript?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-901"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/italics-and-when-they-are-correct-to-use/">Italics and when they are correct to use</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-902"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/letters-in-manuscripts/">Letters in manuscripts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1281"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/manuscript-formatting-101/">Manuscript formatting 101</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-406"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/manuscript-formatting-like-a-pro/">Manuscript formatting like a pro</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-924"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/manuscript-shipping/">Manuscript shipping</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-977"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/must-i-italicize-thought-or-is-it-a-stylistic-choice/">Must I italicize thought or is it a stylistic choice?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1091"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/numbers-in-manuscripts/">Numbers in manuscripts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-324"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/page-1-and-what-it-should-look-like/">Page 1 and what it should look like</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-695"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/page-2-and-thereafter/">Page 2 and thereafter</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-942"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/page-numbering/">Page numbering</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-730"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/prologues-and-introductions/">Prologues and introductions</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-381"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/section-breaks/">Section breaks</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-411"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/slug-line/">Slug line</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-412"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/slug-lines-illustrated/">Slug lines illustrated</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1233"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/song-titles-and-names-of-publications/">Song titles and names of publications</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-696"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/the-great-one-space-two-space-debate/">The great one space – two space debate</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-383"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/the-rules-of-book-formatting/">The rules of book formatting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-384"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/title-page-formatting/">Title page formatting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-421"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/what-book-manuscripts-look-like/">What book manuscripts look like</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1086"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/what-book-proposals-look-like/">What book proposals look like</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1137"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/whats-the-difference-between-left-justified-text-and-block-formatted-text-and-why-should-i-care/">What's the difference between left-justified text and block-formatted text and why should I care?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-319"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/where-can-i-find-the-right-kind-of-folder-for-a-book-proposal/">Where can I find the right kind of folder for a book proposal?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-373"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/why-does-it-matter-how-my-manuscript-is-formatted/">Why does it matter how my manuscript is formatted?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1123"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/why-should-i-include-a-title-page-in-my-submission-at-all/">Why should I include a title page in my submission at all?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1326"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/why-should-i-indent-my-paragraphs/">Why should I indent my paragraphs?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1124"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/manuscripts-and-how-to-format-them-properly/why-youre-usually-better-off-estimating-word-count-than-using-actual-word-count-for-a-manuscript/">Why you're usually better off estimating word count than using actual word count for a manuscript</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1004"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/marketing-plan/">Marketing plan</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1323"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/medical-issues-for-writers/">Medical issues for writers</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-464"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/meeting-fellow-writers-and-other-kindred-spirits/">Meeting fellow writers and other kindred spirits</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1763"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/">Memoir – its many joys and trials</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1338"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/are-dialogue-and-thought-in-memoir-governed-by-the-same-rules-as-dialogue-and-thought-in-fiction/">Are dialogue and thought in memoir governed by the same rules as dialogue and thought in fiction?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-815"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/autobiography-and-memoir-defined/">Autobiography and memoir defined</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-344"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/character-development-in-memoir/">Character development in memoir</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-331"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/common-memoir-writing-faux-pas/">Common memoir-writing faux pas</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-345"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/coping-with-your-kith-and-kins-reactions-to-your-writing-a-memoir/">Coping with your kith and kin's reactions to your writing a memoir</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1127"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/dealing-with-the-tolstoy-problem/">Dealing with the Tolstoy problem</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-650"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/do-i-have-to-write-my-entire-memoir-before-i-start-to-query-or-only-the-book-proposal/">Do I have to write my entire memoir before I start to query or only the book proposal?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1781"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/fact-checking-anecdotes/">Fact-checking anecdotes</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1046"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/how-can-i-tell-whether-i-am-writing-memoir-or-narrative-nonfiction/">How can I tell whether I am writing memoir or narrative nonfiction?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1494"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/how-do-i-format-my-title-page-if-my-memoir-has-a-subtitle/">How do I format my title page if my memoir has a subtitle?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-347"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/how-does-good-memoir-style-differ-from-good-writing-in-other-types-of-manuscript/">How does good memoir style differ from good writing in other types of manuscript?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-348"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/how-much-of-my-memoirs-voice-should-i-reveal-in-my-query/">How much of my memoir's voice should I reveal in my query?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-603"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/humor-in-memoir/">Humor in memoir</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-309"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/memoir-book-proposals/">Memoir book proposals</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-611"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/memoir-contest-entries/">Memoir contest entries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-349"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/memoir-craft-and-marketing/">Memoir craft and marketing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-621"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/memoir-openings-and-structure/">Memoir openings and structure</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-249"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/memoir-querying/">Memoir querying</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-477"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/memoir-synopsis-writing/">Memoir synopsis-writing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-350"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/memoir-voice/">Memoir voice</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-754"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/revising-memoir/">Revising memoir</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-336"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/story-arc-in-memoir/">Story arc in memoir</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-338"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/travel-memoir/">Travel memoir</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-353"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/ways-you-might-not-want-to-describe-your-memoir-in-a-query-or-pitch/">Ways you might not want to describe your memoir in a query or pitch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-853"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/what-happens-after-a-publisher-buys-my-memoir/">What happens after a publisher buys my memoir?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-657"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/why-do-some-agencies-expect-only-a-proposal-for-a-memoir-and-others-a-full-manuscript/">Why do some agencies expect only a proposal for a memoir and others a full manuscript?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-340"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/why-the-phrase-true-memoir-drives-millicent-nuts/">Why the phrase true memoir drives Millicent nuts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-356"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/memoir-its-many-joys-and-trials/writing-memoir/">Writing memoir</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-193"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/millicent-who-the-heck-is-millicent/">Millicent? Who the heck is Millicent?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-527"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/multi-book-contracts/">Multi-book contracts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1764"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/multiple-protagonists-and-how-to-handle-them/">Multiple protagonists and how to handle them</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1090"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/multiple-protagonists-and-how-to-handle-them/formatting-a-multiple-pov-novel/">Formatting a multiple POV novel</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-663"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/multiple-protagonists-and-how-to-handle-them/multiple-protagonist-novel-queries/">Multiple protagonist novel queries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-740"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/multiple-protagonists-and-how-to-handle-them/multiple-protagonist-synopses/">Multiple protagonist synopses</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-453"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/multiple-protagonists-and-how-to-handle-them/multiple-protagonist-narratives/">Multiple-protagonist narratives</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-741"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/multiple-protagonists-and-how-to-handle-them/multiple-protagonist-novels/">Multiple-protagonist novels</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-187"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/must-reads/">Must Reads</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-800"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/my-memoirs-saga/">My memoir's saga</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-645"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/my-novels-road-to-publication/">My novel's road to publication</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1077"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/naming-characters/">Naming characters</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1765"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/">Narrative Choices</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-452"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/first-person-narration/">First-person narration</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-172"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/ive-heard-that-the-rules-of-grammar-may-be-applied-differently-to-first-person-narration-is-that-true/">I've heard that the rules of grammar may be applied differently to first-person narration — is that true?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1244"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/italics-use-and-how-it-can-affect-narrative-voice/">Italics use and how it can affect narrative voice</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-176"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/narrative-distance-vs-generalization/">Narrative distance vs. generalization</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1275"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/omniscient-narration/">Omniscient narration</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-706"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/point-of-view-choices/">Point of view choices</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-622"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/present-tense-narratives/">Present-tense narratives</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-629"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/tight-third-person-narration/">Tight third-person narration</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1209"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/voice-choices-and-your-pitch/">Voice choices and your pitch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-656"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/voice-choices-and-your-query/">Voice choices and your query</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-731"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/voice-choices-and-your-synopsis/">Voice choices and your synopsis</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-613"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/what-does-and-doesnt-make-a-voice-book-category-appropriate/">What does and doesn't make a voice book category-appropriate?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-354"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-choices/what-does-and-doesnt-make-a-voice-unique/">What does and doesn't make a voice unique?</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1012"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/narrative-shortcuts/">Narrative shortcuts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1363"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/new-years-resolutions-and-how-to-put-them-into-practice-well/">New Year's resolutions and how to put them into practice well</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-871"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/niche-market/">Niche market</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1033"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nom-de-plume-usage/">Nom de plume usage</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1766"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/">Nonfiction</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1081"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/a-one-stop-reference-to-formatting-a-book-proposal/">A one-stop reference to formatting a book proposal</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-860"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/annotated-table-of-contents/">Annotated table of contents</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1079"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/competitive-market-analysis/">Competitive market analysis</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1493"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/how-do-i-format-a-title-with-a-colon-in-it-on-a-title-page-or-in-the-slug-line/">How do I format a title with a colon in it on a title page or in the slug line?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-654"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/how-selling-nonfiction-is-different-from-selling-fiction/">How selling nonfiction is different from selling fiction</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-938"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/how-to-format-a-subheading/">How to format a subheading</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-949"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/how-to-format-quotations-from-other-sources/">How to format quotations from other sources</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-862"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/how-to-mail-a-book-proposal/">How to mail a book proposal</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-941"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/introductions-and-prologues/">Introductions and prologues</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1117"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/my-book-has-a-subtitle-how-should-it-appear-on-the-title-page/">My book has a subtitle — how should it appear on the title page?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-577"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/narrative-nonfiction/">Narrative nonfiction</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-310"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/nonfiction-contest-entries/">Nonfiction contest entries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-454"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/nonfiction-marketing/">Nonfiction marketing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-877"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/nonfiction-pitching/">Nonfiction pitching</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-311"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/nonfiction-proposals/">Nonfiction proposals</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-250"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/nonfiction-querying/">Nonfiction querying</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-528"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/nonfiction-synopses/">Nonfiction synopses</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-519"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/nonfiction-technique/">Nonfiction technique</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-351"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/nonfiction-voice/">Nonfiction voice</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-982"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/overview-in-a-proposal/">Overview in a proposal</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1203"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/what-happens-after-a-publisher-accepts-my-proposal/">What happens after a publisher accepts my proposal?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1087"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/what-should-a-book-proposal-look-like-on-the-page/">What should a book proposal look like on the page?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1088"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/what-should-a-book-proposals-title-page-look-like/">What should a book proposal's title page look like?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1749"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/nonfiction/will-footnotes-or-endnotes-work-in-a-book-proposal/">Will footnotes or endnotes work in a book proposal?</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-352"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/originality-in-manuscripts/">Originality in manuscripts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1709"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/overcoming-writers-block/">Overcoming writer's block</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1245"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/partial-manuscript-submissions/">Partial manuscript submissions</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1246"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/partials-and-how-to-handle-them/">Partials and how to handle them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-325"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pen-names-and-how-to-use-them/">Pen names and how to use them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-367"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pet-peeves-on-parade/">Pet peeves on parade</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1725"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/">Pitching to an agent</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-449"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/2-minute-pitch/">2-minute pitch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-825"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/3-line-pitch/">3-line pitch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1340"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/but-i-made-a-connection-with-that-agent/">But I made a connection with that agent!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-209"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/but-ive-heard/">But I've heard…</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1212"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/do-i-need-to-memorize-my-pitch/">Do I need to memorize my pitch?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-965"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/does-a-successful-pitch-mean-that-i-cant-query-or-submit-to-anyone-else/">Does a successful pitch mean that I can't query or submit to anyone else?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-827"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/elevator-speech/">Elevator speech</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-829"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/hallway-pitching/">Hallway pitching</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1216"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/hollywood-hooks/">Hollywood hooks</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-876"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/how-can-i-keep-myself-from-freaking-out-mid-pitch/">How can I keep myself from freaking out mid-pitch?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-883"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/how-do-i-know-which-agent-at-a-conference-would-be-the-best-to-approach/">How do I know which agent at a conference would be the best to approach?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1217"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/how-long-is-it-likely-to-be-between-a-successful-pitch-and-the-books-hitting-the-shelves/">How long is it likely to be between a successful pitch and the book's hitting the shelves?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1221"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/how-will-i-know-if-my-pitch-did-work/">How will I know if my pitch DID work?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-220"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/ive-pitched-and-received-a-request-for-pages-what-do-i-do-now/">I've pitched and received a request for pages — what do I do now?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1182"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/ive-received-a-request-to-send-pages-do-i-still-need-to-query/">I've received a request to send pages — do I still need to query?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-845"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/pitch-examples/">Pitch examples</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-455"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/pitching-101/">Pitching 101</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-889"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/pitching-a-multiple-protagonist-novel/">Pitching a multiple protagonist novel</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1102"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/pitching-a-nonfiction-book/">Pitching a nonfiction book</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-456"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/pitching-faux-pas/">Pitching faux pas</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-878"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/pitching-memoir/">Pitching memoir</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-457"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/pitching-or-querying-nonfiction/">Pitching or querying nonfiction</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-458"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/pitching-tips/">Pitching tips</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1571"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/pitching-basic-how-to/">Pitching: basic how-to</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1440"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/pitching-the-master-class/">Pitching: the master class</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-806"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/post-pitch-etiquette/">Post-pitch etiquette</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-999"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/scheduling-pitch-meetings/">Scheduling pitch meetings</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-886"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/should-i-bring-my-manuscript-to-a-pitch-meeting/">Should I bring my manuscript to a pitch meeting?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1226"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/the-magic-first-hundred-words/">The magic first hundred words</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1213"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/the-mythical-right-words-to-use-in-a-pitch/">The mythical right words to use in a pitch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1347"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/the-one-thing-a-pitcher-should-never-do-after-receiving-a-request-for-pages/">The one thing a pitcher should NEVER do after receiving a request for pages</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1214"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/what-actually-happens-in-a-pitch-meeting/">What actually happens in a pitch meeting?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-561"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/what-do-i-do-if-my-pitch-works/">What do I do if my pitch works?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1219"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/what-should-i-do-if-i-cant-make-my-scheduled-pitching-appointment/">What should I do if I can't make my scheduled pitching appointment?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1222"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/what-should-i-do-if-my-pitch-doesnt-seem-to-be-working/">What should I do if my pitch doesn't seem to be working?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1228"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/when-should-i-not-approach-an-agent-at-a-conference/">When should I NOT approach an agent at a conference?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1223"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitching-to-an-agent/why-might-my-pitch-get-rejected/">Why might my pitch get rejected?</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-834"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/pitchingpalooza/">Pitchingpalooza!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1768"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/platform/">Platform</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-251"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/platform/platform-paragraph-in-a-query/">Platform paragraph in a query</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1103"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/platform/platform-demonstration-in-a-pitch/">Platform-demonstration in a pitch</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-864"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/platform/platform-demonstration-in-a-proposal/">Platform-demonstration in a proposal</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-578"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/platform/platform-demonstration-in-a-synopsis/">Platform-demonstration in a synopsis</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-283"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/platform/what-is-a-platform-and-why-do-i-need-one/">What is a platform and why do I need one?</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-612"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/plugs-for-readers-work/">Plugs for Readers' Work</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-978"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/poetry-formatting/">Poetry formatting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-465"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/post-conference-etiquette/">Post-conference etiquette</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-778"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/print-on-demand-pod/">Print-on-demand (POD)</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-943"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/prologues/">Prologues</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-177"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/proofreading/">Proofreading</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-466"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/public-readings/">Public readings</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-711"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/publishing-contracts/">Publishing contracts</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1770"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/">Punctuation and how to use it properly</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1490"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/colons-and-why-they-should-have-two-spaces-after-them/">Colons and why they should have two spaces after them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-944"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/commas-and-their-proper-wrangling/">Commas and their proper wrangling</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-503"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/ellipsis-use/">Ellipsis use</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1256"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/how-to-format-dashes-and-hyphens/">How to format dashes and hyphens</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-171"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/hyphens-and-how-they-are-frequently-abused/">Hyphens and how they are frequently abused</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1390"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/indentation-and-why-it-isnt-optional/">Indentation and why it isn't optional</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-947"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/punctuating-dialogue/">Punctuating dialogue</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-178"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/punctuation-and-grammar-of-the-non-standard-variety/">Punctuation and grammar of the non-standard variety</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-579"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/quotation-marks-around-non-quotes/">Quotation marks around non-quotes</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-913"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/semicolons-and-why-only-writers-like-them-much/">Semicolons and why only writers like them much</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1173"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/using-possessives-and-plurals-correctly/">Using possessives and plurals correctly</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-183"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/what-is-subject-object-agreement-and-why-should-anyone-still-care-about-it/">What is subject-object agreement and why should anyone still care about it?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1293"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/punctuation-and-how-to-use-it-properly/why-you-might-want-to-think-twice-about-capitalizing-words-other-than-proper-nouns/">Why you might want to think twice about capitalizing words other than proper nouns</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1722"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/">Query letters and how to write them well</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1409"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/complete-at-x-words-and-other-querying-cliches/">"Complete at X words" and other querying clichés</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-291"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/concrete-examples-of-queries-and-why-they-work-or-dont/">Concrete examples of queries and why they work or don't</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-263"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/dear-agent-letters/">Dear Agent letters</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-292"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/do-i-have-to-mention-the-word-count-in-my-query/">Do I have to mention the word count in my query?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-293"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/does-it-matter-what-font-size-i-use-in-my-query/">Does it matter what font size I use in my query?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-242"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/eye-catching-query-letter-candy/">Eye-Catching Query Letter Candy</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-277"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/figuring-out-which-agents-to-query/">Figuring out which agents to query</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-170"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/how-not-to-write-that-pesky-description-of-your-book-for-a-query/">How not to write that pesky description of your book for a query</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-491"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/how-to-construct-a-query-packet/">How to construct a query packet</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-243"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/how-to-show-why-you-are-querying-a-particular-agent/">How to show why you are querying a particular agent</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-267"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/how-to-talk-about-your-target-audience-without-sounding-boastful/">How to talk about your target audience without sounding boastful</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-245"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/how-to-write-a-query-letter-step-by-step/">How to write a query letter step by step</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-294"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/how-to-write-that-pesky-description-of-your-book-for-a-query/">How to write that pesky description of your book for a query</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-957"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/ive-been-rejected-before-why-should-i-keep-querying/">I've been rejected before — why should I keep querying?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-222"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/is-it-ever-okay-to-query-the-same-agent-twice-with-the-same-book/">Is it ever okay to query the same agent twice with the same book?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-494"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/is-it-ever-okay-to-send-more-sample-pages-than-an-agencys-submission-guidelines-specify/">Is it ever okay to send more sample pages than an agency's submission guidelines specify?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-661"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/is-it-okay-to-include-attention-grabbing-gifts-in-my-query-packet/">Is it okay to include attention-grabbing gifts in my query packet?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-662"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/magic-words-you-might-want-to-include-in-your-query-letter/">Magic words you might want to include in your query letter</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-252"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/queries-that-are-too-long/">Queries that are too long</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-409"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/query-sample-pages/">Query + sample pages</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-295"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/query-formatting/">Query formatting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-179"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/query-letter-troubleshooting/">Query letter troubleshooting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1422"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/query-letters-101/">Query letters 101</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-326"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/query-letters-illustrated/">Query letters illustrated</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-254"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/queryfest/">Queryfest!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-152"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/querying/">Querying</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-327"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/querying-a-multiple-protagonist-novel/">Querying a multiple protagonist novel</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-255"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/querying-a-us-based-agent-from-outside-the-u-s/">Querying a US-based agent from outside the U.S.</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-226"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/querying-ethics/">Querying ethics</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-195"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/querying-fatigue/">Querying fatigue</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-153"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/querying-faux-pas/">Querying faux pas</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-646"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/querying-literary-fiction/">Querying literary fiction</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-256"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/querying-memoir/">Querying memoir</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-228"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/querying-sffantasy/">Querying SF/fantasy</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-312"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/querying-us-agents-from-outside-the-us/">Querying US agents from outside the US</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-229"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/querying-via-e-mail-or-online/">Querying via e-mail or online</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-296"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/querying-ya/">Querying YA</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-156"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/self-rejecting-queries/">Self-rejecting queries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-500"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/should-i-mention-that-someone-referred-me-to-this-agent/">Should I mention that someone referred me to this agent?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-328"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/should-i-query-under-my-pen-name-or-my-real-one/">Should I query under my pen name or my real one?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-189"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/the-one-thing-a-savvy-querier-absolutely-must-do-to-a-query-before-sending-it/">The one thing a savvy querier ABSOLUTELY MUST do to a query before sending it</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-339"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/what-do-i-use-as-a-writing-credentials-paragraph-if-i-have-no-writing-credentials/">What do I use as a writing credentials paragraph if I have no writing credentials?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-856"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/what-if-i-have-more-than-one-book-to-query/">What if I have more than one book to query?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-486"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/what-is-a-query-letter/">What is a query letter?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-570"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/what-is-this-sase-i-keep-seeing-mentioned-in-submission-guidelines/">What is this SASE I keep seeing mentioned in submission guidelines?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-355"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/what-should-a-query-letter-look-like/">What should a query letter look like?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-197"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/when-are-the-best-and-worst-times-to-query/">When are the best and worst times to query?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-273"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/why-generic-queries-dont-work/">Why generic queries don't work</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-199"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/why-havent-i-heard-back-about-my-query/">Why haven't I heard back about my query?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1740"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-letters-and-how-to-write-them-well/why-must-i-include-a-sase-with-my-query/">Why MUST I include a SASE with my query?</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-253"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/query-packets-and-things-that-go-in-them/">Query packets and things that go in them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-270"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/querying-multiple-agents-at-once/">Querying multiple agents at once</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-335"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/querying-nonfiction/">Querying nonfiction</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-257"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/querying-or-submitting-to-us-agencies-from-outside-the-us/">Querying or submitting to US agencies from outside the US</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-505"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/querypalooza/">Querypalooza!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-900"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/quoting-other-writers-in-your-work/">Quoting other writers in your work</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-155"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/realistic-expectations-for-writers/">Realistic expectations for writers</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-467"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/referrals-to-agents/">Referrals to agents</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1769"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/">Rejection and moving on from it</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-670"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/a-quick-history-of-rejection-practices/">A quick history of rejection practices</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-450"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/dealing-with-fear-of-rejection/">Dealing with fear of rejection</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-210"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/dealing-with-rejection/">Dealing with rejection</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-954"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/does-rejection-mean-that-my-book-is-no-good/">Does rejection mean that my book is no good?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-286"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/form-letter-rejections/">Form-letter rejections</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1354"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/its-been-months-and-i-have-not-heard-back-about-my-exclusive-submission-what-are-my-options/">It's been months and I have not heard back about my exclusive submission — what are my options?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-888"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/pitch-rejection/">Pitch rejection</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-288"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/rejection-letters-decoded/">Rejection letters decoded</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-446"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/rejection-on-page-1/">Rejection on page 1</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-196"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/rejection-when-they-dont-tell-you-at-all/">Rejection: when they don't tell you at all</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-230"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/rejection-when-they-dont-tell-you-why/">Rejection: when they don't tell you why</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1122"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/was-my-manuscript-rejected-because-it-was-too-long/">Was my manuscript rejected because it was too long?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-184"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/rejection-and-moving-on-from-it/why-might-my-query-have-gotten-rejected/">Why might my query have gotten rejected?</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-895"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/repetitive-strain-injuries/">Repetitive strain injuries</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1758"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/">Requested materials and how to send them</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-668"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/a-brief-history-of-requested-materials-and-requested-revisions/">A brief history of requested materials — and requested revisions</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1253"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/a-visual-tour-of-the-constituent-parts-of-a-book-manuscript/">A visual tour of the constituent parts of a book manuscript</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-952"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/am-i-the-only-writer-whose-ever-been-tempted-not-to-send-requested-materials/">Am I the only writer whose ever been tempted not to send requested materials?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-299"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/book-proposals-and-how-to-send-them/">Book proposals and how to send them</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1241"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/but-the-final-page-in-the-partial-ends-in-mid-sentence/">But the final page in the partial ends in mid-sentence!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1181"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/cover-letters-for-requested-materials/">Cover letters for requested materials</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-675"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/how-can-i-keep-my-manuscript-from-getting-mangled-in-the-mail/">How can I keep my manuscript from getting mangled in the mail?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-719"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/how-can-i-tell-if-my-synopsis-is-polished-enough-yet/">How can I tell if my synopsis is polished enough yet?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-734"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/how-long-should-my-synopsis-be/">How long should my synopsis be?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-216"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/how-soon-must-i-send-requested-materials/">How soon must I send requested materials?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-218"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/ive-just-pitched-successfully-should-i-send-the-pages-the-agent-requested-today/">I've just pitched successfully — should I send the pages the agent requested today?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-219"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/ive-just-pitched-successfully-what-do-i-do-now/">I've just pitched successfully — what do I do now?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-679"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/mailing-requested-materials/">Mailing requested materials</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-565"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/overnight-shipping-requested-materials/">Overnight shipping requested materials</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-566"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/partials/">Partials</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-313"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/requested-material-wrangling/">Requested material-wrangling</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-314"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/sending-requested-materials-to-us-agents-from-outside-the-us/">Sending requested materials to US agents from outside the US</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1118"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/should-i-include-a-title-page-with-requested-pages/">Should I include a title page with requested pages?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1119"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/should-i-list-the-actual-or-the-estimated-word-count-on-my-submissions-title-page/">Should I list the actual or the estimated word count on my submission's title page?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-712"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/simultaneous-submissions/">Simultaneous submissions</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-315"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/submission-packets/">Submission packets</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-921"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/submissions-and-exclusive-requests/">Submissions and exclusive requests</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-496"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/theyve-asked-for-50-pages-but-my-chapter-ends-on-page-51/">They've asked for 50 pages but my chapter ends on page 51!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-569"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/what-if-the-agent-likes-my-partial-and-wants-to-see-the-rest-of-the-book/">What if the agent likes my partial and wants to see the rest of the book?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-571"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/what-should-i-do-if-ive-received-a-request-for-pages/">What should I do if I've received a request for pages?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1386"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/why-its-worth-your-time-to-back-up-your-manuscripts-writing-files-before-you-submit/">Why it's worth your time to back up your manuscript's writing files before you submit</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-582"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/requested-materials-and-how-to-send-them/why-its-worth-your-time-to-proofread/">Why it's worth your time to proofread</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-529"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/responses-from-book-readers/">Responses from book readers</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-368"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revise-and-resubmit/">Revise and resubmit</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-702"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-burnout/">Revision burnout</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1771"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/">Revision to improve your book's chances</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-970"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/a-quick-checklist-for-correct-manuscript-formatting/">A quick checklist for correct manuscript formatting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-159"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/agency-screeners-pet-peeves-of-the-notorious-variety/">Agency screeners' pet peeves of the notorious variety</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-689"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/but-isnt-revising-to-make-my-work-more-marketable-compromising-my-artistic-vision/">But isn't revising to make my work more marketable compromising my artistic vision?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-535"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/clarifying-your-voice/">Clarifying your voice</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-162"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/common-rejection-triggers/">Common rejection triggers</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-400"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/first-pages-that-grab/">First pages that grab</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-322"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/format-troubleshooting/">Format troubleshooting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1171"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/how-can-i-tell-if-i-should-add-s-or-s/">How can I tell if I should add -s or -'s?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-540"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/how-much-slack-can-i-assume-an-agent-will-cut-a-new-writers-submission/">How much slack can I assume an agent will cut a new writer's submission?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-435"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/picking-up-the-pace/">Picking up the pace</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-681"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/requested-revisions/">Requested revisions</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-753"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/revising-for-flow-and-rhythm/">Revising for flow and rhythm</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-588"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/revising-for-freshness/">Revising for freshness</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-181"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/revision-to-improve-your-books-chances/revision-tips/">Revision tips</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-784"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/royalties-and-how-they-work/">Royalties and how they work</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1027"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/sase-guidelines/">SASE guidelines</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-791"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/self-publishing/">Self-publishing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1772"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/series-writing-and-how-to-do-it-well/">Series writing and how to do it well</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1491"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/series-writing-and-how-to-do-it-well/coming-up-with-a-title-and-title-page-for-a-series/">Coming up with a title — and title page — for a series</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1492"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/series-writing-and-how-to-do-it-well/how-do-i-fit-revenge-of-the-triffids-part-iv-run-in-terror-into-a-slug-line/">How do I fit Revenge of the Triffids Part IV: Run in Terror! into a slug line?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1398"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/series-writing-and-how-to-do-it-well/plotting-a-mystery-series/">Plotting a mystery series</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-851"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/series-writing-and-how-to-do-it-well/series-authors-talk-about-series-writing/">Series authors talk about series writing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-852"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/series-writing-and-how-to-do-it-well/wait-what-im-writing-is-a-series/">Wait — what I'm writing is a series?</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1035"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/should-i-be-worried-about-my-work-being-stolen/">Should I be worried about my work being stolen?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-682"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/slush-piles-and-why-they-no-longer-exist/">Slush piles and why they no longer exist</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-271"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/small-publishers/">Small publishers</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1773"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/standard-format-for-manuscripts/">Standard format for manuscripts</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-698"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/standard-format-for-manuscripts/business-format-vs-indented-paragraphs/">Business format vs indented paragraphs</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-306"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/standard-format-for-manuscripts/how-standard-format-looks-different-for-us-letter-and-a4/">How standard format looks different for US letter and A4</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-929"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/standard-format-for-manuscripts/how-standard-format-looks-different-than-what-you-might-see-in-a-published-book/">How standard format looks different than what you might see in a published book</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-369"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/standard-format-for-manuscripts/standard-format-basics/">Standard format basics</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1129"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/standard-format-for-manuscripts/standard-format-for-poetry/">Standard format for poetry</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1121"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/standard-format-for-manuscripts/standard-format-for-title-pages/">Standard format for title pages</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-382"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/standard-format-for-manuscripts/standard-format-illustrated/">Standard format illustrated</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-370"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/start-with-these-posts-if-you-are-brand-new-to-publishing/">Start with these posts if you are brand-new to publishing</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1013"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/stock-dialogue/">Stock dialogue</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-337"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/strategizing-a-writing-career/">Strategizing a writing career</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1686"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/">Submission</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-971"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/a-quick-guide-to-submission-formatting/">A quick guide to submission formatting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-671"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/a-short-history-of-submission-practices/">A short history of submission practices</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-207"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/are-some-times-of-the-week-or-year-better-for-submission/">Are some times of the week or year better for submission?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-555"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/cover-letters-for-submissions/">Cover letters for submissions</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-960"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/help-ive-already-submitted-to-one-agent-and-another-has-asked-for-an-exclusive/">Help! I've already submitted to one agent and another has asked for an exclusive!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-221"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/is-it-ever-ok-to-resubmit-to-an-agent-that-hasnt-specifically-asked-to-see-a-revised-version/">Is it ever OK to resubmit to an agent that hasn't specifically asked to see a revised version?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-308"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/is-it-okay-to-submit-a-synopsis-formatted-for-a4-paper-to-us-based-agents/">Is it okay to submit a synopsis formatted for A4 paper to US-based agents?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-966"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/must-i-submit-to-only-one-agent-at-a-time/">Must I submit to only one agent at a time?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-821"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/submission-avoidance/">Submission avoidance</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-232"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/submission-of-requested-materials/">Submission of requested materials</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-329"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/submission-troubleshooting/">Submission troubleshooting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-779"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/submitting-to-a-small-publisher/">Submitting to a small publisher</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-841"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission/what-happens-after-i-submit-requested-materials/">What happens after I submit requested materials?</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-759"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submission-fatigue/">Submission fatigue</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-317"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/submitting-to-us-agents-and-editors-from-outside-the-us/">Submitting to US agents and editors from outside the US</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-414"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/">Synopses and everything you need to know about them</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-387"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/1-page-synopses/">1-page synopses</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-714"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/3-page-synopsis/">3-page synopsis</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-715"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/5-page-synopsis/">5-page synopsis</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-733"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/editing-your-synopsis-for-length/">Editing your synopsis for length</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-574"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/fiction-vs-nonfiction-synopses/">Fiction vs. nonfiction synopses</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-720"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/how-can-i-tell-if-the-synopsis-ive-written-is-up-to-professional-standards/">How can I tell if the synopsis I've written is up to professional standards?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-756"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/how-not-to-write-a-synopsis/">How not to write a synopsis</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1727"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/synopses/">Synopses</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-415"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/synopses-illustrated/">Synopses illustrated</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-478"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/synopsis-for-a-series/">Synopsis for a series</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-318"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/synopsis-formatting/">Synopsis formatting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-736"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/synopsis-length-when-in-doubt/">Synopsis length when in doubt</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-416"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/synopsis-troubleshooting/">Synopsis troubleshooting</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1477"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/synopsis-writing-101/">Synopsis-writing 101</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-417"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/synopsis-writing-stumbling-blocks/">Synopsis-writing stumbling blocks</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1737"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopses-and-everything-you-need-to-know-about-them/writing-a-synopsis-for-a-contest/">Writing a synopsis for a contest</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-744"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/synopsispalooza/">Synopsispalooza!</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-418"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/target-audience/">Target audience</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1712"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/telling-details/">Telling details</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1346"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/the-one-thing-a-conference-pitcher-should-not-do-after-receiving-a-request-for-pages/">The one thing a conference pitcher should NOT do after receiving a request for pages</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1774"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/titles/">Titles</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1674"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/titles/do-e-mailed-submissions-require-title-pages/">Do e-mailed submissions require title pages?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1254"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/titles/do-i-need-to-include-a-title-page-if-ive-been-asked-to-send-only-part-of-my-manuscript/">Do I need to include a title page if I've been asked to send only part of my manuscript?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1083"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/titles/does-my-book-proposal-need-a-title-page-and-what-should-it-look-like/">Does my book proposal need a title page — and what should it look like?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1115"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/titles/how-do-i-format-a-title-page-if-my-book-has-a-subtitle/">How do I format a title page if my book has a subtitle?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-839"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/titles/how-do-i-remove-the-slug-line-from-the-title-page/">How do I remove the slug line from the title page?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1675"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/titles/is-my-title-page-included-in-the-page-count/">Is my title page included in the page count?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-385"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/titles/title-pages/">Title pages</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-233"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/titles/titling-your-work/">Titling your work</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-989"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/titles/why-do-i-need-to-include-a-title-page-in-my-submission/">Why do I need to include a title page in my submission?</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-234"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/turn-around-times/">Turn-around times</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1266"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/university-presses/">University presses</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1464"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/what-happens-if-an-agent-wants-to-see-my-manuscript/">What happens if an agent wants to see my manuscript?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-568"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/what-happens-if-the-agent-asks-first-for-a-partial-then-asks-to-see-more/">What happens if the agent asks first for a partial then asks to see more?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1218"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/what-if-i-miss-my-pitching-appointment/">What if I miss my pitching appointment?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-648"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/what-if-they-think-my-fictional-protagonist-is-me/">What if they think my fictional protagonist is ME?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-485"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/what-is-a-query-letter-and-why-do-i-need-one-to-get-an-agent/">What is a query letter and why do I need one to get an agent?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1260"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/what-should-i-do-while-im-waiting-to-hear-back/">What should I do while I'm waiting to hear back?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1257"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/what-should-my-manuscript-look-like-on-the-page/">What should my manuscript look like on the page?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-459"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/what-to-bring-to-a-conference/">What to bring to a conference</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1368"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/what-to-say-when-non-writers-ask/">What to say when non-writers ask</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-880"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/what-to-wear-to-a-conference/">What to wear to a conference</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1731"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/why-are-there-so-many-different-sets-of-writing-rules-online/">Why are there so many different sets of writing rules online?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1385"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/why-its-a-good-idea-to-make-backups-as-you-revise/">Why it's a good idea to make backups as you revise</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1742"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/why-should-i-post-links-to-my-books-amazon-page/">Why should I post links to my book’s Amazon page?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1743"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/why-wasnt-my-comment-posted/">Why wasn’t my comment posted?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1744"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/why-would-an-agent-care-how-i-format-my-manuscript/">Why would an agent care how I format my manuscript?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1748"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/will-my-writing-automatically-be-taken-less-seriously-if-im-under-18/">Will my writing automatically be taken less seriously if I’m under 18?</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-905"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/womens-fiction/">Women's fiction</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-423"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/word-count/">Word count</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-802"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/writers-block/">Writer's block</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-447"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/writers-conferences/">Writers' Conferences</a> <ul class='children'> <li class="cat-item cat-item-531"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/writers-conferences/good-writing-always-finds-a-home-and-other-publishing-platitudes/">"Good writing always finds a home" and other publishing platitudes</a> </li> </ul> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-704"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/writers-groups/">Writers' groups</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-437"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/writing-advice-truisms/">Writing advice truisms</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-341"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/writing-credentials/">Writing credentials</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1687"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/writing-retreats/">Writing retreats</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1736"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/writing-samples/">Writing samples</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1735"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/writing-space-creation/">Writing space creation</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1734"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/writing-taboos/">Writing taboos</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1200"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/ya-voice/">YA voice</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-692"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/your-books-selling-points/">Your book's selling points</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-1732"><a href="https://www.annemini.com/category/your-next-book/">Your next book</a> </li> </ul> </nav></section></aside> </div> <hr /> <div id="footer" role="contentinfo">  Author! Author!:: Anne Mini's Blog is proudly powered by <a href="https://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a> </div> </div>  <div><a href="https://nananana-intl.com" style="color:#0000; display: none;">slot gacor</a></div> <div><a href="https://paketssh.com" style="color:#0000; display: none;">ssh account</a></div> <div style="display:none;"> <a href="https://api.puregym.com/slot-thailand/">slot server thailand</a> </div><script src="https://www.annemini.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-spam-fighter/javascript/wp-spamfighter.js?ver=0.5.1" id="wpsf_wp-spam-fighter-js"></script> <script id="twentyseventeen-skip-link-focus-fix-js-extra"> var twentyseventeenScreenReaderText = {"quote":"<svg class=\"icon icon-quote-right\" aria-hidden=\"true\" role=\"img\"> <use href=\"#icon-quote-right\" xlink:href=\"#icon-quote-right\"><\/use> <\/svg>"}; </script> <script src="https://www.annemini.com/wp-content/themes/twentyseventeen/assets/js/skip-link-focus-fix.js?ver=20161114" id="twentyseventeen-skip-link-focus-fix-js"></script> <script src="https://www.annemini.com/wp-content/themes/twentyseventeen-child/assets/js/global.js?ver=20190121" id="twentyseventeen-global-js"></script> <script src="https://www.annemini.com/wp-content/themes/twentyseventeen/assets/js/jquery.scrollTo.js?ver=2.1.2" id="jquery-scrollto-js"></script> <svg style="position: absolute; width: 0; height: 0; overflow: hidden;" version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <defs> <symbol id="icon-behance" viewBox="0 0 37 32"> <path class="path1" d="M33 6.054h-9.125v2.214h9.125v-2.214zM28.5 13.661q-1.607 0-2.607 0.938t-1.107 2.545h7.286q-0.321-3.482-3.571-3.482zM28.786 24.107q1.125 0 2.179-0.571t1.357-1.554h3.946q-1.786 5.482-7.625 5.482-3.821 0-6.080-2.357t-2.259-6.196q0-3.714 2.33-6.17t6.009-2.455q2.464 0 4.295 1.214t2.732 3.196 0.902 4.429q0 0.304-0.036 0.839h-11.75q0 1.982 1.027 3.063t2.973 1.080zM4.946 23.214h5.286q3.661 0 3.661-2.982 0-3.214-3.554-3.214h-5.393v6.196zM4.946 13.625h5.018q1.393 0 2.205-0.652t0.813-2.027q0-2.571-3.393-2.571h-4.643v5.25zM0 4.536h10.607q1.554 0 2.768 0.25t2.259 0.848 1.607 1.723 0.563 2.75q0 3.232-3.071 4.696 2.036 0.571 3.071 2.054t1.036 3.643q0 1.339-0.438 2.438t-1.179 1.848-1.759 1.268-2.161 0.75-2.393 0.232h-10.911v-22.5z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-deviantart" viewBox="0 0 18 32"> <path class="path1" d="M18.286 5.411l-5.411 10.393 0.429 0.554h4.982v7.411h-9.054l-0.786 0.536-2.536 4.875-0.536 0.536h-5.375v-5.411l5.411-10.411-0.429-0.536h-4.982v-7.411h9.054l0.786-0.536 2.536-4.875 0.536-0.536h5.375v5.411z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-medium" viewBox="0 0 32 32"> <path class="path1" d="M10.661 7.518v20.946q0 0.446-0.223 0.759t-0.652 0.313q-0.304 0-0.589-0.143l-8.304-4.161q-0.375-0.179-0.634-0.598t-0.259-0.83v-20.357q0-0.357 0.179-0.607t0.518-0.25q0.25 0 0.786 0.268l9.125 4.571q0.054 0.054 0.054 0.089zM11.804 9.321l9.536 15.464-9.536-4.75v-10.714zM32 9.643v18.821q0 0.446-0.25 0.723t-0.679 0.277-0.839-0.232l-7.875-3.929zM31.946 7.5q0 0.054-4.58 7.491t-5.366 8.705l-6.964-11.321 5.786-9.411q0.304-0.5 0.929-0.5 0.25 0 0.464 0.107l9.661 4.821q0.071 0.036 0.071 0.107z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-slideshare" viewBox="0 0 32 32"> <path class="path1" d="M15.589 13.214q0 1.482-1.134 2.545t-2.723 1.063-2.723-1.063-1.134-2.545q0-1.5 1.134-2.554t2.723-1.054 2.723 1.054 1.134 2.554zM24.554 13.214q0 1.482-1.125 2.545t-2.732 1.063q-1.589 0-2.723-1.063t-1.134-2.545q0-1.5 1.134-2.554t2.723-1.054q1.607 0 2.732 1.054t1.125 2.554zM28.571 16.429v-11.911q0-1.554-0.571-2.205t-1.982-0.652h-19.857q-1.482 0-2.009 0.607t-0.527 2.25v12.018q0.768 0.411 1.58 0.714t1.446 0.5 1.446 0.33 1.268 0.196 1.25 0.071 1.045 0.009 1.009-0.036 0.795-0.036q1.214-0.018 1.696 0.482 0.107 0.107 0.179 0.161 0.464 0.446 1.089 0.911 0.125-1.625 2.107-1.554 0.089 0 0.652 0.027t0.768 0.036 0.813 0.018 0.946-0.018 0.973-0.080 1.089-0.152 1.107-0.241 1.196-0.348 1.205-0.482 1.286-0.616zM31.482 16.339q-2.161 2.661-6.643 4.5 1.5 5.089-0.411 8.304-1.179 2.018-3.268 2.643-1.857 0.571-3.25-0.268-1.536-0.911-1.464-2.929l-0.018-5.821v-0.018q-0.143-0.036-0.438-0.107t-0.42-0.089l-0.018 6.036q0.071 2.036-1.482 2.929-1.411 0.839-3.268 0.268-2.089-0.643-3.25-2.679-1.875-3.214-0.393-8.268-4.482-1.839-6.643-4.5-0.446-0.661-0.071-1.125t1.071 0.018q0.054 0.036 0.196 0.125t0.196 0.143v-12.393q0-1.286 0.839-2.196t2.036-0.911h22.446q1.196 0 2.036 0.911t0.839 2.196v12.393l0.375-0.268q0.696-0.482 1.071-0.018t-0.071 1.125z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-snapchat-ghost" viewBox="0 0 30 32"> <path class="path1" d="M15.143 2.286q2.393-0.018 4.295 1.223t2.92 3.438q0.482 1.036 0.482 3.196 0 0.839-0.161 3.411 0.25 0.125 0.5 0.125 0.321 0 0.911-0.241t0.911-0.241q0.518 0 1 0.321t0.482 0.821q0 0.571-0.563 0.964t-1.232 0.563-1.232 0.518-0.563 0.848q0 0.268 0.214 0.768 0.661 1.464 1.83 2.679t2.58 1.804q0.5 0.214 1.429 0.411 0.5 0.107 0.5 0.625 0 1.25-3.911 1.839-0.125 0.196-0.196 0.696t-0.25 0.83-0.589 0.33q-0.357 0-1.107-0.116t-1.143-0.116q-0.661 0-1.107 0.089-0.571 0.089-1.125 0.402t-1.036 0.679-1.036 0.723-1.357 0.598-1.768 0.241q-0.929 0-1.723-0.241t-1.339-0.598-1.027-0.723-1.036-0.679-1.107-0.402q-0.464-0.089-1.125-0.089-0.429 0-1.17 0.134t-1.045 0.134q-0.446 0-0.625-0.33t-0.25-0.848-0.196-0.714q-3.911-0.589-3.911-1.839 0-0.518 0.5-0.625 0.929-0.196 1.429-0.411 1.393-0.571 2.58-1.804t1.83-2.679q0.214-0.5 0.214-0.768 0-0.5-0.563-0.848t-1.241-0.527-1.241-0.563-0.563-0.938q0-0.482 0.464-0.813t0.982-0.33q0.268 0 0.857 0.232t0.946 0.232q0.321 0 0.571-0.125-0.161-2.536-0.161-3.393 0-2.179 0.482-3.214 1.143-2.446 3.071-3.536t4.714-1.125z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-yelp" viewBox="0 0 27 32"> <path class="path1" d="M13.804 23.554v2.268q-0.018 5.214-0.107 5.446-0.214 0.571-0.911 0.714-0.964 0.161-3.241-0.679t-2.902-1.589q-0.232-0.268-0.304-0.643-0.018-0.214 0.071-0.464 0.071-0.179 0.607-0.839t3.232-3.857q0.018 0 1.071-1.25 0.268-0.339 0.705-0.438t0.884 0.063q0.429 0.179 0.67 0.518t0.223 0.75zM11.143 19.071q-0.054 0.982-0.929 1.25l-2.143 0.696q-4.911 1.571-5.214 1.571-0.625-0.036-0.964-0.643-0.214-0.446-0.304-1.339-0.143-1.357 0.018-2.973t0.536-2.223 1-0.571q0.232 0 3.607 1.375 1.25 0.518 2.054 0.839l1.5 0.607q0.411 0.161 0.634 0.545t0.205 0.866zM25.893 24.375q-0.125 0.964-1.634 2.875t-2.42 2.268q-0.661 0.25-1.125-0.125-0.25-0.179-3.286-5.125l-0.839-1.375q-0.25-0.375-0.205-0.821t0.348-0.821q0.625-0.768 1.482-0.464 0.018 0.018 2.125 0.714 3.625 1.179 4.321 1.42t0.839 0.366q0.5 0.393 0.393 1.089zM13.893 13.089q0.089 1.821-0.964 2.179-1.036 0.304-2.036-1.268l-6.75-10.679q-0.143-0.625 0.339-1.107 0.732-0.768 3.705-1.598t4.009-0.563q0.714 0.179 0.875 0.804 0.054 0.321 0.393 5.455t0.429 6.777zM25.714 15.018q0.054 0.696-0.464 1.054-0.268 0.179-5.875 1.536-1.196 0.268-1.625 0.411l0.018-0.036q-0.411 0.107-0.821-0.071t-0.661-0.571q-0.536-0.839 0-1.554 0.018-0.018 1.339-1.821 2.232-3.054 2.679-3.643t0.607-0.696q0.5-0.339 1.161-0.036 0.857 0.411 2.196 2.384t1.446 2.991v0.054z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-vine" viewBox="0 0 27 32"> <path class="path1" d="M26.732 14.768v3.536q-1.804 0.411-3.536 0.411-1.161 2.429-2.955 4.839t-3.241 3.848-2.286 1.902q-1.429 0.804-2.893-0.054-0.5-0.304-1.080-0.777t-1.518-1.491-1.83-2.295-1.92-3.286-1.884-4.357-1.634-5.616-1.259-6.964h5.054q0.464 3.893 1.25 7.116t1.866 5.661 2.17 4.205 2.5 3.482q3.018-3.018 5.125-7.25-2.536-1.286-3.982-3.929t-1.446-5.946q0-3.429 1.857-5.616t5.071-2.188q3.179 0 4.875 1.884t1.696 5.313q0 2.839-1.036 5.107-0.125 0.018-0.348 0.054t-0.821 0.036-1.125-0.107-1.107-0.455-0.902-0.92q0.554-1.839 0.554-3.286 0-1.554-0.518-2.357t-1.411-0.804q-0.946 0-1.518 0.884t-0.571 2.509q0 3.321 1.875 5.241t4.768 1.92q1.107 0 2.161-0.25z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-vk" viewBox="0 0 35 32"> <path class="path1" d="M34.232 9.286q0.411 1.143-2.679 5.25-0.429 0.571-1.161 1.518-1.393 1.786-1.607 2.339-0.304 0.732 0.25 1.446 0.304 0.375 1.446 1.464h0.018l0.071 0.071q2.518 2.339 3.411 3.946 0.054 0.089 0.116 0.223t0.125 0.473-0.009 0.607-0.446 0.491-1.054 0.223l-4.571 0.071q-0.429 0.089-1-0.089t-0.929-0.393l-0.357-0.214q-0.536-0.375-1.25-1.143t-1.223-1.384-1.089-1.036-1.009-0.277q-0.054 0.018-0.143 0.063t-0.304 0.259-0.384 0.527-0.304 0.929-0.116 1.384q0 0.268-0.063 0.491t-0.134 0.33l-0.071 0.089q-0.321 0.339-0.946 0.393h-2.054q-1.268 0.071-2.607-0.295t-2.348-0.946-1.839-1.179-1.259-1.027l-0.446-0.429q-0.179-0.179-0.491-0.536t-1.277-1.625-1.893-2.696-2.188-3.768-2.33-4.857q-0.107-0.286-0.107-0.482t0.054-0.286l0.071-0.107q0.268-0.339 1.018-0.339l4.893-0.036q0.214 0.036 0.411 0.116t0.286 0.152l0.089 0.054q0.286 0.196 0.429 0.571 0.357 0.893 0.821 1.848t0.732 1.455l0.286 0.518q0.518 1.071 1 1.857t0.866 1.223 0.741 0.688 0.607 0.25 0.482-0.089q0.036-0.018 0.089-0.089t0.214-0.393 0.241-0.839 0.17-1.446 0-2.232q-0.036-0.714-0.161-1.304t-0.25-0.821l-0.107-0.214q-0.446-0.607-1.518-0.768-0.232-0.036 0.089-0.429 0.304-0.339 0.679-0.536 0.946-0.464 4.268-0.429 1.464 0.018 2.411 0.232 0.357 0.089 0.598 0.241t0.366 0.429 0.188 0.571 0.063 0.813-0.018 0.982-0.045 1.259-0.027 1.473q0 0.196-0.018 0.75t-0.009 0.857 0.063 0.723 0.205 0.696 0.402 0.438q0.143 0.036 0.304 0.071t0.464-0.196 0.679-0.616 0.929-1.196 1.214-1.92q1.071-1.857 1.911-4.018 0.071-0.179 0.179-0.313t0.196-0.188l0.071-0.054 0.089-0.045t0.232-0.054 0.357-0.009l5.143-0.036q0.696-0.089 1.143 0.045t0.554 0.295z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-search" viewBox="0 0 30 32"> <path class="path1" d="M20.571 14.857q0-3.304-2.348-5.652t-5.652-2.348-5.652 2.348-2.348 5.652 2.348 5.652 5.652 2.348 5.652-2.348 2.348-5.652zM29.714 29.714q0 0.929-0.679 1.607t-1.607 0.679q-0.964 0-1.607-0.679l-6.125-6.107q-3.196 2.214-7.125 2.214-2.554 0-4.884-0.991t-4.018-2.679-2.679-4.018-0.991-4.884 0.991-4.884 2.679-4.018 4.018-2.679 4.884-0.991 4.884 0.991 4.018 2.679 2.679 4.018 0.991 4.884q0 3.929-2.214 7.125l6.125 6.125q0.661 0.661 0.661 1.607z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-envelope-o" viewBox="0 0 32 32"> <path class="path1" d="M29.714 26.857v-13.714q-0.571 0.643-1.232 1.179-4.786 3.679-7.607 6.036-0.911 0.768-1.482 1.196t-1.545 0.866-1.83 0.438h-0.036q-0.857 0-1.83-0.438t-1.545-0.866-1.482-1.196q-2.821-2.357-7.607-6.036-0.661-0.536-1.232-1.179v13.714q0 0.232 0.17 0.402t0.402 0.17h26.286q0.232 0 0.402-0.17t0.17-0.402zM29.714 8.089v-0.438t-0.009-0.232-0.054-0.223-0.098-0.161-0.161-0.134-0.25-0.045h-26.286q-0.232 0-0.402 0.17t-0.17 0.402q0 3 2.625 5.071 3.446 2.714 7.161 5.661 0.107 0.089 0.625 0.527t0.821 0.67 0.795 0.563 0.902 0.491 0.768 0.161h0.036q0.357 0 0.768-0.161t0.902-0.491 0.795-0.563 0.821-0.67 0.625-0.527q3.714-2.946 7.161-5.661 0.964-0.768 1.795-2.063t0.83-2.348zM32 7.429v19.429q0 1.179-0.839 2.018t-2.018 0.839h-26.286q-1.179 0-2.018-0.839t-0.839-2.018v-19.429q0-1.179 0.839-2.018t2.018-0.839h26.286q1.179 0 2.018 0.839t0.839 2.018z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-close" viewBox="0 0 25 32"> <path class="path1" d="M23.179 23.607q0 0.714-0.5 1.214l-2.429 2.429q-0.5 0.5-1.214 0.5t-1.214-0.5l-5.25-5.25-5.25 5.25q-0.5 0.5-1.214 0.5t-1.214-0.5l-2.429-2.429q-0.5-0.5-0.5-1.214t0.5-1.214l5.25-5.25-5.25-5.25q-0.5-0.5-0.5-1.214t0.5-1.214l2.429-2.429q0.5-0.5 1.214-0.5t1.214 0.5l5.25 5.25 5.25-5.25q0.5-0.5 1.214-0.5t1.214 0.5l2.429 2.429q0.5 0.5 0.5 1.214t-0.5 1.214l-5.25 5.25 5.25 5.25q0.5 0.5 0.5 1.214z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-angle-down" viewBox="0 0 21 32"> <path class="path1" d="M19.196 13.143q0 0.232-0.179 0.411l-8.321 8.321q-0.179 0.179-0.411 0.179t-0.411-0.179l-8.321-8.321q-0.179-0.179-0.179-0.411t0.179-0.411l0.893-0.893q0.179-0.179 0.411-0.179t0.411 0.179l7.018 7.018 7.018-7.018q0.179-0.179 0.411-0.179t0.411 0.179l0.893 0.893q0.179 0.179 0.179 0.411z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-folder-open" viewBox="0 0 34 32"> <path class="path1" d="M33.554 17q0 0.554-0.554 1.179l-6 7.071q-0.768 0.911-2.152 1.545t-2.563 0.634h-19.429q-0.607 0-1.080-0.232t-0.473-0.768q0-0.554 0.554-1.179l6-7.071q0.768-0.911 2.152-1.545t2.563-0.634h19.429q0.607 0 1.080 0.232t0.473 0.768zM27.429 10.857v2.857h-14.857q-1.679 0-3.518 0.848t-2.929 2.134l-6.107 7.179q0-0.071-0.009-0.223t-0.009-0.223v-17.143q0-1.643 1.179-2.821t2.821-1.179h5.714q1.643 0 2.821 1.179t1.179 2.821v0.571h9.714q1.643 0 2.821 1.179t1.179 2.821z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-twitter" viewBox="0 0 30 32"> <path class="path1" d="M28.929 7.286q-1.196 1.75-2.893 2.982 0.018 0.25 0.018 0.75 0 2.321-0.679 4.634t-2.063 4.437-3.295 3.759-4.607 2.607-5.768 0.973q-4.839 0-8.857-2.589 0.625 0.071 1.393 0.071 4.018 0 7.161-2.464-1.875-0.036-3.357-1.152t-2.036-2.848q0.589 0.089 1.089 0.089 0.768 0 1.518-0.196-2-0.411-3.313-1.991t-1.313-3.67v-0.071q1.214 0.679 2.607 0.732-1.179-0.786-1.875-2.054t-0.696-2.75q0-1.571 0.786-2.911 2.161 2.661 5.259 4.259t6.634 1.777q-0.143-0.679-0.143-1.321 0-2.393 1.688-4.080t4.080-1.688q2.5 0 4.214 1.821 1.946-0.375 3.661-1.393-0.661 2.054-2.536 3.179 1.661-0.179 3.321-0.893z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-facebook" viewBox="0 0 19 32"> <path class="path1" d="M17.125 0.214v4.714h-2.804q-1.536 0-2.071 0.643t-0.536 1.929v3.375h5.232l-0.696 5.286h-4.536v13.554h-5.464v-13.554h-4.554v-5.286h4.554v-3.893q0-3.321 1.857-5.152t4.946-1.83q2.625 0 4.071 0.214z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-github" viewBox="0 0 27 32"> <path class="path1" d="M13.714 2.286q3.732 0 6.884 1.839t4.991 4.991 1.839 6.884q0 4.482-2.616 8.063t-6.759 4.955q-0.482 0.089-0.714-0.125t-0.232-0.536q0-0.054 0.009-1.366t0.009-2.402q0-1.732-0.929-2.536 1.018-0.107 1.83-0.321t1.679-0.696 1.446-1.188 0.946-1.875 0.366-2.688q0-2.125-1.411-3.679 0.661-1.625-0.143-3.643-0.5-0.161-1.446 0.196t-1.643 0.786l-0.679 0.429q-1.661-0.464-3.429-0.464t-3.429 0.464q-0.286-0.196-0.759-0.482t-1.491-0.688-1.518-0.241q-0.804 2.018-0.143 3.643-1.411 1.554-1.411 3.679 0 1.518 0.366 2.679t0.938 1.875 1.438 1.196 1.679 0.696 1.83 0.321q-0.696 0.643-0.875 1.839-0.375 0.179-0.804 0.268t-1.018 0.089-1.17-0.384-0.991-1.116q-0.339-0.571-0.866-0.929t-0.884-0.429l-0.357-0.054q-0.375 0-0.518 0.080t-0.089 0.205 0.161 0.25 0.232 0.214l0.125 0.089q0.393 0.179 0.777 0.679t0.563 0.911l0.179 0.411q0.232 0.679 0.786 1.098t1.196 0.536 1.241 0.125 0.991-0.063l0.411-0.071q0 0.679 0.009 1.58t0.009 0.973q0 0.321-0.232 0.536t-0.714 0.125q-4.143-1.375-6.759-4.955t-2.616-8.063q0-3.732 1.839-6.884t4.991-4.991 6.884-1.839zM5.196 21.982q0.054-0.125-0.125-0.214-0.179-0.054-0.232 0.036-0.054 0.125 0.125 0.214 0.161 0.107 0.232-0.036zM5.75 22.589q0.125-0.089-0.036-0.286-0.179-0.161-0.286-0.054-0.125 0.089 0.036 0.286 0.179 0.179 0.286 0.054zM6.286 23.393q0.161-0.125 0-0.339-0.143-0.232-0.304-0.107-0.161 0.089 0 0.321t0.304 0.125zM7.036 24.143q0.143-0.143-0.071-0.339-0.214-0.214-0.357-0.054-0.161 0.143 0.071 0.339 0.214 0.214 0.357 0.054zM8.054 24.589q0.054-0.196-0.232-0.286-0.268-0.071-0.339 0.125t0.232 0.268q0.268 0.107 0.339-0.107zM9.179 24.679q0-0.232-0.304-0.196-0.286 0-0.286 0.196 0 0.232 0.304 0.196 0.286 0 0.286-0.196zM10.214 24.5q-0.036-0.196-0.321-0.161-0.286 0.054-0.25 0.268t0.321 0.143 0.25-0.25z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-bars" viewBox="0 0 27 32"> <path class="path1" d="M27.429 24v2.286q0 0.464-0.339 0.804t-0.804 0.339h-25.143q-0.464 0-0.804-0.339t-0.339-0.804v-2.286q0-0.464 0.339-0.804t0.804-0.339h25.143q0.464 0 0.804 0.339t0.339 0.804zM27.429 14.857v2.286q0 0.464-0.339 0.804t-0.804 0.339h-25.143q-0.464 0-0.804-0.339t-0.339-0.804v-2.286q0-0.464 0.339-0.804t0.804-0.339h25.143q0.464 0 0.804 0.339t0.339 0.804zM27.429 5.714v2.286q0 0.464-0.339 0.804t-0.804 0.339h-25.143q-0.464 0-0.804-0.339t-0.339-0.804v-2.286q0-0.464 0.339-0.804t0.804-0.339h25.143q0.464 0 0.804 0.339t0.339 0.804z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-google-plus" viewBox="0 0 41 32"> <path class="path1" d="M25.661 16.304q0 3.714-1.554 6.616t-4.429 4.536-6.589 1.634q-2.661 0-5.089-1.036t-4.179-2.786-2.786-4.179-1.036-5.089 1.036-5.089 2.786-4.179 4.179-2.786 5.089-1.036q5.107 0 8.768 3.429l-3.554 3.411q-2.089-2.018-5.214-2.018-2.196 0-4.063 1.107t-2.955 3.009-1.089 4.152 1.089 4.152 2.955 3.009 4.063 1.107q1.482 0 2.723-0.411t2.045-1.027 1.402-1.402 0.875-1.482 0.384-1.321h-7.429v-4.5h12.357q0.214 1.125 0.214 2.179zM41.143 14.125v3.75h-3.732v3.732h-3.75v-3.732h-3.732v-3.75h3.732v-3.732h3.75v3.732h3.732z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-linkedin" viewBox="0 0 27 32"> <path class="path1" d="M6.232 11.161v17.696h-5.893v-17.696h5.893zM6.607 5.696q0.018 1.304-0.902 2.179t-2.42 0.875h-0.036q-1.464 0-2.357-0.875t-0.893-2.179q0-1.321 0.92-2.188t2.402-0.866 2.375 0.866 0.911 2.188zM27.429 18.714v10.143h-5.875v-9.464q0-1.875-0.723-2.938t-2.259-1.063q-1.125 0-1.884 0.616t-1.134 1.527q-0.196 0.536-0.196 1.446v9.875h-5.875q0.036-7.125 0.036-11.554t-0.018-5.286l-0.018-0.857h5.875v2.571h-0.036q0.357-0.571 0.732-1t1.009-0.929 1.554-0.777 2.045-0.277q3.054 0 4.911 2.027t1.857 5.938z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-quote-right" viewBox="0 0 30 32"> <path class="path1" d="M13.714 5.714v12.571q0 1.857-0.723 3.545t-1.955 2.92-2.92 1.955-3.545 0.723h-1.143q-0.464 0-0.804-0.339t-0.339-0.804v-2.286q0-0.464 0.339-0.804t0.804-0.339h1.143q1.893 0 3.232-1.339t1.339-3.232v-0.571q0-0.714-0.5-1.214t-1.214-0.5h-4q-1.429 0-2.429-1t-1-2.429v-6.857q0-1.429 1-2.429t2.429-1h6.857q1.429 0 2.429 1t1 2.429zM29.714 5.714v12.571q0 1.857-0.723 3.545t-1.955 2.92-2.92 1.955-3.545 0.723h-1.143q-0.464 0-0.804-0.339t-0.339-0.804v-2.286q0-0.464 0.339-0.804t0.804-0.339h1.143q1.893 0 3.232-1.339t1.339-3.232v-0.571q0-0.714-0.5-1.214t-1.214-0.5h-4q-1.429 0-2.429-1t-1-2.429v-6.857q0-1.429 1-2.429t2.429-1h6.857q1.429 0 2.429 1t1 2.429z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-mail-reply" viewBox="0 0 32 32"> <path class="path1" d="M32 20q0 2.964-2.268 8.054-0.054 0.125-0.188 0.429t-0.241 0.536-0.232 0.393q-0.214 0.304-0.5 0.304-0.268 0-0.42-0.179t-0.152-0.446q0-0.161 0.045-0.473t0.045-0.42q0.089-1.214 0.089-2.196 0-1.804-0.313-3.232t-0.866-2.473-1.429-1.804-1.884-1.241-2.375-0.759-2.75-0.384-3.134-0.107h-4v4.571q0 0.464-0.339 0.804t-0.804 0.339-0.804-0.339l-9.143-9.143q-0.339-0.339-0.339-0.804t0.339-0.804l9.143-9.143q0.339-0.339 0.804-0.339t0.804 0.339 0.339 0.804v4.571h4q12.732 0 15.625 7.196 0.946 2.393 0.946 5.946z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-youtube" viewBox="0 0 27 32"> <path class="path1" d="M17.339 22.214v3.768q0 1.196-0.696 1.196-0.411 0-0.804-0.393v-5.375q0.393-0.393 0.804-0.393 0.696 0 0.696 1.196zM23.375 22.232v0.821h-1.607v-0.821q0-1.214 0.804-1.214t0.804 1.214zM6.125 18.339h1.911v-1.679h-5.571v1.679h1.875v10.161h1.786v-10.161zM11.268 28.5h1.589v-8.821h-1.589v6.75q-0.536 0.75-1.018 0.75-0.321 0-0.375-0.375-0.018-0.054-0.018-0.625v-6.5h-1.589v6.982q0 0.875 0.143 1.304 0.214 0.661 1.036 0.661 0.857 0 1.821-1.089v0.964zM18.929 25.857v-3.518q0-1.304-0.161-1.768-0.304-1-1.268-1-0.893 0-1.661 0.964v-3.875h-1.589v11.839h1.589v-0.857q0.804 0.982 1.661 0.982 0.964 0 1.268-0.982 0.161-0.482 0.161-1.786zM24.964 25.679v-0.232h-1.625q0 0.911-0.036 1.089-0.125 0.643-0.714 0.643-0.821 0-0.821-1.232v-1.554h3.196v-1.839q0-1.411-0.482-2.071-0.696-0.911-1.893-0.911-1.214 0-1.911 0.911-0.5 0.661-0.5 2.071v3.089q0 1.411 0.518 2.071 0.696 0.911 1.929 0.911 1.286 0 1.929-0.946 0.321-0.482 0.375-0.964 0.036-0.161 0.036-1.036zM14.107 9.375v-3.75q0-1.232-0.768-1.232t-0.768 1.232v3.75q0 1.25 0.768 1.25t0.768-1.25zM26.946 22.786q0 4.179-0.464 6.25-0.25 1.054-1.036 1.768t-1.821 0.821q-3.286 0.375-9.911 0.375t-9.911-0.375q-1.036-0.107-1.83-0.821t-1.027-1.768q-0.464-2-0.464-6.25 0-4.179 0.464-6.25 0.25-1.054 1.036-1.768t1.839-0.839q3.268-0.357 9.893-0.357t9.911 0.357q1.036 0.125 1.83 0.839t1.027 1.768q0.464 2 0.464 6.25zM9.125 0h1.821l-2.161 7.125v4.839h-1.786v-4.839q-0.25-1.321-1.089-3.786-0.661-1.839-1.161-3.339h1.893l1.268 4.696zM15.732 5.946v3.125q0 1.446-0.5 2.107-0.661 0.911-1.893 0.911-1.196 0-1.875-0.911-0.5-0.679-0.5-2.107v-3.125q0-1.429 0.5-2.089 0.679-0.911 1.875-0.911 1.232 0 1.893 0.911 0.5 0.661 0.5 2.089zM21.714 3.054v8.911h-1.625v-0.982q-0.946 1.107-1.839 1.107-0.821 0-1.054-0.661-0.143-0.429-0.143-1.339v-7.036h1.625v6.554q0 0.589 0.018 0.625 0.054 0.393 0.375 0.393 0.482 0 1.018-0.768v-6.804h1.625z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-dropbox" viewBox="0 0 32 32"> <path class="path1" d="M7.179 12.625l8.821 5.446-6.107 5.089-8.75-5.696zM24.786 22.536v1.929l-8.75 5.232v0.018l-0.018-0.018-0.018 0.018v-0.018l-8.732-5.232v-1.929l2.625 1.714 6.107-5.071v-0.036l0.018 0.018 0.018-0.018v0.036l6.125 5.071zM9.893 2.107l6.107 5.089-8.821 5.429-6.036-4.821zM24.821 12.625l6.036 4.839-8.732 5.696-6.125-5.089zM22.125 2.107l8.732 5.696-6.036 4.821-8.821-5.429z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-instagram" viewBox="0 0 27 32"> <path class="path1" d="M18.286 16q0-1.893-1.339-3.232t-3.232-1.339-3.232 1.339-1.339 3.232 1.339 3.232 3.232 1.339 3.232-1.339 1.339-3.232zM20.75 16q0 2.929-2.054 4.982t-4.982 2.054-4.982-2.054-2.054-4.982 2.054-4.982 4.982-2.054 4.982 2.054 2.054 4.982zM22.679 8.679q0 0.679-0.482 1.161t-1.161 0.482-1.161-0.482-0.482-1.161 0.482-1.161 1.161-0.482 1.161 0.482 0.482 1.161zM13.714 4.75q-0.125 0-1.366-0.009t-1.884 0-1.723 0.054-1.839 0.179-1.277 0.33q-0.893 0.357-1.571 1.036t-1.036 1.571q-0.196 0.518-0.33 1.277t-0.179 1.839-0.054 1.723 0 1.884 0.009 1.366-0.009 1.366 0 1.884 0.054 1.723 0.179 1.839 0.33 1.277q0.357 0.893 1.036 1.571t1.571 1.036q0.518 0.196 1.277 0.33t1.839 0.179 1.723 0.054 1.884 0 1.366-0.009 1.366 0.009 1.884 0 1.723-0.054 1.839-0.179 1.277-0.33q0.893-0.357 1.571-1.036t1.036-1.571q0.196-0.518 0.33-1.277t0.179-1.839 0.054-1.723 0-1.884-0.009-1.366 0.009-1.366 0-1.884-0.054-1.723-0.179-1.839-0.33-1.277q-0.357-0.893-1.036-1.571t-1.571-1.036q-0.518-0.196-1.277-0.33t-1.839-0.179-1.723-0.054-1.884 0-1.366 0.009zM27.429 16q0 4.089-0.089 5.661-0.179 3.714-2.214 5.75t-5.75 2.214q-1.571 0.089-5.661 0.089t-5.661-0.089q-3.714-0.179-5.75-2.214t-2.214-5.75q-0.089-1.571-0.089-5.661t0.089-5.661q0.179-3.714 2.214-5.75t5.75-2.214q1.571-0.089 5.661-0.089t5.661 0.089q3.714 0.179 5.75 2.214t2.214 5.75q0.089 1.571 0.089 5.661z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-flickr" viewBox="0 0 27 32"> <path class="path1" d="M22.286 2.286q2.125 0 3.634 1.509t1.509 3.634v17.143q0 2.125-1.509 3.634t-3.634 1.509h-17.143q-2.125 0-3.634-1.509t-1.509-3.634v-17.143q0-2.125 1.509-3.634t3.634-1.509h17.143zM12.464 16q0-1.571-1.107-2.679t-2.679-1.107-2.679 1.107-1.107 2.679 1.107 2.679 2.679 1.107 2.679-1.107 1.107-2.679zM22.536 16q0-1.571-1.107-2.679t-2.679-1.107-2.679 1.107-1.107 2.679 1.107 2.679 2.679 1.107 2.679-1.107 1.107-2.679z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-tumblr" viewBox="0 0 19 32"> <path class="path1" d="M16.857 23.732l1.429 4.232q-0.411 0.625-1.982 1.179t-3.161 0.571q-1.857 0.036-3.402-0.464t-2.545-1.321-1.696-1.893-0.991-2.143-0.295-2.107v-9.714h-3v-3.839q1.286-0.464 2.304-1.241t1.625-1.607 1.036-1.821 0.607-1.768 0.268-1.58q0.018-0.089 0.080-0.152t0.134-0.063h4.357v7.571h5.946v4.5h-5.964v9.25q0 0.536 0.116 1t0.402 0.938 0.884 0.741 1.455 0.25q1.393-0.036 2.393-0.518z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-dockerhub" viewBox="0 0 24 28"> <path class="path1" d="M1.597 10.257h2.911v2.83H1.597v-2.83zm3.573 0h2.91v2.83H5.17v-2.83zm0-3.627h2.91v2.829H5.17V6.63zm3.57 3.627h2.912v2.83H8.74v-2.83zm0-3.627h2.912v2.829H8.74V6.63zm3.573 3.627h2.911v2.83h-2.911v-2.83zm0-3.627h2.911v2.829h-2.911V6.63zm3.572 3.627h2.911v2.83h-2.911v-2.83zM12.313 3h2.911v2.83h-2.911V3zm-6.65 14.173c-.449 0-.812.354-.812.788 0 .435.364.788.812.788.447 0 .811-.353.811-.788 0-.434-.363-.788-.811-.788"></path> <path class="path2" d="M28.172 11.721c-.978-.549-2.278-.624-3.388-.306-.136-1.146-.91-2.149-1.83-2.869l-.366-.286-.307.345c-.618.692-.8 1.845-.718 2.73.063.651.273 1.312.685 1.834-.313.183-.668.328-.985.434-.646.212-1.347.33-2.028.33H.083l-.042.429c-.137 1.432.065 2.866.674 4.173l.262.519.03.048c1.8 2.973 4.963 4.225 8.41 4.225 6.672 0 12.174-2.896 14.702-9.015 1.689.085 3.417-.4 4.243-1.968l.211-.4-.401-.223zM5.664 19.458c-.85 0-1.542-.671-1.542-1.497 0-.825.691-1.498 1.541-1.498.849 0 1.54.672 1.54 1.497s-.69 1.498-1.539 1.498z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-dribbble" viewBox="0 0 27 32"> <path class="path1" d="M18.286 26.786q-0.75-4.304-2.5-8.893h-0.036l-0.036 0.018q-0.286 0.107-0.768 0.295t-1.804 0.875-2.446 1.464-2.339 2.045-1.839 2.643l-0.268-0.196q3.286 2.679 7.464 2.679 2.357 0 4.571-0.929zM14.982 15.946q-0.375-0.875-0.946-1.982-5.554 1.661-12.018 1.661-0.018 0.125-0.018 0.375 0 2.214 0.786 4.223t2.214 3.598q0.893-1.589 2.205-2.973t2.545-2.223 2.33-1.446 1.777-0.857l0.661-0.232q0.071-0.018 0.232-0.063t0.232-0.080zM13.071 12.161q-2.143-3.804-4.357-6.75-2.464 1.161-4.179 3.321t-2.286 4.857q5.393 0 10.821-1.429zM25.286 17.857q-3.75-1.071-7.304-0.518 1.554 4.268 2.286 8.375 1.982-1.339 3.304-3.384t1.714-4.473zM10.911 4.625q-0.018 0-0.036 0.018 0.018-0.018 0.036-0.018zM21.446 7.214q-3.304-2.929-7.732-2.929-1.357 0-2.768 0.339 2.339 3.036 4.393 6.821 1.232-0.464 2.321-1.080t1.723-1.098 1.17-1.018 0.67-0.723zM25.429 15.875q-0.054-4.143-2.661-7.321l-0.018 0.018q-0.161 0.214-0.339 0.438t-0.777 0.795-1.268 1.080-1.786 1.161-2.348 1.152q0.446 0.946 0.786 1.696 0.036 0.107 0.116 0.313t0.134 0.295q0.643-0.089 1.33-0.125t1.313-0.036 1.232 0.027 1.143 0.071 1.009 0.098 0.857 0.116 0.652 0.107 0.446 0.080zM27.429 16q0 3.732-1.839 6.884t-4.991 4.991-6.884 1.839-6.884-1.839-4.991-4.991-1.839-6.884 1.839-6.884 4.991-4.991 6.884-1.839 6.884 1.839 4.991 4.991 1.839 6.884z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-skype" viewBox="0 0 27 32"> <path class="path1" d="M20.946 18.982q0-0.893-0.348-1.634t-0.866-1.223-1.304-0.875-1.473-0.607-1.563-0.411l-1.857-0.429q-0.536-0.125-0.786-0.188t-0.625-0.205-0.536-0.286-0.295-0.375-0.134-0.536q0-1.375 2.571-1.375 0.768 0 1.375 0.214t0.964 0.509 0.679 0.598 0.714 0.518 0.857 0.214q0.839 0 1.348-0.571t0.509-1.375q0-0.982-1-1.777t-2.536-1.205-3.25-0.411q-1.214 0-2.357 0.277t-2.134 0.839-1.589 1.554-0.598 2.295q0 1.089 0.339 1.902t1 1.348 1.429 0.866 1.839 0.58l2.607 0.643q1.607 0.393 2 0.643 0.571 0.357 0.571 1.071 0 0.696-0.714 1.152t-1.875 0.455q-0.911 0-1.634-0.286t-1.161-0.688-0.813-0.804-0.821-0.688-0.964-0.286q-0.893 0-1.348 0.536t-0.455 1.339q0 1.643 2.179 2.813t5.196 1.17q1.304 0 2.5-0.33t2.188-0.955 1.58-1.67 0.589-2.348zM27.429 22.857q0 2.839-2.009 4.848t-4.848 2.009q-2.321 0-4.179-1.429-1.375 0.286-2.679 0.286-2.554 0-4.884-0.991t-4.018-2.679-2.679-4.018-0.991-4.884q0-1.304 0.286-2.679-1.429-1.857-1.429-4.179 0-2.839 2.009-4.848t4.848-2.009q2.321 0 4.179 1.429 1.375-0.286 2.679-0.286 2.554 0 4.884 0.991t4.018 2.679 2.679 4.018 0.991 4.884q0 1.304-0.286 2.679 1.429 1.857 1.429 4.179z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-foursquare" viewBox="0 0 23 32"> <path class="path1" d="M17.857 7.75l0.661-3.464q0.089-0.411-0.161-0.714t-0.625-0.304h-12.714q-0.411 0-0.688 0.304t-0.277 0.661v19.661q0 0.125 0.107 0.018l5.196-6.286q0.411-0.464 0.679-0.598t0.857-0.134h4.268q0.393 0 0.661-0.259t0.321-0.527q0.429-2.321 0.661-3.411 0.071-0.375-0.205-0.714t-0.652-0.339h-5.25q-0.518 0-0.857-0.339t-0.339-0.857v-0.75q0-0.518 0.339-0.848t0.857-0.33h6.179q0.321 0 0.625-0.241t0.357-0.527zM21.911 3.786q-0.268 1.304-0.955 4.759t-1.241 6.25-0.625 3.098q-0.107 0.393-0.161 0.58t-0.25 0.58-0.438 0.589-0.688 0.375-1.036 0.179h-4.839q-0.232 0-0.393 0.179-0.143 0.161-7.607 8.821-0.393 0.446-1.045 0.509t-0.866-0.098q-0.982-0.393-0.982-1.75v-25.179q0-0.982 0.679-1.83t2.143-0.848h15.857q1.696 0 2.268 0.946t0.179 2.839zM21.911 3.786l-2.821 14.107q0.071-0.304 0.625-3.098t1.241-6.25 0.955-4.759z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-wordpress" viewBox="0 0 32 32"> <path class="path1" d="M2.268 16q0-2.911 1.196-5.589l6.554 17.946q-3.5-1.696-5.625-5.018t-2.125-7.339zM25.268 15.304q0 0.339-0.045 0.688t-0.179 0.884-0.205 0.786-0.313 1.054-0.313 1.036l-1.357 4.571-4.964-14.75q0.821-0.054 1.571-0.143 0.339-0.036 0.464-0.33t-0.045-0.554-0.509-0.241l-3.661 0.179q-1.339-0.018-3.607-0.179-0.214-0.018-0.366 0.089t-0.205 0.268-0.027 0.33 0.161 0.295 0.348 0.143l1.429 0.143 2.143 5.857-3 9-5-14.857q0.821-0.054 1.571-0.143 0.339-0.036 0.464-0.33t-0.045-0.554-0.509-0.241l-3.661 0.179q-0.125 0-0.411-0.009t-0.464-0.009q1.875-2.857 4.902-4.527t6.563-1.67q2.625 0 5.009 0.946t4.259 2.661h-0.179q-0.982 0-1.643 0.723t-0.661 1.705q0 0.214 0.036 0.429t0.071 0.384 0.143 0.411 0.161 0.375 0.214 0.402 0.223 0.375 0.259 0.429 0.25 0.411q1.125 1.911 1.125 3.786zM16.232 17.196l4.232 11.554q0.018 0.107 0.089 0.196-2.25 0.786-4.554 0.786-2 0-3.875-0.571zM28.036 9.411q1.696 3.107 1.696 6.589 0 3.732-1.857 6.884t-4.982 4.973l4.196-12.107q1.054-3.018 1.054-4.929 0-0.75-0.107-1.411zM16 0q3.25 0 6.214 1.268t5.107 3.411 3.411 5.107 1.268 6.214-1.268 6.214-3.411 5.107-5.107 3.411-6.214 1.268-6.214-1.268-5.107-3.411-3.411-5.107-1.268-6.214 1.268-6.214 3.411-5.107 5.107-3.411 6.214-1.268zM16 31.268q3.089 0 5.92-1.214t4.875-3.259 3.259-4.875 1.214-5.92-1.214-5.92-3.259-4.875-4.875-3.259-5.92-1.214-5.92 1.214-4.875 3.259-3.259 4.875-1.214 5.92 1.214 5.92 3.259 4.875 4.875 3.259 5.92 1.214z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-stumbleupon" viewBox="0 0 34 32"> <path class="path1" d="M18.964 12.714v-2.107q0-0.75-0.536-1.286t-1.286-0.536-1.286 0.536-0.536 1.286v10.929q0 3.125-2.25 5.339t-5.411 2.214q-3.179 0-5.42-2.241t-2.241-5.42v-4.75h5.857v4.679q0 0.768 0.536 1.295t1.286 0.527 1.286-0.527 0.536-1.295v-11.071q0-3.054 2.259-5.214t5.384-2.161q3.143 0 5.393 2.179t2.25 5.25v2.429l-3.482 1.036zM28.429 16.679h5.857v4.75q0 3.179-2.241 5.42t-5.42 2.241q-3.161 0-5.411-2.223t-2.25-5.366v-4.786l2.339 1.089 3.482-1.036v4.821q0 0.75 0.536 1.277t1.286 0.527 1.286-0.527 0.536-1.277v-4.911z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-digg" viewBox="0 0 37 32"> <path class="path1" d="M5.857 5.036h3.643v17.554h-9.5v-12.446h5.857v-5.107zM5.857 19.661v-6.589h-2.196v6.589h2.196zM10.964 10.143v12.446h3.661v-12.446h-3.661zM10.964 5.036v3.643h3.661v-3.643h-3.661zM16.089 10.143h9.518v16.821h-9.518v-2.911h5.857v-1.464h-5.857v-12.446zM21.946 19.661v-6.589h-2.196v6.589h2.196zM27.071 10.143h9.5v16.821h-9.5v-2.911h5.839v-1.464h-5.839v-12.446zM32.911 19.661v-6.589h-2.196v6.589h2.196z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-spotify" viewBox="0 0 27 32"> <path class="path1" d="M20.125 21.607q0-0.571-0.536-0.911-3.446-2.054-7.982-2.054-2.375 0-5.125 0.607-0.75 0.161-0.75 0.929 0 0.357 0.241 0.616t0.634 0.259q0.089 0 0.661-0.143 2.357-0.482 4.339-0.482 4.036 0 7.089 1.839 0.339 0.196 0.589 0.196 0.339 0 0.589-0.241t0.25-0.616zM21.839 17.768q0-0.714-0.625-1.089-4.232-2.518-9.786-2.518-2.732 0-5.411 0.75-0.857 0.232-0.857 1.143 0 0.446 0.313 0.759t0.759 0.313q0.125 0 0.661-0.143 2.179-0.589 4.482-0.589 4.982 0 8.714 2.214 0.429 0.232 0.679 0.232 0.446 0 0.759-0.313t0.313-0.759zM23.768 13.339q0-0.839-0.714-1.25-2.25-1.304-5.232-1.973t-6.125-0.67q-3.643 0-6.5 0.839-0.411 0.125-0.688 0.455t-0.277 0.866q0 0.554 0.366 0.929t0.92 0.375q0.196 0 0.714-0.143 2.375-0.661 5.482-0.661 2.839 0 5.527 0.607t4.527 1.696q0.375 0.214 0.714 0.214 0.518 0 0.902-0.366t0.384-0.92zM27.429 16q0 3.732-1.839 6.884t-4.991 4.991-6.884 1.839-6.884-1.839-4.991-4.991-1.839-6.884 1.839-6.884 4.991-4.991 6.884-1.839 6.884 1.839 4.991 4.991 1.839 6.884z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-soundcloud" viewBox="0 0 41 32"> <path class="path1" d="M14 24.5l0.286-4.304-0.286-9.339q-0.018-0.179-0.134-0.304t-0.295-0.125q-0.161 0-0.286 0.125t-0.125 0.304l-0.25 9.339 0.25 4.304q0.018 0.179 0.134 0.295t0.277 0.116q0.393 0 0.429-0.411zM19.286 23.982l0.196-3.768-0.214-10.464q0-0.286-0.232-0.429-0.143-0.089-0.286-0.089t-0.286 0.089q-0.232 0.143-0.232 0.429l-0.018 0.107-0.179 10.339q0 0.018 0.196 4.214v0.018q0 0.179 0.107 0.304 0.161 0.196 0.411 0.196 0.196 0 0.357-0.161 0.161-0.125 0.161-0.357zM0.625 17.911l0.357 2.286-0.357 2.25q-0.036 0.161-0.161 0.161t-0.161-0.161l-0.304-2.25 0.304-2.286q0.036-0.161 0.161-0.161t0.161 0.161zM2.161 16.5l0.464 3.696-0.464 3.625q-0.036 0.161-0.179 0.161-0.161 0-0.161-0.179l-0.411-3.607 0.411-3.696q0-0.161 0.161-0.161 0.143 0 0.179 0.161zM3.804 15.821l0.446 4.375-0.446 4.232q0 0.196-0.196 0.196-0.179 0-0.214-0.196l-0.375-4.232 0.375-4.375q0.036-0.214 0.214-0.214 0.196 0 0.196 0.214zM5.482 15.696l0.411 4.5-0.411 4.357q-0.036 0.232-0.25 0.232-0.232 0-0.232-0.232l-0.375-4.357 0.375-4.5q0-0.232 0.232-0.232 0.214 0 0.25 0.232zM7.161 16.018l0.375 4.179-0.375 4.393q-0.036 0.286-0.286 0.286-0.107 0-0.188-0.080t-0.080-0.205l-0.357-4.393 0.357-4.179q0-0.107 0.080-0.188t0.188-0.080q0.25 0 0.286 0.268zM8.839 13.411l0.375 6.786-0.375 4.393q0 0.125-0.089 0.223t-0.214 0.098q-0.286 0-0.321-0.321l-0.321-4.393 0.321-6.786q0.036-0.321 0.321-0.321 0.125 0 0.214 0.098t0.089 0.223zM10.518 11.875l0.339 8.357-0.339 4.357q0 0.143-0.098 0.241t-0.241 0.098q-0.321 0-0.357-0.339l-0.286-4.357 0.286-8.357q0.036-0.339 0.357-0.339 0.143 0 0.241 0.098t0.098 0.241zM12.268 11.161l0.321 9.036-0.321 4.321q-0.036 0.375-0.393 0.375-0.339 0-0.375-0.375l-0.286-4.321 0.286-9.036q0-0.161 0.116-0.277t0.259-0.116q0.161 0 0.268 0.116t0.125 0.277zM19.268 24.411v0 0zM15.732 11.089l0.268 9.107-0.268 4.268q0 0.179-0.134 0.313t-0.313 0.134-0.304-0.125-0.143-0.321l-0.25-4.268 0.25-9.107q0-0.196 0.134-0.321t0.313-0.125 0.313 0.125 0.134 0.321zM17.5 11.429l0.25 8.786-0.25 4.214q0 0.196-0.143 0.339t-0.339 0.143-0.339-0.143-0.161-0.339l-0.214-4.214 0.214-8.786q0.018-0.214 0.161-0.357t0.339-0.143 0.33 0.143 0.152 0.357zM21.286 20.214l-0.25 4.125q0 0.232-0.161 0.393t-0.393 0.161-0.393-0.161-0.179-0.393l-0.107-2.036-0.107-2.089 0.214-11.357v-0.054q0.036-0.268 0.214-0.429 0.161-0.125 0.357-0.125 0.143 0 0.268 0.089 0.25 0.143 0.286 0.464zM41.143 19.875q0 2.089-1.482 3.563t-3.571 1.473h-14.036q-0.232-0.036-0.393-0.196t-0.161-0.393v-16.054q0-0.411 0.5-0.589 1.518-0.607 3.232-0.607 3.482 0 6.036 2.348t2.857 5.777q0.946-0.393 1.964-0.393 2.089 0 3.571 1.482t1.482 3.589z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-codepen" viewBox="0 0 32 32"> <path class="path1" d="M3.857 20.875l10.768 7.179v-6.411l-5.964-3.982zM2.75 18.304l3.446-2.304-3.446-2.304v4.607zM17.375 28.054l10.768-7.179-4.804-3.214-5.964 3.982v6.411zM16 19.25l4.857-3.25-4.857-3.25-4.857 3.25zM8.661 14.339l5.964-3.982v-6.411l-10.768 7.179zM25.804 16l3.446 2.304v-4.607zM23.339 14.339l4.804-3.214-10.768-7.179v6.411zM32 11.125v9.75q0 0.732-0.607 1.143l-14.625 9.75q-0.375 0.232-0.768 0.232t-0.768-0.232l-14.625-9.75q-0.607-0.411-0.607-1.143v-9.75q0-0.732 0.607-1.143l14.625-9.75q0.375-0.232 0.768-0.232t0.768 0.232l14.625 9.75q0.607 0.411 0.607 1.143z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-twitch" viewBox="0 0 32 32"> <path class="path1" d="M16 7.75v7.75h-2.589v-7.75h2.589zM23.107 7.75v7.75h-2.589v-7.75h2.589zM23.107 21.321l4.518-4.536v-14.196h-21.321v18.732h5.821v3.875l3.875-3.875h7.107zM30.214 0v18.089l-7.75 7.75h-5.821l-3.875 3.875h-3.875v-3.875h-7.107v-20.679l1.946-5.161h26.482z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-meanpath" viewBox="0 0 27 32"> <path class="path1" d="M23.411 15.036v2.036q0 0.429-0.241 0.679t-0.67 0.25h-3.607q-0.429 0-0.679-0.25t-0.25-0.679v-2.036q0-0.429 0.25-0.679t0.679-0.25h3.607q0.429 0 0.67 0.25t0.241 0.679zM14.661 19.143v-4.464q0-0.946-0.58-1.527t-1.527-0.58h-2.375q-1.214 0-1.714 0.929-0.5-0.929-1.714-0.929h-2.321q-0.946 0-1.527 0.58t-0.58 1.527v4.464q0 0.393 0.375 0.393h0.982q0.393 0 0.393-0.393v-4.107q0-0.429 0.241-0.679t0.688-0.25h1.679q0.429 0 0.679 0.25t0.25 0.679v4.107q0 0.393 0.375 0.393h0.964q0.393 0 0.393-0.393v-4.107q0-0.429 0.25-0.679t0.679-0.25h1.732q0.429 0 0.67 0.25t0.241 0.679v4.107q0 0.393 0.393 0.393h0.982q0.375 0 0.375-0.393zM25.179 17.429v-2.75q0-0.946-0.589-1.527t-1.536-0.58h-4.714q-0.946 0-1.536 0.58t-0.589 1.527v7.321q0 0.375 0.393 0.375h0.982q0.375 0 0.375-0.375v-3.214q0.554 0.75 1.679 0.75h3.411q0.946 0 1.536-0.58t0.589-1.527zM27.429 6.429v19.143q0 1.714-1.214 2.929t-2.929 1.214h-19.143q-1.714 0-2.929-1.214t-1.214-2.929v-19.143q0-1.714 1.214-2.929t2.929-1.214h19.143q1.714 0 2.929 1.214t1.214 2.929z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-pinterest-p" viewBox="0 0 23 32"> <path class="path1" d="M0 10.661q0-1.929 0.67-3.634t1.848-2.973 2.714-2.196 3.304-1.393 3.607-0.464q2.821 0 5.25 1.188t3.946 3.455 1.518 5.125q0 1.714-0.339 3.357t-1.071 3.161-1.786 2.67-2.589 1.839-3.375 0.688q-1.214 0-2.411-0.571t-1.714-1.571q-0.179 0.696-0.5 2.009t-0.42 1.696-0.366 1.268-0.464 1.268-0.571 1.116-0.821 1.384-1.107 1.545l-0.25 0.089-0.161-0.179q-0.268-2.804-0.268-3.357 0-1.643 0.384-3.688t1.188-5.134 0.929-3.625q-0.571-1.161-0.571-3.018 0-1.482 0.929-2.786t2.357-1.304q1.089 0 1.696 0.723t0.607 1.83q0 1.179-0.786 3.411t-0.786 3.339q0 1.125 0.804 1.866t1.946 0.741q0.982 0 1.821-0.446t1.402-1.214 1-1.696 0.679-1.973 0.357-1.982 0.116-1.777q0-3.089-1.955-4.813t-5.098-1.723q-3.571 0-5.964 2.313t-2.393 5.866q0 0.786 0.223 1.518t0.482 1.161 0.482 0.813 0.223 0.545q0 0.5-0.268 1.304t-0.661 0.804q-0.036 0-0.304-0.054-0.911-0.268-1.616-1t-1.089-1.688-0.58-1.929-0.196-1.902z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-periscope" viewBox="0 0 24 28"> <path class="path1" d="M12.285,1C6.696,1,2.277,5.643,2.277,11.243c0,5.851,7.77,14.578,10.007,14.578c1.959,0,9.729-8.728,9.729-14.578 C22.015,5.643,17.596,1,12.285,1z M12.317,16.551c-3.473,0-6.152-2.611-6.152-5.664c0-1.292,0.39-2.472,1.065-3.438 c0.206,1.084,1.18,1.906,2.352,1.906c1.322,0,2.393-1.043,2.393-2.333c0-0.832-0.447-1.561-1.119-1.975 c0.467-0.105,0.955-0.161,1.46-0.161c3.133,0,5.81,2.611,5.81,5.998C18.126,13.94,15.449,16.551,12.317,16.551z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-get-pocket" viewBox="0 0 31 32"> <path class="path1" d="M27.946 2.286q1.161 0 1.964 0.813t0.804 1.973v9.268q0 3.143-1.214 6t-3.259 4.911-4.893 3.259-5.973 1.205q-3.143 0-5.991-1.205t-4.902-3.259-3.268-4.911-1.214-6v-9.268q0-1.143 0.821-1.964t1.964-0.821h25.161zM15.375 21.286q0.839 0 1.464-0.589l7.214-6.929q0.661-0.625 0.661-1.518 0-0.875-0.616-1.491t-1.491-0.616q-0.839 0-1.464 0.589l-5.768 5.536-5.768-5.536q-0.625-0.589-1.446-0.589-0.875 0-1.491 0.616t-0.616 1.491q0 0.911 0.643 1.518l7.232 6.929q0.589 0.589 1.446 0.589z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-vimeo" viewBox="0 0 32 32"> <path class="path1" d="M30.518 9.25q-0.179 4.214-5.929 11.625-5.946 7.696-10.036 7.696-2.536 0-4.286-4.696-0.786-2.857-2.357-8.607-1.286-4.679-2.804-4.679-0.321 0-2.268 1.357l-1.375-1.75q0.429-0.375 1.929-1.723t2.321-2.063q2.786-2.464 4.304-2.607 1.696-0.161 2.732 0.991t1.446 3.634q0.786 5.125 1.179 6.661 0.982 4.446 2.143 4.446 0.911 0 2.75-2.875 1.804-2.875 1.946-4.393 0.232-2.482-1.946-2.482-1.018 0-2.161 0.464 2.143-7.018 8.196-6.821 4.482 0.143 4.214 5.821z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-reddit-alien" viewBox="0 0 32 32"> <path class="path1" d="M32 15.107q0 1.036-0.527 1.884t-1.42 1.295q0.214 0.821 0.214 1.714 0 2.768-1.902 5.125t-5.188 3.723-7.143 1.366-7.134-1.366-5.179-3.723-1.902-5.125q0-0.839 0.196-1.679-0.911-0.446-1.464-1.313t-0.554-1.902q0-1.464 1.036-2.509t2.518-1.045q1.518 0 2.589 1.125 3.893-2.714 9.196-2.893l2.071-9.304q0.054-0.232 0.268-0.375t0.464-0.089l6.589 1.446q0.321-0.661 0.964-1.063t1.411-0.402q1.107 0 1.893 0.777t0.786 1.884-0.786 1.893-1.893 0.786-1.884-0.777-0.777-1.884l-5.964-1.321-1.857 8.429q5.357 0.161 9.268 2.857 1.036-1.089 2.554-1.089 1.482 0 2.518 1.045t1.036 2.509zM7.464 18.661q0 1.107 0.777 1.893t1.884 0.786 1.893-0.786 0.786-1.893-0.786-1.884-1.893-0.777q-1.089 0-1.875 0.786t-0.786 1.875zM21.929 25q0.196-0.196 0.196-0.464t-0.196-0.464q-0.179-0.179-0.446-0.179t-0.464 0.179q-0.732 0.75-2.161 1.107t-2.857 0.357-2.857-0.357-2.161-1.107q-0.196-0.179-0.464-0.179t-0.446 0.179q-0.196 0.179-0.196 0.455t0.196 0.473q0.768 0.768 2.116 1.214t2.188 0.527 1.625 0.080 1.625-0.080 2.188-0.527 2.116-1.214zM21.875 21.339q1.107 0 1.884-0.786t0.777-1.893q0-1.089-0.786-1.875t-1.875-0.786q-1.107 0-1.893 0.777t-0.786 1.884 0.786 1.893 1.893 0.786z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-whatsapp" viewBox="0 0 32 32"> <path d="M15.968 2.003a14.03 13.978 0 0 0-14.03 13.978 14.03 13.978 0 0 0 2.132 7.391L1.938 29.96l6.745-2.052a14.03 13.978 0 0 0 7.285 2.052 14.03 13.978 0 0 0 14.03-13.978 14.03 13.978 0 0 0-14.03-13.978z" stroke-width=".2000562"/> <path d="M10.454 8.236a2.57 3.401 51.533 0 0-1.475 3.184v.015c.01 2.04 4.045 10.076 10.017 12.688l.017-.013a2.57 3.401 51.533 0 0 3.454-.706 2.57 3.401 51.533 0 0 1.064-4.129 2.57 3.401 51.533 0 0-4.262.103 2.57 3.401 51.533 0 0-.505.473c-1.346-.639-2.952-1.463-4.168-2.98-.771-.962-1.257-2.732-1.549-4.206a2.57 3.401 51.533 0 0 .605-.403 2.57 3.401 51.533 0 0 1.064-4.129 2.57 3.401 51.533 0 0-4.262.103z" stroke-width=".372"/> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-telegram" viewBox="0 0 32 32"> <path d="M30.8,2.2L0.6,13.9c-0.8,0.3-0.7,1.3,0,1.6l7.4,2.8l2.9,9.2c0.2,0.6,0.9,0.8,1.4,0.4l4.1-3.4 c0.4-0.4,1-0.4,1.5,0l7.4,5.4c0.5,0.4,1.2,0.1,1.4-0.5L32,3.2C32.1,2.5,31.4,1.9,30.8,2.2z M25,8.3l-11.9,11 c-0.4,0.4-0.7,0.9-0.8,1.5l-0.4,3c-0.1,0.4-0.6,0.4-0.7,0.1l-1.6-5.5c-0.2-0.6,0.1-1.3,0.6-1.6l14.4-8.9C25,7.7,25.3,8.1,25,8.3z"/> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-hashtag" viewBox="0 0 32 32"> <path class="path1" d="M17.696 18.286l1.143-4.571h-4.536l-1.143 4.571h4.536zM31.411 9.286l-1 4q-0.125 0.429-0.554 0.429h-5.839l-1.143 4.571h5.554q0.268 0 0.446 0.214 0.179 0.25 0.107 0.5l-1 4q-0.089 0.429-0.554 0.429h-5.839l-1.446 5.857q-0.125 0.429-0.554 0.429h-4q-0.286 0-0.464-0.214-0.161-0.214-0.107-0.5l1.393-5.571h-4.536l-1.446 5.857q-0.125 0.429-0.554 0.429h-4.018q-0.268 0-0.446-0.214-0.161-0.214-0.107-0.5l1.393-5.571h-5.554q-0.268 0-0.446-0.214-0.161-0.214-0.107-0.5l1-4q0.125-0.429 0.554-0.429h5.839l1.143-4.571h-5.554q-0.268 0-0.446-0.214-0.179-0.25-0.107-0.5l1-4q0.089-0.429 0.554-0.429h5.839l1.446-5.857q0.125-0.429 0.571-0.429h4q0.268 0 0.446 0.214 0.161 0.214 0.107 0.5l-1.393 5.571h4.536l1.446-5.857q0.125-0.429 0.571-0.429h4q0.268 0 0.446 0.214 0.161 0.214 0.107 0.5l-1.393 5.571h5.554q0.268 0 0.446 0.214 0.161 0.214 0.107 0.5z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-chain" viewBox="0 0 30 32"> <path class="path1" d="M26 21.714q0-0.714-0.5-1.214l-3.714-3.714q-0.5-0.5-1.214-0.5-0.75 0-1.286 0.571 0.054 0.054 0.339 0.33t0.384 0.384 0.268 0.339 0.232 0.455 0.063 0.491q0 0.714-0.5 1.214t-1.214 0.5q-0.268 0-0.491-0.063t-0.455-0.232-0.339-0.268-0.384-0.384-0.33-0.339q-0.589 0.554-0.589 1.304 0 0.714 0.5 1.214l3.679 3.696q0.482 0.482 1.214 0.482 0.714 0 1.214-0.464l2.625-2.607q0.5-0.5 0.5-1.196zM13.446 9.125q0-0.714-0.5-1.214l-3.679-3.696q-0.5-0.5-1.214-0.5-0.696 0-1.214 0.482l-2.625 2.607q-0.5 0.5-0.5 1.196 0 0.714 0.5 1.214l3.714 3.714q0.482 0.482 1.214 0.482 0.75 0 1.286-0.554-0.054-0.054-0.339-0.33t-0.384-0.384-0.268-0.339-0.232-0.455-0.063-0.491q0-0.714 0.5-1.214t1.214-0.5q0.268 0 0.491 0.063t0.455 0.232 0.339 0.268 0.384 0.384 0.33 0.339q0.589-0.554 0.589-1.304zM29.429 21.714q0 2.143-1.518 3.625l-2.625 2.607q-1.482 1.482-3.625 1.482-2.161 0-3.643-1.518l-3.679-3.696q-1.482-1.482-1.482-3.625 0-2.196 1.571-3.732l-1.571-1.571q-1.536 1.571-3.714 1.571-2.143 0-3.643-1.5l-3.714-3.714q-1.5-1.5-1.5-3.643t1.518-3.625l2.625-2.607q1.482-1.482 3.625-1.482 2.161 0 3.643 1.518l3.679 3.696q1.482 1.482 1.482 3.625 0 2.196-1.571 3.732l1.571 1.571q1.536-1.571 3.714-1.571 2.143 0 3.643 1.5l3.714 3.714q1.5 1.5 1.5 3.643z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-thumb-tack" viewBox="0 0 21 32"> <path class="path1" d="M8.571 15.429v-8q0-0.25-0.161-0.411t-0.411-0.161-0.411 0.161-0.161 0.411v8q0 0.25 0.161 0.411t0.411 0.161 0.411-0.161 0.161-0.411zM20.571 21.714q0 0.464-0.339 0.804t-0.804 0.339h-7.661l-0.911 8.625q-0.036 0.214-0.188 0.366t-0.366 0.152h-0.018q-0.482 0-0.571-0.482l-1.357-8.661h-7.214q-0.464 0-0.804-0.339t-0.339-0.804q0-2.196 1.402-3.955t3.17-1.759v-9.143q-0.929 0-1.607-0.679t-0.679-1.607 0.679-1.607 1.607-0.679h11.429q0.929 0 1.607 0.679t0.679 1.607-0.679 1.607-1.607 0.679v9.143q1.768 0 3.17 1.759t1.402 3.955z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-arrow-left" viewBox="0 0 43 32"> <path class="path1" d="M42.311 14.044c-0.178-0.178-0.533-0.356-0.711-0.356h-33.778l10.311-10.489c0.178-0.178 0.356-0.533 0.356-0.711 0-0.356-0.178-0.533-0.356-0.711l-1.6-1.422c-0.356-0.178-0.533-0.356-0.889-0.356s-0.533 0.178-0.711 0.356l-14.578 14.933c-0.178 0.178-0.356 0.533-0.356 0.711s0.178 0.533 0.356 0.711l14.756 14.933c0 0.178 0.356 0.356 0.533 0.356s0.533-0.178 0.711-0.356l1.6-1.6c0.178-0.178 0.356-0.533 0.356-0.711s-0.178-0.533-0.356-0.711l-10.311-10.489h33.778c0.178 0 0.533-0.178 0.711-0.356 0.356-0.178 0.533-0.356 0.533-0.711v-2.133c0-0.356-0.178-0.711-0.356-0.889z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-arrow-right" viewBox="0 0 43 32"> <path class="path1" d="M0.356 17.956c0.178 0.178 0.533 0.356 0.711 0.356h33.778l-10.311 10.489c-0.178 0.178-0.356 0.533-0.356 0.711 0 0.356 0.178 0.533 0.356 0.711l1.6 1.6c0.178 0.178 0.533 0.356 0.711 0.356s0.533-0.178 0.711-0.356l14.756-14.933c0.178-0.356 0.356-0.711 0.356-0.889s-0.178-0.533-0.356-0.711l-14.756-14.933c0-0.178-0.356-0.356-0.533-0.356s-0.533 0.178-0.711 0.356l-1.6 1.6c-0.178 0.178-0.356 0.533-0.356 0.711s0.178 0.533 0.356 0.711l10.311 10.489h-33.778c-0.178 0-0.533 0.178-0.711 0.356-0.356 0.178-0.533 0.356-0.533 0.711v2.311c0 0.178 0.178 0.533 0.356 0.711z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-play" viewBox="0 0 22 28"> <path d="M21.625 14.484l-20.75 11.531c-0.484 0.266-0.875 0.031-0.875-0.516v-23c0-0.547 0.391-0.781 0.875-0.516l20.75 11.531c0.484 0.266 0.484 0.703 0 0.969z"></path> </symbol> <symbol id="icon-pause" viewBox="0 0 24 28"> <path d="M24 3v22c0 0.547-0.453 1-1 1h-8c-0.547 0-1-0.453-1-1v-22c0-0.547 0.453-1 1-1h8c0.547 0 1 0.453 1 1zM10 3v22c0 0.547-0.453 1-1 1h-8c-0.547 0-1-0.453-1-1v-22c0-0.547 0.453-1 1-1h8c0.547 0 1 0.453 1 1z"></path> </symbol> </defs> </svg> <svg style="position: absolute; width: 0; height: 0; overflow: hidden;" version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <defs> <symbol id="icon-kickstarter" viewBox="0 0 16 16"> <path d="M6.406 5.453L9.34 1.2C9.895.4 10.61 0 11.49 0c.715 0 1.335.254 1.86.762.522.51.784 1.117.784 1.826 0 .523-.138.986-.416 1.386L11.073 7.82l3.235 4.102c.323.408.485.886.485 1.433 0 .724-.254 1.345-.763 1.865-.508.52-1.124.78-1.848.78-.793 0-1.398-.258-1.814-.774l-3.962-4.944v2.726c0 .778-.135 1.383-.405 1.814C5.51 15.607 4.8 16 3.86 16c-.855 0-1.518-.29-1.987-.866-.44-.532-.66-1.237-.66-2.114V2.91c0-.83.224-1.516.67-2.055C2.348.285 2.995 0 3.82 0c.786 0 1.44.285 1.964.855.292.316.477.635.554.96.047.2.07.572.07 1.12v2.518z"/> </symbol> </defs> </svg> </body> </html>